Custom Search
Showing posts with label Rodney Monroe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rodney Monroe. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Charlotte Plans To Lay-Off Police Like Newark; Stimulus Funds Expiring






















Charlotte Public Safety Task force: "Charlotte Can't Afford Cost Of Firefighters, Police; Stimulus Funds Expiring


The City of Charlotte's spending on police officers and firefighters is "financially unsustainable without large budget cuts or increased taxes," according to a task force appointed by Mayor Anthony Foxx that presented its yearlong study into the city's finances Monday night.

The warning is cold water to the city, which has so far survived the economic downturn mostly unscathed, at least compared with other governments, including Mecklenburg County.

The task force, chaired by Cyndee Patterson of The Lee Institute, said that the city's biggest problem is that it gives public safety employees raises annually that exceed the growth rate for other city employees.

An additional problem is that the city will lose federal stimulus dollars that have helped pay for 125 new police officers, leaving a $5.6 million hole in the budget by 2014.

The report said that by fiscal year 2013, police and fire expenses would outstrip property tax revenue that primarily pays for them. Public-safety represents 65 percent of the city's general fund.

"You don't have a lot of time to fix this," Patterson said.

The report projected escalating deficits, from roughly $4 million in fiscal 2013 to $23 million in fiscal 2015. A small property tax increase would likely only delay the problem, Patterson said.

City budget director Ruffin Hall said after Monday's workshop that outside factors could alter the expense and revenue lines, which project a shortfall in three years.

It's possible the economy could bounce back, spurring development and generating more property tax revenues.

On the expense side, the City Council could choose not to give public safety employees a typical pay plan, which is a 3 percent annual cost-of-living increase and occasional 5 percent step increases. There are 10 possible pay steps over a career for police officers, and eight steps for firefighters.

For fiscal 2010, as the economy soured, the city gave no raises to any employees. (The City Council did vote to give bonuses to City Manager Curt Walton and City Attorney Mac McCarley.)

For the current fiscal year, the City Council approved a 2.5 percent step increase for public safety employees and a 2 percent cost-of-living increase. Other city employees received 2 percent raises.

The city made roughly $10 million in budget cuts to fund that controversial pay increase, which cost the city roughly $6 million. Most Democrats supported the pay hike, while Republicans argued against the pay raises, saying the money should be saved.

The debate this summer came as the national and local economy was struggling, and city staff said upcoming budgets would be uncertain. But the council members hadn't seen the gloomy projection that Patterson's group presented Monday night.

Council member Edwin Peacock, a Republican, asked task force members whether they thought police and fire staffing was at the right level.



"You are stating we have something unsustainable," Peacock said. "Are we operating efficiently?"

The task force didn't comment on the staffing levels for police and fire, and whether they are appropriate. It did, however, suggest that the city could reduce pay increases and still be within pay levels of peer cities.

It noted that recent public-safety voluntary turnover rate is 1.2 percent, and that applicants had submitted over 1,500 applications for 100 police and fire vacancies. It also said that other cities have smaller step increases, or no step increases at all.

There were no representatives from Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police or the Charlotte Fire Department at Monday's meeting.

Peacock asked: "In what job can you get an 8 percent raise (referring to a 5 percent step increase and a 3 percent cost-of-living increase)?"

Sam Bowles, vice president of Carousel Capital and a task force member, said, "We got into pretty strong debates about raises, but we concluded it wasn't in our purview to make that value judgment. We did conclude, regardless of what you feel, the current structure is unsustainable."

Foxx appointed the task force a year ago in hopes that it would scour the budget, looking for savings.

Patterson said that overall the city's finances are in good shape. With departments being run efficiently, it made it difficult to search for savings to cover the projected police and fire shortfall.





Laid-Off Newark Police Officers Cope With Unemployment


Only a year ago, Zack Vonlagen was hailed as a hero by Newark Mayor Cory Booker. Today, he was filing for unemployment.

Vonlagen, 25, was among 167 Newark police officers who were ordered to turn in their guns at several precincts throughout the city today as part of the biggest layoff of city police since 1978 — at a time of year when crime is at its peak, and in a year where violence is trending upward.

A member of the last graduating police academy in March, Vonlagen said he doesn’t regret his time with the Newark police. "This is what I’ve always wanted to do. I’d definitely do it again even if I knew what the outcome would be. It was almost like a dream come true."

Richard Velez, a two-year veteran, turned in his gun this afternoon at the city’s South Precinct.

"Right now we’re going to sit down and balance out a budget," he said of his wife and two young daughters. "Unfortunately, Christmas time is here. It’s going to be a short Christmas list."

After a sleepless night, Robert Andrews, 23, rose at 7 a.m. today and started looking for work.

"I’m on the computer right now," he said from his home. Andrews graduated from the police academy in July 2008, having left a job that paid him $60,000.

When he was laid off today, he was making $47,000.

"It’s not about money with me with this job. I’m concerned with the citizens," he said. "If it took 167 of us to bring Newark back, how can they go on without us?"
The potential threat to public safety prompted a group of 50 Guardian Angels, the well-known vigilante group based in New York City, to patrol Newark’s West and South Wards tonight — their first foray into the city in almost 30 years.

"We’ll make citizens’ arrests, we’ll make physical interventions, we’ll chase drug dealers," said the group’s founder and president, Curtis Sliwa.

He said he had been inundated with calls from residents to patrol Newark’s streets.

Although Police Director Garry McCarthy and the mayor both insist the police reorganization will provide for the same number of officers on the streets, finger-pointing continued today between the administration and the union.

Booker and union president Derrick Hatcher blamed each other for the layoffs.

Booker assailed Hatcher for not putting the city’s proposal of $6.8 million in department cuts to a vote of the union membership.

"This is a guy who was sitting in a bubble," Booker said, telling Hatcher to "be a man of your word."

