Custom Search

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Black Voter Turnout Declines Again...Tired Of Fake Black Leaders

























(Sheila Crump Johnson, Democrat, Co-founder of Black Entertainment Television, local Middleburg Business owner, Noted philanthropist and Entrepreneur, recently endorsed Republican Bob McDonnell in his campaign for governor.)





(Media folks assume most people know At-Large Charlotte City Council members/ 2009 Mayoral Candidates John Lassiter (Republican) and Anthony Foxx (Democrat). Experts say that's not the case at all.)







Dems ponder drop in black voter turnout


Democrats are bracing for a precipitous drop in black voter turnout next month and beyond.

Alarms are being rung about just how many African-Americans will vote without President Barack Obama on the ballot, and the New Jersey and Virginia governors’ races in three weeks will provide the first major test since the 2008 election.

A recent Washington Post survey estimated the black turnout in Virginia’s governor’s race at 12 percent, which would be about a 40 percent drop from last year’s general election. Other polling has shown both its and New Jersey’s black population unmoved about the off-year election.

The question at this point isn’t so much whether black voters will turn out at 2008 levels, but how big the drop will be — and then, whether it carries into the 2010 midterms.

Tom Jensen, a spokesman for the Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling, has been among the most outspoken. He said the high number of Democrats with districts that are significantly black means such a turnout shift could be disastrous for Democrats.

“If what looks like is going to happen in Virginia plays out on a national level, I do think Democrats will lose the House,” Jensen said.

“We really don’t find that many people who voted Democratic in 2008 are switching sides; they’re just becoming complacent,” he added. “And that’s particularly true with black Democrats, which is the party’s most dependable voter bloc.”

Virginia is about 20 percent black, and New Jersey is about 14 percent black. Both percentages are higher than the 12 percent national average. And in both states, polling shows the race could come down to the final days.

David Bositis, an expert on black turnout at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, said not too much should be read into the results on Nov. 3, because the two campaigns are unique. While Virginia Democrat Creigh Deeds has virtually no connection to the black community, he said, New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine (D) has made plenty of inroads with African-Americans over the years.

Whatever the case, he said, the stretch run in both states is sure to feature plenty of black outreach, and then the party will have to confront the problem going forward.

“It’s going to be a stretch to say that what happens in Virginia will, in any way, be telling about next year,” he said. “But it definitely is something they are going to be concerned about in terms of 2010.”

While others might view the state as a foreign political universe, though, the commonwealth features at least two Democratic freshmen who could train a keen eye on the turnout models in the governor’s race.

Reps. Tom Perriello and Glenn Nye both rode into Washington in districts that are nearly one-quarter black. Nye won by 5 percent, while Perriello won by fewer than 1,000 votes.

The third freshman Democrat in the state’s delegation, Rep. Gerry Connolly has a 10 percent African-American district. He said he, Nye and Perriello will be watching the results, but that it’s a yearly exercise in the state to re-evaluate the electorate.

He noted that not only are black voters expected to drop significantly, but so is another key Democratic voter group: young adults.

“That’s a huge change in the composition of the electorate. That’s not easily made up on the run,” Connolly said. “So, yeah, we’re watching the electorate, but this is not a new phenomenon in Virginia.”

Many other freshman Democrats come from districts with black populations similar in size to Nye’s and Perriello’s, including Alabama Reps. Bobby Bright and Parker Griffith, North Carolina Rep. Larry Kissell and Ohio Rep. Steve Driehaus. Many of the rest come from districts with about 10 percent black populations, like Connolly’s.

“It’s going to be hard to get African-Americans to vote without Obama, but there’s going to be lower turnout across the board,” said a consultant who works with candidates in the former group.

The limited evidence so far is a little frightening for Democrats. Apart from the voter models in Virginia’s governor’s race, Louisiana Democrats lost two December House races in significantly black districts — including one in majority-black New Orleans. And Georgia Democrats saw Senate nominee Jim Martin lose to Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) by 15 percentage points in a December runoff, after losing by just three points the month before.

All three losses were attributed, in significant part, to drops in black turnout.

Emory University Professor Merle Black said that, much like with Deeds and Corzine, it can depend on how much a candidate has to offer black voters, and that’s what Democrats will have to work on.

“There were efforts to turn them out [in the Senate runoff], but the main driving force is whether voters think candidates are going to do something for them,” Black said. “The difference between Obama and Martin was a chasm. The real election was in November.”


READER'S COMMENTS:

Ont thing liberals and democrats do not want to recognize is that Blacks vote for Black candidates and Black issues exclusively. Their block vote is something that democrats have "BOUGHT" through giving them something. When these voters finally realize that they have been taken for a ride, the love affair will be over. Blackwater Ken on 10/14/2009 at 09:14

Oh my God…blacks voting for black candidates regardless of the candidates experience or even criminal record (mayor Berry, Washington D.C.), I AM SHOCKED!! Blacks voting against even the teachings of their faiths and for the candidates that will enact programs to enslave another generation in the welfare snare?? Blacks voting (nearly 100%) for a man whose lineage is only partially African for president? I guess in this case the old "one drop" rule is ironically enforced these days by black Americans…for shame. Dr. M on 10/14/2009 at 10:00

As a mature (over 60) black voter, I'm sorry that Americans think that all of us have been fooled or bought off. I love this country. I love the fact that when we are wrong, we admit it. I have accepted the genuine apology of those who feel that slavery was wrong and then re-enslaved us with welfare. I am sorry that those in power believe that more welfare is the answer. Poison is poison, I hope our community learns to be self sufficient and free. Obama should be able to unite us. He seems more interested in uniting his power base. There are a lot of young black voters who were excited at the possibilities of a black president, who are now becoming cynical. You can't blame blacks for wanting hope. This is clearly not the hope we were looking for. grey deitrich on 10/14/2009 at 11:06

Neglecting one issue. Voter registration. More blacks and young voters registered in 2008, hence there will be more of them available to vote. Persons who have voted before are more likely to vote again. While turnout may be lower, it may not be as low as some are predicting. It will be interesting to watch. Al, KS on 10/14/2009 at 11:06

AA should and must turn out and defend President Obama's if we want to see his vision and policies enacted otherwise they shouldn't be complaining about Lardbaugh's racist vitriol. Because now is the easy part, the country I fear will become more obstructionist if the dastardly Repukes ever get a chance to gain any seats in the next election. They are a party of N-O, disaster (witness 8 years of Bush and GOOP control) and WARS, against Iran, Iraq, and all of Israel's enemies. Nazim Hussein on 10/14/2009 at 11:25

Wait 'till they find out the FREE health care isn't free. Discouraged on 10/14/2009 at 11:36

The playbook of the progressives. Stop free speech by name calling. Attack the person, not the opinion. No opinion is valid but mine. The posting would be funny if it wasn't so sad. Is there any hope of uniting? NH doesn't want it. No one else matters. Just as long as he gets what he wants. Like little children, take your ball and go home. Grey on 10/14/2009 at 11:40

