WENDY TOWS SHARINA HUDSON’S GOLD FERRARI KEVIN BOUGHT W/ HER MONEY (KARMA)

WENDY WILLIAMS TOWS SHARINA HUDSON’S GOLD FERRARI KEVIN BOUGHT W/ HER MONEY:

HOW YOU DOING SHARINA THE ADULTRESS??

WIVES WHO HAVE BEEN CHEATED ON ARE CELEBRATING.

FORGIVENESS DOES NOT ELIMINATE CONSEQUENCES.

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION

KARMA IS A B__TCH.

I LOVE YOU WENDY & I’M PRAYING FOR YOUR SUCCESS.

YOU ARE MY SHERO.


Post Sources: Daily Mail, Armon Wiggins Show, ET Canada, Youtube


***** EXCLUSIVE: Wendy Williams' estranged husband Kevin Hunter apologizes in vain as he is FIRED from her show and has been given 48 hours to clear out from their marital home while the $215K Ferrari he bought for his baby mama is towed away


* Kevin Hunter was fired as executive producer on Wendy Williams' show after she served her philandering husband divorce papers last week
* The 47-year-old was also fired as Wendy's manager and he was given 48 hours to remove his belongings from their New Jersey home, a source told DailyMail.com
* The TV show host decided she had enough after Hunter's baby mama Sharina Hudson was photographed by DailyMail.com driving around a brand new Ferrari
* Hunter and Hudson had been living the high life at a hideaway in New Jersey, going for dinner dates, dressing in designer gear and driving flashy new cars
* 'Wendy saw the photos of him and Sharina on the Daily Mail... she was furious. That's what tipped her over the edge, she was like, he's gotta go', a source said
* Hunter publicly apologized in vain on Tuesday, admitting he was not 'proud of his recent actions' and was 'trying to right some wrongs'
* Hunter's statement came as the $215,000-plus gold Ferrari Portofino he gifted Hudson was seen being towed away - a day after he was hit with the papers
* Wendy was seen apartment hunting in NYC on Tuesday as she revealed Monday she was moving out of her sober living home and was ready to start a new life
*
Kevin Hunter has been fired as an executive producer on his estranged wife Wendy Williams' show, as the $215K Ferrari he bought for his baby mama is towed away, DailyMail.com can reveal.
Williams decided she finally had enough of her philandering husband of nearly 22 years and served him divorce papers at her TV studio in Manhattan last Thursday.

The 47-year-old was fired from the show and as Wendy's manager, a source on the show confirmed to DailyMail.com.
The source also said Hunter had been given 48 hours to remove his belongings from their marital home in Livingston, New Jersey as she was seen apartment hunting in New York City on Tuesday.
Wendy reached her tipping point after learning Hunter had been living the high life with his decade-long mistress Sharina Hudson, who gave birth last month, splurging on Rolls-Royces, Ferraris and gifting her with diamonds.
Hunter released an apology on Tuesday admitting he was not 'proud of his recent actions' and was 'trying to right some wrongs' while taking 'full accountability' for what he had done.
His groveling statement came after the flashy $215,000-plus gold Ferrari Portofino he gifted Hudson was seen being towed away - a day after Wendy hit him with the divorce papers.

The source said: 'Kevin had expected to stay on at the show and as Wendy's manager. He ran the show with an iron fist, he was the guy who kept the vultures away.

'But when Wendy saw the photos of him and Sharina last week on the Daily Mail going out for dinner and her driving around in a Ferrari she was furious.
'That's what tipped her over the edge, she was like, "he's gotta go". She now wants him out of her life completely, she's given him 48 hours to clear his office and clear his belongings out of the house.
'Wendy's sister Wanda came up from Florida over the weekend and she's helping get everything in order. Wendy means business, she's cleaning house.'
A day after DailyMail.com published photos of the new Ferrari that Hunter gifted Hudson, it was loaded onto a truck and taken away.
A Ferrari dealership from Greenwich, Connecticut, picked the golden car up, as two men who appear to be helpers for Hunter looked on.
Hunter's statement on Tuesday read: '28 years ago I met an amazing woman: Wendy Williams. At the time, I didn't realize that she would not only become my wife, but would also change the face of entertainment and the world.
'I have dedicated most of our lives to the business empire that is Wendy Williams Hunter, a person that I truly love and respect unconditionally.

I am not proud of my recent actions and take full accountability and apologize to my wife, my family and her amazing fans. I am going through a time of self-reflection and am trying to right some wrongs.
'No matter what the outcome is or what the future holds, we are still The Hunter Family and I will continue to work with and fully support my wife in this business and through any and all obstacles she may face living her new life of sobriety, while I also work on mine.
'I ask that you please give me and my family privacy as we heal. Thank you.'

On Monday, Wendy kicked off her Hot Topics segment by revealing she was just a few days away from moving out the sober living facility she has called home for the past few weeks, and is ready to start a new life for herself and her son Kevin Jr. - the son she shares with Hunter.
DailyMail.com exclusively revealed in early March the TV host had been living in the sober home in Queens, New York, to battle an addiction to alcohol and prescription pills, her downward spiral sparked by learning Hunter was still seeing Hudson.
Meanwhile, Hunter has been spending time with Hudson, who recently gave birth, at a hideaway in Edgewater, New Jersey.
The two seem to be living the high life, going out for dinner dates and driving new luxury vehicles.
Hunter was seen driving a new maroon convertible Rolls-Royce last Saturday to pick up Hudson and take her out to dinner, with the massage therapist proudly showing off her post baby pooch.
The 33-year-old, whose hair was freshly curled, carried a $5,200 quilted Chanel purse while wearing a chunky diamond chain necklace and diamond studs.
While Hunter treated his baby mama to a Ferrari, he seems to have also treated himself to new cars, including the luxury Rolls-Royce.
Hudson was seen driving her new sports car last Monday, exiting the flashy vehicle in a $1,260 Thom Browne tracksuit that showed off her post-baby body.
And Kevin has spared no expense on his own duds as well, seen one day in a $1,500 Fendi vest, $490 Fendi hat, $770 Fendi pants and $515 Fendi sunglasses.

The couple have been hiding out in New Jersey weeks after Hudson was secreted away to Hahnemann University Hospital in Philadelphia to give birth in order to avoid media attention.

Hunter has been seen at the secret hideaway chauffeuring Sharina around.
Kevin was served with divorce papers from Wendy last Thursday morning at the TV studio, according to TMZ.
Extra security was hired in case Kevin, known to have a temper, got enraged on set. But there were apparently no outbursts.
The split will most likely be contested as Hunter is an executive producer on Williams' TV show and told Hudson that he couldn't afford to split from Wendy because she paid all the bills, a source previously told DailyMailTV.
In New Jersey, parties can file fault or no-fault. Fault allows a judge to dock alimony based on the seriousness of the offense. Proving will not be hard for either side in this case.
Reasons for fault include adultery, abandonment, physical or emotional abuse, and alcohol or drug abuse.
The Wendy Williams Show said in a statement: 'Wendy and her family have been a part of Debmar-Mercury for over 10 years. We respect their privacy regarding personal matters. As always, we remain committed to bringing an entertaining and topical show to our viewers.'
A personal representative for Williams said: 'Thank you to everyone for respecting the family's privacy during this time. Kevin is supportive of Wendy and they are working through this process together. No additional comment will be provided at this time.'