Hatcher accused the mayor of hiding the city’s budget crisis until after the May election and then blaming the union for the layoffs.

"We didn’t hire these individuals. He did, " Hatcher said. "He should put on his big-boy pants and say, ‘I’m going to take this on the chin.’"

Laid-off cops blamed both Booker and Hatcher for not putting aside their differences in the interest of saving jobs.

"We supported this city for a long time and committed to turning it around for a long time," Vonlagen said. "Our good effort and spirit were stomped on. A lot of hearts were broken. I lost faith in the city today. "







Survey Reveals Charlotte's Crime Problem Is Not Improving


Respondents to a survey organized by a Charlotte community organization disagree with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police statistics showing a dropping crime rate in the city.

About 80 percent of the approximately 500 people who participated in the survey said the crime problem in Charlotte is either unchanged or has gotten worse over the past two years.

The study was conducted in recent weeks by Neighbors For A Safer Charlotte, a grassroots organization founded in April 2008.

Their study results contrast with a steady stream of monthly crime statistics from Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police, showing -- for the most part -- that the crime rate has been dropping over the past 12 to 18 months. Earlier this week, CMPD statistics through March showed the overall crime rate is down 15 percent since the same time a year ago.

The survey results show that if CMPD statistics are correct, the perception among residents is that crime remains a big problem.

Respondents did not fall into the "lock-them-up-and-throw-away-the-key" category, as most of them said they support more mental health and substance abuse programs -- and said they believe only violent offenders should be put in jail.

Here are results from some of the organization's questions:

How much of a problem do you feel crime is in the Charlotte area?

75% rated it "serious" or "very serious"

In the past two years, has crime in Charlotte increased, stayed the same, or decreased?

42% said it is worse. Another 38% said it has remained the same.

Do you own a gun for protection?

31% said they owned a gun. Another 18 percent said they are considering buying one.

Which factors tend to increase the crime problem locally?

91% said gang and drug activity.

83% said the absence of a responsible parent or role model tends to increase crime activity among juveniles.

75% said lenient sentencing equals more crime.

50% said racial tensions were not likely to contribute to crime.

Not rated as significant factors were unemployment and poverty, and the lack of a police presence.

Have the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County done enough to deal with the crime problem?

79% said more needs to be done.

Are the courts too lenient or too tough?

78% said they are too lenient.

Do you plan to vote in the District Attorney race in November?

91% said they plan to vote in that contest.

What would help solve the crime problem?

96% said tougher sentencing.

88% said more programs for juveniles outside regular school hours.

85% said more mental health and substance abuse programs.

70% said only violent offenders should be incarcerated.







Charlotte Trumps Newark In Crime, Murder Rate Up


Its Official folks!

Charlotte, N.C. is now the new "Dirty South".

Charlotte city officials are trying to pretend Crime is decreasing, however area residents can't be fooled.

We know that Crime within the Charlotte-Mecklenburg region is actually getting worse!

Now here's some positive news from Urban America:

Thanks to Bold, Outstanding Leadership and a United Community effort (all ethnic & socio-economic groups working together) Newark, NJ's Murder rate is down.

In fact Newark was completely Murder-Free (March 2010) for the first time in 44 years!

Kudos to Mayor Corey Booker!

On the other hand Charlotte, NC’s Crime and Murder rates continues to rise.

Let’s see Newark is located in the heavily Diverse yet densely populated Northeastern United States, while Charlotte rests in the South with a population of less than 1 million people and is much less Diverse.

Could it be Mayor Booker actually knows what he's doing and actually cares about ALL his Constituents not just Wealthy, Caucasian citizens?

Could it be Mayor Booker, his Chief of Police and the County D.A.'s Office all realize it takes more than just locking up all Blacks & Hispanics to help resolve a citywide Crime crisis?

Or....

Could it be due to Mayor Booker investing useful, Academic type resources into the lives of his city's Minority Youth?

For example: After School programs, College Prep programs, Mentors, Summer Camps, Summer Jobs, etc.,

Perhaps all three efforts have contributed to Newark's recent dramatic drop in Crime.

Take a hint Charlotte!

Obviously our local "Leaders" don't know what the heck they are doing or they may need to just dump their Pride and communicate more with Mayors like Corey Booker for advice on how to fix Charlotte-Mecklenburg's growing Crime problem.

Hey I’m just saying, please don't hate the messenger.

Instead of becoming offended (Charlotte's local "leaders") over the contents of this revealing post, why not channel those energies into lowering the Crime rate in a Constructive, Unified manner?





Forbes.com Ranks Charlotte, N.C. 14th Most Dangerous City


(Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, N.C.-S.C. metropolitan statistical area)

Population: 1,635,133

Violent Crimes per 100,000: 721

To determine our list, we used violent crime statistics from the FBI's latest uniform crime report, issued in 2008.

The violent crime category is composed of four offenses: murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated assault.

We evaluated U.S. Metropolitan statistical areas--geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget for use by Federal agencies in collecting, tabulating and publishing federal statistics--with more than 500,000 residents.



View Larger Map


Sources: Forbes.com, McClatchy Newspapers, MSNBC, NJ.com, Neighbors For A Safer Charlotte, WCNC, Youtube, Google Maps

Charlotte Plans To Lay -Off Police Like Newark; Stimulus Funds Expire























Charlotte's Public Safety Task force: City Can't Sustain Public Safety Staff


The City of Charlotte's spending on police officers and firefighters is "financially unsustainable without large budget cuts or increased taxes," according to a task force appointed by Mayor Anthony Foxx that presented its yearlong study into the city's finances Monday night.

The warning is cold water to the city, which has so far survived the economic downturn mostly unscathed, at least compared with other governments, including Mecklenburg County.

The task force, chaired by Cyndee Patterson of The Lee Institute, said that the city's biggest problem is that it gives public safety employees raises annually that exceed the growth rate for other city employees.

