Custom Search
Showing posts with label gossip. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gossip. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

WENDY TOWS SHARINA HUDSON’S GOLD FERRARI KEVIN BOUGHT W/ HER MONEY (KARMA)










WENDY WILLIAMS TOWS SHARINA HUDSON’S GOLD FERRARI KEVIN BOUGHT W/ HER MONEY:

HOW YOU DOING SHARINA THE ADULTRESS??

WIVES WHO HAVE BEEN CHEATED ON ARE CELEBRATING.

FORGIVENESS DOES NOT ELIMINATE CONSEQUENCES.

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION

KARMA IS A B__TCH.

I LOVE YOU WENDY & I’M PRAYING FOR YOUR SUCCESS.

YOU ARE MY SHERO.


Post Sources: Daily Mail, Armon Wiggins Show, ET Canada, Youtube


***** EXCLUSIVE: Wendy Williams' estranged husband Kevin Hunter apologizes in vain as he is FIRED from her show and has been given 48 hours to clear out from their marital home while the $215K Ferrari he bought for his baby mama is towed away


* Kevin Hunter was fired as executive producer on Wendy Williams' show after she served her philandering husband divorce papers last week
* The 47-year-old was also fired as Wendy's manager and he was given 48 hours to remove his belongings from their New Jersey home, a source told DailyMail.com
* The TV show host decided she had enough after Hunter's baby mama Sharina Hudson was photographed by DailyMail.com driving around a brand new Ferrari
* Hunter and Hudson had been living the high life at a hideaway in New Jersey, going for dinner dates, dressing in designer gear and driving flashy new cars
* 'Wendy saw the photos of him and Sharina on the Daily Mail... she was furious. That's what tipped her over the edge, she was like, he's gotta go', a source said
* Hunter publicly apologized in vain on Tuesday, admitting he was not 'proud of his recent actions' and was 'trying to right some wrongs'
* Hunter's statement came as the $215,000-plus gold Ferrari Portofino he gifted Hudson was seen being towed away - a day after he was hit with the papers
* Wendy was seen apartment hunting in NYC on Tuesday as she revealed Monday she was moving out of her sober living home and was ready to start a new life
*
Kevin Hunter has been fired as an executive producer on his estranged wife Wendy Williams' show, as the $215K Ferrari he bought for his baby mama is towed away, DailyMail.com can reveal.
Williams decided she finally had enough of her philandering husband of nearly 22 years and served him divorce papers at her TV studio in Manhattan last Thursday.

The 47-year-old was fired from the show and as Wendy's manager, a source on the show confirmed to DailyMail.com.
The source also said Hunter had been given 48 hours to remove his belongings from their marital home in Livingston, New Jersey as she was seen apartment hunting in New York City on Tuesday.
Wendy reached her tipping point after learning Hunter had been living the high life with his decade-long mistress Sharina Hudson, who gave birth last month, splurging on Rolls-Royces, Ferraris and gifting her with diamonds.
Hunter released an apology on Tuesday admitting he was not 'proud of his recent actions' and was 'trying to right some wrongs' while taking 'full accountability' for what he had done.
His groveling statement came after the flashy $215,000-plus gold Ferrari Portofino he gifted Hudson was seen being towed away - a day after Wendy hit him with the divorce papers.

The source said: 'Kevin had expected to stay on at the show and as Wendy's manager. He ran the show with an iron fist, he was the guy who kept the vultures away.

'But when Wendy saw the photos of him and Sharina last week on the Daily Mail going out for dinner and her driving around in a Ferrari she was furious.
'That's what tipped her over the edge, she was like, "he's gotta go". She now wants him out of her life completely, she's given him 48 hours to clear his office and clear his belongings out of the house.
'Wendy's sister Wanda came up from Florida over the weekend and she's helping get everything in order. Wendy means business, she's cleaning house.'
A day after DailyMail.com published photos of the new Ferrari that Hunter gifted Hudson, it was loaded onto a truck and taken away.
A Ferrari dealership from Greenwich, Connecticut, picked the golden car up, as two men who appear to be helpers for Hunter looked on.
Hunter's statement on Tuesday read: '28 years ago I met an amazing woman: Wendy Williams. At the time, I didn't realize that she would not only become my wife, but would also change the face of entertainment and the world.
'I have dedicated most of our lives to the business empire that is Wendy Williams Hunter, a person that I truly love and respect unconditionally.

I am not proud of my recent actions and take full accountability and apologize to my wife, my family and her amazing fans. I am going through a time of self-reflection and am trying to right some wrongs.
'No matter what the outcome is or what the future holds, we are still The Hunter Family and I will continue to work with and fully support my wife in this business and through any and all obstacles she may face living her new life of sobriety, while I also work on mine.
'I ask that you please give me and my family privacy as we heal. Thank you.'

On Monday, Wendy kicked off her Hot Topics segment by revealing she was just a few days away from moving out the sober living facility she has called home for the past few weeks, and is ready to start a new life for herself and her son Kevin Jr. - the son she shares with Hunter.
DailyMail.com exclusively revealed in early March the TV host had been living in the sober home in Queens, New York, to battle an addiction to alcohol and prescription pills, her downward spiral sparked by learning Hunter was still seeing Hudson.
Meanwhile, Hunter has been spending time with Hudson, who recently gave birth, at a hideaway in Edgewater, New Jersey.
The two seem to be living the high life, going out for dinner dates and driving new luxury vehicles.
Hunter was seen driving a new maroon convertible Rolls-Royce last Saturday to pick up Hudson and take her out to dinner, with the massage therapist proudly showing off her post baby pooch.
The 33-year-old, whose hair was freshly curled, carried a $5,200 quilted Chanel purse while wearing a chunky diamond chain necklace and diamond studs.
While Hunter treated his baby mama to a Ferrari, he seems to have also treated himself to new cars, including the luxury Rolls-Royce.
Hudson was seen driving her new sports car last Monday, exiting the flashy vehicle in a $1,260 Thom Browne tracksuit that showed off her post-baby body.
And Kevin has spared no expense on his own duds as well, seen one day in a $1,500 Fendi vest, $490 Fendi hat, $770 Fendi pants and $515 Fendi sunglasses.

The couple have been hiding out in New Jersey weeks after Hudson was secreted away to Hahnemann University Hospital in Philadelphia to give birth in order to avoid media attention.