WENDY WILLIAMS PROMOTES OPEN MARRIAGES; CRUSH KEVIN, SUE SHARINA HUDSON

WENDY WILLIAMS PROMOTES OPEN MARRIAGES; CRUSH KEVIN HUNTER & SUE SHARINA HUDSON:

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION

KEVIN HUNTER’S BRAZEN, UNASHAMED, ADULTEROUS MISTRESS SHARINA HUDSON GIVES BIRTH TO BABY GIRL:

SHARINA HAD THE BABY IN A PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL MARCH 22, 2019......KEVIN PAID CASH.

KEVIN HUNTER HOW COULD YOU DO THIS AFTER WENDY MADE YOU SUPER WEALTHY??

SHARINA OBVIOUSLY WAS POORLY REARED TO THINK IT’S ACCEPTABLE TO STEAL WENDY’S HUSBAND.

PLEASE PRAY FOR WENDY WILLIAMS.

I WOULD NOT WISH ADULTERY ON MY WORST ENEMY.

IT’S NOT OK TO BE A MISTRESS.

KARMA IS A B__TCH SHARINA.


Post Sources: Unwine With Tasha K, Instagram, Perez Hilton, Hot New Hip Hop.com, Shade Room, Twitter, Youtube


Media Mogul and Talk Show Extraordinarie Wendy Williams needs to stop promoting OPEN MARRIAGES by defending her Adulterous Husband Kevin Hunter.

Wendy needs to allow Kevin to Divorce her and she needs to Sue Kevin’s Mistress SHARINA HUDSON for Alienation of Affection.

Wendy Williams is a New Yorker who needs to Fight back!

I’m praying for Wendy to make it and not give up.

ISAIAH 54:17

_____________________________________
#WendyWilliams’ husband, #KevinHunter’s mistress, Sharina Hudson, has allegedly given birth to a baby girl. According to @iamunwinewithtashak, Kevin and Sharina’s child was reportedly born on Wednesday, March 22nd.
_____________________________________
Sharina and Kevin allegedly paid cash for their hospital proceedings. In addition, Kevin allegedly used a different name while he was at the hospital, and he’s allegedly not on the baby's birth certificate.
_____________________________________
As you all know, Wendy and Kevin’s alleged marital issues have been on the forefront lately. When Wendy returned from her hiatus from #TheWendyWilliams show, she addressed some of the rumors about her marriage, saying she and Kevin are goodT! We will keep y’all posted on this story

LINDSAY SAUNDERS-VELEZ, 20 (TRANSGENDER WOMAN) FORCED INTO MEN’S PRISON & RAPED

LINDSAY SAUNDERS-VELEZ, 20 (TRANSGENDER WOMAN) FORCED INTO MEN’S PRISON & RAPED:

COLORADO JUDGE SENT LINDSAY BACK TO MEN’S PRISON AFTER PREVIOUS RAPE.

I DON’T SUPPORT GAY/ LGBTQ RIGHTS BUT THIS IS INHUMANE AND WRONG.

LINDSAY WAS BORN MALE, PLACED IN FOSTER CARE AND HAS LIVED LIFE AS A FEMALE SINCE AGE 4.

I’M SORRY BUT THE JUDGE IN COLORADO IS WRONG.

REGARDLESS OF GENDER LINDSAY IS STILL A HUMAN BEING WITH INALIENABLE RIGHTS.


Sources: AP, The Independent, TIME, Yahoo News, Youtube


**** Transgender woman 'raped at men's prison' hours after judge blocked move


A transgender inmate says she was raped at a men’s prison hours after a judge threw out her request to block corrections officers from keeping her in a disciplinary unit.

Lindsay Saunders-Velez claims she had been threatened, harassed and assaulted since entering Colorado’s prison system last spring for violating her plea deal in a menacing case.

The prisoner filed a lawsuit against the state’s corrections agency in July, branding the system “discriminatory and dangerous” for transgender offenders.

Last month, her lawyers requested a judge not send Saunders-Velez to her jail’s “punishment pod” for a disciplinary infraction, saying she could end up with inmates who had tormented her.

The judge said the attorneys failed to prove an imminent risk, and rejected their request .

However, the 20-year-old was attacked during her time in the pod and needed more than a week in the infirmary recover, according to her attorney, Paula Greisen.

“This issue is not going to go away,” she said: “We’re going to fight it until these individuals are treated with the respect they deserve.”

Federal law requires prisons to individually asses where to house each transgender person, said Demoya Gordon, an attorney with LGBTQ+ advocacy group Lambda Legal’s transgender rights project.

But, she added, almost all facilities still housed inmates based on their genitalia or birth gender, resulting in many transgender women being abused or raped during their sentence.

Saunders-Velez entered Colorado’s foster care system as a child, then spent years in its youth corrections system, according to her attorneys and court records.

The prisoner says she has been “out as a trans female” since the age of four and was diagnosed with gender dysphoria in 2016, beginning hormone treatments in 2017.

Her lawsuit states that it was after she entered an adult prison on a three-year jail term in May last year and was sent to Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility that her problems with other inmates began.

Court records detail incidents in which male prisoners frequently pulled down a privacy screen shielding Saunders-Velez from view as she used the bathroom in her cell.

She said other prisoners threatened her, and in December she reported an inmate sexually assaulted her during a brief transfer to another Colorado prison.

“To escape,” Saunders-Velez swallowed razors and was sent to a hospital before being reassigned to “territorial”, her attorneys said.

Prison staff denied her requests to be called Lindsay and to be identified with female pronouns, according to the complaint, as well as refusing requests to be searched by a woman.

The most recent Bureau of Justice statistics from 2012 suggest around 3,200 inmates in America’s state and federal prisons identified as transgender.

Some 40 per cent of transgender inmates reported being a victim of abusive sexual contact by another inmate or a staff member, 10 times the rate among the general prison population.

Several authorities, including the San Francisco and New York City jail systems, have begun to house transgender prisoners by the gender they identify as.

In Colorado, at least one other inmate is suing the corrections department over its treatment of transgender people. The agency said it was unable to comment on ongoing litigation.

TRUMP DC HOTEL SUED FOR EMPLOYMENT & RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (DOMINIQUE HILL, IRVING SMITH JR); BLACK vs LATINO WORKERS

TRUMP DC HOTEL SUED FOR EMPLOYMENT & RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (DOMINIQUE HILL, IRVING SMITH JR); BLACK vs LATINO WORKERS:

I REALLY HOPE THIS ISN'T TRUE.