An additional problem is that the city will lose Federal Stimulus Dollars that have helped pay for 125 new police officers, leaving a $5.6 million hole in the budget by 2014.

The report said that by fiscal year 2013, police and fire expenses would outstrip property tax revenue that primarily pays for them. Public-safety represents 65 percent of the city's general fund.

"You don't have a lot of time to fix this," Patterson said.

The report projected escalating deficits, from roughly $4 million in fiscal 2013 to $23 million in fiscal 2015. A small property tax increase would likely only delay the problem, Patterson said.

City budget director Ruffin Hall said after Monday's workshop that outside factors could alter the expense and revenue lines, which project a shortfall in three years.

It's possible the economy could bounce back, spurring development and generating more property tax revenues.

On the expense side, the City Council could choose not to give public safety employees a typical pay plan, which is a 3 percent annual cost-of-living increase and occasional 5 percent step increases. There are 10 possible pay steps over a career for police officers, and eight steps for firefighters.

For fiscal 2010, as the economy soured, the city gave no raises to any employees.

(The City Council did vote to give bonuses to City Manager Curt Walton and City Attorney Mac McCarley.)

For the current fiscal year, the City Council approved a 2.5 percent step increase for public safety employees and a 2 percent cost-of-living increase. Other city employees received 2 percent raises.

The city made roughly $10 million in budget cuts to fund that controversial pay increase, which cost the city roughly $6 million. Most Democrats supported the pay hike, while Republicans argued against the pay raises, saying the money should be saved.

The debate this summer came as the national and local economy was struggling, and city staff said upcoming budgets would be uncertain. But the council members hadn't seen the gloomy projection that Patterson's group presented Monday night.

Council member Edwin Peacock, a Republican, asked task force members whether they thought police and fire staffing was at the right level.

"You are stating we have something unsustainable," Peacock said. "Are we operating efficiently?"

The task force didn't comment on the staffing levels for police and fire, and whether they are appropriate. It did, however, suggest that the city could reduce pay increases and still be within pay levels of peer cities.

It noted that recent public-safety voluntary turnover rate is 1.2 percent, and that applicants had submitted over 1,500 applications for 100 police and fire vacancies. It also said that other cities have smaller step increases, or no step increases at all.

There were no representatives from Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police or the Charlotte Fire Department at Monday's meeting.

Peacock asked: "In what job can you get an 8 percent raise (referring to a 5 percent step increase and a 3 percent cost-of-living increase)?"

Sam Bowles, vice president of Carousel Capital and a task force member, said, "We got into pretty strong debates about raises, but we concluded it wasn't in our purview to make that value judgment. We did conclude, regardless of what you feel, the current structure is unsustainable."

Foxx appointed the task force a year ago in hopes that it would scour the budget, looking for savings.

Patterson said that overall the city's finances are in good shape. With departments being run efficiently, it made it difficult to search for savings to cover the projected police and fire shortfall.





Laid-Off Newark Police Officers Cope With Unemployment


Only a year ago, Zack Vonlagen was hailed as a hero by Newark Mayor Cory Booker. Today, he was filing for unemployment.

Vonlagen, 25, was among 167 Newark police officers who were ordered to turn in their guns at several precincts throughout the city today as part of the biggest layoff of city police since 1978 — at a time of year when crime is at its peak, and in a year where violence is trending upward.

A member of the last graduating police academy in March, Vonlagen said he doesn’t regret his time with the Newark police. "This is what I’ve always wanted to do. I’d definitely do it again even if I knew what the outcome would be. It was almost like a dream come true."

Richard Velez, a two-year veteran, turned in his gun this afternoon at the city’s South Precinct.

"Right now we’re going to sit down and balance out a budget," he said of his wife and two young daughters. "Unfortunately, Christmas time is here. It’s going to be a short Christmas list."

After a sleepless night, Robert Andrews, 23, rose at 7 a.m. today and started looking for work.

"I’m on the computer right now," he said from his home. Andrews graduated from the police academy in July 2008, having left a job that paid him $60,000.

When he was laid off today, he was making $47,000.

"It’s not about money with me with this job. I’m concerned with the citizens," he said. "If it took 167 of us to bring Newark back, how can they go on without us?"
The potential threat to public safety prompted a group of 50 Guardian Angels, the well-known vigilante group based in New York City, to patrol Newark’s West and South Wards tonight — their first foray into the city in almost 30 years.

"We’ll make citizens’ arrests, we’ll make physical interventions, we’ll chase drug dealers," said the group’s founder and president, Curtis Sliwa.

He said he had been inundated with calls from residents to patrol Newark’s streets.

Although Police Director Garry McCarthy and the mayor both insist the police reorganization will provide for the same number of officers on the streets, finger-pointing continued today between the administration and the union.

Booker and union president Derrick Hatcher blamed each other for the layoffs.

Booker assailed Hatcher for not putting the city’s proposal of $6.8 million in department cuts to a vote of the union membership.

"This is a guy who was sitting in a bubble," Booker said, telling Hatcher to "be a man of your word."

Hatcher accused the mayor of hiding the city’s budget crisis until after the May election and then blaming the union for the layoffs.

"We didn’t hire these individuals. He did, " Hatcher said. "He should put on his big-boy pants and say, ‘I’m going to take this on the chin.’"

Laid-off cops blamed both Booker and Hatcher for not putting aside their differences in the interest of saving jobs.

"We supported this city for a long time and committed to turning it around for a long time," Vonlagen said. "Our good effort and spirit were stomped on. A lot of hearts were broken. I lost faith in the city today. "






Survey Reveals Charlotte's Crime Problem Is Not Improving


Respondents to a survey organized by a Charlotte community organization disagree with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police statistics showing a dropping crime rate in the city.

About 80 percent of the approximately 500 people who participated in the survey said the crime problem in Charlotte is either unchanged or has gotten worse over the past two years.