Nazim,Thanks for the positive message of hope and change. I am sure your words of issue-driven intellect will pursuade thousands. Thanks for not engaging in bitter, vitriolic attacks not grounded in any principle other than ideological hatred. The Democrat Party is very fortunate to have you their side. Brian on 10/14/2009 at 11:45

It seems to me if white voters voted for white people the way black voters vote for black people, we would all be deemed racists. Blacks need to wake up and realize that they are being taken advantage of by the dumbocratic party. The Dums simply pay off the blacks to be their slave voters. Blacks wake up and refuse to be their lackeys any longer! Mark on 10/14/2009 at 11:51

Based on a billboard that I recently snapped a photo of, I pointed out an incredible example of just how accurate the claim that Democrats are fearful of how a drop off in the African-American vote will negatively effect their elections. The photo shows billboards purchased by New Jersey Democrat Governor Jon Corzine. They simply show a picture of President Obama with Corzine standing behind and to the side of him. The caption reads "Keep It Going". This billboard is being displayed in predominantlt Africa-American neighborhoods and it does nothing other than try to tie the unpopular, uninspiring Governor to the overwhelmingly popular President, who is obviously a particularly inspiring figure among African-Americans. Tieing one to popular figures is not new but Corzine has based his entire campaign on nothing other than Barack Obama. This billboard just demonstrates that fact all the more. Below, I am attempting to post the image of that billboard. I do not know if html will translate on this platform but I will try it. If it does not, you can follow the link below to see the billboard in question.http://politics247.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/new-jerseys-race-for-governor-an-unbelievably-pathetic-political-exercise/(If the html does not translate, please excuse the exposed code that will show up in its place) Kempite on 10/14/2009 at 12:15

The real path to health care reform should begin with tort reform. It's the lawyers that drive up health care cost. The behemoth insurance corporations you talk about make about 3 - 4% profit. When lawyers make tons of money by suing the health industry, who do you think pays? Adding millions of people to the health insurance policies who don't pay in. And running off good doctors that can make more money by becoming a pet doctor, is not the answer. It's all supply and demand. Low supply of doctors for a larger supply of customers will only drive the cost up. Force them to take less and they will move to greener pastures. MARK X on 10/14/2009 at 12:17

It amazes me that people think that Black voters are so ignorant. Since when do we ONLY go to the polls when there is a black candidate. For the record, ignorant people, regardless of race, make ignorant choices… Let's not run down the line of all the bad choices white people (especially our recent former president) have made and how those choices have affected our country. It's so easy to point at the actions of others while totally ignoring your own flaws. Democrats AND Republicans use their respective constituency as pawns in a super-selfish political game that usually helps very few. say what? on 10/14/2009 at 15:05

There is ANOTHER element that 'The Hill' and Democrats are forgetting. That is the elderly. They tend to vote more for Democrats because they got SUCKED into the trap of, "The GOP wants to cut your social security and medicare".Well? The Democrats ARE going to cut the elderly Medicare. And more and more seniors are SEEING that! And two things about seniors, 1. We go to bed early, 2. WE VOTE, in fact we count more in off year elections than any other group. Say GOODBYE to the Democrat hold in congress…The NIGHTMARE will be over Nov. 3, 2010. Old Guy on 10/14/2009 at 15:18






How much is race a factor in the Foxx - Lassiter race?

Just before Election Day, the race for Charlotte mayor appears all tied, according to two recent polls.

Republican John Lassiter and Democrat Anthony Foxx are tied at 45-45, according to a poll from Public Policy Polling in Raleigh. A poll from Cornerstone Solutions shows Lassiter with a 42-37 lead, but that is within the margin of error, meaning the poll shows "essentially a dead heat," said Chris Sinclair, a partner with Cornerstone.

The PPP poll broke down largely along racial lines. White voters back Lassiter 63-29 while Foxx leads among black voters 80-9. That suggests that the outcome could hinge on turnout, particularly the racial breakdown of people who go to the polls.

"If excitement about the possibility of the city having its first black Mayor since the '80s results in African Americans turning out at a higher rate than whites Foxx will win. But black turnout has tended to lag in local elections and if that turns out to be the case Lassiter is the likely winner," PPP's Tom Jensen says on his organization's blog.

PPP has done work for Democratic candidates, but was not hired by the Foxx campaign and has had one of the better track records among polling organizations over at least the past year.

Cornerstone, a GOP-leaning firm in Raleigh, has not been hired by either campaign either. Its poll showed Lassiter winning about 25 percent of likely black voters.


READER'S COMMENTS:

FULFILLMENT said: Wow. It really is sad how this nation appears to be segregating their votes to only specific individuals of a particular skin color. Shameful really.

FAVOR said: My vote my choice. Like it or not, I vote how I want and for whom I want. Fulfillment, you need to mind your business and stop worrying about others.

FLY-SWATTER said: This type of pedestrian thinking is keeping our society behind on many levels.

KARL said: Keith Larson had a great guest on today. He was a black man who wrote a book called "What White People Want to Know About Black People." In essence his position was that no matter what your race is, if you make a judgement/decision based solely on a person's skin color, you are a racist - plain and simple.

KELLY said: Karl, it's really not that simple. To truly be a racist, there inherently has to be some "power" aspect included. Racism is not merely hating another race. A true racist has to be able to assert some oppressive power over the race because of that hate. And by the way, love for one's own race does not inherently mean that person hates all others.




View Larger Map

Sources: The Hill, McClatchy Newspapers, Charlotte Observer, Public Policy Polling, Cornerstone Polls, Flickr, Youtube, Google Maps

Public Option Covers Only 2 Percent Of Uninsured?? CBO Weighs In

Cracks in the Public Option



(What does Pres. Obama really want in the Health Care Bill?)



(Was a weak Public Option doomed to fail?)




(Boehner outlines GOP's health care plan. In the GOP's weekly radio and Internet address, Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, says that the Democrats "recklessly pursue" a government takeover of the health care system and offers his party's alternative.)




Sources: MSNBC, The Ed Show, Countdown with Keith Olbermann

Scozzafava Suspends Campaign, Hoffman Gains Supporters...NY-23 Race



















(G.O.P. Nominee for the NY-23 Race drops out.)



Fred Thompson's commercial for Douglas Hoffman. FredPAC Supporters







Base sends GOP warning shot in NY-23



Republican Dede Scozzafava’s decision Saturday to drop out of the New York special congressional election gave conservatives a big win, but may present a challenge for Republicans heading into next year's mid-term elections.

The long-term implications from Scozzafava’s Halloween surprise will depend on what lessons Republicans take from the race, where Conservative Party nominee Doug Hoffman now seems poised to consolidate center-right support and win the seat previously held by Republican John McHugh, who resigned to become President Obama’s Secretary of the Army.

The message from national and New York conservatives is unambiguous, though: This was an angry, energized base telling the national party that an anything-for-a-majority approach by GOP leaders is unacceptable. They are serious and deeply concerned about what's going on in Washington.

While the Empire State's unique ballot rules and a Republican candidate to the left of the GOP mainstream helped open the door for Hoffman’s unlikely run, the national effect of this race may be to embolden more conservatives to take on party establishment-approved candidates who don't toe the idelogical line.