BLACK PEOPLE & LATINO PEOPLE ARE BOTH CONSIDERED MINORITIES BUT LATINOS CAN'T BE HIRED TO REPLACE BLACKS.

LARGE & SMALL COMPANIES ARE NOW HIRING LATINOS TO REPLACE BLACKS FOR LOWER WAGES WITH THE PREMISE THAT LATINOS ARE STILL MINORITIES.

WHEN BLACK EMPLOYEES SUE COMPANIES FOR SUCH DISCRIMINATION, EMPLOYERS DON'T BELIEVE WE CAN PROVE IT.

EEOC NO LONGER PROTECTS BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE TRULY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST IN THE WORKPLACE.

OBAMA CHANGED EEOC LAWS TO ONLY PROTECT WHITE WOMEN, LATINOS, MIDDLE EASTERN MUSLIMS AND NON-BLACK GAY PEOPLE.

SO WHERE IS CONGRESS ON THIS ISSUE?

CONGRESS DOESN'T CARE.

YET MILLIONS OF BLACK VOTERS ELECTED CONGRESS.

IN FACT MILLIONS OF BLACK VOTERS ELECTED CONGRESS DECADES BEFORE LATINOS VOTED FOR AMERICAN POLITICIANS.



Sources: Washington Post


***** Black employees of BLT Prime, in Trump International Hotel, allege racial discrimination


Dominique Hill and Irving Smith Jr. had good jobs.

Last year, Hill worked as a bartender at P.F. Chang’s in Tysons Corner and Smith had recently been promoted to bartender at Wildfire grill, also in Tysons. Each had more than a decade of experience working in restaurants and was making $700 to $900 a week.

But last summer both of them walked away from their jobs for a chance at something better: the opportunity to work at BLT Prime, the steakhouse in the luxury Trump International Hotel, Washington D.C.

The couple said they soon discovered their hopes were misplaced. In a civil complaint filed Wednesday morning in D.C. Superior Court, Hill, a former BLT employee, and Smith, a current one, allege that the Trump Organization and hotel managing director Mickael Damelincourt saw to it that the restaurant routinely steered black employees to less lucrative shifts and subjected them to discriminatory behavior by other staff and by guests. The two men are joined in the case by another former BLT employee, JaNette Sturdivant.

Hill said he was the first bartender the restaurant hired last summer, before the hotel opened, but was almost exclusively given only lunch shifts.
“Some days I would just stand there all day long and have no customers,” he said. He routinely made $300 to $400 for a 30- to 35-hour workweek at BLT. He claims only four black employees still work at BLT after the hotel opened with 15 or more.

Smith, who works as a BLT server, said he was demoted to assistant server early on and rarely given prime shifts, where weekly earnings averaged $600 to $1,500 and which allegedly went instead to newly hired white and Latino employees.
“They started hiring all these people and instead of putting them on day shifts they was giving them night shifts and keeping us on day shift. Next thing I know, within the month all the black people were on the day shift,” he said.
In a statement, the Trump Organization, which runs the hotel, called the allegations “utterly baseless,” particularly because “the Hotel never employed these individuals.”

“Rather, the plaintiffs worked for a third-party restaurant company that is solely responsible for the direction, supervision, and management of its own employees. In short, this lawsuit appears to be nothing more than a desperate, politically-motivated publicity stunt. We look forward to litigating this matter,” said Amanda Miller, a spokeswoman for the Trump Organization, in a statement.
ESquared Hospitality, which operates the restaurant, said it “wholeheartedly” disputed the allegations and that the employees “did not previously voice or file complaints through any of the proper channels.”
“Had they done so, BLT Prime would have immediately taken the alleged complaints seriously and investigated them to the fullest extent and would have taken appropriate action where warranted,” the company said.

Trump opened the hotel last fall, weeks before he was elected president. He no longer runs his company and has placed his ownership into a trust, but the family name still adorns everything from the sign out front to the cocktail napkins. After the election, Smith claimed one of his co-workers began making racist statements to him and that Smith’s complaints to management fell on deaf ears.

The lawsuit’s allegations about the restaurant stand in contrast to the operation of the larger hotel, whose is widely diverse by race, gender and nationality. On a busy Friday night in September, when the hotel unveiled a new dessert menu, staff who appeared to be black worked in prominent positions as bartender, hostess, server, valet and other posts.
A reporter observing six shifts of morning, afternoon and evening work at BLT, viewed staffs that appeared to be diverse as well, although evening bartenders appeared to usually be white. “We work diligently to create a culture of equal opportunity employment with a zero-tolerance policy for any kind of discrimination regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religion or otherwise,” ESquared said in its statement.
Gregg C. Greenberg, a Maryland employment attorney, said racial discrimination cases are often difficult to prove.

“If you have a client that says, ‘I have been discriminated against,’ how and why are you able to prove it? Do you have emails or policies in place that are objectively discriminatory? Or do you just have the feeling that someone there is out for you?” he said.
Smith and Hill, unlike most workers in the hotel, were not employed directly by the Trump Organization but by ESquared. Hill produced paperwork showing that in March he filed a discrimination charge with the D.C. Office of Human Rights and underwent mediation in July with attorneys for ESquared.
When that failed, he filed suit with representation from A.J. Dhali, a D.C. attorney who said he has brought nearly 100 employment cases in his career and averages 15 to 18 annually.
Dhali argued the Trump Organization had control over the BLT employees’ employment because of the nature of the management contract between the hotel and ESquared. Whether other black employees were treated well or not was not the issue for the court to consider, he said.
“I don’t have to show that discrimination occurred against everybody. I just have to show that discrimination occurred against my clients,” Dhali said. The plaintiffs are seeking $14.5 million in damages.
Hill and Smith said they have both experienced discrimination in other restaurant jobs. Smith said guests at Wildfire once informed management they did not want a black or gay server. “Management asked them to leave,” he said. He said management at Clyde’s issued the same directive when necessary, but that at BLT, he said he had twice observed guests requesting service from nonblack staff who were allowed to stay. The suit cites other allegedly racist behavior by some guests, and it describes a working environment where, for instance, a staff memo posted in the kitchen details how the staff ought to handle $39 ostrich eggs for a dish that includes a photo of an ostrich chasing a black man.
The third plaintiff, Sturdivant, 34, a black woman who worked at BLT from May to June as a server, claimed she was complimented on her light skin after arriving.

“When I first came on board … the server manager said it’s good to see someone with Milano complexion here,” she said. Still, she said she was not given “moneymaking” night shifts.
Hill said he was fired after dropping a bloody mary on a baby in a stroller at a weekend brunch. But he said a white server who spilled a bottle of champagne down a bride’s dress and was not suspended or fired.
“I kept saying, why am I being terminated? Why can’t I be suspended or transferred? … My feeling was Mickael, who was right there, was letting me go from the company.” After being fired he said he was without work for six weeks and had his cable and electricity cut off in his apartment. Smith lost his car because he could not make the payments.
Smith said he took a second restaurant job to pay his bills and works about 60 hours a week.
“I would go to work crying and ask god why are you doing this? We were so comfortable and gave up everything to go to this place. And then to be treated like this.”

