Custom Search
Showing posts with label Combat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Combat. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE vs THE 2016 ELECTION (WOMEN VOTERS)








DOMESTIC VIOLENCE vs THE 2016 ELECTION (WOMEN VOTERS):

VA HOSPITALS DON'T SCREEN VETS FOR MENTAL HEALTH OR SIGNS OF BEATING THEIR WIVES. (AGGRESSION)

THE MEDIA HAS FORGOTTEN RAY RICE PUNCHING OUT HIS THEN FIANCEE' JANAY PALMER.

IT'S TIME TO CLOSE VA HOSPITALS &  PRIVATIZE VET HEALTH CARE.


Helping Women in Abusive Marriages and Relationships become self-sufficient should be a key 2016 platform issue.

Women married to U.S. SOLDIERS and ATHLETES are frequent victims of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

There are thousands of Male U.S. Military Vets living in American society with severe MENTAL HEALTH issues.

Due to Survival skills they learned while on Active Duty, its not uncommon for Military VETS (Men) to appear Sane in public while Abusing their Wives and Children behind closed doors.

VA Hospitals do NOT screen these Military Heroes, instead they just prescribe them PILLS for the purpose of SELF-MEDICATING their Mental Health issues.

Considering the number of mega VA Hospitals Scandals under Pres OBAMA'S administration, I say it is time shut down all VA Hospitals and PRIVATIZE Health Care for Veterans.

It is also time for all VETS to receive MANDATORY Mental Health screening each time they request pills for illness, each time they are DIVORCED and each time an immediate member of their family dies via SUICIDE.


With thousands of troops now preparing to return, a new crisis may open on the domestic front. Military wife Stacy Bannerman on the husbands she’s seen transformed into domestic abusers.

"If you don't hear from me in the next 24 hours, call the police," she whispered, then hung up. My phone read 2:12 am; it was the third call in as many minutes.

I tried calling back—no answer. I went back to sleep, angry at Kristi for calling in the middle of the night and scaring me with a single sentence.

The next morning I fired off an email: "I cannot, for the love of God, imagine what you were thinking when you called last night.

Please tell me." Kristi and I had become battle buddies at home while our husbands were serving in Iraq in 2004-05.

We had cried each time a military family member called with word of a soldier's death or suicide; we grieved at funerals and gravesites, marches and memorials.

We wept with and for each another when she or I learned that our husband had been mobilized for another deployment, and again when they finally came home.
Her husband had served three combat tours since 2002.

The last one was the shortest yet, a mere 10 months, and Kristi wrote in an email that "he actually came back pretty normal this time!" That was nearly four months ago. When my phone rang in the afternoon early last fall, I saw that it was her, and picked up.

"Mark tried to strangle me last night," she blurted out. "I called you from the bathroom. I locked myself in with the pets. I didn't want him to hurt my puppy. I'm sorry I called. I was just so scared, and I didn't have anyone else to call. I couldn't call the cops."

I had gotten other midnight calls from other military wives, cowering in closets and under dining room tables, dialing for a lifeline to someone outside of their domestic war zone.
But this was my friend: strong and smart, she had worked at a women's shelter nearly a decade ago. She knew all the warning signs.
And Kristi's husband adored her.

He had no history of domestic violence, no pattern of abuse. He had made no attempts to isolate her from friends, family, or finances. Mark's most recent post-deployment mental health assessment hadn't indicated any issues.

There hadn't been a single red flag before Mark wrapped his hands around Kristi's throat and squeezed, which is what makes veterans' household violence unique.

Abuse by combat veterans tends to have its own distinctive pattern that is unlike the recurring power-and-control cycle of abuse described in most domestic violence literature.

The journal Disabled American Veterans stated that veteran interpersonal violence often involves "only one or two extremely violent and frightening abusive episodes that quickly precipitate treatment seeking."
"Mark tried to strangle me last night," my friend blurted out.

The majority of studies of treatment-seeking veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or combat-related mental health issues report that at least 50 percent of those veterans commit wife-battering and family violence.

Male veterans with PTSD are two to three times more likely than veterans without PTSD to engage in intimate partner violence, according to the VA, which also found that the majority of veterans with combat stress commit at least one act of spousal abuse in their first year post-deployment.

"How are you now?" I asked Kristi. "Where is he?"