Hunter has been seen at the secret hideaway chauffeuring Sharina around.
Kevin was served with divorce papers from Wendy last Thursday morning at the TV studio, according to TMZ.
Extra security was hired in case Kevin, known to have a temper, got enraged on set. But there were apparently no outbursts.
The split will most likely be contested as Hunter is an executive producer on Williams' TV show and told Hudson that he couldn't afford to split from Wendy because she paid all the bills, a source previously told DailyMailTV.
In New Jersey, parties can file fault or no-fault. Fault allows a judge to dock alimony based on the seriousness of the offense. Proving will not be hard for either side in this case.
Reasons for fault include adultery, abandonment, physical or emotional abuse, and alcohol or drug abuse.
The Wendy Williams Show said in a statement: 'Wendy and her family have been a part of Debmar-Mercury for over 10 years. We respect their privacy regarding personal matters. As always, we remain committed to bringing an entertaining and topical show to our viewers.'
A personal representative for Williams said: 'Thank you to everyone for respecting the family's privacy during this time. Kevin is supportive of Wendy and they are working through this process together. No additional comment will be provided at this time.'

Monday, March 25, 2019

WENDY WILLIAMS PROMOTES OPEN MARRIAGES; CRUSH KEVIN, SUE SHARINA HUDSON






WENDY WILLIAMS PROMOTES OPEN MARRIAGES; CRUSH KEVIN HUNTER & SUE SHARINA HUDSON:

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION

KEVIN HUNTER’S BRAZEN, UNASHAMED, ADULTEROUS MISTRESS SHARINA HUDSON GIVES BIRTH TO BABY GIRL:

SHARINA HAD THE BABY IN A PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL MARCH 22, 2019......KEVIN PAID CASH.

KEVIN HUNTER HOW COULD YOU DO THIS AFTER WENDY MADE YOU SUPER WEALTHY??

SHARINA OBVIOUSLY WAS POORLY REARED TO THINK IT’S ACCEPTABLE TO STEAL WENDY’S HUSBAND.

PLEASE PRAY FOR WENDY WILLIAMS.

I WOULD NOT WISH ADULTERY ON MY WORST ENEMY.

IT’S NOT OK TO BE A MISTRESS.

KARMA IS A B__TCH SHARINA.


Post Sources: Unwine With Tasha K, Instagram, Perez Hilton, Hot New Hip Hop.com, Shade Room, Twitter, Youtube


Media Mogul and Talk Show Extraordinarie Wendy Williams needs to stop promoting OPEN MARRIAGES by defending her Adulterous Husband Kevin Hunter.

Wendy needs to allow Kevin to Divorce her and she needs to Sue Kevin’s Mistress SHARINA HUDSON for Alienation of Affection.

Wendy Williams is a New Yorker who needs to Fight back!

I’m praying for Wendy to make it and not give up.

ISAIAH 54:17

_____________________________________
#WendyWilliams’ husband, #KevinHunter’s mistress, Sharina Hudson, has allegedly given birth to a baby girl. According to @iamunwinewithtashak, Kevin and Sharina’s child was reportedly born on Wednesday, March 22nd.
_____________________________________
Sharina and Kevin allegedly paid cash for their hospital proceedings. In addition, Kevin allegedly used a different name while he was at the hospital, and he’s allegedly not on the baby's birth certificate.
_____________________________________
As you all know, Wendy and Kevin’s alleged marital issues have been on the forefront lately. When Wendy returned from her hiatus from #TheWendyWilliams show, she addressed some of the rumors about her marriage, saying she and Kevin are goodT! We will keep y’all posted on this story

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

CHRISTIANS WHO MURDER OTHER CHRISTIANS WITH THEIR TONGUE (GOSSIP & SLANDER)




CHRISTIANS WHO MURDER OTHER CHRISTIANS WITH THEIR TONGUE

YOU SHALL KNOW THEM BY THEIR FRUIT.

Sources: Gospelway, Open Bible Info, YouTube

Why is it that CHRISTIANS (followers of CHRIST) appear to be the only population on planet Earth who make it a habit to destroy other CHRISTIANS with their tongues on a regular basis?

Is this CHRIST-like behaviour?

What does the Bible teach about controlling our tongues so that we do not speak evil against others? What are slander, gossip, rumors, talebearing, and  backbiting? How important are truth, motives, and proper attitudes in our speech? Does Bible teaching about meddling and slander mean we must not rebuke people or tell them they need to repent of sin or error? How pure is your speech?

Introduction:

Speech is one of the most difficult aspects of life to control.

James 3:2 - If we can control our speech, we can control all areas of our lives.
Titus 3:1,2 - Christians are told to "speak evil of no one."
1 Peter 2:1 - "Lay aside ... all evil speaking."
Most people are aware that the Bible gives guidelines about speech, and specifically about how we should speak about others. The Bible deals with "slander," "backbiting," etc.

Most are also aware that this is common problem.

People love to talk about other people, especially if they can say something bad: at work, over the backyard fence, and especially over the telephone, etc. Many newspaper columns, magazines, and TV and radio talk shows are devoted to the latest gossip about movie stars, politicians, and other public figures. People delight in digging up dirt.
If we were honest, most of us would admit we ourselves at times have a problem with speech. How many can honestly say they have never said something about someone else and then later realized they should not have said it? If we understood the Bible better, we might regret even more of our speech.
The purpose of this study is to consider the Bible teaching about slander and speaking evil about others.

I. What Constitutes Sinful Slander?

Exactly what constitutes improper speech about others? Understanding this is the most difficult part of the subject for many.

A. Some Definitions

The following definitions are from The American Heritage Dictionary.
"Gossip" - "Rumor or talk of a personal, sensational, or intimate nature." This word is nowhere used in the KJV (it is used in the NKJV in 1 Timothy 5:13).
"Rumor" - "Unverified information of uncertain origin usually spread by word of mouth; hearsay."
"Slander" - "The utterance of defamatory statements injurious to the reputation or well-being of a person. ... A malicious statement or report."
"Backbite" - "To speak spitefully or slanderously about (a person)."
"Talebearer" - "A person who spreads malicious stories or gossip."
"Rail" - "To condemn or attack in bitter, harsh, or abusive language..."
"Revile" - "To denounce with abusive language."
Some people believe that all talking about people who are not present is "gossip," and therefore wrong. Others think saying bad things about people not present is "gossip." Or some think talking about things you don't know to be true about others is "gossip" and wrong.
While there are many ways to be guilty of speaking improperly about other people, not everything that some would call "gossip" is wrong. We must let the Bible define what is wrong.