DISNEY SHOULDN'T BE SUED FOR LANE GRAVES' DEATH; (PARENTS WEREN'T INVESTIGATION)

DISNEY SHOULDN'T BE SUED FOR LANE'S GRAVES DEATH; WERE HIS PARENTS INVESTIGATED?

WHERE IS PETA??

LANE'S PARENTS WERE NOT INVESTIGATED BY POLICE AS THE BLACK PARENTS WERE IN OHIO AFTER GORILLA INCIDENT.

Sources: CBS News, CNN, Chicago Tribune, Wear Your Voice Mag, Romper.com, WHOTV, Youtube

Within the span of two weeks, two very young Children were attacked by wild animals.

Lane Graves, 2, of Nebraska was killed by Alligators while vacationing at DISNEY World in Florida.  Several Alligators were Euthanized before Lane's lifeless body was recovered.

I offer my prayers and condolences to the parents of Lane Graves.

By the way Lane Graves was a White child.

Isaiah Gregg, 4, of Ohio was recently spared death after falling into a Gorilla pit while visiting the CINCINNATI ZOO with his parents.

However in order to save little Isaiah, an Adult male Gorilla named Harambe had to be shot after he was seen dragging Isaiah and demonstrated other signs of Aggression.

After Harambe was shot and killed, PETA an organization which protects Animals' rights, immediately began publicly protesting and questioning why CINCINNATI ZOO officials allowed Harambe to be killed in order to save a BLACK male child.

Ohio Police also investigated Isaiah Gregg's parents to see if they perhaps intentionally allowed Isaiah to fall into the Gorilla pit in order to later SUE the Cincinnati Zoo.

But I didn't hear PETA screaming about Killing the Alligators at the Disney resort while Law Enforcement officials were trying to recover little Lane Graves' body.

And............

No Police in Florida are investigating the parents of Lane Graves to see if they properly supervised Lane prior to him being dragged off by an Alligator and killed.

Two very young Human Beings were recently  attacked by wild Animals.  

One Child survived, the other Child died.

One Child was White, the other Child was BLACK.

Why does the Mainstream Media, Police and Federal Government continue to inject RACE into every situation in American society?

DISNEY had "NO SWIMMING" signs posted around the beach resort where Lane Graves was snatched by Alligators, yet Lane's parents allowed him to WADE in the water.

Is DISNEY still legally GROSSLY NEGLIGENT or CULPABLE?

****** What a gorilla and an alligator can tell us about ourselves

Not far from the Magic Kingdom, a child was swept up by an alligator, dragged into a lagoon and killed.

The 2-year-old had wandered away from his parents, as toddlers often do. Before they knew it, the child had made his way to the edge of the water where a 4- to 7-foot gator laid waiting. A day after their son's body was found, the Nebraska couple who had been on vacation at an upscale Walt Disney World resort thanked the public for their prayers and asked to be left alone to grieve. For the most part, the public and the media obliged.

People correctly understood that this was a horrific tragedy that no family should have to endure. A toddler had innocently gotten too close to a man-made lake where alligators dwelled, placing his life in grave danger. And in the end, the helpless child lay dead.

There was no chorus of brutal attacks on the parents for losing sight of their child for a quick moment. There was no online petition calling for child endangerment charges against the mother. There were no candlelight vigils for the five alligators that were killed by rescue workers during their frantic search for the boy. And no one blamed the child for simply doing what children do.

Any of those reactions would have been insensitive, even inhumane. Yet that is exactly what happened last month after a 3-year-old boy fell into a gorilla habitat at the Cincinnati Zoo.

Of course, there is an obvious difference in the two incidents. Lane Graves died and Isaiah survived. Other than that, the circumstances basically were the same. Why, then, was the public reaction so different?

I believe the answer has a lot to do with how we value lives. Some simply are more expendable than others. Lane was from an affluent, suburban family. Isaiah is not. Lane was white. Isaiah is African-American.

After writing a recent column that said zoo officials were right in killing the gorilla after it dragged the little boy through a moat, a reader sent me this email:

"Your column about not understanding those who are outraged at Harambe's murder troubles me deeply. A person named Harambe was shot because his life was deemed less valuable than a person named Isaiah. Like racism, 'speciesism' (sic) is fueled by fear and ignorance."

I could not bring myself to respond.

It should not be a surprise to anyone that poor, black boys from the inner city are the most vulnerable of America's children. When we look at an African-American boy from Cincinnati, we don't always see the same inherent innocence that we would notice in a white child from Nebraska, though they are close to the same age.

Multiple studies have found that black boys are more likely to be mistaken as older than they actually are. As a result, they experience higher suspension rates in school and are thus introduced to the criminal justice system and other adverse situations at much younger ages that white boys.

According to the Civil Rights Data Collection, a national survey conducted by the U.S. Department of Education, schools begin kicking African-American students out of class at higher rates than white students as early as preschool.

A recent survey found that black boys, though they made up 52 percent of preschool enrollment, represented 79 percent of preschoolers who were suspended once and 82 percent of preschoolers suspended multiple times.

One of biggest problems, according to researchers, is perception.

Whether we realize it or not, skin tone and social class often play a role in determining our comfort level. And the way we respond to people sometimes is based on how comfortable we feel with them.

In a Stanford University study, researchers asked 190 teachers to review information about a student misbehaving in class. In one scenario, a student fell asleep in class. Some teachers were told the boy's name was Jake, and for others, it was Darnell, a common name for African-Americans. In many cases, Darnell received the harsher punishment.

The result is a growing achievement gap between black and white boys. But it also lends itself to a lack of compassion for African-American boys.

Cincinnati Zoo officials had no choice but to shoot and kill the western lowland gorilla, yet it created an unnatural outpouring of rage. Most of it was leveled at the mother, who had turned to attend to one of her other three children when Isaiah scampered off. Before police and prosecutors decided that no charges were warranted, an online petition seeking "Justice for Harambe" had earned more than 100,000 signatures in less than 48 hours.

Anger also was clearly aimed at Isaiah.

Some people didn't think the toddler seemed frightened while in the grasp of a 450-pound dominant male gorilla. Some criticized him for being too curious, pointing out that he had been overhead telling his mother that he wanted to go swimming with the gorillas. Some just labeled him as a bad kid when, in fact, he was just being a normal kid.

Lane's family, including his 4-year-old sister, were sitting in a beach-like area near the resort's pool when he went to the edge of the bank to play in the water, authorities said. His playpen was set up nearby.