At issue is whether the GOP next year will be able to channel the electricity now coursing through the conservative grassroots to fuel Republican candidates or if the fervor that’s propelled Hoffman to the precipice of victory in a district he doesn’t even live in will continue to divide the party’s pragmatic and right wings.

“Over the long term, if we keep dividing up it may cost us,” said former Rep. Tom Davis, a Virginia moderate who helped build the GOP House majority as NRCC chairman. “You’ve got to stay under one tent and that’s got to mean accommodations on both sides.”

Former New York Rep. Tom Reynolds, also a previous NRCC Chairman, said that, inevitably, the party would need to run moderate contenders if it wanted to regain the majority.

“The question is, what is the future for moderates? We will have a future.”

“We can play checkmate forever and moderates can do next what conservatives did [to Scozzafava],” Davis added. “So this is something that the party is going to have to manage, keeping everybody under the same tent. These groups need each other.”

Davis and other Republicans said one way to prevent future splits within the party is to ensure that there is a fair and open nominating process in which voters can determine which GOP candidate they prefer.

“The age of party leaders picking people is over,” wrote former House Speaker and Scozzafava supporter Newt Gingrich in an email to POLITICO, alluding to Scozzafava’s having received the nomination by a vote of county party committee chairman.

Karl Rove said the local process in which the Republican was chosen and New York’s uniquely powerful Conservative Party made for an aberrant set of circumstances that would not likely be repeated around the country.

“When 11 people in a backroom pick among nine candidates, there are going to be hard feelings,” Rove said in a telephone interview, referring to the county chairs who tapped Scozzafava. “Most states don’t have third-parties as readily available and no other state has as cohesive and persistent a third party as the Conservative Party in New York.”

Rove noted that this is in part because in New York, ballots can be cast on third-party lines for major-party candidates who are also co-nominated by the smaller parties.

But other conservatives say the problem in both the New York contest and hampering Republicans more broadly is the tendency of GOP establishment leaders in Washington to get behind moderate candidates out of fear a purist conservative can’t win a general election.

"Hmmm, I thought the Era of Reagan was over?” wrote Rush Limbaugh in an email to POLITICO. “Who was it that said that? Oh yeah, the smart people on our side who told us the only way we could win was with moderate-liberal candidates like Scozzafava.”

Erick Erickson, who runs the popular conservative blog RedState, predicted future family fights and put the blame squarely at the feet of national party leaders, who he noted spent nearly $1 million to bolster a candidate who quit before Election Day.

“Thanks to Pete Sessions, Chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, not Doug Hoffman, there is a new inspiration for a third-party movement to challenge the GOP – a movement that will only help Democrats,” Erickson wrote Saturday. “Good men in the GOP are now going to be challenged in primaries because of the ill-will the NRCC has generated in New York’s 23rd Congressional District.”

Democrats, while acknowledging the difficulty they’d now have in picking up the New York seat on Tuesday, were quick to claim that Scozzafava’s decision proved that the GOP is split and leaderless.

“During August, Republicans thought they’d be able to harness the energy of the far-right, but the opposite has happened,” DCCC Chair Chris Van Hollen told POLITICO in a phone interview. “The far-right, tea-bag party is leading there Republican Party around by the nose.”

Van Hollen cited the New York race as “exhibit A” that the GOP has been taken over by the right-wing.

“The Republican candidate was effectively forced out of the race by a third-party candidate funded by the far-right,” he said, adding: “If we see this same phenomenon play out then it certainly could help Democratic candidates next year because we’d be facing a much more divided opposition.”

Democrats also moved Saturday to cast Scozzafava’s move as a sign that centrists had no place in the GOP.

“The true leaders of the Republican Party like Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Tim Pawlenty have said to all moderates and independents: ‘When it comes to being part of our party you need not apply,’” said DNC communications director Brad Woodhouse, citing individuals who got behind Hoffman.

Another top Democratic strategist said, “It's clear that even the GOP conference isn't united around winning, there are ideological breaks,” noting that the NRCC had tapped about a quarter of their cash in the bank for a candidate who didn’t even have endorsements from a chunk of the House GOP.

“The Republicans now have to deal with an empowered, emboldened, and well-funded far-right,” said this Democrat.

Asked if they were worried about what the New York example may mean for other primaries next year, a House GOP Leadership aide involved in the special election said: “Is there concern? There is always concern.”

But, this official said, the party had been careful to select conservative contenders in most cases.

“Of our 45 candidates, I would note that most are conservatives.”

And Rove made the case that the sort of tea-party activists who flocked to New York’s sprawling North Country to aid Hoffman are not composed of right-wingers who spend their days reading conservative blogs and closely following politics.

“They’re really wired up right now about deficits, spending and the expansion of government,” he said. “A great many may identify as conservatives, but they don’t fit the traditional model. The thing that makes them unpredictable is that they’re mostly fresh actors on the scene.”

So, Rove said, the GOP must find “candidates who can channel anti-Obama, anti-Washington sentiment in constructive ways.”

He suggested having to choose between ideological purity and projecting a welcoming image to independents represented a false choice.

Rove cited Virginia Republican gubernatorial nominee Bob McDonnell, who enjoys a commanding lead in the polls in a state Obama captured last year, as the type of candidate who has been able to tap into the populist frustrations on the right and center-right without alienating the sort of pivotal moderates who can often swing elections.

“He’s a conservative but has offered a positive, optimistic vision of small government,” Rove said. “And he has come across with a pleasing, moderate demeanor.”

Even as they take stock of what Scozzafava’s withdrawal means, most Republicans are seeing only upside in what seems likely to happen next week in the three closely-watched off-year races, all in localities that Obama won last year, Virginia, New Jersey and New York-23.

“The big story Tuesday will be the collapse of the Democratic brand in three states as Democratic nominees run ten to twenty points behind Obama’s vote a year ago,” wrote Gingrich, who came under a wave of criticism for his support of Scozzafava.

But even as they start to savor what could be a clean sweep, Republicans also must be mindful of what a Hoffman win could set off.

“I think it will empower tea party activists” to look for moderate scalps in other districts,” fretted one senior GOP strategist with national campaign experience. “The question is, Will we go through a period in the party where a great purge begins?” this strategist asked. “If it spreads into that, this will be a very bad day.”

Davis said the party was now confronted with what he termed “a good problem to have.”

“We need to capture this lightning in a bottle,” he said of the conservative energy. “They’re now the energy base of the party. But you can’t let them run the show or you’re going to lose all the independents.”





Scozzafava bows out of NY-23 race


Republican Dede Scozzafava announced Saturday that she is suspending her campaign in the Nov. 3 House special election in New York, a dramatic development that increases the GOP's chances of winning the contentious and closely-watched race.

"In recent days, polls have indicated that my chances of winning this election are not as strong as we would like them to be. The reality that I've come to accept is that in today's political arena, you must be able to back up your message with money—and as I've been outspent on both sides, I've been unable to effectively address many of the charges that have been made about my record,” she said in a statement.