The study was conducted in recent weeks by Neighbors For A Safer Charlotte, a grassroots organization founded in April 2008.

Their study results contrast with a steady stream of monthly crime statistics from Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police, showing -- for the most part -- that the crime rate has been dropping over the past 12 to 18 months. Earlier this week, CMPD statistics through March showed the overall crime rate is down 15 percent since the same time a year ago.

The survey results show that if CMPD statistics are correct, the perception among residents is that crime remains a big problem.

Respondents did not fall into the "lock-them-up-and-throw-away-the-key" category, as most of them said they support more mental health and substance abuse programs -- and said they believe only violent offenders should be put in jail.

Here are results from some of the organization's questions:

How much of a problem do you feel crime is in the Charlotte area?

75% rated it "serious" or "very serious"

In the past two years, has crime in Charlotte increased, stayed the same, or decreased?

42% said it is worse. Another 38% said it has remained the same.

Do you own a gun for protection?

31% said they owned a gun. Another 18 percent said they are considering buying one.

Which factors tend to increase the crime problem locally?

91% said gang and drug activity.

83% said the absence of a responsible parent or role model tends to increase crime activity among juveniles.

75% said lenient sentencing equals more crime.

50% said racial tensions were not likely to contribute to crime.

Not rated as significant factors were unemployment and poverty, and the lack of a police presence.

Have the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County done enough to deal with the crime problem?

79% said more needs to be done.

Are the courts too lenient or too tough?

78% said they are too lenient.

Do you plan to vote in the District Attorney race in November?

91% said they plan to vote in that contest.

What would help solve the crime problem?

96% said tougher sentencing.

88% said more programs for juveniles outside regular school hours.

85% said more mental health and substance abuse programs.

70% said only violent offenders should be incarcerated.







Charlotte Trumps Newark In Crime, Murder Rate Up


Its Official folks!

Charlotte, N.C. is now the new "Dirty South".

Charlotte city officials are trying to pretend Crime is decreasing, however area residents can't be fooled.

We know that Crime within the Charlotte-Mecklenburg region is actually getting worse!

Now here's some positive news from Urban America:

Thanks to Bold, Outstanding Leadership and a United Community effort (all ethnic & socio-economic groups working together) Newark, NJ's Murder rate is down.

In fact Newark was completely Murder-Free (March 2010) for the first time in 44 years!

Kudos to Mayor Corey Booker!

On the other hand Charlotte, NC’s Crime and Murder rates continues to rise.

Let’s see Newark is located in the heavily Diverse yet densely populated Northeastern United States, while Charlotte rests in the South with a population of less than 1 million people and is much less Diverse.

Could it be Mayor Booker actually knows what he's doing and actually cares about ALL his Constituents not just Wealthy, Caucasian citizens?

Could it be Mayor Booker, his Chief of Police and the County D.A.'s Office all realize it takes more than just locking up all Blacks & Hispanics to help resolve a citywide Crime crisis?

Or....

Could it be due to Mayor Booker investing useful, Academic type resources into the lives of his city's Minority Youth?

For example: After School programs, College Prep programs, Mentors, Summer Camps, Summer Jobs, etc.,

Perhaps all three efforts have contributed to Newark's recent dramatic drop in Crime.

Take a hint Charlotte!

Obviously our local "Leaders" don't know what the heck they are doing or they may need to just dump their Pride and communicate more with Mayors like Corey Booker for advice on how to fix Charlotte-Mecklenburg's growing Crime problem.

Hey I’m just saying, please don't hate the messenger.

Instead of becoming offended (Charlotte's local "leaders") over the contents of this revealing post, why not channel those energies into lowering the Crime rate in a Constructive, Unified manner?





Forbes.com Ranks Charlotte, N.C. 14th Most Dangerous City


(Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, N.C.-S.C. metropolitan statistical area)

Population: 1,635,133

Violent Crimes per 100,000: 721

To determine our list, we used violent crime statistics from the FBI's latest uniform crime report, issued in 2008.

The violent crime category is composed of four offenses: murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated assault.

We evaluated U.S. Metropolitan statistical areas--geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget for use by Federal agencies in collecting, tabulating and publishing federal statistics--with more than 500,000 residents.



View Larger Map


Sources: Forbes.com, McClatchy Newspapers, MSNBC, NJ.com, WCNC, Youtube, Google Maps

Monday, July 5, 2010

Charlotte's Black Crime Skyrockets! Black Leaders M.I.A.











Black Homicides Up In Charlotte This Year


Six months after Charlotte celebrated a year with a record low in homicides, an uptick in killings this year has officials and residents worried - especially in an area near uptown that has long struggled with violence.

In the first half of this year, Charlotte-Mecklenburg police investigated 33 homicides, up 27 percent from the same period last year, when there were 26 homicides.

The increase in crime is driven largely by a spike of killings in the Metro Division, an area of older neighborhoods that have struggled with crime in the past. In the 1990s, city leaders declared the area a top priority for improved police, housing and recreation services.

At this point last year, Metro Division's two dozen or so neighborhoods had one murder. This year, 11 people have lost their lives in that area, which lies mostly northwest of uptown and includes the corridors of Beatties Ford Road and Brookshire Freeway.

At its current pace, Metro is on track to finish the year with the division's highest homicide count since 2007. The division contains a mix of poor and working-class neighborhoods along with industrial areas - and it includes fragile communities such as the Lincoln Heights, Druid Hills, Genesis Park and Seversville neighborhoods.

Police note that crime overall in the Metro division is down about 20 percent from last year. Still, they say, the increased killings frustrate and overshadow gains made by police, residents and businesses.

Metro Capt. Bruce Bellamy recently outlined what his division is doing to combat crime during his monthly meeting with police commanders.

Bellamy says drug sales simmer beneath Metro's crime, so officers are disrupting street-level dealing. He has also assigned "focused mission teams" of officers to target pockets of crime.

