Custom Search
Showing posts with label Cuba. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cuba. Show all posts

Saturday, November 26, 2016

FIDEL CASTRO ESTA' MUERTO!, TRUMP CONDEMNS LEGACY




FIDEL CASTRO ESTA' MUERTO!

PRES ELECT TRUMP CONDEMNS CASTRO'S LEGACY.


Sources: CNN, USA Today, YouTube


**** Trump condemns Castro as 'brutal dictator'

Donald Trump condemned the late Cuban leader Fidel Castro on an otherwise quiet Saturday for the president-elect.

"The world marks the passing of a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for nearly six decades," Trump said in a statement issued hours after Castro's death. "Fidel Castro’s legacy is one of firing squads, theft, unimaginable suffering, poverty and the denial of fundamental human rights."

Trump, who has pledged to roll back the Obama administration's diplomatic opening to Cuba, said the nation remains "a totalitarian island," but he hopes that Castro's passing will mark "a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve.

Noting support of anti-Castro Cuban Americans during the recent presidential election, Trump pledged to fight for a "free Cuba" during his administration.

Though the tragedies, deaths and pain caused by Fidel Castro cannot be erased, our administration will do all it can to ensure the Cuban people can finally begin their journey toward prosperity and liberty," Trump said in his statement.

Earlier in the morning, Trump marked the news with brief tweet: "Fidel Castro is dead!"

Otherwise, the president-elect spent a low-key Saturday at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Fla. Trump is expected to return to New York on Sunday.
Since arriving in South Florida early Tuesday, Trump named members of his Cabinet and White House staff, including foreign policy posts.
On Friday, Trump made two White House appointments: Kathleen Troia "K.T." McFarland to serve as deputy national security adviser and Don McGahn as White House counsel.

McGahn's duties will include helping Trump navigate between his duties as president and his business interests across the world.
There are also more than 70 lawsuits still facing Trump from his businessman days.

In late October, USA TODAY reported that "if elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public."

McFarland, who will be deputy to National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, served the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations in various national security-related posts.

A Fox News commentator, McFarland has echoed Trump's support of Russian President Vladimir Putin over his activities in Syria. Critics of Putin say he is only interested in propping up Russian ally and Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.

Earlier in the week, Trump nominated South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley to be the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and Michigan-based charter school advocate Betsy DeVos to be education secretary. Both nominees are subject to Senate confirmation.
Trump and aides continue to consider a secretary of State.

Contenders include 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, though each has his critics.

Ben Carson, a rival of Trump's during the Republican primaries, is considering an offer to join Trump's Cabinet. The president-elect says he is considering Carson for secretary of housing and urban development.


Friday, April 15, 2016

PAYPAL'S LGBT HYPOCRISY: CUBA vs NORTH CAROLINA (HB2)




PAYPAL'S LGBT HYPOCRISY: CUBA vs NORTH CAROLINA


WHERE IS OBAMA AND GEORGE SOROS?

WHERE IS CONGRESS??

Sources: Christian Post, Red State, WND, YouTube 



Let’s start off this piece with the understanding that hypocrisy is a liberal virtue. 

They won’t openly claim to be hypocrites, but they will openly engage in hypocritical behavior. 

Without that glaring absence of self-awareness, the progressive left would likely lose some of their Stalinesque charm.
Now, turn your focus to PayPal.

 As reported here, yesterday, PayPal has withdrawn plans to expand their operations in North Carolina, in response to the newly passed House Bill 2, or the “bathroom bill,” which prohibits NC cities from setting gender neutral policies for all businesses and schools in their area. 
The bill came as a response to a Charlotte, NC ordinance that was set to go into effect on April 1, 2016, that would have allowed men to enter the locker rooms or bathrooms of women, in accordance with how they claimed to “feel,” gender-wise, for that day. Gov. McCrory signed the bill correcting the ordinance. Cue pearl-clutching.
North Carolina Lieutenant Governor, Dan Forest, issued a statement today, in regards to PayPal’s decision to cease expansion in the state over the bill:
"If our action in keeping men out of women's bathrooms and showers protected the life of just one child or one woman from being molested or assaulted, then it was worth it. North Carolina will never put a price tag on the value of our children. They are precious and priceless. 
If a corporation wanting to do business in North Carolina does not see the worth of our children in the same light, then I wish them well as they do business somewhere else."
Kudos to North Carolina’s state government for holding the line, where other states have stood, only to quickly fold under outside pressure, in this war against cultural Marxism.
Paypal has no problem maintaining operations in areas like Cuba, Singapore, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia – all known for their stringent anti-LGBT policies (and they don’t stop at just prohibiting mixed bathrooms). Hypocrisy.
Also, while PayPal would see North Carolina’s women and children put in harm’s way, simply to save the feelings of what amounts to 0.3% of the population, they don’t exactly practice what they preach. Lt. Governor Forest displayed this picture of PayPal’s global operations center on his Facebook page today. They’ve highlighted the symbol indicating the way to the Men’s restroom – not “gender neutral,” but an honest-to-goodness, segregated-by-gender bathroom!
PayPal, like every other business, is free to conduct their business any way they see fit. If that means they just can’t tolerate doing business with a state that keeps bathrooms and public shower rooms separated for the privacy and safety of the different sexes, then so be it. However, they should know that their customers are equally free to decide if they want to do business with a company that doesn’t reflect their values and would use coercive means to force their beliefs on that population.
There are unsubstantiated reports of PayPal office phone lines being backed up with calls of users cancelling their accounts, in protest of their stance against North Carolina’s bathroom bill.
Time will tell who suffers the most damage in this cultural conflict.