"I'm okay, but my throat hurts a little. He's gone. I made him leave this morning. I told him I didn't want to hear from him until he had talked to a counselor or gotten into some kind of treatment.

I said that I didn't feel safe with him, and I couldn't…I wasn't…" she sobbed, hiccupping out words, "I wasn't sure if I ever would again… Goddamn it. Goddamn this war."

Kristi and I talked a lot over the next days and weeks—mostly she talked, and I listened. She was seeing a civilian counselor, but spent most of her time at home, shell-shocked and alone.

She said her counselor just kept telling her to leave her husband, giving her lectures on the typical cycle of domestic abuse, so she tried to find someone who understood the military and veterans.

She called the military chaplain on post, but he never called back. She called the VA, and asked if they had support programs for wives of combat veterans.

They didn't. She called Military One Source, a free counseling assistance program provided by the Department of Defense.

But the lady there just started to cry, and told her that she got "these calls all the time. I can't help you. Unless you authorize a report, I can't authorize assistance."

Kristi reached out to another military spouse that lived off post and was married to an Iraq war veteran.
She told her what happened, and her friend said that she and her husband had gotten into so many fights, hitting and screaming and throwing things at each other, that she ended up going to the domestic violence shelter.

Staff at the shelter told her that they didn't have programs for wives of veterans, and that her husband made too much money for her to stay there, anyway.

Meanwhile, Mark was staying with friends, or sleeping in his office. 

After several days of silence, they began talking, but she hasn't seen him since that night, and at times, she's wondered if she even wants to. "I miss him, I do," she said. "We've already been apart way too much, but I am so angry, and hurt."

Today, Kristi says that Mark's trying to get help, but it's not easy.

He called a domestic violence hotline, and the person he talked to discouraged him from going to the men's group because he doesn't fit the abuser profile. "It's not like he can make a lot of calls about this when he works for 10 hours every day,"

Kristi says. "His insurance won't pay for him go to a private therapist at night. They said he can only see someone at the base medical center, and he's not doing that. He can't really sneak off for three hours in the middle of the day and drive down to the VA, either."

Most family victims of veteran violence don't file reports with the police or their husband's command.

The military is stepping up domestic violence programs and education at military instillations, but the pressure on spouses within the active duty and retired military culture and much of the civilian population to remain silent is especially intense during a time a war.

Speaking out about veteran violence at home seems to be perceived as more of a betrayal than the violence itself.

Even so, since 2003, there has been a 75 percent increase in reports of domestic violence in and around Ft. Hood, where the number of soldiers diagnosed with PTSD rose from 310 in 2004 to 2,445 in 2009.

Equally telling is the 2010 Military Family Lifestyle Survey, the second annual poll conducted by Blue Star Families (BSF) of military families with a loved one currently in the service.

This year's survey included a ream of questions about returning-veteran violence. I don't think there was a single question on that topic last year.

When I last spoke to Kristi, she said that she had quit praying that she and Mark "would get their old lives back. That's gone." Now, she just prays that the last deployment was, in fact, the last, and that someday, the war will end for them, too.

About 63,000 soldiers will return from combat tours between July and December. 

According to military statistics, nearly half of active-duty National Guard members, 38 percent of Army soldiers, and 31 percent of Marines report mental health problems upon return from Middle East deployments.

If just 20 percent of them have post-combat stress, then it can reasonably be projected that roughly half of those veterans will commit at least one act of severe domestic abuse or interpersonal violence in the coming year.

That's approximately 6,300 veterans' wives and kids who are at risk.

President Obama declared that major combat operations in Iraq are over.

They may just be starting for thousands of America's military family members.


Sources: CNN, Daily Beast NY Times, TMZ, Youtube

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Kayla Jean Mueller: Is She Dead Or Alive?? Many Believe ISIL Murdered Her Months Ago










#‎KaylaJeanMueller‬

‪#‎ISIL‬ CLAIMS JORDAN KILLED U.S. HOSTAGE KAYLA JEAN MUELLER:

****HOWEVER I BELIEVE ISIL MURDERED KAYLA MONTHS AGO.

~ THE GOP IS SALIVATING AT THE START OF WORLD WAR 3 BUT COOLER HEADS MUST PREVAIL BECAUSE ISIL LEADERS ARE VERY INTELLIGENT.