In June, Police Chief Rodney Monroe announced he was beefing up patrols around homicide hot spots after a citywide spree of five killings in five days. One of those was the shooting death of a 23-year-old man in a Metro Division apartment complex.

Charlotte could still end the year with a lower-than-average homicide total. And the city is unlikely to come anywhere near its peak of 122 people killed in 1993, when the crack cocaine epidemic made drug violence soar.

Last year's 56 homicides was the lowest number in 21 years, and the lowest rate per 100,000 people since police began keeping uniform records in 1977.

Chief Monroe last week declined to discuss what might be driving the recent increase in killings.

In Metro, most of the homicides stemmed from disputes between loved ones or acquaintances, says Capt. Bellamy, heat-of-the-moment crimes that are hard to stop.

"It's not just random...The victims know the accused," Bellamy says. "It's frustrating from a police standpoint not to be able to do anything in some cases to prevent that."

People living in the Metro division say the police presence is noticeable, and that things have gotten better over the last decade or so.

In the mid-1990s, Charlotte recognized the troubles in the city's urban core neighborhoods and launched new efforts - with charities, churches and citizens - to attack root causes of crime. Taxpayers and donors spent millions to build better housing, fight crime, repair infrastructure, and create outlets for youth.

But some Metro residents say those coalitions have eroded.

"In our case, we feel almost abandoned," says Thomas "Pop" Sadler, who leads the Greenville neighborhood in Metro. "Not only have our partners walked away, they closed the pool and now they're closing the recreation center....I don't know what the kids are supposed to do. I'm afraid we're going to be visiting some of them in jail someday."

Sadler is glad to see police in Greenville, but he wishes officers would do more to build relationships with residents, rather than simply patrol.

He also says politicians don't come around like they used to. "It's not blighted like it once was so there's not a lot of attention. We don't have the representation we really deserve. We don't have advocates."

City Council member James Mitchell, whose district includes much of the Metro division, could not be reached last week.

Neighborhood leaders in Metro also fault residents for a waning commitment to the fight against crime. A previous generation of leaders, some say, has moved out or grown tired of shouldering so many of challenges.

"Nowhere in the world can police improve a neighborhood by themselves," says Herbert Weathers, a longtime resident of Enderly Park, where three of Metro's homicides this year happened - one in January, one in February and one last Friday.

"Monroe is a good chief. He has a lot of good ideas, but he needs help from the people ... We've been trying for honest to God about 30 years. It's not improving."

Bellamy says police are working to strengthen coalitions. He points to new alliances with business owners and apartment managers, such as those at the Bahama apartments, where he says crime has dropped this year.

"We're there to partner with anybody and everybody who's in (the) community," Bellamy says.



View Larger Map


Sources: Charmeck.org, McClatchy Newspapers, WCNC, Google Maps

Monday, April 12, 2010

Andrew Murray vs Michael Barnes For Charlotte's New D.A.




















































Charlotte's crime rate is on the rise.

Some people have even started calling Charlotte the new "Dirty South".

How can Charlotte-Mecklenburg residents help slow down or stop this crisis?

By electing a New District Attorney this Fall!

Charlotteans have a District Attorney's race fast approaching: Andrew Murray vs Michael Barnes.

Both men are prominent, highly respected Charlotte Lawyers.

Which candidate will replace Mecklenburg County D.A. Peter Gilchrist?

One of the contenders is Michael Barnes a well-known Charlotte Politician currently serving on the City Council.

(In case your wondering Mr. Barnes is NOT the well-known Charlotte Politician I'm blood-related to.)


I strongly recommend NOT voting for Michael Barnes.

Why?

Michael Barnes like Anthony Foxx is associated with Charlotte's Black Community Elite cliques.

The people in those groups don't give a darn about Charlotte's lower income/ middle class constituents, except during Election time.

During election time they cunningly seek support from Charlotte's Straight Ticket Voters (mostly lower income Blacks ignorant of the issues), than once in Public Office give those same voters "the boot".

This is another reason why I did NOT vote for Anthony Foxx last fall during Charlotte's last Mayoral race.

If you vote for Michael Barnes it will just be more of the same.

No Equal Justice for Charlotte's lower income/ middle class citizens (especially Blacks) and swift Justice for Charlotte's Elite, Wealthiest citizens (mostly Caucasians).

More of Charlotte's Black Youth will continue being locked up, while Charlotte's White citizens receive slaps on their wrists for the same types of crimes.

No Federal Funding will be used to help keep Minority Youth off the street. (After School programs, College Prep Programs, etc.,)

Instead it will only be used to lock them up, even for committing very minor offenses.

Michael Barnes will more than likely make decisions on cases like the Tiffany Wright murder case based purely on Politics and Cover Ups for his Friends versus Fair Justice.

Please Beware!

Michael Barnes and Charlotte Observer reporters will no doubt try to play the "race card" just as they did during the Mayoral election last Fall.

Just because the City of Charlotte has a Black Police Chief doesn't mean a Black D.A. will be a better choice.

Atlanta has a Black Police Chief and Black D.A.

Look at that region's disturbingly high crime statistics!

As an African-American citizen who currently resides in Charlotte, more often than not I would rather cast my ballot for White political candidates (i.e., Andrew Murray) than Black candidates.

Why?

The White candidate knows he or she will HAVE to do something constructive for the Black community or be labeled as a "Racist".

While Black candidates think if they mistreat Black citizens there is NO way anyone can call them a "Racist" or accuse them of Unfair practices.

For the record I'm NOT playing the "race card"!

I'm simply trying to demonstrate a Black candidate isn't necessarily needed to be effective in a mostly Black Administration.

I could go on but I'll stop here.

During the upcoming Charlotte D.A.'s, Charlotte-Mecklenburg County Commissioners and next Mayoral races I strongly suggest Charlotte citizens NOT listen to local media organizations.