“It is increasingly clear that pressure is mounting on many of my supporters to shift their support. Consequently, I hereby release those individuals who have endorsed and supported my campaign to transfer their support as they see fit to do so. I am and have always been a proud Republican.”

Her decision came as a Siena Research Institute poll released Saturday confirmed that her support has all but collapsed over the last month. In her statement, Scozzafava acknowledged that while her name will continue to appear on the ballot, “victory is unlikely.”

The Siena poll conducted Oct. 27-29, in line with other recent polls, showed Democrat Bill Owens holding a razor-thin lead over Conservative Party nominee Doug Hoffman, 36 percent to 35 percent.

Scozzafava trailed far behind at 20 percent, with 9 percent of voters still undecided.

The National Republican Congressional Committee will now be throwing its support to Hoffman, after endorsing Scozzafava and deriding the Conservative Party candidate in statements throughout much of the race.

The fortunes of Scozzafava and Hoffman had nearly flipped over the last month as national attention focused on the upstate New York race, which has become a rallying point for grassroots conservatives.

Conservatives have asserted that Scozzafava, a GOP establishment-backed state assemblywoman who supports abortion rights and gay marriage, is far too liberal for them to support and numerous prominent GOP figures have recently endorsed Hoffman.

Scozzafava, who in the beginning of the month was the frontrunner with a 7-point lead over Owens in an Oct. 1 Siena poll, saw her support crater while Hoffman surged from a distant third place to a virtual tie in the polls with Owens.

With Scozzafava slipping in the polls and her candidacy dividing the GOP, national Republicans began hedging their bets on her campaign and have recently signaled that they would no longer actively resist Hoffman’s candidacy.

National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Texas) told POLITICO Thursday that he would welcome Hoffman “with open arms.” On Friday, Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele told POLITICO that a Hoffman victory is essentially a Republican Party victory.

“You’ve got two Republicans running in that race. My upside is that one of them will likely win,” Steele said. “We want to be supporting the one that wins.”

“He would be very welcome, with open arms,” Sessions told POLITICO in an interview off the House floor.

The decision to suspend her campaign is a boost for Hoffman, who already had the support of 50 percent of GOP voters, according to a newly-released Siena poll, and is now well-positioned to win over the 25 percent of Republicans who had been sticking with Scozzafava.

Republicans applauded Scozzafava’s decision Saturday.

“Dede Scozzafava has placed her Party and her principles over politics and position for years,” said New York GOP chairman Ed Cox in a statement. “For those who know her, her actions today come as no surprise because they show real leadership. It is testament to her character and strength under difficult circumstances.”

Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser, whose group has organized an independent pro-Hoffman grassroots ground program and spent over $125,000 in the race said, "Dede Scozzafava’s courage and strength allowed her to make the choice to let the strongest candidate in her party move forward, and to serve the voters of the 23rd District.''

The NRCC released a joint statement from House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), House Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and Sessions, indicating that the party will now throw its support behind Hoffman.

"As the House stands on the cusp of the forthcoming vote on a trillion-dollar healthcare reform measure, it is vital that we unify behind a candidate that will support reining in massive government spending and work with Republicans in Congress to restore fiscal sanity and propose thoughtful measures to get our nation’s economy on the right track," the statement read. “With Assemblywoman Scozzafava suspending her campaign, we urge voters to support Doug Hoffman’s candidacy in New York’s 23rd Congressional District.

“We look forward to welcoming Doug Hoffman into the House Republican Conference as we work together for the good of our nation.”

One Republican strategist familiar with the race said Scozzafava’s departure from the race significantly increased the GOP’s chances of holding the seat left vacant by the resignation of GOP Rep. John McHugh.

“Republicans and Independents will now be able to unite behind one candidacy. Dede's last base of support was among Republican loyalists. They likely overwhelmingly switch to Hoffman,” the strategist said. “As a practical matter, this lets the GOTV operations of two campaigns merge into one - makes a huge mechanical difference in a special election.”

Hoffman echoed that sentiment in a statement Saturday.

“This morning’s events prove what we have said for the last week; this campaign is a horserace between me and Nancy Pelosi’s handpicked candidate, Bill Owens. At this moment, the Democratic Party, the Working Families Party, ACORN, Big Labor and pro-abortion groups are flooding the district with troops and they are flooding the airwaves with a million dollars worth of negative ads. They are throwing mud; they are trying to stop me,” he said. “It’s time for us to send a message to Washington—we’re sick and tired of big-spending, high-taxing, career politicians and by voting for me on Tuesday you will send that message loud and clear.”

Recognizing that a two-candidate race increased the chances that Republicans would hold on to the seat, a senior Democrat said the party will work to get Scozzafava to endorse Owens in an attempt to pick up some of her moderate supporters.

"If we don't get her on board we lose," said the Democrat.

Another senior Democrat said it the situation is still too fluid to come to any conclusions.

"Unpredictable this late – she's a very well known elected official and she remains on the ballot so she'll likely pull some votes but it's hard to say how many," the official said.




A profile in courage, it isn't - GOP latecomers hop on Hoffman bandwagon

As conservative activists scored a political scalp, mainstream Republicans wasted no time in grasping at the coat tails of Conservative Doug Hoffman.

The much-watched off-year special election in upstate New York's 23rd Congressional District that had Republicans scrambling to pick the right side turned into a stampede rightward Saturday, as stragglers rushed to endorse Hoffman after Republican Dede Scozzafava suspended a campaign that she appeared to have little chance of winning.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who’d previously warned that backing Hoffman in the NY-23 House race amounted to a “purge” of the GOP, told POLITICO Saturday morning that he was now endorsing the conservative, "and believe[s] everyone who wants to create jobs with lower taxes and to control spending and deficits should vote for Hoffman Tuesday."

The National Republican Congressional Committee, which had slammed the Conservative contender in a seemingly endless series of press releases, declared that they too now “look forward to welcoming Doug Hoffman into the House Republican Conference as we work together for the good of our nation.”

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, who said in recent weeks that he was standing by Scozzafava, announced that “effective immediately, the RNC will endorse and support the conservative candidate in the race, Doug Hoffman,” and that he was re-gearing the party apparatus to boost Hoffman in the final days of the contest.

All three statements came within an hour of Scozzafava’s announcement.

Former Arkansas gov. and 2012 GOP hopeful Mike Huckabee — who alienated many conservative backers of his 2008 White House bid by conspicuously declining to throw his support behind Hoffman — followed with a muted statement, written in the third person and signed Huck PAC: "We commend Dede Scozzafava for stepping aside and in light of her very unselfish announcement, we join the RNC and other Republicans in urging support for Doug Hoffman."

Saturday’s rush caps a week of late-in-the-race Hoffman endorsements from establishment Republicans seizing the chance to score points with conservative purists, and back a winner at the same time.

While Hoffman’s early supporters cast their endorsements as a decision to place principle above party, for many – especially those seeking higher office – the conservative vs. moderate proxy battle provided a low-risk opportunity to back a candidate surging in the polls while at the same time banking capital with right-wingers.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry, facing a heated challenge from Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, declared in an e-mail to his supporters this week, “Electing Doug Hoffman will send a clear message that cannot be denied: conservatives must stand on principle.”