B. Some Things that Are Not Necessarily Sinful

Simply talking about someone who is not present is not necessarily sinful.

Many inspired men did this. Who will claim they were wrong?
Matthew 28:7,8 - An angel told the women to tell the apostles about Jesus' resurrection. They were to speak to the apostles about someone who was not present.
Matthew 11:7-19 - Jesus told people how great John the Baptist was. [17:10ff]
Acts 11:1-18 - Peter told Christians in Jerusalem about the conversion of Cornelius.
In all these cases, someone spoke about people who were not present, but did they sin?
We often do similar things and we know it is not wrong.
* We may tell good news about someone: they had a baby, got a job promotion, bought a new car.
* We may tell an interesting or humorous story about people not present, but the person involved may not object at all if he knew we told it.
* We sometimes make announcements in our assemblies and even pray to God about people who are not present: someone who is out of town, sick, etc. These are people who are not present. Is it wrong to make announcements about them and pray about them?
Such speech is not wrong, because the person about whom we are speaking is not in any way harmed or injured.
[Cf. Acts 9:39; Galatians 1:18-2:10; Luke 1:13-17; cf. 1 Timothy 3; Titus 1:5-9.]

Even telling unfavorable or uncomplimentary things about people not present is not necessarily sinful.

Again, inspired men often did this. Were they wrong?
Matthew 15:12-14 - After Jesus had finished rebuking the Pharisees, His disciples told Him that He had offended them. Though the Pharisees obviously were no longer present, Jesus proceeded to warn His disciples about the errors of the Pharisees. [16:5-12]
Matthew 20:17-19 - Jesus took His disciples aside and told them that the chief priests and scribes would kill Him (obviously these men were not present).
Galatians 2:11-14 - Paul told Christians in Galatia about a sin Peter had committed in Antioch.
In fact, Bible writers often record events in which various people committed sins, even naming names and groups involved. We read about these sins even today, even though the people who committed the sins are obviously not present. Did these inspired men sin? Obviously not.
[1 Timothy 1:19,20; 2 Timothy 1:15; 2:16-18; 3:8; 4:10,14; Acts 4:27; Matthew 6:7; etc.]
There are situations in which the Bible commands us to tell people about bad things other people have done.
Matthew 18:17 - If a Christian sins and will not repent, we are commanded to tell the church. So under certain circumstances we must tell other people about a person's sin.
Just as Jesus and His apostles and prophets often spoke about the sins of people, so we are required to oppose error and false teaching. In doing so, we may mention sins or false teaching people have committed, in order to warn other people to avoid those errors. This may not be wrong, and in some cases may be required.
Sometimes when people hear that this has happened, they claim wrong was done. They say we "gossiped" about those people. It is possible, of course, to speak wrongfully in such cases; but the Bible examples show it is not necessarily sinful, and in many cases God requires us to do it.
So just because we have spoken about someone who is not present - even saying bad things about them - does not necessarily mean we have sinned. So what is sinful slander?

C. Some Characteristics of Sinful Slander

It is possible to slander someone when they are not present or even when they are present! Slander involves saying unfavorable things about a person in the following ways:

1. Some people accuse others of doing wrong when they do not know it to be true.

It is not necessarily wrong to sincerely ask someone about what they did, but it is slander to accuse someone without substantial evidence they are guilty.
Exodus 20:16 - You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
2 Timothy 3:3 - Paul lists a number of sins that characterize perilous times. The list of sins includes "slanderers" (NKJV), translated "false accusers" in the KJV.
Titus 2:3 - Aged women should be taught not to be "slanderers," again translated "false accusers" in the KJV.
The Greek definitions of the words "slander," "backbiting," "evil speaking," etc., show these include spreading false reports.
[Cf. Psalm 31:18; 15:3; 109:2,3; Romans 1:30; 2 Corinthians 12:20; Examples: Matthew 12:22-25; 11:18,19; 5:11; Acts 25:1,2; 24:2-9,13; 2 Samuel 10:1-3; Luke 23:2-5.]
What if we circulate a false report that someone else started? Can we blame them and remain free from guilt if it is false?
People often circulate rumors saying, "I don't know this is true, but I heard..."
Exodus 23:1 - You shall not circulate a false report. Do not put your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness. No matter who originates the accusation, we should not repeat and spread it unless we have substantial evidence it is true.
The fact that someone simply made an accusation is not enough. Anybody can make accusations. Lots of innocent people, in the Bible and since, have been falsely accused. We need to know what the evidence is.
What if I suspect a thing, but cannot really prove it?
1 Timothy 5:19 - Do not receive an accusation against an elder except from two or three witnesses. We must have evidence before we make accusations. If we do not have proof, maybe we need to ask questions and seek witnesses. But don't affirm guilt till the proof is in.
1 Timothy 6:4 - Sins listed include "reviling" (speaking evil) and "evil suspicions" (NKJV; "evil surmising" - KJV). This is jumping to conclusions without adequate proof about what a person did or why he did it. Often in a time of conflict, people circulate all kinds of rumors and motives for which they have no evidence. "I think he did it because..."
Proverbs 24:28 - Do not be a witness against your neighbor without cause. It is not always wrong to speak against someone, but there must be adequate cause first.
Matthew 18:16 -By the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. The testimony of personal witnesses constitutes evidence to be evaluated.
Obviously, there are limits on our knowledge or what others have done. When it comes to Scripture, we have an infallible revelation. But when it comes to knowing what other people have said or done, sometimes even reliable sources may be sincerely mistaken. But a sincere mistake is significantly different from negligence, indifference, jumping to conclusions, or circulating unsubstantiated rumors. Before we definitely accuse others, we must put forth a reasonable effort to get the facts, not just suspicions.
If we don't have the facts, investigate first. Ask questions, gather testimony. But don't make charges till we have reasonable evidence.