~ WILL THOUSANDS OF ENLISTED TROOPS WILL BE SACRIFICED TO ISIL BY CONGRESS FOR OIL MONEY & WAR PROFITEERING CONTRACTS IN THE NAME OF "NATIONAL SECURITY"??

26-year-old American aid worker Kayla Jean Mueller of Prescott, Ariz., who was taken captive by ISIL in August 2013, is now believed to be DEAD.

ISIL leaders claims she was recently Killed by Airstrikes fired by the Jordanian Military.

I along with many other American citizens believe ISIL's version of Kayla's Death is just more Terrorist PROPAGANDA and that Kayla was most likely Murdered Months ago by ISIL members.

Considering the fact she was a Young, WHITE Woman, ISIL leaders probably Raped her and passed her around.

One can only imagine the Physical, Emotional & Mental Atrocities Kayla Suffered before being Murdered.

Kayla should be Admired for Courageously wanting to help the Syrian Refugees but when U.S. Aid Workers travel to a WAR Zone in the Middle East, being Captured & Murdered by AL QAEDA Terrorists such as ISIL, is a Risk they must Consider.

This includes U.S. Aid Workers who are WOMEN.

Due to ISIL's reign of Terror, GOD only knows how Brutally Kayla may have been Murdered.

My Heart goes out to Kayla's Mother and I offer my deepest Condolences to Kayla's Family.

So does news of Kayla's Cold-Blooded Murder mean Congress or Pres OBAMA should RUSH into starting WORLD WAR THREE??

No it does NOT!

When dealing with such Cold-Blooded TERRORISTS as ISIL, Cooler Heads must Prevail amongst the ranks of American Leadership.

ISIL Leaders know the Middle East's Blueprint like the back of their hands and they are very Intelligent people, who have diligently Studied how the U.S. Military operates in a Combat situation.

To assume the U.S. Military can Defeat ISIL in a Combat situation in the Vast Middle East would be a Foolish Presumption, and an Act of GENOCIDE against U.S. Military Armed Forces.

ISIL wants to leads the U.S. Military into one Large, Deadly Booby-Trap.

Killing thousands & thousands of U.S. Military Troops is a JIHAD Dream for ISIL members.

ISIL has created a Different type of WAR in the Middle East which now requires the use of more U.S. Military INTELLIGENCE, versus just the use of more Boots-on-the-Ground.

Given these Facts, it is unfortunate that many GOP members of Congress don't care about sending more U.S. Military Troops into another Endless Middle East WAR which can Not be won in a Combat theater.

So why don't most GOP members of Congress care about sending more U.S. Military Troops into another Endless Middle East WAR which can Not be achieved in a Combat theater?

***Two Reasons:

#1) OIL Money & Huge WAR Profiteering Contracts.

I would hope GOP members of CONGRESS would Not be so Greedy as to Intentionally Sacrifice U.S. Military Troops to ISIL in the name of "NATIONAL SECURITY", for more OIL Money & WAR Profiteering Contracts.

CONGRESS has enough MILLIONAIRES who became Super Wealthy via Middle East WAR Profiteering Contracts!

#2) Many of the Enlisted U.S. Military Troops who will be Sacrificed to ISIL will be BLACK & LATINO Enlisted Soldiers and BLACK & LATINO Commissioned Officers.

I doubt seriously if any Enlisted U.S. Military Troops Killed by ISIL will come from the branches of the NAVY or AIR FORCE.

Why?

Because the Majority of all NAVY & AIR FORCE members are WHITE.

I did NOT say there are NO BLACK & LATINO members serving in the NAVY or AIR FORCE.

I stated the Majority of all NAVY & AIR FORCE members serving in those branches are indeed WHITE.
While the Majority of all ARMY & MARINE members are BLACK and LATINO.

Thus we all know who will be Sacrificed FIRST to ISIL or any in Military Conflict.

It is time to PRAY intensely for the entire U.S. Military.

It is time to PRAY intensely for the United States of America.

It is time to PRAY intensely for MUSLIM citizens world wide who will be Blamed for ISIL's actions and many of whom will be Falsely labeled as JIHADISTS.

It is time to PRAY intensely for PEACE in all of the Middle East, including ISRAEL.

It is time to PRAY intensely for Pres OBAMA, Pentagon Leaders and each member of CONGRESS that GOD will grant them all WISDOM.