Bloggers took to social media asking for compassion for the parents. Some compared Lane to 18-month-old "Baby Jessica" who was rescued after falling into a well in 1987. Another said it was reminiscent of the abduction of 6-year-old Adam Walsh from a shopping mall in 1981.

The Orange County sheriff said a routine investigation would be conducted but quickly added that charges against the parents were unlikely.

"I believe what this 2-year-old was doing was what, perhaps, any 2-year-old might be doing as well," the sheriff said at a news conference.

The sheriff got it right about Lane and his parents, just as authorities in Cincinnati got it right about Isaiah and his.

What happened at the Disney resort was horrible. And what could have happened at the Cincinnati Zoo would have been just as bad.

MCCRORY vs LORETTA LYNCH: MCRORY MAY LOSE

MCCRORY vs LORETTA LYNCH: MCRORY MAY LOSE

WHITE MAN vs BLACK WOMAN FOR 2016 POLITICS.

MCRORY STOOD UP AGAINST POLITICAL INTIMIDATION BUT HE MAY HAVE DONE SO TOO LATE.

Sources: Fox News, CNN, Citizen Wells, Youtube

In February 2016, despite wide voter opposition, Charlotte City Council members passed a Transgender Bathroom Sharing Ordinance which only forced Private Businesses, Private Schools (not Public Schools), Churches and Non-Profit agencies to comply.

The Ordinance was due to become effective April 1st.

In March 2016, North Carolina Gov Pat McCory and the NC General Assembly repealed the Charlotte Ordinance via passage of House Bill 2.

Ironically the man who spearheaded passage of Charlotte's Transgender Bathroom Ordinance is an LGBT Advocate who was Convicted of taking Indecent Liberties with a 15-yr old boy on a field trip.

The mainstream media refuses to report on this fact.

In May 2016, GOP North Carolina Gov Pat McCrory is suing the Federal gov't for its overreach in trying to force every state and commonwealth in America to enact laws which order Private Businesses and Churches to allow Transgender people to use Bathroom facilities of their personal choice.

US DOJ Attorney General Loretta Lynch, a Black Woman from North Carolina, claims that denying Transgender people access to use Bathrooms of their choice is a Civil Rights Violation.

In response to Gov McCrory's lawsuit, Loretta Lynch has now countersued the state of North Carolina.

So here we have a Powerful Black Woman from North Carolina fighting a Powerful White Man from North Carolina over Bathrooms for Transgender people during a critical election year.

Unlike Black people, Transgender were not Biologically born Transgender. Instead their sexual orientation is merely a Lifestyle choice.

Millions of US citizens are unemployed, the US Military is lacking in crucial funding for Training so they can defeat ISIL and America's Borders are porous yet Obama has Politicians fighting and wasting US Taxpayer money over Bathrooms for Transgender people.

God Forbid!

I stand with Gov McCrory on HB2, however this public legal battle may indeed cost him re-election.

Why?

Because McCrory sat quietly for too long and then allowed Obama to intentionally drag him into a Cultural Political war for the sole purpose of destroying Pat McCrory's political career forever and for the 2016 election.

I will continue to Pray diligently for Gov McCrory and for the entire United States of America.

**** North Carolina, U.S., square off over transgender rights

(CNN)The United States and North Carolina tangled over transgender rights on Monday, with the Justice Department filing a civil rights lawsuit over the state's so-called bathroom bill and state officials defiantly filing suits against the federal directive to stop the implementation of the controversial legislation.

Also, a major player in North Carolina -- the state's public university system -- defied the governor and legislature and told the Justice Department on Monday it intends to act "in compliance with federal law" as it relates to House Bill 2, known as HB2.

The Justice Department seeks declaratory relief and threatens to curtail federal funding to the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and the University of North Carolina.

With hundreds of millions of dollars in funding at stake, UNC System President Margaret Spellings said longstanding policy prohibits university personnel from discriminating on the basis of, among other things, gender identity, sex, or sexual orientation.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch, announcing the U.S. legal action to reporters on Monday, cast the bathroom bill issue as the latest civil rights struggle of the era.

"It was not so very long ago that states, including North Carolina, had other signs above restrooms, water fountains, and on public accommodations, keeping people out based on a distinction without a difference. We've moved beyond those dark days," Lynch said.

The act bans people from using public bathrooms that do not correspond with their biological sex. Since its passage in March, North Carolina has become a national battleground on the issue of transgender rights. It has drawn a flurry of condemnation from civil liberties groups, LGBT advocates and major businesses. It has also won praise from groups like the Family Research Council.

After the law's passage, musicians Bruce Springsteen, Demi Lovato, Nick Jonas, and the bands Pearl Jam and Boston canceled concerts in the state. Those cancellations have cost one major venue nearly $200,000 in ticket sales.

PayPal and Deutsche Bank have both canceled plans to expand into North Carolina.

The Justice Department said last week that "access to sex-segregated restrooms and other workplace facilities consistent with gender identity is a term, condition or privilege of employment. Denying such access to transgender individuals, whose gender identity is different from their gender assigned at birth, while affording it to similarly situated non-transgender employees, violates Title VII," a section of the Civil Rights Act prohibiting discrimination against workers on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion.

The federal government demanded the state "remedy" the act or risk being in violation of federal law. 

Instead, North Carolina officials filed a lawsuit calling the Justice Department's position a "radical reinterpretation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act." Top state legislators, Phil Berger and Tim Moore, also filed a complaint against the Justice Department.

But Lynch on Monday said the legislature and governor put the state in "direct opposition to federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex and gender identity. More to the point, they created state-sponsored discrimination against transgender individuals who simply seek to engage in the most private of functions in a place of safety and security, a right taken for granted by most of us."

After the federal government asked the state to certify by the end of the day Monday that it would not comply with or implement the bill's restriction on bathroom access, Lynch said the state requested an extension and that had been under "active consideration."

Instead, the governor and the state chose another course: a lawsuit.

"But instead of replying to our offer or providing a certification, this morning, the state of North Carolina and its governor chose to respond by suing the Department of Justice. As a result of their decisions, we are now moving forward," Lynch said.

The federal suit also says the state is in violation of Title IX, the Education Acts Amendment of 1972 that bans gender discrimination in education, and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act that outlaws discrimination on the basis of sex. 

"This action is about a great deal more than bathrooms," Lynch said. "This is about the dignity and the respect that we accord our fellow citizens and the laws that we as a people and as a country have enacted to protect them."

Lynch said there have been "discriminatory responses to historic moments of progress": the Jim Crow laws that followed the Emancipation Proclamation, the resistance to Brown V. Board of Education, and the "proliferation of state bans on same-sex unions that were intended to stifle any hope that gay and lesbian Americans might one day be afforded the right to marry."

"That right, of course, is now recognized as a guarantee embedded in our Constitution. And in the wake of that historic triumph, we have seen bill after bill in state after state taking aim at the LGBT community," she said. 

She told transgender people that the Obama administration "will do everything we can to protect you going forward."