Oklahoma Rep. Mary Fallin, competing for the GOP nod in her run for governor, wrote Hoffman this week that his campaign, “has reminded Americans everywhere that principles come before party affiliation.”

In his Hoffman endorsement, Kansas Rep. Todd Tiahrt, engaged in a heated Senate GOP primary against fellow Rep. Jerry Moran, announced, “The Republican Party is either going to return to the party of fiscal responsibility and consistent conservative principles as it was under Ronald Reagan or it will continue down the path of ‘sporadic moderation.’”

Not to be outdone, Moran gave Hoffman his seal of approval a day later.

“It’s all about self-interest in most cases,” explained University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato. “NY-23 has become a powerful symbol for the right, and any candidate who is trying to stay out is finding neutrality to be as difficult as nation-states did in World War II.”

Sabato compared the party’s backlash to its own nominee to the early 1990s response to David Duke’s runs, when Republicans in Louisiana and nationally turned their back on the white supremacist.

“This is the most remarkable aspect of the entire contest,” Sabato said. “There is a national footrace by elected Republican officials and candidates to abandon the official GOP congressional nominee.”

“Everyone is trying to use their endorsements for political purposes,” added Carl Forti, a veteran GOP operative who has upstate New York ties. “It’s like, who’s going to be the last guy to the party?”

As polls showed Hoffman pulling ahead and Scozzafava at best a spoiler, latecomers raced to latch on to the new frontrunner's coattails. Former New York Governor George Pataki, a moderate Republican rumored to be considering a senate run next year, announced his support in a tepid statement on Friday, less than 24 hours before Hoffman cleared the right side of the field.

Former congressman and GOP gubernatorial hopeful Rick Lazio, who’s best known for his spectacularly botched 2001 senate run against Hillary Clinton, joined the Hoffman camp after the question was resolved – about an hour after Scozzafava announced she was suspending her campaign.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who irked conservatives earlier this month, when he admitted he hadn’t been following the New York race, reversed course earlier this week, saying Hoffman “understands the federal government needs to quit spending so much, will vote against tax increases, and protect key values like the right to vote in private in union elections.”

Also belatedly picking a side this past week were two House Republicans facing primaries from the right and looking to cover that flank: Missouri Rep. Todd Akin and Indiana Rep. Mark Souder.

“I realize that, to capture the majority in Congress, not all Republicans can be as conservative as I am,” said Souder, who is facing a challenge from a conservative, tea party-inspired opponent.

But, Souder said, “Not all Republicans in Congress feel power is more important than basic principles.”

“They’re trying to brand themselves nationally and ingratiate themselves with that wing of the party,” said Tom Davis, a former chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee.

“It’s not brave politics,” one former New York GOP leader said this week. “It makes for an easy call for politicians to jump on the conservative nominee.”

New Hampshire Attorney General Kelly Ayotte, a moderate Republican who is running for Senate and who is facing the prospect of a challenge from the right, also eventually endorsed Hoffman, saying Friday that, “we must have pro-growth economic policies that will create jobs."

Even as their campaign encountered strong resistance from conservatives, Scozzafava allies say they were taken aback by the hemorrhaging of GOP establishment support to Hoffman.

“It’s almost like we have two parties now. Is the NRCC going to be relevant in the future?” one person close to the Scozzafava campaign remarked late this week. “This is the strangest thing I have ever seen.”

“I don’t know what to make of this thing, to be honest. There are so many angles to this thing. It’s wild.”

But as Republicans broke ranks to back Hoffman, there is significant concern within the party leadership over the precedent it sets for potential disunity within GOP in the future.

“If there is anything to be lost, it would be within the party structure,” said Forti. “This is setting a precedent for the party for the future which will allow the party to be torn apart.”

“It is every man for themselves,” lamented another Republican operative. “There is clearly no cohesion.”




Where Do Scozzafava's Voters Go?

Pollster.com’s Mark Blumenthal flags a previously unreported crosstab from the Siena Research Institute survey: 64 percent of Scozzafava voters in the survey identified as Republicans, while only 19 percent identified with the Democratic party.

As Blumenthal notes, that makes it awfully tough for Owens to pick up much support in the aftermath of Scozzafava's campaign suspension. The Republicans who stuck with Scozzafava in the Siena survey fit into three rough categories: 1) Watertown-area voters who she’s represented in the state Assembly and were with her the whole way; 2) party-line voters who stuck with her out of devotion to the GOP; 3) true Rockefeller Republicans who blanche at Hoffman’s conservatism.

Of those three categories, Owens is unlikely to make inroads with the first two groups. His only hope is to peel off the moderates who view Hoffman as too conservative – and it seems like they’re not thrilled with Democrat Bill Owens, either. The Siena poll showed Owens viewed as unfavorably among Scozzafava supporters (50 percent unfavorable) as Hoffman was (57 percent unfavorable).

So with Republicans now rallying around Conservative party candidate Doug Hoffman, and the vast majority of Scozzafava backers associating themselves with the GOP, it’s a challenging road to victory for Owens.




View Larger Map

Sources: Politico, MSNBC, National Journal, Pollster.com, Wikipedia, Youtube, Google Maps

Lassiter Maintains Slight Lead Over Foxx...Dirty Politics Didn't Work
























(Media folks assume most people know At-Large Charlotte City Council members/ 2009 Mayoral Candidates John Lassiter (Republican) and Anthony Foxx (Democrat). Experts say that's not the case at all.)






Lassiter, Foxx Horserace


A Public Policy Polling poll shows Republican John Lassiter and Democrat Anthony Foxx tied 45 to 45 in next Tuesday’s mayoral election. This is the closest mayoral race Charlotte has seen in years as Mayor Pat McCrory won all seven of his terms pretty handily. Demographically, Lassiter leads among white voters 63 to 29 and Foxx leads among black voters 80 to 9. 59% have a favorable view of Lassiter while 52% have a favorable view of Foxx.

A Cornerstone Solutions poll shows Lassiter leading Foxx 42 to 37 with a margin of error of plus or minus five points, which for all intents and purposes makes this a tied race as well.

PPP is a Democrat pollster and Cornerstone Solutions is a Republican pollster, so wading through a bit of the bias that could be present, I think Lassiter has a slight edge over Foxx going into Tuesday, which is what I’ve been predicting pretty much since both candidates were formally declared.






Charlotte Mayor's race gets heated in final days


The race for mayor in Charlotte has been cool, if not downright civil -- until now.

Republican John Lassiter called a morning news conference to complain about a mailer sent out that links him to wealthy developers at the expense of city homeowners.

"I think this is trying to reflect on my character and I take that as a personal affront," Lassiter told reporters in the lobby of the Government Center.

Lassiter estimates the mailing went to thousands of Democrats and unaffiliated voters.

The mailer was paid for and sent out by the state Democratic Party, headquartered in Raleigh.

Lassiter did not directly accuse his opponent Anthony Foxx of involvement but said, "This piece of mail has no mention of my opponent and states that no candidate or candidate's committee approved the content. Maybe."