2. Some make derogatory statements from malicious motives.

We must sincerely seek to be sure our accusations are true. But even when we have the truth, that does not mean we are right in spreading the information. Some people think they can say anything about anyone as long as they feel sure it is true. But there is also the question of motive: there must be good reasons for telling bad things about others. Sometimes people spread stories because they want to hurt people's reputation.
1 Peter 2:1 - Evil speaking is associated with malice.
Psalm 41:5-7 - David's enemies spoke against him seeking to hurt him.
Malice or improper motives can take various forms, such as:
[Cf. Ephesians 4:31; Romans 1:29,30; Colossians 3:8; 2 Cor. 12:20; Psalm 31:13; 15:3.]
* Jealousy
1 Peter 2:1 associates evil speaking with envy. We may do wrong by speaking evil of others because we envy their abilities or blessings or the honor or favor they have received. We may seek to exalt ourselves above them by making them look bad.
* Vengeance, anger, hatred, or grudges.
Jeremiah 20:10 - Jeremiah's enemies denounced and defamed him to take revenge.
1 Peter 3:9; 2:23 - We should not return evil for evil or reviling for reviling. Jesus set the example in this. When He was reviled, He did not in turn revile others.
Vengeance is not just physical actions we take against others. One of the most common ways to take vengeance is by saying things to hurt others. Others harm us (or we imagine so), so we say defamatory things to "get even." Someone accuses us of something, so we respond, "Well, what about the time when you..."
Sin must be rebuked. But when we do so, we must be sure that we are motivated by concern for the sinner and others who may be involved, not by a desire for vengeance.
[1 Corinthians 4:12,13; Ephesians 4:31]
* Self will
When others oppose our views, whether in personal matters or doctrinal issues, we may seek to get some "dirt" on them to discredit them and keep others from listening to them.
1 Timothy 6:4 - False teachers are often involved in "reviling." They hope to find fault in those who speak truth.
Jeremiah 6:28 - Rebels (against God) go about as slanderers.
3 John 9,10 - Diotrophes loved pre-eminence. One of his methods was to speak evil against the apostle John (note: "malicious words").
We see this technique again and again in politics. It is sometimes called the "scorched earth policy." When politicians oppose one another in an election or in some policy decision, often someone leaks some personal information about his opponents or their party to make them look bad. Often it happens shortly before an election.
Speaking evil against others so we can win a confrontation and get our way is a form of sinful slander. Yet it frequently happens in time of conflict.
* Persecution
Matthew 5:11 - We are blessed when people persecute us and say evil against us falsely.
Before we spread derogatory statements about someone, we need to make sure our motives are pure. Are we speaking for our own personal benefit, or are we sincerely speaking for the good of the one we criticize or for the good of others who really have a genuine need for the information? This requires serious self-examination, because it is easy to attribute bad motives to others and good motives to ourselves.
[Psalm 31:18; 1 Peter 2:12; 3:16; 4:4]

3. Some simply enjoy meddling in the personal affairs of others, spreading dirt about others.

Some people just get a thrill from spreading derogatory stories about others. They feel important because they know some intimate personal affairs that other people do not know about someone, and especially if they know some "dirt" about somebody.
Some tabloid magazines, newspapers columns, and TV shows sell their product and make a living this way. They delight in digging up dirt, and become rich by spreading the dirt to people who delight in reading it.
1 Timothy 5:13 - Young widows should not be idle, tattlers, busybodies.
2 Thessalonians 3:11 - Some refuse to work but become busybodies.
Leviticus 19:16 - You shall not go about as a talebearer among your people.
Some people are idle, having nothing constructive to do. So they spread rumors about others. When others do wrong, instead of sorrowing and trying to help them, they enjoy talking about it to others.
Again, there are times when some information needs to be made known in order to help the one who did wrong or to help other people who have a real reason to know the information. But we must be sure we speak for the good of others, not just because we enjoy being busybodies.

4. Some broadcast private sins instead of personally confronting the sinner.

Matthew 18:15-17; Luke 17:3 - If our brother sins against us, we are to go tell him his fault between the two of us. If he repents (hears us) we have gained our brother. The matter is resolved. Note that "hearing" us in Matthew 18 is defined in Luke 17 to mean "repenting." Until the person repents and starts doing right, he has not "heard" us.
The sin is made known to others only if the brother refuses to correct his error when he has been personally confronted. To spread a personal matter before confronting the sinner may cause unnecessary harm to a brother's reputation, and it drags other people into a controversy unnecessarily. When the brother has been confronted and has refused to correct the wrong, however, then we must get others involved.
Sometimes such matters are handled improperly because of ignorance of God's plan. But often people report private sins to other people, before the sinner has been adequately confronted, because of improper motivations. The issue to be remembered is: Are we acting according to the Bible for the sincere purpose of helping others, or are we acting to hurt others?

II. What Are the Effects of Slander?

What problems are caused by sinful slander? Why should we avoid it?

A. Slander Alienates Friends and Promotes Strife and Contention.

Proverbs 16:28 - A perverse man sows strife, and a whisperer separates the best of friends. How many times have people become alienated because of slander other people spread about them?
Proverbs 26:20 - Where there is no wood, the fire goes out; and where there is no talebearer, strife ceases.
Slander is often associated with strife, contention, and division like fuel to a fire. In such times, people may say harsh things about one another. They may drag out all the dirt they can to discredit one another. They may bring up old wrongs that were corrected wrong ago, or old matters that had been overlooked till a "blow-up" occurs.
People say, "Do you know what so-and-so said about you?" Others respond, "Well, remember years ago when he did such-and-such?" Then others become upset and they respond by saying nasty things or by dragging up things the other party said. Soon a major conflict has resulted, all started by someone spreading slander.
Have you and I been guilty, or do we control our attitudes and our speech?
[2 Corinthians 12:20; 1 Timothy 6:4; Ephesians 4:31; Colossians 3:8]

B. Slander Can Destroy a Man.

Proverbs 11:9 - The hypocrite with his mouth destroys his neighbor. Men have lost jobs, wealth, and families because of character assassination.
Proverbs 18:21 - Death and life are in the power of the tongue, and those who love it will eat its fruit. People have been killed because of slanderous lies told against them.
Common accusations that are used currently to discredit people are "sexual harassment," "racism," and "child abuse." When they really occur, such things are tragic. But when such accusations are made, society and government often have such a knee-jerk emotional reaction that they forget the concept that a person is innocent until proved guilty. Anyone who wants to hurt others, especially public figures, can destroy their reputations, their jobs, even their homes simply by making accusations, despite the fact they cannot prove them. Many have had their children taken away because some disgruntled acquaintance made an anonymous tip to a child welfare agency with no proof.
2 Samuel 10:1-3 - David sent his servants to comfort the king of Ammon when his father died. However, the king's advisers slandered David saying the servants were spies. War resulted because of totally untrue slander.
How many congregations have been torn apart by unfounded slander in which people made untrue accusations, spread malicious rumors, or refused to confront people personally?
Any fool (in the sense of Proverbs) can make an accusation. What we must consider is the proof. If it is lacking, then we must not spread the accusation, and must not treat the accused person as guilty until the facts are known. If people continue to accuse someone when they lack proof, then the accusers are the ones who are wrong.