'Not a protected class'

McCrory's communications director Josh Ellis said after Lynch's remarks that the governor is "appropriately seeking legal certainty to a complex issue impacting employers and students throughout the country" but "in contrast, the attorney general is using divisive rhetoric to advance the Obama administration's strategy of making laws that bypass the constitutional authority of Congress and our courts." 

The act puts in place a statewide policy that bans individuals from using public bathrooms that do not correspond to their biological sex and stops cities from passing anti-discrimination ordinances to protect gay and transgender identity. That power is reserved for the state under the new law. 

North Carolina officials defend the act and said it doesn't violate federal law. The state also said the United States didn't give the state enough time to deal with the matter.

McCrory said Monday that he requested an additional two weeks to respond but was told he would be granted one week, and only if he issued a statement concurring with the Justice Department.

The lawsuit filed by the governor and Public Safety Secretary Frank Perry calls the demand that the state "remedy" the legislation by Monday or risk being in violation of federal law "a baseless and blatant overreach" and said it is making a "radical reinterpretation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act."

McCrory's argument also said the state of North Carolina hasn't been given enough time to respond and that the federal government is overstepping its authority.

In a Monday news conference, McCrory blamed the city of Charlotte for raising the issue of gender identity and public restrooms. The matter was not on the state's agenda, he said, until the city imposed a mandate that "caused major privacy concerns about males entering female facilities and females entering male facilities."

Because, he said, this is now a national issue -- and could affect every U.S. company with more than 15 employees -- McCrory called on Congress to revisit the anti-discrimination provisions under Titles VII and IX.

"Our nation is one nation, especially when it comes to fighting discrimination, which I wholeheartedly support," McCrory said. 

North Carolina homes in on Title VII in its lawsuit, saying precedence is clear: "Transgender status is not a protected class under Title VII," and it cites a half-dozen cases that it says back its stance. Only Congress can change this, the lawsuit says.

Even if the state felt transgender individuals were afforded federal protection, the Justice Department demands overstep, the state suit says, because the law "allows accommodations based on special circumstances, including but not limited to transgender individuals." 

In a statement announcing the lawsuit, McCrory said the federal government was trying to tell every government agency and company employing more than 15 people "that men should be allowed to use a women's locker room, restroom or shower facility."

He said later that the "new, complex and emotional issue" pitted privacy against equality.

The lawsuit emphasizes that no one is facing discrimination because the law applies equally to everyone.

"All state employees are required to use the bathroom and changing facilities assigned to a person of their same biological sex, regardless of gender identity, or transgender status," it says.

The lawsuit filed by Berger, North Carolina Senate president pro tempore and Moore, state House Speaker, reflected the views of many of the bill's supporters that people "expect to encounter only other people of the same biological sex" when they are in intimate setting such as public bathrooms.

It says the "ideological extremity -- and utter unworkability -- of the department's position on the issues in this case is astonishing." 

NC SUES FEDERAL GOVT BULLIES & DEFENDS U.S. CONSTITUTION (HB2)

@northcarolina

NC SUES FEDERAL GOVT BULLIES & DEFENDS U.S. CONSTITUTION (HB2):

GOV MCCRORY IS PROVEN TO BE A POLITICIAN WITH A REAL BACKBONE.

IT'S NOT ABOUT LGBT DISCRIMINATION, IT'S ABOUT ELIMINATING CIVIL LIBERTIES.

Sources:  The Hill, Fox News, CNN, YouTube

****** North Carolina Sues Federal Gov't Over Bathroom Law

Officials in North Carolina on Monday filed a lawsuit against the federal government in an effort to keep the state's controversial bathroom law in place, according to multiple reports.

The lawsuit comes after the Department of Justice (DOJ) told Gov. Pat McCrory (R) that the state's law — which requires transgender people to use the bathroom corresponding to their biological sex — violates the Civil Rights Act. 

The DOJ ordered McCrory to respond by Monday to confirm "that the State will not comply with or implement HB2."

North Carolina's lawsuit against the federal government said the DOJ's position is "baseless and blatant overreach," NBC News reported.

"If the United States desires a new protected class under Title VII, it must seek such action by the United States Congress," the suit said.

McCrory said Sunday that the state was given an "unrealistic" deadline for response, adding that the federal government is "being a bully."

"They gave the ninth-largest state in the United States ... three working days to respond to a pretty complex letter and to a pretty big threat," McCrory said on "Fox News Sunday."

"We don't think three working days is enough to respond to such a threat." 

The North Carolina law, condemned by LGBT rights supporters, also has provisions restricting local governments from enacting their own anti-discrimination legislation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.

The DOJ announced that Attorney General Loretta Lynch will announce a "law enforcement action" connected to the state later Monday afternoon.

COMCAST & TIME WARNER FORCE BLACK CUSTOMERS INTO HIGH-PRICED SERVICE BUNDLES

COMCAST & TIME WARNER Cable companies are the two largest television Cable conglomerates in the USA.

COMCAST services the state of GEORGIA.

TIME WARNER services the state of NORTH CAROLINA.

Both companies appear to demonstrate RACIST Business practices (especially COMCAST) of forcing BLACK Customers to pay higher rates than WHITE customers for Service bundles.

This includes charging higher rates for WIFI.

COMCAST even charges different rates to BLACK consumers based on GEORGIA Zip codes.

Both COMCAST & TIMEWARNER are currently being sued for $20 Billion by the National Association of African-American Owned Media for RACIST practices.

I encourage BLACK consumers to contact their members of CONGRESS about these RACIST Business Practices.

I also encourage BLACK consumers to seek other Cable & WIFI Options such as GOOGLE FIBER, Hulu and Netflix.

Sources: Reuters, YouTube

OBAMACARE PRESSURES INSURANCE COMPANIES TO INFLATE ENROLLMENT NUMBERS WITH DENTAL PLANS?? HHS CONFIRMS; GOP SUES

Article Sources: Bloomberg News; Newser

***ARTICLE: "Obamacare’s Subscriber Rolls Include Unpublicized Dental Plans"

The Obama administration said it erroneously calculated the number of people with health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, incorrectly adding 380,000 dental subscribers to raise the total above 7 million.

The accurate number with full health-care plans is 6.7 million as of Oct. 15, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirmed today, saying the U.S. won’t include dental plans in future reports.

“The mistake we made is unacceptable,” Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell said on her verified Twitter account. “I will be communicating that clearly throughout the department.”

The error was brought to light by Republican investigators for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, using data they obtained from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

“A mistake was made in calculating the number of individuals with effectuated Marketplace enrollments,” said Kevin Griffis, a spokesman for the U.S. Health and Human Services Department. “Individuals who had both Marketplace medical and dental coverage were erroneously counted in our recent announcements,” he said in an e-mail.

The new count puts enrollment short of a 2013 estimate by the Congressional Budget Office, adopted last year as a goal by the Obama administration, that 7 million people would be enrolled this year. Federal officials said in September they had 7.3 million people enrolled in coverage through new government-run insurance exchanges.