I repeat.....

When dealing with such Cold-Blooded TERRORISTS as ISIL, Cooler Heads must Prevail amongst the ranks of American Leadership.

ISIL Leaders know the Middle East's Blueprint like the back of their hands and they are very Intelligent people, who have diligently Studied how the U.S. Military operates in a Combat situation.

To assume the U.S. Military can Defeat ISIL in a Combat situation in the Vast Middle East would be a Foolish Presumption, and an Act of GENOCIDE against U.S. Military Armed Forces.

ISIL wants to leads the U.S. Military into one Large, Deadly Booby-Trap.

Killing thousands & thousands of U.S. Military Troops is a JIHAD Dream for ISIL members.

ISIL has created a Different type of WAR in the Middle East which now requires the use of more U.S. Military INTELLIGENCE, versus just the use of more Boots-on-the-Ground.

Sources: CBS News; CNN; The Telegraph; Washington Post; Youtube


Saturday, June 23, 2012

Pentagon Recommends Combat Zone Pay Cut For Enlisted Troops! Are You Kidding Me? That Is Wrong!
















Choosing to cut Combat Zone Pay for Enlisted Soldiers who already earn way too little for their Duty, is just plain WRONG!

Such a Pay cut will cause many Military Families to be Financially Deprived, go Hungry & some to be Evicted or Suffer Foreclosures.

Congress Needs to get its Act together because America's Enlisted Troops deserve a Pay Increase NOT a Severe Pay Cut.

Especially NOT a Pay Cut that will Adversely Impact the Families of Enlisted Troops.





Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy





Review recommends combat pay be based on level of danger

The days of American troops living on luxurious bases, hanging out at the coffee shop, attending dance parties and still earning full combat pay may be coming to an end.

The Pentagon is considering changes to combat pay that could result in a tiered system, based on how much danger the service member is actually in.

The new recommendations come from an independent review ordered by President Barack Obama in 2010, the Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation.

The review concluded that "the relationship between combat compensation and the degree of danger to which a member is exposed has eroded."

In fact, the reviewers found evidence that troops exposed to the most danger in many cases were receiving the smallest benefit.

"Linking reward to risk is the principal justification for combat compensation," the review stated.

A major problem with the current combat pay system is its relationship to the IRS tax code.

Service members in combat zones are allowed to exclude income for tax purposes. The report found that junior members, especially those with with families, have little income and pay little in income taxes. Therefore, income exclusion gives them very little benefit.

More senior enlisted troops can exclude their income and receive a greater tax benefit. Officers can exclude nearly $7,800 a month during the time they are deployed to a combat zone.

The report concluded that this exclusion gives the greatest benefit to more highly ranked service members, even though they may be much farther from actual danger than lower-ranking troops.

The report recommends that combat pay be restructured "so that those who are exposed to the greatest danger receive higher compensation, regardless of grade." It recommends replacing the income exclusion with a tax credit.

The reviewers also recommend increasing "hostile fire pay" so that it surpasses "imminent danger pay." Both award troops $225 a month, but "hostile fire" indicates an area where troops could be exposed to enemy fire, whereas "imminent danger" is simply presence in a combat zone.

As part of its findings, the report cited a 2011 opinion piece in the Washington Post in which Capt. Michael Cummings wrote, "I didn't deserve my combat pay."

Cummings described the living conditions at Victory Base Complex in Iraq, "The water was always warm. The chow hall had a Caesar salad bar, a sandwich bar, an ice cream freezer, and shrimp & steak Fridays. My personal room had a working air conditioning unit and internet connection.

VBC hosted multiple PXs, coffee shops and nightly dance parties. I could buy pillows, microwaves, televisions or any video game."

Defense Department officials are still reviewing the results and have yet to make final decisions on whether to adopt the changes.

Pentagon spokeswoman Eileen Lainez said, "We'll review the QRMC recommendations. The recommendations do not convey the department's official position but rather provide alternatives for the department to consider."

Nations such as Japan, Germany and Australia already have a risk-based tier system of pay.



View Larger Map


Sources: AP, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, Youtube, Google Maps

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Afghan & Iraq War Vet Suicide Rate Alarmingly High! 18+ Daily! (Videos)














WAR IS HELL!