It was the Charlotte Observer who endorsed Anthony Foxx and now look what a mess our city is in now.

Higher Crime rate and rapid mistreatment of Charlotte's Minority citizens.

Once again I'll remind you I didn't vote for Anthony Foxx.

Charlotte Voters who wanted ALL constituents to be treated fairly, voted for Foxx's opponent John Lassiter.

I too voted for his Republican opponent John Lassiter.

Not all of Charlotte's Republican party members are biased or racist.

Many of them are kind-hearted towards Minority citizens and John Lassiter just happens to be one of those individuals.

In my opinion Charlotte's Minority citizens would have been treated more Fair had Lassiter been elected.

Looks like I was right.

Remember to Vote Intelligently at the polls this November.

Please don't vote for Black candidates just because you feel guilty about Charlotte's Racist history.

I'm also asking that you not just vote your Political Party affiliation while ignoring the D.A. Candidates' backgrounds or associations.

Race or Political Party shouldn't matter.

If your Black it doesn't mean you can't vote for a White Candidate, be it Republican or Democrat.

If your White it doesn't mean you can't vote for a Black Candidate, be it Democrat or Republican.

Do your research and vote according to what's best for Charlotte's future.

Check out the videos & articles below which provides more details about Charlotte's rising crime rates.







Charlotte Citizens Still Think High Crime Is A Major Problem



According to police, crime is down across Charlotte.

But a new survey shows that's not what people who live in the Queen City think.

According to a crime survey done by Neighbors for Safer Charlotte, crime is still a big issue to many.

The study surveyed 500 people from across Mecklenburg County.

Greg Flewelling is a member of the group and said, “We saw in our survey people don’t feel that crime is down.”

CMPD says things are getting better, but 75% of those surveyed say it just doesn’t feel that way.

“And we have to agree, based upon where Charlotte ranks with cities our size, we rank very high for crime rate,” Flewelling said.

The watchdog group found people feel police aren’t to blame, instead the absence of a role model at home and a lax court system are what has people really concerned.

“And they’d like to see more sentencing for repeat offenders,” Flewelling said.

The group says that’s what prompted the survey, the chance to change things.

Because, for the first time in more than thirty years, there will definitely be a new district attorney elected in November.

“It’s been such a long time since we’ve had a new DA , and they play such a critical role in the justice system. We hope we can raise awareness with people this election is happening,” said Flewelling

Neighbors for Safer Charlotte says they have passed the results of the survey on to CMPD.






Survey Results: Charlotte's Crime Problem Not Improving, Citizens Are Scared


Respondents to a survey organized by a Charlotte community organization disagree with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police statistics showing a dropping crime rate in the city.

About 80 percent of the approximately 500 people who participated in the survey said the crime problem in Charlotte is either unchanged or has gotten worse over the past two years.

The study was conducted in recent weeks by Neighbors For A Safer Charlotte, a grassroots organization founded in April 2008.

Their study results contrast with a steady stream of monthly crime statistics from Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police, showing -- for the most part -- that the crime rate has been dropping over the past 12 to 18 months. Earlier this week, CMPD statistics through March showed the overall crime rate is down 15 percent since the same time a year ago.

The survey results show that if CMPD statistics are correct, the perception among residents is that crime remains a big problem.

Respondents did not fall into the "lock-them-up-and-throw-away-the-key" category, as most of them said they support more mental health and substance abuse programs -- and said they believe only violent offenders should be put in jail.




Here are results from some of the organization's questions:

How much of a problem do you feel crime is in the Charlotte area?

75% rated it "serious" or "very serious"



In the past two years, has crime in Charlotte increased, stayed the same, or decreased?

42% said it is worse. Another 38% said it has remained the same.

Do you own a gun for protection?

31% said they owned a gun. Another 18 percent said they are considering buying one.

Which factors tend to increase the crime problem locally?



91% said gang and drug activity.

83% said the absence of a responsible parent or role model tends to increase crime activity among juveniles.

75% said lenient sentencing equals more crime.

50% said racial tensions were not likely to contribute to crime.

Not rated as significant factors were unemployment and poverty, and the lack of a police presence.

When asked has the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County done enough to deal with the crime problem?

79% of Respondents said more needs to be done.




Are the courts too lenient or too tough?

78% said they are too lenient.

Do you plan to vote in the District Attorney race in November?

91% said they plan to vote in that contest.

What would help solve the crime problem?



96% said tougher sentencing.

88% said more programs for juveniles outside regular school hours.

85% said more mental health and substance abuse programs.

70% said only violent offenders should be incarcerated.





Forbes List Charlotte, NC As America's 14th Most Dangerous City

(Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, N.C.-S.C. metropolitan statistical area)

Population: 1,635,133

Violent Crimes per 100,000: 721



View Larger Map


Sources: WCNC, WBTV, Creative Loafing, McClatchy Newspapers, Charmeck.org, Charlotte Conservative, Forbes.com, NSC, Google Maps

Anthony Foxx Uses Crime To "Clean" Up Charlotte, Barnes For D.A.? No Way!


















Who is responsible for Charlotte's recent higher crime rate?

Is it the Gangbangers, drug dealers, prostitutes, thieves, etc.,

No!

Instead its Charlotte new Mayor Anthony "Uncle" Foxx!

Continue reading to learn more about how Charlotte's Public Safety is now at risk because of Foxx's not-so hidden dirty agenda.

Its no secret Charlotte's crime rate tends to be higher within the city's Lower Income/ Middle Class communities because Charlotte's new mayor Anthony "Uncle" Foxx has instructed CMPD Chief Rodney Monroe to ONLY direct Public Safety efforts towards Charlotte's wealthier areas.

Charlotte's wealthiest communities: Ballantyne, Fairview rd, Myers Park, Park Road, South Park, Third Ward receive Excellent Public Safety response from CMPD, along with several close, friendly Neighborhood Partnerships.