They didn’t distinguish between medical and dental plans, breaking from previous practice without notice.

No More Dental

“Moving forward only individuals with medical coverage will be included in our effectuated enrollment numbers,” Griffis said.

Blending dental and medical plans let the administration assert that enrollment was more than 7 million. The move also partly obscured the attrition of more than 1 million in the number of people enrolled in medical insurance.

The administration had supplied information about dental plans separately in earlier disclosures. In May, the government reported that 8 million were signed up for health plans and 1.1 million were in dental coverage.

Then in September, the numbers became less transparent.

The Medicare agency’s administrator, Marilyn Tavenner, released a new enrollment figure, obtained from insurance companies participating in the exchanges: 7.3 million people were “enrolled in the health insurance marketplace coverage,” she said at a hearing by the Republican-led Oversight committee.

Quietly Added

Tavenner didn’t elaborate or break out dental plans. Reporters asked a spokesman for her agency, Aaron Albright, for more detail on the number after the hearing: He said he had no additional information about it.

“After touting 8 million initial sign-ups for medical plans, four months later they engaged in a concerted effort to obscure a heavy drop-out rate of perhaps a million or more enrollees by quietly adding in dental plan sign-ups to exchange numbers,”
Republican Darrell Issa of California, chairman of the Oversight committee, said in an e-mail from a spokeswoman.

Charles Gaba, a Bloomfield Hills, Michigan-based blogger who backs the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and has accurately forecast enrollment, was among those who found Tavenner’s announcement encouraging.

He had predicted enrollment would suffer attrition of about 3 percent per month; Tavenner’s figure suggested the rate was lower, only about 2 percent.

“This is FANTASTIC news,” he wrote at the time.

He said yesterday that he is “appalled” to find out dental plans were included in the figure.

Shifting Estimates

“I really don’t see what the point would be of being misleading about that number,” he said in a phone interview. “Even if it had been 6.9 million, I don’t see that as being a terrible thing.”

The CBO, which forecasts enrollment under the Affordable Care Act, projected in 2013 that 7 million people would be signed up in 2014 before lowering the estimate by 1 million early this year.

The Obama administration has previously said that enrollment would erode from the 8 million figure. Some customers never paid their premiums or stopped paying. Some may have found alternative coverage, such as through a new job; others may have decided the program wasn’t worth the price.

“Instead of offering the public an accurate accounting, the administration engaged in an effort to obscure and downplay the number of dropouts,” Issa said.

Uninsured Drop

The success of the Affordable Care Act should be measured primarily by one “fundamental number,” the U.S. uninsured rate, U.S. health secretary has said. That number is down about four percentage points this year to 13.4 percent, according to Gallup Inc.

After Tavenner’s announcement in September that 7.3 million people had signed up, aides to the Oversight committee demanded the Medicare agency’s raw data. Weeks of negotiations yielded 289 password-protected Excel spreadsheets, each representing enrollment in a single insurance company’s Affordable Care Act health plans.

In addition to enrollment, the spreadsheets include information such as premium revenue each plan received and the amount of tax credits it was paid by the government, to discount premiums. Dividing total premium revenue by enrollment in the plans, the committee aides noticed that some plans had premiums of less than $60 a month.

The low-priced plans also received little in the way of tax credits. Dental coverage sold under the ACA isn’t eligible for the credits, unless it’s combined with a health plan. In that case, the credit first subsidizes the premium for medical coverage, and anything left over goes to the dental plan.

Critical Threshold

The 7 million threshold appears to be important for the administration, said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, a Washington advocacy group aligned with Republicans that has opposed the health law.
“It’s a little weird,” Holtz-Eakin, a former CBO director, said. “Usually, the goal is for the forecast to hit the reality, but here the reality is being massaged to hit the forecast.”

The dental-plan data may add to a growing credibility problem for the Obama administration, Holtz-Eakin said. Recently, the administration has rebutted remarks by a former adviser, Massachusetts Institute of Technology economics professor Jonathan Gruber, suggesting that Democrats deceived the public when the law was passed in 2010.

‘They Lied’

“The No. 1 most effective message against the Affordable Care Act is: they lied to you to get it through,” Holtz-Eakin said in a phone interview. “People believe that years now after its passage. The distrust is already there, and they’re doing nothing but exacerbate it.”

Burwell, the health secretary, said at a Nov. 10 event that Obamacare enrollment was 7.1 million in October, 200,000 less than in August, again without breaking out dental plans. “That’s the number of people currently enrolled and paying in the marketplace,” Burwell said at the event, which was hosted by the Democratic-aligned Center for American Progress.

Burwell reported the October number after Ted Strickland, the former Democratic governor of Ohio who moderated the event, asked her to respond to critics who say the Obama administration has not been transparent about enrollment or premiums under the Affordable Care Act.

“In terms of this transparency issue, what we’re trying to do is make sure we’re clear,” Burwell said. “What we try and do is give you information when we have it that’s accurate.”

***ARTICLE: "House GOP Sues Obama Over ObamaCare"

As Republicans plot strategy on how to oppose President Obama's immigration changes, they're moving ahead with a plan to go after another signature policy: ObamaCare.

House Republicans today filed their expected lawsuit against the White House, arguing that the president overstepped his authority on certain parts of the legislation (including his postponement of the controversial employer mandate), reports the Wall Street Journal.

Though the suit had been threatened for a while, the filing seemed imminent when Republicans announced earlier this week that they had hired constitutional attorney Jonathan Turley.

Republicans had previously threatened to add their immigration objections to the ObamaCare lawsuit, given that both involve allegations of executive overreach, but today's suit addresses only the health care law, reports New York Times.

John Boehner lays out his main complaint: "If this president can get away with making his own laws, future presidents will have the ability to as well.

The House has an obligation to stand up for the Constitution, and that is exactly why we are pursuing this course of action." The suit was filed against the Health and Human Services and Treasury departments.

JAHI MCMATH vs THE OAKLAND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: The Hospital Staff Wants Jahi To DIE!!

#JahiMcMathBATTLE

Why Hasn't Pres OBAMA Weighed In On This Situation??

He weighed in on the TRAYVON MARTIN Tragedy.

I wonder if JAHI MCMATH'S Parents Voted for Pres OBAMA in 2008 & 2012??


ARTICLE: "Family Seeks To Move Brain-Dead Girl"


A judge has concluded that Jahi, who suffered complications after tonsil surgery, is brain dead.

"Yesterday we spent Christmas together as a family -- doing a lot of prayers and trying to have some fun, hoping for a miracle, and looks like we may have gotten our miracle.

We found out that someone is willing to take Jahi away from Children's Hospital to a facility nearby here in the Bay Area to treat her," Jahi's uncle, Omari Sealey, told reporters Thursday.

"So right now, we're asking Children's Hospital to work with us to make that possible," he said, referring to Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland.