C. Slander Demonstrates We Have the Character of Satan.

1 Timothy 3:11 - The wives of elders and deacons must not be slanderers. The word for "slanderer" here is the same word as the word "devil." "Devil" means slanderer or false accuser.
For example, the devil accused Job before God saying Job would turn against God if he suffered enough (Job 1,2). This demonstrates the nature of Satan and illustrates the character of a slanderer or false accuser.
When we are guilty of slander, we are acting like devils: we demonstrate that our character is like that of Satan.

D. Slander Causes the One Who Is Guilty to Lose His Eternal Reward.

Psalms 101:5 - Whoever secretly slanders his neighbor, Him I will destroy.
Romans 1:30,32 - Backbiters are worthy of death and so are people who approve of others who practice it.
1 Corinthians 5:11 - Revilers in a local church should be withdrawn from (if they don't repent).
Surely there are many reasons to avoid slander. What about us? Have we been guilty of slander or have we kept our speech pure? If we have slandered others, have we repented and asked for forgiveness from those whom we have harmed?
[Psalm 15:1-3; 1 Corinthians 6:10]

III. How Can We Avoid Slander?

Here are some guidelines to help us avoid being guilty.

A. Don't Get Involved When Others Spread Slander.

Not only are there people who just enjoy spreading dirt about others, there are also people who enjoy listening to the dirt.

Do not encourage or cooperate with a slanderer.

Romans 1:29,30,32 - Those who consent with (take pleasure in) people who backbite and whisper, are themselves guilty of sin. Talebearers must have someone to tell their slander to. By giving them a listening ear, we encourage their evil.
Instead of listening, we should challenge their evidence and their motivesfor their accusations. Ask them, "How do you know this is true? And why are you telling me this?" What proof do they have, and what good are they doing by spreading such information to you? If they cannot properly defend their speech, we should rebuke them (Ephesians 5:11).

Limit your association with people known to be persistent slanderers.

Proverbs 20:19 - He who goes about as a talebearer reveals secrets; therefore do not associate with one who flatters with his lips (or one who "opens wide his lips" - ASV). Some talebearers are also flatterers. They say sweet things to people's face, but slander them behind the back. Remember, if you see them treat other people this way, they will also treat you this way. So, don't associate with them.
1 Corinthians 5:11 - If a member of the church persists in reviling others, he should be withdrawn from.
1 Corinthians 15:33 - Whether or not the slanderer is a member of the church, remember that evil company corrupt good habits. If people continue such conduct and will not quit, we should limit our association with them. By avoiding them we are not influenced to act like they do. Also, we can't repeat all the gossip to others, because we don't know what it is.
[Exodus 23:1]

B. Carefully Examine Our Motives.

To correct our speech, we must first correct our hearts.

Matthew 12:33-37 - What the mouth speaks depends on the condition of the heart. So to correct our speech, we must correct our hearts. We have learned that slander is often caused by sinful motives, so before we speak we must carefully examine our hearts to be sure we speak from proper motives.

Speak from love for the good of others.

What should be the correct motive for speaking about others?
Matthew 22:39 - Love your neighbor as yourself. If we cease being primarily concerned for pleasing ourselves, we can learn to be concerned about what is best for all concerned. It may help us improve our attitude if we put ourselves in the other person's place: if I had this problem, what would be the proper, Biblical, loving way for others to deal with it?
Ephesians 4:29 - Let no corrupt word proceed out of your mouth, but what is good for necessary edification, that it may impart grace to the hearers. The goal is to edify others and impart grace - that is to build others up and help them be right according to God's word.
There are definitely times when the sins and problems of others should be discussed. Sinners must be rebuked, and other people who may be involved must be warned to avoid being harmfully influenced by sin. But all should be done like Jesus and His apostles did it. We must speak from a sincere concern for the welfare of others, not out of jealousy, pride, vengeance, etc. How carefully do you and I guard our motives when we speak about others?

C. Desire Sinners to Correct Their Sins and Be Forgiven.

Rather than maliciously spreading slander about people we hear about who have sinned, we should hope for their repentance and forgiveness.

Matthew 18:15; Luke 17:3

If a brother sins against you personally, you must go to him personally. Remember we must not accuse people till we have proof they sinned. Often a personal discussion reveals that the person did not commit the sin we thought they did. Or he may have a good attitude so that discussion will lead him to correct the problem.
If a brother has been confronted and will not repent, it should be taken to the church. But many problems could be "nipped in the bud" by personal confrontation. Spreading the matter to other people, rather than speaking to the one who did the wrong, just enlarges the problem. In any case, we should hope that the one who is accused of sin should be right before God.
What if someone comes to me and tells me about some sin that he personally knows some other member has committed? If he believes the other brother sinned against him, then I should show him what the Bible says and teach him that he must now go speak to the brother who sinned against him. Even if the sin is not a personal matter between them, but he knows about the sin and I don't know, then he should see to it that the sinner is confronted by people who do know about the sin. There is nothing to be gained by spreading the matter to people who know nothing about it before the sinner has been confronted.

Galatians 6:1

If a brother is overcome in a fault, seek to restore him. This should be our desire, even if the sin was not a personal offense against us. We should sincerely want what is best for the sinner. But the best thing for every sinner is to repent and be forgiven, so he can be saved. This requires that the sinner be shown what the problem is, with sincere concern for his soul. The goal is not to take pleasure in spreading the news about the sin to other people, but to help the sinner to change.
Obviously, our responsibility in rebuking others may be limited by opportunity and circumstances. Our greatest responsibility is to people we know, especially in the local church. If the sin was committed by someone we don't know and never meet, we have little opportunity to help them.
For example, suppose we hear of some sin or false doctrine in the life of a prominent religious leader, political leader, entertainer, sports figure, etc. If they were a family member, neighbor, friend, or especially a member of the local church, surely we should make sure they are taught the truth. But if we have no relationship or contact with them, we are not responsible to personally confront every sinner in the world. Even so, we may properly use them as an example in teaching to warn others to avoid such errors.
But in any case, we should hope for their restoration and not take pleasure in their downfall. And if we personally know the people involved, and especially if the sin is committed against us personally, we should be sure the sinner is confronted in love.