A spokesperson for the Democratic Party could not say how much the mailing cost or how many fliers were sent out.

Kerra Bolton, a senior advisor did issue a statement saying Lassiter's comments "are a distraction from the truth." Bolton went on to say, "Lassiter knows that if he cries negative politics, no one will look at his record. All we're saying is that it's time that we do."

Late Friday afternoon, Foxx told Newschannel 36, "John doesn't have to worry about me attacking him personally because I never would."

The Democratic Party said Foxx had no role in putting the mailer together or sending it out. Foxx told NewsChannel 36 he had not seen a copy of it before it went out.

"I had no knowledge of that flier at all," he said.





NC Democrats "Dirty Politics" Mailing heats up Charlotte Mayor's race

Five days before the election, Republican mayoral candidate John Lassiter Friday lashed out at a state Democratic Party mailing that he said injected negative politics into what had been a civil campaign.

He called on Democratic rival Anthony Foxx to ask the state party to take itself out of the race.

"We have been applauded for the refreshingly clean campaign," he told a news conference. "The tone, the rhetoric and the content has suddenly changed."

Lassiter was responding to a Democratic Party mailer that apparently went to thousands of voters. It says Lassiter sides with developers, "hanging homeowners out to dry."

"Lassiter's developer donors get the royal treatment," it says. "Lassiter has taken thousands of dollars from big developers and then supported their agenda of unrestrained sprawl."

The line echoes criticism Foxx made in a TV debate Wednesday and amplifies his complaints that Lassiter is beholden to contributions from real estate and development interests.

An Observer analysis showed Lassiter has received $104,000 from such interests, 20 percent of what he raised. They gave Fox $28,000, or 5 percent of his campaign money.

Lassiter expressed skepticism about the mailing's claim to have no ties to Foxx or his campaign.

"This piece of mail ... states that no candidate's committee approved the content. Maybe."

In a statement Friday, Foxx said, "I am proud of the positive campaign we have run, and I have no intention of changing course now.

"I particularly appreciate Mr. Lassiter's acknowledgement that I had no role in sending any independent mailer."

State Democratic Party spokeswoman Kerra Bolton said the Foxx campaign had nothing to do with the mailing. She said she didn't know how much the party spent or how many mailings were sent.

"The question isn't just the money he's raised from developers," she said, "the issue is the actions that he took while on city council."

Lassiter compared the mailing to attack ads in national and statewide races, including the 1990 Senate race between Democrat Harvey Gantt and Republican Jesse Helms.

"This is an attempt to negatively attack me by folks who aren't in the community," he said, "using tactics we have not seen in this city."

Lassiter said he has refrained from personal attacks.

"Despite encouragement, I have avoided talking about the employment status of my opponent or his family," he said, an apparent reference to a job Foxx's wife got last year at the Department of Social Services. Some critics called it cronyism.

But county commissioners said this spring they were satisfied the hire of Samara Foxx and two other workers followed county policies and procedures.




DSS hires politically-connected during "Freeze"

While Mecklenburg County is cutting some jobs, the county's Department of Social Services has been hiring.

The NewsChannel 36 I-Team discovered DSS has hired 30-40 positions, many of them managers and several filled with candidates who have political connections.

The DSS hiring freeze was in effect when Mary E. Wilson joined the department as director last July. But in the name of reorganizing the department, DSS has hired dozens of new employees, including the daughter of Charlotte's police chief, the daughter of a Superior Court judge and the wife of a city councilman who is running for mayor.

DSS hired Samara Foxx, the wife of at-large councilman and mayoral candidate Anthony Foxx, last July.

Her salary as Division Director II was $100,000 a year.

Foxx's hiring raised questions among some DSS staffers since the position was posted on July 17 and taken down the very next day.

For months, the I-Team has asked DSS in writing for public records showing when the job was posted. At first a department spokeswoman told us that legal counsel had advised her the records were confidential personnel records. After our repeated requests for only the public portion of the records, DSS sent us a two-page letter detailing the job posting.

The letter says in part, "The creation of Ms. Foxx's position was an initial step in the re-organization of DSS, which was approved by the county's executive team."

Charlotte-Meck. County Commissioners Chair Jennifer Roberts told us by phone from Washington, "I did not realize that opening was posted for such a short period of time. It's concerning. We pride ourselves on being open, transparent, equal and fair. I can't imagine why the posting period would not be available to reporters."

After DSS Director Mary E. Wilson gave Samara Foxx the job, Wilson's husband Cornell donated $4,000 -- the legal maximum -- to Anthony Foxx's mayoral campaign.

Foxx Campaign Manager Bruce Clark said Wilson and Foxx had worked together in the past but declined comment on the hiring, saying it was a county decision.

Foxx is not the only person with political connections to be hired by DSS since the "hiring freeze" went into effect.

Public records show DSS hired Hollye Monroe, the daughter of CMPD Police Chief Rodney Monroe, on Jan. 14 as a Management Analyst. Her salary: $46,613.60 per year. Our phone messages to Monroe's public information officer and chief of staff were not returned.

DSS also hired Tracey Evans, the daughter of Superior Court Judge Yvonne Mims-Evans, on Feb. 11 as a Social Services Manager at a salary of $57,380.95 per year. Judge Mims-Evans told us in a brief telephone interview that she had nothing to do with the hire.

County Manager Harry Jones e-mailed us a two-line response saying, "These individuals were hired within our policies and without regard to who their parents or spouses are."

Neither Jones nor DSS Director Mary E. Wilson responded to our requests for an on-camera interview.

But County Commissioner Bill James says the hiring smacks of political patronage and in his words "just smells bad." Commissioner James says the hiring should be investigated.




View Larger Map

Sources: Charlotte Conservative.com, Carolina Politics Online, Public Policy Polling, Cornerstone Polls, McClatchy Newspapers, Charlotte Observer, WCNC, NC Dems Party, Youtube, Google Maps

"This Is It!" Pleases Michael's Fans...The King Of Pop Is Still Missed

"This Is It" Preview. Fan say the film delivers.




Jackson film "This Is It" generates big buzz





Behind the scenes of "This Is It"





Michael Jackson teaches the dance steps to one of his performances.




The team behind "This Is It"





View Larger Map


Sources: MSNBC, Google Maps

Karzi's Rival To Boycott Run Off Election..Taliban's Comeback



















(Abdullah to boycott Afghan runoff? Afghan presidential challenger Abdullah Abdullah may boycott next week's runoff against incumbent Hamid Karzai. NBC's Richard Engel reports.)



(How the Taliban made a comeback?)






Karzai rival will boycott runoff, aide says


Afghan presidential challenger Abdullah Abdullah plans to boycott next week's runoff against President Hamid Karzai and instead call for postponement of the vote until the spring, his campaign manager said Saturday.

"As of now" Abdullah plans to call for a boycott during a press conference Sunday, Satar Murad said.

Abdullah will also call for an interim government to run the country until a new, fair vote can be held, Murad said.

The runoff was called after massive fraud in the first round vote on Aug. 20.

A boycott would severely undermine a vote intended to affirm the Afghan government's credibility.