Sealey declined to identify the other facility.

Jahi was declared brain dead by doctors at the hospital on December 12, three days after tonsil surgery.

The case has drawn National attention and sparked protests from some local leaders who say the hospital should have provided better care.

On Monday, a judge appointed Dr. Paul Fisher, chief of pediatric neurology at Stanford Children's Hospital, to evaluate Jahi as an independent expert.

Fisher testified Tuesday that Jahi meets the criteria for brain death.

Alameda Superior Court Judge Evelio Grillo previously ruled that the hospital must hold off on any decisions regarding discontinuing life support until December 30, and the judge encouraged both sides to work together.

Family attorney Christopher Dolan told reporters Thursday that Jahi would need to have tracheostomy and gastrostomy tubes put in before she could be moved.

"The most logical people are the ones in the hospital where she's sitting who have the ability to do that.

If they refuse to do that, and insist upon moving towards this deadline of pulling the plug, then we'll just continue to do what we've been doing," he said.

Chief of Pediatrics David Durand responded in a statement for Children's Hospital.

"Judge Grillo was very clear on Tuesday December 24. He ruled Jahi McMath to be deceased and instructed the hospital to maintain the status quo. Judge Grillo did not authorize or order any surgical procedures or transfer to another facility.

"Children's Hospital Oakland does not believe that performing surgical procedures on the body of a deceased person is an appropriate medical practice.

Children's Hospital Oakland continues to extend its wishes for peace and closure to Jahi McMath's family," he said.

#JahiMcMathOBAMA

JAHI MCMATH vs PRES OBAMA & OAKLAND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL:

Did JAHI MCMATH'S Parents VOTE for Pres OBAMA in 2008 & 2012??

Has anyone other than Myself wondered why Pres OBAMA hasn't weighed in on this National Story about BLACK Teen JAHI MCMATH??

He weighed in on the TRAYVON MARTIN Tragedy.

So why hasn't Pres OBAMA or someone from his Administration stepped into the JAHI MCMATH situation??

Is it because He is NOT campaigning for another Election??

What about JAHI'S LIFE??

Her Parents want to move her to another Medical Facility before the OAKLAND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL removes her from LIFE SUPPORT.

However Hospital Officials want to KILL this Child!

Why??

I believe it is for the purpose of taking some of her ORGANS. (Human Organ Harvesting)

Or.........

It could be about MONEY.

Or...........

It could be about MEDICAID Limits i.e, OBAMACARE.

I thought Pres OBAMA previously claimed to Care about "HEALTH CARE REFORM".

Especially as it relates to CHILDREN!

I can assure You if this National Story was about a GAY Teenager, someone from Pres OBAMA'S Administration would have commented on this Story by now!

I repeat.

Why hasn't Pres OBAMA or someone from his Administration stepped into the JAHI MCMATH fray??

What about JAHI MCMATH's Life??

Why is everyone in such a hurry to KILL this Child??

If it is NOT about HUMAN ORGAN HARVESTING & Money, then why are the Officials at OAKLAND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL in such a hurry to KILL her??

Did JAHI MCMATH'S Parents VOTE for Pres OBAMA in 2008 & 2012??

JAHI MCMATH vs PRES OBAMA & OAKLAND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL:

WHERE IS PRES OBAMA???

WHERE IS NANCY PELOSI??

WHERE IS DIANNE FEINSTEIN??

WHERE IS JESSE JACKSON SR??

Dear GOD in Heaven help Us!!

UPDATE: A SPONSOR OFFERS TO PAY FOR JAHI MCMATH'S CONTINUED CARE BUT OAKLAND HOSPITAL STILL WANTS TO KILL HER.

WHY??

CAN YOU SAY "HUMAN ORGAN HARVESTING?" (Please Keep Praying)

JAHI MCMATH'S PARENTS CAN FILE A WRONGFUL DEATH LAWSUIT AGAINST THE HOSPITAL THAT KILLED HER.

WHERE IS JESSE JACKSON SR.......DIANNE FEINSTEIN......NANCY PELOSI, AND GLORIA ALLRED???

PLEASE KEEP PRAYING!!!

The CHILDREN'S Hospital in OAKLAND where BLACK Teen JAHI MCMATH was admitted for a Simple Tonsillectomy Surgical Procedure, has still NOT provided a Logical Explanation to JAHI'S parents as to why She mysteriously went into CARDIAC ARREST during this routine procedure.

All Surgery involves some RISK but.....

Prior to JAHI'S Surgery Hospital Officials, including the Surgeons,
were made aware of this Child's MEDICAL HISTORY.

So what REALLY happened on the Operating Table??

Is the CHILDREN'S Hospital in OAKLAND a Residency Training Hospital??

Is JAHI MCMATH a MEDICAID patient??

Where is U.S. Senator DIANNE FEINSTEIN and NANCY PELOSI??

Where is GLORIA ALLRED??

Why aren't they Speaking out on this situation???

Is the CHILDREN'S Hospital in OAKLAND a Huge Political DONOR to FEINSTEIN & PELOSI??

And where is JESSE JACKSON SR??

U. S. Rep JESSE JACKSON SR was with DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR when he was Assassinated.

JESSE JACKSON SR used to be a Very Effective, Authentic CIVIL RIGHTS Leader.

However he Foolishly ceded this much needed Role (in BLACK communities),
to Opportunist AL SHARPTON, for POLITICS.......MONEY.......and FAME!

Once the LIFE SUPPORT plug is pulled on Dec 30, 2013, will Hospital Officials STEAL some of JAHI'S Vital Organs??

FYI:

Human ORGAN HARVESTING is Big Business for American Hospitals.

Who better to STEAL Human ORGANS from then Poor BLACK People??

JAHI'S parents will most likely File a WRONGFUL DEATH LAWSUIT against the CHILDREN'S Hospital in OAKLAND,

however.........

In CALIFORNIA there is a Cap on WRONGFUL DEATH LAWSUITS of Only $250,000!!

(CALIFORNIA TORT LAW)

If JAHI were My Child, I would SUE based on GROSS NEGLIGENCE and attempt to Charge the Hospital Officials with MURDER!!

If JAHI were My Child, I would also keep this Story in the MEDIA.

This is Not an "Unfortunate Tragedy"!!

It is a PRIMA FACIE case of GROSS NEGLIGENCE and CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE.

It is indeed MURDER and the Hospital doesn't care because JAHI MCMATH is a BLACK Child!

Please continue to PRAY for JAHI & Her Family but Immediate LEGAL ACTION is also needed!

UPDATE: JAHI MCMATH'S PARENTS CAN FILE A WRONGFUL DEATH LAWSUIT AGAINST THE HOSPITAL THAT KILLED HER.

WHERE IS JESSE JACKSON SR.......DIANNE FEINSTEIN......NANCY PELOSI, AND GLORIA ALLRED???


Sources: ABC News, CNN; Fox News, Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Gate.com