D. Pray for People Who Have Problems.

Instead of rejoicing when we hear of people who have problems, and instead of maliciously spreading evil reports about them, we should pray for their welfare.
Luke 6:27,28 - Even those who persecute us and misuse us should be treated with love. We should pray for them and seek God's blessing (something good) on them. Pray they will receive what is truly good for them.
Luke 23:34 - Jesus prayed for the forgiveness of the very people who killed Him. He was our example in suffering (1 Peter 2:23). He did not revile or say that He wanted things to happen contrary to their well being (but they did have to repent for their sin - see Acts 2). So we should pray for those who wrong us to receive what is truly good for them, and it is always good for sinners to be taught to repent and be forgiven.
It is not easy to sincerely pray for people and then turn around and maliciously slander them. When we hear reports of people who have sinned or have other problems, an attitude of love and prayer will help us avoid many of the sinful attitudes that lead to slander.

Conclusion

Christians need to work diligently to maintain proper attitudes and proper speech.
James 3:1-8 - The tongue is "full of deadly poison." Like a small flame it can kindle a great fire. Thousands of acres of forest can be destroyed by a small spark. So our speech can destroy the well-being of many.
Colossians 4:6 - Let your speech always be with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer each one. Proper answers are answers that help people do right and be saved. This may include telling people they have sinned and need to repent. It may include warning other people so they avoid the sins of others. But it must always be spoken with a sincere concern for the welfare of all involved.
Psalms 141:3 - We need to pray with David, "Set a guard, O lord, over my mouth; Keep watch over the door of my lips."
What about your speech and mine? Would our Lord be pleased with our speech?
What is your relationship with the Son of God who died to save you from sin?

Friday, December 27, 2013

WENDY WILLIAMS vs NENE LEAKES: THE BEEF IS REAL!!



#WendyWilliamsNeNeLeakes

WENDY WILLIAMS vs NENE LEAKES: THE BEEF IS REAL!

FYI: I'M TEAM WENDY!!

In the Media & Entertainment Game, only the STRONG & VERSATILE Survive.

Is there a Real BEEF between Talk Show Diva/ Best-Selling Author WENDY WILLIAMS, and Reality TV Star NENE LEAKES??

Yes!!

I believe NENE actually started this Feud but there is definitely Fireworks & TENSION between these two BLACK, Female Celebrities.

Usually I don't advocate, nor Support Feuds between Powerful BLACK Women but in this case I digress.

I may be Wrong for doing so but I'm choosing sides:

#TEAM WENDY!!!

WENDY STILL HAS THE HEAT!!!

Now Please allow Me to explain my position.

While its true NENE LEAKES is a Celebrity, She has NO Longevity beyond BRAVO's "Real Housewives Of Atlanta".

For example:

NENE's sitcom "The New Normal" was Cancelled after only One Season.

And........

At the moment No one in Hollywood appears to be knocking down her doors to offer her any Major Film roles.

Has NENE been offered an Opportunity to launch her Own Talk Show??

NO!!

Why??

It's because NENE LEAKES has been typecast as an "Angry, BLACK Woman".

NENE is indeed very Intelligent & Talented, however every TV role I've seen her Acting Skills displayed involved some form of ANGER or Cutthroat Bullying.

Thus She has in fact been typecast.

Let's face it people!

Were it Not for NENE'S role on the "RHOA", She would be UNEMPLOYED!

That is unless She was willing to accept a Job in the ATL as a Radio DJ on STEVE HARVEY'S Show.

(I don't believe NENE would fare well among NYC or Los Angeles Markets as a Radio Presence.)

A couple of years ago NENE LEAKES released her autobiography "Never Make The Same Mistake Twice".

Sales for NENE'S book were Not Great.

Now let's talk about WENDY WILLIAMS from the East Coast.

NEW JERSEY native WENDY WILLIAMS has been around for more than 20 Years as an A-list, BLACK Female, Multi-Media Professional.

WENDY did Not achieve her level of International Success via the "Casting Couch", Nor via playing the role of an "ANGRY......BLACK Woman!

(NENE LEAKES did Not achieve Success via the "Casting Couch", but She did Achieve Success via playing the role of an ANGRY........BLACK Woman.)

WENDY is a Controversial Multi-Media Professional.....however She is NEVER been typecast as an ANGRY........BLACK Woman!

WENDY is Controversial but She is NOT Cutthroat!

There is a distinct Difference

WENDY WILLIAMS is extremely Intelligent......Personable....and Versatile just like OPRAH.

WENDY WILLIAMS keeps it REAL.......the Good, the Bad & the Ugly!!

While NENE LEAKES appears to only be "REAL" when the Cameras at BRAVO are Filming.

WENDY is also a Best-Selling Author, with a 3rd Book soon to hit the Shelves.

And.......

Like her Idol OPRAH.......

Multi-Media Professional WENDY WILLIAMS has Genuine LONGEVITY & True Valuable Staying Power for Advertisers.

Many Top-of-the-Line Advertising Sponsors & Hollywood Execs only view NENE LEAKES as a Short-Term Reality TV Show "GIMMICK".

But those Same Top-of-the-Line Advertising Sponsors & Hollywood Execs view Multi-Media Professional WENDY WILLIAMS as a Long-Term Valuable Commodity.

Yes NENE'S Salary on BRAVO is $1 Million Dollars but WENDY WILLIAMS surpassed that years ago!

When her Brand was HOT, Mrs. NENE LEAKES should have launched additional Streams of Revenue as did her fellow RHOA Castmates:

KANDI BURUSS

PHAEDRA PARKS

KIM ZOLCIAK-BIERMANN

and........

CYNTHIA BAILEY

Instead NENE ran after the Flashing lights of Hollywood only to be Fooled & later tossed aside.

I repeat.

In the Media & Entertainment Game, only the STRONG & VERSATILE Survive!

Is there real BEEF between WENDY WILLIAMS & NENE LEAKES??

Yes!!

I may be Wrong for doing so but I'm choosing sides:

#TEAM WENDY

WENDY STILL HAS THE HEAT!!!



Source: NY Daily News

Monday, April 5, 2010

Get Unvarnished.com Rates Regular People, Allows Freedom Of Speech




Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy





"Get Unvarnished": People Ratings Web Site Unleashes Controversy


For a Web site about reputation, "Get Unvarnished" is having a tough time establishing a good one of its own.

In the few days since its debut earlier this week, the Silicon Valley start-up, which lets users submit anonymous reviews about anyone, has weathered a firestorm of fierce reviews about itself.