The political stalemate in Kabul comes as President Barack Obama has been meeting with his advisers to try to determine U.S. strategy in Afghanistan, including troop levels. A weakened Afghan government will make it harder for Obama to get public support for his efforts.

October has been the deadliest month for U.S. forces since the 2001 invasion to oust the Taliban. The Afghan war has intensified this year as militants have stepped up attacks and more troops have arrived trying to stabilize the country.

Abdullah, who was once Karzai's foreign minister, put forward several conditions this week to avoid a repeat of the massive fraud of the August presidential election, including the replacement of the top election official and the suspension of several ministers.

He set Saturday as the deadline for his demands to be met.

Breakdown in talks

A Westerner close to talks between the two sides said their agenda also included a power-sharing proposal by the challenger and cited both Karzai and Abdullah as saying that talks broke down Friday, prompting Abdullah to decide on a boycott of the Nov. 7 runoff.

An Afghan figure close to Abdullah said Saturday that the boycott decision came after a contentious and fruitless meeting Thursday over Abdullah's conditions for a runoff.

Both spoke on condition of anonymity, saying that the announcement must come from Abdullah himself.

The Afghan said a boycott was certain, and that Abdullah would likely tell his supporters to simply stay home during the vote.

Afghan electoral law says that any vote cast for a candidate who withdraws will not be counted. However, neither electoral nor the constitution specifically address the issue of a candidate who does not formally withdraw but urges supporters to boycott the polls.

A spokesman for the Afghan election commission said that it is too late for Abdullah to officially withdraw and that a boycott will not prevent the runoff from going forward.

"The election will be held and all procedures will go as normal," Noor Mohammad Noor said.

A Personal Choice

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said a runoff with only one candidate would not necessarily threaten the legitimacy of the process.

"We see that happen in our own country where, for whatever combination of reasons, one of the candidates decides not to go forward," Clinton told reporters in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. "I don't think it has anything to do with the legitimacy of the election. It's a personal choice which may or may not be made."

The runoff election in Afghanistan became necessary after widespread fraud in the first round of voting in August resulted in hundreds of thousands of Karzai's ballots being invalidated, pushing him below the required 50 percent margin to win. Concerns have been raised about a possible repetition of the ballot-box stuffing and distorted tallies in the second round.

Abdullah complained Monday that there were no assurances that the November vote would be fairer than the first balloting and demanded that the head of the Karzai-appointed Independent Election Commission, Azizullah Lodin, be fired.

Even if Abdullah withdraws, it's unclear whether Karzai could be proclaimed the winner or if the runoff would still have to proceed, either with Abdullah on the ballot or the third-place finisher, lawmaker Ramazan Bashardost.

A spokesman for the Afghan election commission said that it is too late for Abdullah to officially withdraw and that a boycott will not prevent the runoff from going forward.

"The election will be held and all procedures will go as normal," Noor Mohammad Noor said.

U.S. officials have been concerned that the second round would expose Afghan civilians to attack by Taliban militants opposed to the election.

Last Wednesday, Taliban attackers killed five U.N. employees — including one American — and three Afghans in a brazen assault on a residential hotel housing international staff in the heart of Kabul. The three attackers also died.

Afghan intelligence chief Amrullah Saleh said Afghan authorities had advance information that a Taliban attack in Kabul was in the works but was expected it during rush hour, and officials were unsure of the target.

Instead, the attackers struck just before dawn. Saleh said eight people had been arrested for their roles in the attack, including an Afghan imam who was apprehended when he arrived by plane in Jiddah, Saudi Arabia.

Saleh said the detainees told interrogators the attackers came from Pakistan's Swat Valley and that the al-Qaida mastermind fled across the border into Pakistan's lawless tribal area, where the al-Qaida leadership is believed hiding.

Casualties have been on the rise since President Barack Obama sent more troops to confront the Taliban.

On Saturday, the NATO-led force announced the latest coalition death in the war. The Canadian Defense Department said the casualty was a 24-year-old Canadian national killed in a bomb blast outside the southern city of Kandahar on Friday.





Pakistan says soldiers close in on Taliban bases

Pakistani soldiers closed in on two major Taliban strongholds in South Waziristan on Saturday, officials said, as government jets pounded insurgent hide-outs and the prime minister said the country had no choice but to defeat the militants.

"We are at war," Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani told a press conference in the city of Peshawar, where a militant car bombing a few days ago killed more than 115 people. "Our civil leadership, our military leadership and political leadership ... we are on the same page that we have to fight the militancy. We do not have any other option because their intentions are to take over" the country.

Pakistan, which years ago helped nurture the Taliban's rise in neighboring Afghanistan, is now involved in an escalating fight with the militants. Two weeks ago, the government launched the offensive in the South Waziristan tribal region, viewed as the main stronghold in the country of both the Taliban and al-Qaida. The offensive has drawn retaliatory militant attacks across Pakistan.

On Saturday, seven paramilitary soldiers driving through the Khyber tribal area were killed in a roadside bomb planted by suspected Taliban militants, said local official Ghulam Farooq Khan. The area is famed for the Khyber pass, the main route for ferrying supplies to U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Mehsud targeted

That attack came as Pakistani jets bombed three hide-outs of Pakistani Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud in the Orkazai tribal region, killing at least eight militants and wounding several others, intelligence officials said. Another airstrike, about 40 miles from the first and near the Afghan border, killed seven militants in the Kurram tribal region, the officials said.

The veracity of the reports could not be confirmed. Authorities have effectively sealed off the tribal areas, semiautonomous regions where the central government in Islamabad has long had only minimal authority, and it is all but impossible to independently verifying such claims.

Pakistan appears eager to prove that it is moving aggressively against the militants after a three-day visit earlier this week by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Clinton said she found it "hard to believe" that no one in Pakistan's government knew where al-Qaida's leadership was hiding and warned that once the current offensive is finished, "the Pakistanis will have to go on to try to root out other terrorist groups, or we're going to be back facing the same threats."

American officials have long said al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and his top lieutenants accused in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks operate out of the region along Pakistan's border with Afghanistan — a region that includes South Waziristan.

Pakistan has publicly reacted to Clinton's chiding with a mixture of acceptance and resentment.

"If we are honest, we cannot deny that much of what she said was true," The News newspaper said in a Saturday editorial, but added that U.S. policies — like foreign policy anywhere — stem from self-interest.

"There is nothing noble about Washington's focus on Islamabad. But it is possible that at this particular moment in history the interests of both nations coincide," the newspaper said.

Nerve center reached

In South Waziristan, the army said it had surrounded the key Taliban stronghold of Sararogha on three sides and had reached the outskirts of Makeen, which it called "the nerve center" of the Pakistani Taliban.

Government soldiers had killed a total of 33 militants over the past 24 hours, discovered a factory for making roadside bombs and seized a handful of weapons, the army said in its Saturday statement.

Pakistani forces were facing stiff resistance in the village of Kaniguram, with soldiers fighting house to house and taking mortar and sniper fire as they searched for more militants.

Four Pakistani soldiers had been injured in fighting in South Waziristan over the past day, the report said.