Please Don't Bash U.S. Military Personnel Currently Serving To Defend Our Country.
Those SAME Members of the U.S. Military You are choosing to Blast & Criticize, are the SAME Military Personnel Working Hard each day to Protect You & Defending Your Rights as an American Citizen.

So unless You Have EVER Served in the U.S. Military Or Unless You have members of Your Immediate Family Who served in the U.S. Military, Please Refrain from Criticizing members of the U.S. Military.

Especially U.S. Soldiers who have been Deployed Multiple times.

Have you EVER served in the U.S. Military?
Have you EVER completed Basic Training?
Have you EVER served in a Combat Zone?
Have you EVER been Shot at by Iraq or Afghanistan Citizens?
Have you EVER suffered a Brain Injury or PTSD as a result of serving in Iraq or Afghanistan?

If your response is "NO" to those questions, than why are you complaining about the Actions of U.S. Soldiers currently serving in Afghanistan?

I have a Husband who retired from the U.S. Army after 23 Years of Active Duty Service.
He served in Vietnam & Saudi.

My husband personally witnessed 2 of his Friends getting their heads Blown Off by the Vietcong.
Witnessing such Tragedies Still affects him years later because he is a Human Being.
And during his time in Vietnam my husband was Injured.

My Father Served in the U.S. Army during War time.
My Uncles & Cousins served in the U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy & Marines.
Now my Son & his Fiancee’ are also Serving in the U.S. Army.

I am Tired of Arrogant People, Especially Arrogant BLACK Men & Women, who NEVER served One day Defending this Country, Criticizing Members of our Armed Services.

I am also Tired of Politicians from both sides of the Aisle, using Our U.S. Military Personnel as Pawns to win Elections.

If Your Religion disavows War or Military Service, I respect Your Decision NOT to Serve in the U.S. Military.
But please don’t use Your Religion as an Excuse to Bash or look down upon our Brave Men & Women who choose to Defend this Country via U.S. Military Service.

I Don’t Condone the type of Violence which took place last weekend when that Army Sergeant Killed 16 Afghan Civilians but who are we to Judge?

Who are we to Judge?

NONE of us except GOD, the U.S. Army & that Army Sergeant knows what really happened or what that Man has experienced during each of his Deployments to Iraq & Afghanistan.

Since he was Suffering from a Brain Injury why was he Still being Allowed to Serve or why was he Still being Deployed to another Dangerous War Zone?

I can bet he was either BLACK or Latino!
I could be Wrong but in this instance I don’t think I am.

BLACK & Latino Soldiers are Often Deployed more frequently to Combat Zones than WHITE Soldiers.

For BLACKS & Latinos serving in the U.S. Military, Racial Discrimination is Still a Major Issue!

Now Add Racial Discrimination to the Stress of trying to Stay Alive while serving in a War Zone.

So unless You plan on Immediately Enlisting into the U.S. Military & Defending the United States Of America (Your Current Home), then please take that Anti-Military Sentiment Somewhere else!

God Bless Our Men & Women Who Serve This Country Via the U.S. Military!



View Larger Map


Sources: Al Jazeera English, Russia Today, Youtube, Google Maps

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Afghan Killings Result Of U.S. Soldier Suffering From Mental Illness & PTSD: Please Bring Troops Home!



















How many more U.S. Troops have to Die or Crack Up and Commit Heinous Crimes before Pentagon Officials bring them home?




U.S. Officials Debate Speeding Afghan Pullout


The Obama administration is discussing whether to reduce American forces in Afghanistan by at least an additional 20,000 troops by 2013, reflecting a growing belief within the White House that the mission there has now reached the point of diminishing returns.

Accelerating the withdrawal of United States forces has been under consideration for weeks by senior White House officials, but those discussions are now taking place in the context of two major setbacks to American efforts in Afghanistan — the killings on Sunday of Afghan civilians attributed to a United States Army staff sergeant and the violence touched off by burning of Korans last month by American troops.

Administration officials cautioned on Monday that no decisions on additional troop cuts have been made, and in a radio interview President Obama reaffirmed his commitment to the Afghan mission in spite of the recent setbacks, warning against “a rush for the exits” amid questions about the American war strategy. “It’s important for us to make sure that we get out in a responsible way, so that we don’t end up having to go back in,” Mr. Obama said in an interview with KDKA in Pittsburgh.