Tech blogs and media sites have called it everything from a "clean, well-lighted place for defamation" to a "public bathroom wall for everyone on the planet" to "a completely evil social network."

Critics say there is little to prevent the Web site's conversation from devolving into the hate fests found on so many sites populated with anonymous comments. But others say the honesty on Unvarnished might not just be a breath of fresh air but a potentially helpful resource for recruiters looking to fill jobs.



View Larger Map


Sources: Get Unvarnished, ABC News, Facebook, MSNBC, Today Show, Google Maps

Friday, March 26, 2010

Beyonce Pregnancy Report Just Another Media Take Out Rumor
































No Baby For Beyonce And Jay-Z: Media Take Out Is Media Fake Out


When it comes to pregnancies, MediaTakeOut.com has been really wrong, with incredible frequency.

It’s also been wrong about Beyonce and husband Jay-Z in general.

So it makes sense that today the site is wrong about everything in one bogus item!

“MTO EXCLUSIVE: Beyonce’s PREGNANT!!!” blares the headline.

Oh, baby.

“MediaTakeOut.com just learned from a ROCK SOLID source that legendary singer Beyonce and her hip hop mogul husband Jay Z are expecting their first child together,” shouts the sloppy site.

No, they aren’t.

“Media Fake Out,” as it’s known, says of Beyonce’s supposed pregnancy, “It’s been a long time waiting… but now it’s finally happened.”

No, it hasn’t.

“You will probably see other news sources pick up on this in coming days,” continues MediaTakeOut, “But when you do — don’t forget where you saw it first.”

Oh, we won’t.

Because we’re going to call out MediaTakeOut.com by name right now… as being completely wrong.

A source close to Beyonce tells Gossip Cop she is not pregnant.

Given MediaTakeOut’s dreadful track record, we have no reason to think otherwise.






Beyonce Pregnant: False Report



UPDATE:
Gossipcop calls the report totally fake and says Beyonce is, according to their sources, not with child. They call Mediatakeout.com "media fake out."

PREVIOUSLY:
Is Beyonce pregnant? Mediatakeout.com reports that she and Jay-Z are expecting their first child.

March 25, 2010. It's been a long time waiting . . . but now it's finally happened. MediaTakeOut.com just learned from a ROCK SOLID source that legendary singer Beyonce and her hip hop mogul husband Jay Z are expecting their first child together.

According to our source Beyonce is doing fine and resting (for now), but she's expected to continue working throughout her pregnancy. And we're also told that Jay Z is EXTREMELY happy to be having his first child with Bey.

Beyonce has spoken about the hard work of having a baby, having watched her younger sister Solange marry and have a son while she was still a teenager.

If it's true, congrats! If not, never mind!

The pair have been married almost two years and she's coming off a world tour.





Media Take Out EXCLUSIVE: BEYONCE'S PREGNANT!!!


It's been a long time waiting . . . but now it's finally happened. MediaTakeOut.com just learned from a ROCK SOLID source that legendary singer Beyonce and her hip hop mogul husband Jay Z are expecting their first child together.

According to our source Beyonce is doing fine and resting (for now), but she's expected to continue working throughout her pregnancy. And we're also told that Jay Z is EXTREMELY happy to be having his first child with Bey.

We and the entire MediaTakeOut.com staff want to wish the happy couple CONGRATS!!!



View Larger Map


Sources: Gossip Cop, Huffington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, Media Take Out, Google Maps

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Sandra Bullock's Hubby A White Supremist? Is Sandra?...(WARNING)
















Sandra Bullock's Husband's Neo-Nazi Friends


Jesse James' mistress did a sexy Nazi photo shoot and reportedly has White Power mementos on her skin and in her home. His ex-wife is married to a reported skinhead. How many neo-Nazis can you date without being one?

Michelle 'Bombshell' McGee denies being a white supremacist: Her sexy Nazi photo shoot was for fetishists, she says, and the W P tattooed on the backs of her thighs stands not for "white power" but the revolting-in-a-different-way.

She says, "Jesse and I had a conversation about it and he says a lot of his friends have the tattoo." (Is that an inside joke? That statement could use context, including an updated assessment on McGee's believability.

She has said she's Amish, as well as a third-generation French Canadian.

Is that even possible?) Suing for custody of their children, her ex-husband said she had "child block magnets on the refrigerator that spell out 'White Power'," and that her older son from a different relationship "is Jewish and she think it's funny that she makes the Nazi salute."

Then we have Jesse's ex-wife Janine Lindemulder, porn star and mother of his children. Her new husband is Jeremy Aikman, a multiple-time felon and reportedly "an admitted skinhead." Jesse and Sandra fought to revoke Lindemulder's custody, citing her marriage to Aikman as evidence of a negative environment for children. (Or, um, anyone.) So Jesse James has a degree of separation from these people—but why are there so many of them in the first place? How naive could he have been to his friends' racist and antisemitic ties and leanings?

Finally, Crushable notes concern over Jesse's West Coast Choppers logo resembling Germany's Iron Cross, which appears in Nazi memorabilia. (Albeit elsewhere, too.) Are we whipping ourselves into a paranoid frenzy, or is this guy uncomfortably close to the white supremacy movement? Way to harsh our racially harmonious Blind Side mellow, Jesse.





View Larger Map

Sources: Gawker, NY Post, TMZ, Fox News, Crushables, US Magazine, Huffington Post, Youtube, Google Maps

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Jesse James Apologizes To Sandra Bullock, His Dark Side





























Jesse James Apologizes To Sandra Bullock As Friends Reveal His Darker Side



Jesse James apologized to his wife Sandra Bullock and his children Thursday amid rumors that he was cheating on her for months with a fetish model.

James denied the “vast majority” of the "unfounded" rumors against him in a statement released to People magazine, but acknowledged that he was to blame for the situation.

“It’s because of my poor judgment that I deserve everything bad that is coming my way,” James,40, said. “"This has caused my wife and kids pain and embarrassment beyond comprehension and I am extremely saddened to have brought this on them. I am truly very sorry for the grief I have caused them. I hope one day they can find it in their hearts to forgive me."

The apology comes on the heels of a tough week for Bullock. Instead of traveling to England with her The Blind Side co-stars for a celebratory bash and the film's Brit premiere, the Oscar-winning actress is embroiled in a cheating scandal thanks to James.