While Charlotte's forgotten corridors: East, Northwest, Southwest & West quite frequently receives poor response from CMPD and very few Neighborhood Partnership efforts

Its also no secret Mayor Anthony Foxx is intentionally allowing the Crime rate in East, Northwest, Southwest & West Charlotte to rise in hopes that lower income/ middle class citizens will become frustrated and leave Charlotte-Mecklenburg.

If this isn't another strong example of North Carolina Corruption than my goodness what is??

Why is Foxx doing this?

Foxx wants all of Charlotte's "Undesirables" (lower income/ middle class) to leave so that he can attract citizens who are highly educated with higher incomes.

People I kid you not!

This explains why Foxx is only spending City funds for Public Safety in Charlotte's wealthiest communities: Ballantyne, Fairview rd, Myers Park, Park Road, South Park, Third Ward.

Even though most of Charlotte's Funding comes from the Federal Gov't, Foxx doesn't care.

To make matters worse NO Federal Funding is being used to help keep Minority Youth off the street. Instead its only being used to lock them up, even for very minor offenses.

The very roots of this terrible Discriminatory agenda originates from Foxx's biggest Mayoral campaign finance supporters: The Levines, Hugh McColl, Harvey Gantt, etc.,

Since they are Charlotte's "powers that be", Anthony "Uncle" Foxx will do whatever they want in hopes of receiving more big bucks for his next campaign.

You see Foxx has great aspirations to become a North Carolina Senator and than a U.S. Congress member like his sorry Political Idol: Incumbent Congressman Mel Watt.

For those of you who naively think citizens in those wealthier communities pay higher taxes for better Public Safety efforts than citizens who reside in lower income neighborhoods, WRONG!

Charlotte's wealthiest citizens (mostly Caucasians) pay fewer taxes than the city's lower income/ middle class constituents.

In fact Charlotte's wealthiest citizens haven't seen a Property Tax increase in 7 years, while Charlotte's low income/ middle class constituents have experienced frequent increases in their property taxes.

Charlotte's wealthiest citizens (mostly Caucasians) can legally evade paying their property taxes while suffering no consequences but if Charlotte's lower income/ middle class constituents evade their taxes they are immediately thrown into jail no questions asked or their property is seized.

Now Charlotteans have a District Attorney's race fast approaching: Andrew Murray vs Michael Barnes.

Both men are respected Charlotte Lawyers.

One of the contenders is Michael Barnes a well-known Charlotte Politician currently serving on the City Council.

In case your wondering Mr. Barnes is NOT the well-known Charlotte Politician I'm blood-related to.

I strongly suggest NOT voting for Michael Barnes.

Why?

Michael Barnes like Anthony Foxx is too closely associated with Charlotte's Black Community Elite cliques.

The people in those groups don't give a darn about Charlotte's lower income/ middle class constituents, except during Election time.

During election time they cunningly seek support from Charlotte's Straight Ticket Voters (mostly lower income Blacks ignorant of the issues), than once in Public Office give those same voters "the boot".

This is another reason why I did NOT vote for Foxx last fall during Charlotte's last Mayoral race.

If you vote for Michael Barnes it will be more of the same.

No Equal Justice for Charlotte's lower income/ middle class citizens (especially Blacks) and swift Justice for Charlotte's Elite, Wealthiest citizens (mostly Caucasians).

Charlotte's Black Youth will continue being locked up, while Charlotte's White citizens receive slaps on their wrists for the same types of crimes.

And as I mentioned above No Federal Funding will be used to help keep Minority Youth off the street. (After School programs, College Prep Programs, etc.,)

Instead it will only be used to lock them up, even for committing very minor offenses.

Michael Barnes will more than likely make decisions on cases like the Tiffany Wright murder case based purely on Politics and Cover Ups for his Friends versus Fair Justice.




Beware!

Michael Barnes and Charlotte Observer reporters will no doubt try to infuse Ethnicity into this upcoming Charlotte D.A.'s race just like they played the "race card" during Charlotte's last Mayoral election.

Just because the City of Charlotte has a Black Police Chief doesn't mean a Black D.A. will be a better choice.

Atlanta has a Black Police Chief and Black D.A.

Look at their high crime statistics!

For the record I'm NOT playing the "race card"!

I'm simply trying to demonstrate that a Black candidate isn't necessarily needed to be effective in a mostly Black Administration.

Perhaps you may not agree but as an African-American citizen who currently resides in Charlotte, more often than not I would rather cast my ballot for a White candidate (Andrew Murray) than a Black one.

Why?

The White candidate knows he or she will HAVE to do something constructive for the Black community or be labeled as a "Racist".

While Black candidates think if they mistreat Black citizens there is NO way anyone can call them a "Racist" or accuse them of Unfair practices.


As I stated above in essence Anthony Foxx is to blame for Charlotte's higher crime rates.

He's using Crime as a tool to push out Charlotte's lower income/ middle class constituents.

He could also possibly be a Snitch, snitching on Black people but that's another blog post for later.

In fact Mayor Anthony Foxx is behind most of Charlotte's Unfair practices, especially as it relates to Public Safety, Small Business Funding & Taxation.

While its true because of his ethnicity I can't label Anthony Foxx as a "Racist", that still doesn't get him off the hook for using Unfair Practices or for violating Civil Rights.

Unfair practices in the areas of: Code Enforcement, City Funded Small Business Financing, Legal Justice, Public Safety, Taxation, and Transportation.

Foxx recently revised the City of Charlotte Small Business program by allowing Funds to ONLY be awarded to applicants who focus on Banking, Energy, Health Care and Technology.

Given Charlotte's extreme Racism and negative racial climate, how many of Charlotte's Minority citizens currently have Small Businesses with a keen focus on Banking, Energy, Health Care or Technology?