In Karachi, police arrested three suspected militants Saturday and seized 65 pounds of explosives and other weaponry. The men were involved in kidnappings for ransom and bank robberies to help fund the Taliban, said senior police officer Fayyaz Khan.

In North West Frontier Province, the local government said it was reopening schools starting Monday, two weeks after schools across the country closed when the offensive set off a string of retaliatory attacks.

"There are (general) security threats, but we will fight back," Mian Iftikhar Husain, the provincial information minister, told reporters in Peshawar. Most of Pakistan's schools reopened last week.




View Larger Map

Sources: MSNBC, Google Maps

Charlotte Observer Encourages Divisive Racial Politics In Mayor's Race ...Its Going To Backfire
























(Media folks assume most people know At-Large Charlotte City Council members/ 2009 Mayoral Candidates John Lassiter (Republican) and Anthony Foxx (Democrat). Experts say that's not the case at all.)








How much is race a factor in the Foxx - Lassiter race?


Just before Election Day, the race for Charlotte mayor appears all tied, according to two recent polls.

Republican John Lassiter and Democrat Anthony Foxx are tied at 45-45, according to a poll from Public Policy Polling in Raleigh. A poll from Cornerstone Solutions shows Lassiter with a 42-37 lead, but that is within the margin of error, meaning the poll shows "essentially a dead heat," said Chris Sinclair, a partner with Cornerstone.

The PPP poll broke down largely along racial lines. White voters back Lassiter 63-29 while Foxx leads among black voters 80-9. That suggests that the outcome could hinge on turnout, particularly the racial breakdown of people who go to the polls.

"If excitement about the possibility of the city having its first black Mayor since the '80s results in African Americans turning out at a higher rate than whites Foxx will win. But black turnout has tended to lag in local elections and if that turns out to be the case Lassiter is the likely winner," PPP's Tom Jensen says on his organization's blog.

PPP has done work for Democratic candidates, but was not hired by the Foxx campaign and has had one of the better track records among polling organizations over at least the past year.

Cornerstone, a GOP-leaning firm in Raleigh, has not been hired by either campaign either. Its poll showed Lassiter winning about 25 percent of likely black voters.

Readers' comments:

FULFILLMENT said: Wow. It really is sad how this nation appears to be segregating their votes to only specific individuals of a particular skin color. Shameful really.

FAVOR said: My vote my choice. Like it or not, I vote how I want and for whom I want. Fulfillment, you need to mind your business and stop worrying about others.

FLY-SWATTER said: This type of pedestrian thinking is keeping our society behind on many levels.

KARL said: Keith Larson had a great guest on today. He was a black man who wrote a book called "What White People Want to Know About Black People." In essence his position was that no matter what your race is, if you make a judgement/decision based solely on a person's skin color, you are a racist - plain and simple.

KELLY said: Karl, it's really not that simple. To truly be a racist, there inherently has to be some "power" aspect included. Racism is not merely hating another race. A true racist has to be able to assert some oppressive power over the race because of that hate. And by the way, love for one's own race does not inherently mean that person hates all others.




View Larger Map

Sources: McClatchy Newspapers, Charlotte Observer, WCNC, NC Dem Party, Public Policy Polling, Cornerstone Polls, Charmeck.org, Youtube, Google Maps

Madoff Is Surprised He Wasn't Caught Earlier...Had The SEC Eating Out Of His Hands



















Madoff: "I had too much credibility with SEC"


As Bernard Madoff sat in jail a few months after pleading guilty to fraud, he sounded faintly boastful.

The only problem with officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission's Washington headquarters, he said, is that he had "too much credibility with them and they dismissed" the idea that he was scheming people out of billions of dollars.

A document released Friday details a prison interview conducted June 17 by the SEC inspector general in which Madoff says he had the impression that "it never entered the SEC's mind that it was a Ponzi scheme."

Madoff seemed convinced SEC staff did not suspect him, despite the agency's numerous probes of his business. He said in the interview that the SEC examiners "never asked" for basic records to corroborate his operations.

The disgraced financier also confided that he didn't bring an attorney with him when he testified in an inquiry by the SEC's enforcement division because he believed he didn't need one — and he was trying to fool the government investigators into thinking he had nothing to hide.

The details emerged in a summary of Inspector General David Kotz's interview with Madoff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, released along with hundreds of other documents related to Kotz's extensive investigation of the SEC's stunning failure to detect Madoff's fraudulent scheme for 16 years.

Dear friend of ex-SEC chairman?

Kotz also issued a statement Friday saying his probe found no evidence to support Madoff's claim of having a "close relationship" with SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, who previously headed the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the brokerage industry's self-policing organization. In the interview, Madoff called Schapiro a "dear friend," saying she "probably thinks, I wish I never knew this guy."

Like the SEC, FINRA made periodic exams of Madoff's brokerage operation, which functioned separately from his investment business hidden from regulators' view. An internal review by FINRA found a regulatory breakdown on the part of the organization in the Madoff case.

As the SEC inspectors carried out probe after probe of his business, Madoff said in the interview he was "worried every time" that he'd be caught. "It was a nightmare for me," he said. "I wish they caught me six years ago, eight years ago."

Madoff, 71, a former Nasdaq stock market chairman, pleaded guilty in March to charges that his secretive investment-adviser operation was a multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that destroyed thousands of people's life savings and wrecked charities. It was possibly the largest-ever Ponzi: the classic scheme in which investors are paid with other investors' money rather than actual profits on their investment.

He is serving a 150-year sentence in federal prison in North Carolina.

Longtime Auditor expected to plead guilty

The new details from Kotz's inquiry came the same day as word that Madoff's longtime auditor is expected to plead guilty next week in a cooperation deal. Prosecutors told a federal judge in New York that accountant David Friehling was expected to offer a guilty plea at a conference Tuesday to revised charges that accuse him of securities fraud, investment adviser fraud, making false filings to the SEC, and obstructing or impeding administration of the Internal Revenue laws.

The charges carry a prison term of up to 108 years, though significant cooperation with prosecutors can bring leniency.

In his interview with Kotz, Madoff said the SEC never asked him about his tiny accounting firm. It seemed incongruous that, with more than $65 billion in private investments he claimed he oversaw for thousands of people, Madoff used what seemed to be a small-time auditor with a minuscule office in suburban New City, N.Y. Authorities say that Friehling appeared to have rubber-stamped Madoff's records.

Kotz's report of his investigation, made public in early September, painstakingly detailed how the agency's investigations of Madoff were bungled, with disputes among inspection staffers over the findings, lack of communication among SEC offices in various cities and repeated failures to act on credible complaints from outsiders forming a sea of red flags.

An inspection of Madoff's operation in 2003-04, for example, "was put on the back burner" even though the exam team still had unresolved questions, Kotz found.

Madoff's former finance chief, Frank DiPascali, is cooperating with prosecutors after pleading guilty in August to helping Madoff carry out his fraud. Madoff was asked in the interview whether he was concerned about DiPascali's testimony. His answer: "No, he didn't know anything was wrong, either."




View Larger Map

Sources: MSNBC, Google Maps