Any accelerated withdrawal would face stiff opposition from military commanders, who want to keep the bulk of the remaining American troops in Afghanistan until the end of 2014, when the NATO mission in Afghanistan is supposed to end. Their resistance puts Mr. Obama in a quandary, as he balances how to hasten what is increasingly becoming a messy withdrawal while still painting a portrait of success for NATO allies and the American people.

The United States now has just under 90,000 troops in Afghanistan, with 22,000 of them due home by September. There has been no schedule set for the withdrawal of the remaining 68,000 American troops, although Mr. Obama said last year that the drawdown would continue “at a steady pace” until the United States handed over security to the Afghan forces in 2014.

At least three options are now under consideration, according to officials at the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department. One plan, backed by Thomas E. Donilon, the national security adviser, would be to announce that at least 10,000 more troops would come home by the end of December, and then 10,000 to 20,000 more by June 2013.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. has been pushing for a bigger withdrawal that would reduce the bulk of the troops around the same time the mission shifts to a support role, leaving behind Special Operations teams to conduct targeted raids. Mr. Biden has long said that the United States mission in Afghanistan is too broad and should focus primarily on a narrow counterterrorism mission against insurgents seeking to attack the United States.

Mr. Obama’s military commanders, meanwhile, want to maintain troops in Afghanistan as long as possible. If cuts have to be made, the commanders favor making them at the end of 2013, after the fighting season is largely finished. Any troop cuts made midyear would mean that those forces would not be available during the main fighting season, which runs from spring to early fall.

“We’ve come up with several options, but they’re back-of-the-envelope options,” said a senior military official, who said the internal discussions were just now beginning to focus on the costs, logistics and security risks of each plan.

Additional troop reductions would be consistent with a shift in mission that Mr. Obama plans to announce at a meeting of NATO members in Chicago in May. Under this plan, American troops would step away from the lead combat role to a supporting mission focused primarily on counterterrorism and training Afghan security forces. Mr. Obama will not announce the next troop reduction at the NATO meeting, aides said on Monday, but the size of the reduction will flow from the NATO decision on when to shift the mission in Afghanistan from combat to support.

In his news conference last week, Mr. Obama called the goal for the NATO meeting to make “sure that the transition is not a cliff, but that there are benchmarks and steps that are taken along the way.”

Benjamin J. Rhodes, one of the president’s senior national security advisers, said in an interview on Monday that “the trajectory we’ve set here is one of transition and Afghan sovereignty.” He added, “We have a goal here of having the Afghans move into the lead and having us steadily pulling back.”

Once the United States and its allies agree on the timing for the shift in mission —Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta has already said that it will take place as early as mid-2013 — the administration must decide exactly when the remaining 68,000 troops will come home. Already, debate there has fallen along familiar lines, according to the officials.

Gen. John R. Allen, the commander of allied forces in Afghanistan, is expected to face tough questioning on the mission and the pace of withdrawal in Congressional hearings scheduled for next week. “The campaign is sound,” General Allen said in an interview on Monday with Wolf Blitzer of CNN. “It is solid. It does not contemplate, at this time, any form of an accelerated drawdown.”

His comments were similar to those of Mr. Panetta, who told reporters on Monday while flying to Kyrgyzstan that the killings of Afghan civilians a day earlier would not undermine United States strategy in Afghanistan or speed up a planned drawdown of American troops over the next two years.

One prominent supporter of the Afghan mission, Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, warned that steep troop cuts before 2014 could jeopardize General Allen’s ability to carry out the mission. “You don’t put a man in charge of a war and undercut his ability to do his job,” Mr. Graham said in a telephone interview.

The shootings on Sunday, and the burning of the Korans, come at a time when Afghans seem increasingly uncertain about their country’s fate once the Americans withdraw. Asylum applications to other countries are at an all-time high, while passport applications have overwhelmed the Afghan Foreign Ministry’s ability to process them. More than 500 people line up outside the passport office in Kabul every morning even in the bitterest weather.

Many respected Afghans have fled the country or lost their jobs, including the head of the country’s Central Bank and the deputy head of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission. Meanwhile, analysts say the Afghan economy appears more and more to be built on the Western aid that has enriched the country’s elite, who have taken much of the money out of the country. Cash moving through Kabul International Airport has gone up drastically in the past year, so that now about $4 billion is leaving the country, in a legitimate annual economy of about $15 billion.