Friends who have known the couple for years tell Fox 411 that the doting husband we've been seeing at awards shows is only one half of the man Sandra, 45, married in 2005.

"Jesse can be a very loving, protective and committed man. He cares about Sandra and would often feel like her personal protector, but he can turn on a dime on a person and be extremely angry and nasty if he is in a bad mood,” a source tells Fox411. “He has a strong temper. I've seen him yell at young girls in their twenties who were at events to talk to Sandra. He can swear and cut people down in an instant - it's very intimidating and threatening. He is scary when he lashes out at someone.”

In the face of his wife’s charmed year as Hollywood’s darling actress, James grew increasingly uncomfortable with her burgeoning fame.

"Jesse hates being in the public eye and it made him even more uncomfortable and easily upset,” the source said. “He refused to divulge a detail of his personal life and it seemed like it was because he wanted to keep Sandra out of excess limelight, but now it looks like practice for keeping his own life completely hidden and shuttered."

"When Sandra and Jesse were first married, they did everything together. He attended events and dinners with her and wanted to be by her side at all times. He would hang back quietly and keep to himself or investigate what she would have to do next and make sure he approved before she had to do it. He was VERY involved in her every move. Over the last two years, they've been apart more and the almost abnormal closeness they once shared had dissipated."



Sources: Fox News, NY Post, Page Six

Monday, January 11, 2010

Elizabeth Edwards Not A "Saint", Abusive To John...Game Change








































































This new book "Game Change" co-authored by John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, is extremely juicy!

If your a Political "Junkie" (like myself) you WILL want to buy "Game Change"!

In the meantime I have included an excerpt from their book on Elizabeth Edward's allegedly true character published in the New Yorker Magazine.

John and Mark claim their information came from very credible sources and that Elizabeth is NOT the same "Saint" of a wife portrayed in the Media.

They allege she was extremely abusive (Verbally, Mentally) to John Edwards for years even before he ran for President.

Perhaps she was still grieving over Wade or afraid of dying early from Breast Cancer.

Could this be the reason why he slipped into a relationship with Rielle Hunter?

Poor Elizabeth.

After viewing a segment about "Game Change" from Fox News, grab your coffee cup and read on....

Yes I watch Fox News and Fox News Sunday so what?

I also watch CNN, MSNBC, Morning Joe, Hardball, The Situation Room, Meet The Press, CBS News, ABC News, etc.,








Saint Elizabeth and the Ego Monster


Even before the cancer, she was among her husband’s greatest political assets.

In one focus group conducted by Hickman in Edwards’s Senate race, voters trashed him as a pretty-boy shyster—until they saw pictures of Elizabeth, four years his senior. “I like that he’s got a fat wife,” one woman said. “I thought he’d be married to a Barbie or a cheerleader.”

The Edwardses’ eldest son, Wade, had been killed in a car crash in 1996; for a long time, Elizabeth went to his grave site every day and read softly to the tombstone. The combination of her suffering, resilience, and imperfections made her a poignant figure. But it was the illness that elevated Elizabeth to a higher plane. She confronted her treatment with bracing courage and wry humor, emerging as one of the most outspoken and widely admired cancer survivors in history.

No one in the Edwardses’ political circle felt anything less than complete sympathy for Elizabeth’s plight. And yet the romance between her and the electorate struck them as ironic nonetheless—because their own relationships with her were so unpleasant that they felt like battered spouses. The nearly universal assessment among them was that there was no one on the national stage for whom the disparity between public image and private reality was vaster or more disturbing.

With her husband, she could be intensely affectionate or brutally dismissive.

At times subtly, at times blatantly, she was forever letting John know that she regarded him as her intellectual inferior.

She called her spouse a “hick” in front of other people and derided his parents as rednecks. One time, when a friend asked if John had read a certain book, Elizabeth burst out laughing. “Oh, he doesn’t read books,” she said. “I’m the one who reads books.”

During the 2004 race, Elizabeth badgered and berated John’s advisers around the clock. She called Nick Baldick, his campaign manager, an idiot. She accused David Axelrod, his (and later Obama’s) media consultant, of lying to her and insisted that he be stripped of the responsibility for making the campaign’s TV ads. She would stay up late scouring the Web, pulling down negative stories and blog items about her husband, forwarding them with vicious messages to the communications team. She routinely unleashed profanity-laced tirades on conference calls. “Why the fuck do you think I’d want to go sit outside a Wal-Mart and hand out leaflets?” she snarled at the schedulers.

Elizabeth’s illness seemed at first to mellow her in the early months of 2005—but not for long. One day, she was on a conference call with the staffers of One America, the political-action committee that was being turned into a vehicle for John’s 2008 bid. There were 40 or 50 people on the line, mostly kids in their twenties being paid next to nothing (and in some cases literally nothing). Elizabeth had been cranky throughout the call, but at the end she asked if her and her husband’s personal health-care coverage had been arranged. Not yet, she was told. There are complications; let’s discuss it after the call.

Elizabeth was having none of that. She flew into a rage.

If this isn’t dealt with by tomorrow, everyone’s health care at the PAC will be cut off until it’s fixed, she barked. I don’t care if nobody has health care until John and I do!

The health-care call attained wide infamy in the Edwards camp. The people around them marveled at Elizabeth’s Callousness.

This from a woman whose family had multiple houses and a net worth in the tens of millions. Yet no one called her out on her behavior, least of all her husband.

His default reflex was to mollify her—or avoid her. No one doubted that, as her condition improved, the increase in John’s travel had a lot to do with steering clear of his wife. What they didn’t know was that the road would soon hold other enticements, too.

“Get ready to get mic’d up,” Edwards announced to Brumberger one day in June 2006 as the campaign was beginning in earnest. We’re gonna have a camera operator and a documentarian traveling with us, Edwards said. We’re gonna show the world what it’s really like to be John Edwards.

Brumberger was stunned to learn that the filmmaker was Hunter. The idea was that she would produce a series of Web videos documenting life on the trail with Edwards.





Edwards told Baldick, now running his PAC, that he liked the concept, that they should do it. Baldick objected for any number of reasons—but not because he had the slightest worry that Edwards was fooling around with Hunter. That was one thing the people in Edwards’s orbit never stressed over when it came to John, who they believed had long ago made the decision not to fall into that trap. And, anyway, he had always seemed … well, sorta asexual, at least to his staff.



View Larger Map


Sources: Harper Collins, Amazon, New Yorker Magazine, Politics, Harpo Productions, Fox News, Youtube, Google maps