Everyone knows the majority of Charlotte's Minority Small Business Owners focus mainly on Beauty Salons, Child Care and Construction.

Revising Charlotte's Small Business program was Anthony Foxx's way of locking out Black and Hispanic applicants.

I could go on but I'll stop here.

During the upcoming Charlotte D.A.'s, Charlotte-Mecklenburg County Commissioners and next Mayoral races I would strongly suggest Charlotte voters NOT listen to local media organizations.

After all it was the Charlotte Observer who endorsed Anthony Foxx and now look what a mess our city is in.

Higher Crime and rapid mistreatment of Charlotte's Minority citizens.

Once again I'll remind you I didn't vote for Anthony Foxx.

Did Foxx receive any White Voter support?

Yes, only from extremely Racist White Voters.

KKKs and other White Voters who didn't want Charlotte's good 'old boy system to change.

This group of Voters knew Anthony "Uncle" Foxx would be the perfect Politician to continue carrying out their agenda of keeping Charlotte's Minority citizens under foot.

On the other hand Charlotte Voters who wanted ALL constituents to be treated fairly, voted for Foxx's opponent John Lassiter.

I too voted for his Republican opponent John Lassiter (Caucasian).

Not all of Charlotte's Republican party members are biased or racist.

Some of them are kind-hearted towards Minority citizens and John Lassiter just happens to be one of those individuals.

John Lassiter's company once offered me a job several years ago after I met him at a Business function.

Would someone like Anthony Foxx or Michael Barnes have done the same?

No because I don't run in their little cliques and have no desire to do so.

In my opinion Charlotte's Minority citizens would have been treated more Fair had Lassiter been elected.

Looks like I was right.

For those of you who think Pres. Barack Obama approves of or endorses Anthony Foxx's dirty agenda (using Crime to get rid of "certain" people), WRONG!

You'll soon find this out.

By the way isn't it ironic how Barack Obama wasn't Anthony Foxx's first choice during the 2008 Presidential race (Hillary Clinton was per advice from Mel Watt), now suddenly he wants everyone to believe that Pres. Obama is his "homeboy"?

How hypocritical!

Check out the videos & articles below which provides more details about Charlotte's rising crime rates.

Remember to Vote Intelligently at the polls this November.

Peace






Charlotte Citizens Still Think High Crime Is A Major Problem



According to police, crime is down across Charlotte.

But a new survey shows that's not what people who live in the Queen City think.

According to a crime survey done by Neighbors for Safer Charlotte, crime is still a big issue to many.

The study surveyed 500 people from across Mecklenburg County.

Greg Flewelling is a member of the group and said, “We saw in our survey people don’t feel that crime is down.”

CMPD says things are getting better, but 75% of those surveyed say it just doesn’t feel that way.

“And we have to agree, based upon where Charlotte ranks with cities our size, we rank very high for crime rate,” Flewelling said.

The watchdog group found people feel police aren’t to blame, instead the absence of a role model at home and a lax court system are what has people really concerned.

“And they’d like to see more sentencing for repeat offenders,” Flewelling said.

The group says that’s what prompted the survey, the chance to change things.

Because, for the first time in more than thirty years, there will definitely be a new district attorney elected in November.

“It’s been such a long time since we’ve had a new DA , and they play such a critical role in the justice system. We hope we can raise awareness with people this election is happening,” said Flewelling

Neighbors for Safer Charlotte says they have passed the results of the survey on to CMPD.






Survey Results: Charlotte's Crime Problem Not Improving, Citizens Are Scared


Respondents to a survey organized by a Charlotte community organization disagree with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police statistics showing a dropping crime rate in the city.

About 80 percent of the approximately 500 people who participated in the survey said the crime problem in Charlotte is either unchanged or has gotten worse over the past two years.

The study was conducted in recent weeks by Neighbors For A Safer Charlotte, a grassroots organization founded in April 2008.

Their study results contrast with a steady stream of monthly crime statistics from Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police, showing -- for the most part -- that the crime rate has been dropping over the past 12 to 18 months. Earlier this week, CMPD statistics through March showed the overall crime rate is down 15 percent since the same time a year ago.

The survey results show that if CMPD statistics are correct, the perception among residents is that crime remains a big problem.

Respondents did not fall into the "lock-them-up-and-throw-away-the-key" category, as most of them said they support more mental health and substance abuse programs -- and said they believe only violent offenders should be put in jail.




Here are results from some of the organization's questions:

How much of a problem do you feel crime is in the Charlotte area?

75% rated it "serious" or "very serious"



In the past two years, has crime in Charlotte increased, stayed the same, or decreased?

42% said it is worse. Another 38% said it has remained the same.

Do you own a gun for protection?

31% said they owned a gun. Another 18 percent said they are considering buying one.

Which factors tend to increase the crime problem locally?



91% said gang and drug activity.

83% said the absence of a responsible parent or role model tends to increase crime activity among juveniles.

75% said lenient sentencing equals more crime.

50% said racial tensions were not likely to contribute to crime.

Not rated as significant factors were unemployment and poverty, and the lack of a police presence.

When asked has the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County done enough to deal with the crime problem?

79% of Respondents said more needs to be done.




Are the courts too lenient or too tough?

78% said they are too lenient.

Do you plan to vote in the District Attorney race in November?

91% said they plan to vote in that contest.

What would help solve the crime problem?



96% said tougher sentencing.

88% said more programs for juveniles outside regular school hours.

85% said more mental health and substance abuse programs.

70% said only violent offenders should be incarcerated.





Forbes List Charlotte, NC As America's 14th Most Dangerous City

(Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, N.C.-S.C. metropolitan statistical area)

Population: 1,635,133

Violent Crimes per 100,000: 721



View Larger Map


Sources: WCNC, WBTV, Creative Loafing, McClatchy Newspapers, Charmeck.org, Forbes.com, NSC, Google Maps