Little of that is expected to be mentioned publicly at the Chicago meeting. Mr. Obama and the NATO allies, European and American officials said, must instead present a picture of success that includes the possibility of reconciliation talks with the Taliban and a NATO withdrawal that is coming only after a job well done.

“The critical issue in Chicago is for the president to make the case that the military picture is good, the insurgency has been weakened, and the Afghan security forces are ready to take over,” said Vali Nasr, a former State Department official under the Obama administration who worked on these issues. “And that reconciliation is under way.”

Mr. Obama will be discussing the NATO mission in Afghanistan when he meets with Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain on Tuesday and Wednesday. A European official said Monday that it was imperative that the United States and its NATO partners project a public face to the Afghans that while NATO troops will be leaving Afghanistan, the West will not abandon the country. “The most important thing now is the messaging,” the official said.



View Larger Map


Sources: AP, CBS News, CNN, Wikipedia, Google Maps

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Army Shooting Leaves Five Dead, Pressures Congress To Pass H.R. 952 - Combat PTSD Act









































"One thing if we've learned from this war, we learned from World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the previous wars, is not all injuries are physical." Maj. Gen. Daniel P. Bolger, commander of Multi-National Division-Baghdad.

"War is Hell!" General William Tecumseh Sherman


Recent news of five Soldiers being murdered in Iraq Monday by a fellow soldier rumbled the airwaves, however none of us were shocked.

For several years we've heard of the urgent need for change in the Military's Mental Health Treatment standards, but alas nothing was ever done about it.

Under the Bush administration substandard Mental Health Treatment for Military personnel became the norm.

After all a Soldier is not supposed to cry, not supposed to show that he or she is feeling pain, not supposed to demonstrate lost of Mental Stability. Instead Soldiers are supposed to function as obedient robots.

Duty. Honor. Country. Nothing else, right?

Well let's logically evaluate that theory.

First of all Human Beings even Soldiers, possess a Psyche or a mind. A mind able to process thoughts, imaginations and information.

A mind which regardless of the intelligence level, can become extremely fragile if it is injured, diseased, improperly stimulated or not allowed to receive proper rest.

In a combat zone the mind of a Soldier is also expected to remain a well-balanced machine. Expected to remain focused, with the ability to think quickly without hesitation because hesitation costs lives.

Thoughts of missing one's Spouse, Children, Siblings, Friends, Pets, etc., are frequently placed on a back shelf while assigned Missions of creating World Peace takes precedent over normal, everyday life.

Soldiers often fear that if they allow their minds to relax and think on close matters of the heart, they will cease functioning as a Soldier thus ending their esteemed Military careers.

The former Bush Administration decided that one solution to helping Soldiers maintain their "Military Bearing" in stressful situations was by allowing deployed, married personnel to live in the same quarters.

Pentagon officials strongly believed if deployed husbands and wives were able to sleep together each night it would help to relieve their levels of Stress.

Not such a bad idea except.....What if the husband is ordered out on a dangerous mission? Gone for two, three, four days at a time. Wouldn't that still add to their level of stress?

What about the children they left behind back in the states?

What if the husband or wife or both are killed while "serving together"?

Enough about Married Soldiers, what about Unmarried Soldiers?

They may have left behind girlfriends, boyfriends, fiance's, children, parents, homes, good jobs, businesses, etc.,

What solution did the Pentagon offer to these hardworking, lonely, active duty Military personnel?

Perhaps this explains why the number of Female Soldiers stationed in Iraq being raped and killed by Male Soldiers also stationed in Iraq, went through the roof during the Bush administration's reign.

Most of those deaths were falsely listed or Classified as "being killed by their own hands", when in fact their deaths were committed by other soldiers in cold-blood. For the record I am not referring to "Friendly Fire". Homicide would be a better description.

Such as was the case with Lavena Johnson. A Young female soldier stationed in Iraq, raped and murdered by fellow male soldiers.

I'm sure she thought those male soldiers would never bring harm to her. Now to the despair of her parents Private First Class Lavena Johnson lies dead at the age of 20, in a cold Missouri grave.

So there you have it. Young Men and Women, Married, Single, Grandmothers and Grandfathers basically thrown into combative, dangerous lions den with very little if any Positive Mental Health Coping Skills training.

Duty. Honor. Country.

When these individuals voluntarily enlisted to serve and protect our nation from further Terrorist attacks, they did so believing that the U.S. Armed Forces would protect them too.

Who knew that Pentagon officials would consider them to be so indispensable that their Mental Health welfare wouldn't be deemed of any such large importance?

How many of these Soldiers and other Military personnel begged for help but were ignored because the Mission was deemed more important?

Or....how many of them were provided Mental Health Counseling so poor and substandard, that a dog being treated by an "Animal Whisperer" receives better care.

Even worse how many of them were too afraid of asking for help because to do so would possibly mean the end of further promotions or worse being ostracized.

In a War Zone thousands of miles away from home, faced with the choice of being ostracized by your fellow soldiers versus asking for help because your feeling suicidal, which do you think is lesser of the two evils?

Less than 40% of troubled troops actually seek help, while one in five soldiers return from Iraq or Afghanistan with psychological problems ranging from insomnia to suicidal or homicidal tendencies.

Military officials are aware of the issue of serious Mental Health issues among the ranks. Yet there has been a steady rise in the number of reported Official Suicides, with more than 150 in 2008.

While I'm not defending him, left to deal with multiple deployments, callous Pentagon Officials pushing orders, Suicide Terrorism, and the lack of decent Mental Health treatment, only a Soldier in Sgt. John M. Russell's position would understand why he snapped.

Military officials claim to be working remove the stigma that soldiers may feel about seeking help. As it stands every new soldier arriving in Iraq is given a card detailing the warning signs for depression and suicide.

For some reason neither Congress nor the Pentagon wants to address the issue of Mismanagement of Military Bases especially as it relates to the safety of Female Soldiers and how screwed up the Mental Health Treatment programs are on most bases.

This year congress introduced H.R. 952, the Combat PTSD Act. The bill has 42 sponsors and addresses the difficulties veterans encounter when required to prove stressors in order to receive service-connected compensation for post-traumatic stress disorder incurred as a result of their military service.

What a wonderful way to help ensure our Military personnel receive a higher, more humane level of Mental Health Treatment. However due to more stupid Politics it has not passed, nor been signed into law by President Obama.

President Obama appears to be a good man with a kind heart, but he's getting ready to send our U.S. Armed Forces into "No Man's Land" Afghanistan and.....
he's considering repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (another War within itself). These actions may place an even higher level of stress on our Soldiers and Veterans.

My husband completed 22 years in the United States Army, serving in both the Vietnam War and Desert Storm theaters. I enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserves but not being able to deal with the stress, my military career was short lived.

Do I have regrets? Of course.

I regret that the U.S. Military didn't do enough to stop Sgt. Russell from loosing his grip on reality.

I regret that our Military didn't do enough to keep Private Lavena Johnson from being raped and killed by fellow soldiers.

I further regret that based upon what I witnessed while stationed at Fort Jackson, I had to leave prematurely due to fear of also becoming another so-called "War Casualty".

The recent army shootings in Iraq which left five soldiers dead and one injured, is sad but nothing new. As society we've sadly become desensitized to such stories in the Media anyway. Besides it goes with the territory.

Call me a cynic if you may but here's a shocking prediction, regardless of how much money our government chooses to give the Pentagon for the purpose of ensuring that our Military personnel receive appropriate Mental Health treatment while engaged in active duty service, the number of dead soldiers' body bags being filmed by American Journalists and Reporters can expect to triple that of those killed during George W. Bush's reign.

War is Hell!

Charged with the shootings: Sgt. John M. Russell, 44, Sherman, Texas

Names of the victims:

Cmdr. Charles Springle, 52, Wilmington, North Carolina

Michael Edward Yates Jr., 19, Federalsburg, Maryland

Dr. Matthew Houseal, a psychiatrist from Amarillo, Texas,

Christian E. Bueno-Galdos, 25, of Paterson, N.J.

Spc. Jacob D. Barton, 20, of Lenox, Mo.




View Larger Map

Sources: Whitehouse.gov, MSNBC, Huffington Post, NY Daily News, NY Post, Daily Kos, Washington Post, Rand Corp., Wikipedia, Salon.com, Jezebel.com, LA Times, Crooks and Liars, Military.com, Newsvine, NPR, Daily Life, Wikipedia, Flickr, Google Maps,