Tuesday, February 23, 2016

OBAMA VOWS TO CLOSE GITMO BEFORE HE LEAVES OFFICE; DARES CONGRESS






OBAMA VOWS TO CLOSE GITMO BEFORE HE LEAVES OFFICE:

IS THIS ABOUT ERASING GEORGE W. BUSH'S LEGACY?

WHERE WILL THE CAPTURED TERRORISTS BE RELEASED?

PLEASE GET OUT THE VOTE IN 2016.

Sources: ABC News, USA Today, Youtube


Keeping the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay open is "contrary to our values," President Obama said Tuesday, as he released a plan that examined 13 potential sites for transferring the suspected terrorists but did not propose any specific location.

His plan sets up a last-year confrontation with Congress about a campaign promise made eight years ago. Terrorists use Guantanamo as propaganda to recruit, and maintaining it harms U.S. national security, he said.

The plan has three elements beyond closing the prison, Obama said. 

More detainees will be safely transferred, reviewing the threat posed by detainees who are not eligible for transfer, and identifying those eligible for military trials.
“This plan has my full support," Obama said.

Obama said closing Guantanamo was something his Republican predecessor, George W. Bush, supported, as did his 2008 Republican challenge, Sen. John McCain of Arizona. Since then, however, the politics have got in the way, he said.

Obama said he was "very clear-eyed" about the challenges of closing Guantanamo. "If it were easy it would have happened years ago," he said.

McCain, who now chairs the Armed Services Committee, called the plan flimsy and said his committee would hold hearings on it soon.

“What we received today is a vague menu of options, not a credible plan for closing Guantanamo, let alone a coherent policy to deal with future terrorist detainees,” McCain said in a statement. “After years of rhetoric, the president has still yet to say how and where he will house both current and future detainees, including those his administration has deemed as too dangerous to release.”

McCain said Obama had missed “a major chance to convince the Congress and the American people that he has a responsible plan to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.”

The plan does not indicate the prisons in the United States under consideration to transfer detainees, Pentagon press secretary Peter Cook said in a statement.

“The administration seeks an active dialogue with Congress on this issue and looks forward to working with Congress to identify the most appropriate location as soon as possible,” Cook said.

The report looked at existing facilities in South Carolina, Kansas and Colorado, as well as new facilities at unnamed military bases across the country.

It would cost $290 million to $475 million for the Department of Defense to renovate an existing state or federal prison, which would be dedicated to holding only Defense detainees, the official said. But the Pentagon estimates it could save $65 million to $85 million a year, recouping the one-time costs in about five years, though the official said the numbers are "somewhat rough and notional” because Congress has not appropriated the money necessary to do a complete site assessment.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that the Pentagon report "will make a compelling case that closing the prison is clearly in our national security interest, but also will reflect the need for the United States government to be a good steward of taxpayer dollars."

There are 91 detainees remaining in the prison; each one costs about $4 million per year.
"There is far too much money that is spent to operate that prison when there are more cost-effective alternatives available. And we certainly would like to work with the Congress to make those alternatives a reality because we know that those alternatives don't weaken our national security. In fact, they strengthen it. They enhance it," Earnest said. "And it would take away — by closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay — a chief recruiting tool that we know is used by terrorist organizations about the world."
The plan, released Tuesday morning, anticipates that a "limited number" of detainees will not be eligible for transfer to other countries
"For these detainees, the administration intends to work with the Congress to relocate them from the Guantanamo Bay detention facility to an appropriate site in the continental United States while continuing to identify other appropriate and lawful dispositions," the plan says.
Guantanamo Bay, located on the eastern edge of Cuba, has housed prisoners taken captive in war on terror since 2002. Since it exists on a base on Cuban soil but held by the United States under a 113-year-old lease, the prisoners are in what some human rights organizations call a "legal black hole."

But transferring them to U.S. soil would not necessarily change their legal status. A previous legal opinion from the Pentagon found that the 2001 legislation authorizing the global war on terror allows them to be held as combatants as long as hostilities remain.

There were 242 detainees still in the Guantanamo Bay prison when Obama took office in 2009, down from a high of almost 700. That number has dwindled over the years as the Pentagon has transferred lower-risk detainees to other countries — meaning that the prisoners who remain tend to be considered higher security risks.

Of the 91 detainees remaining, 35 are eligible to be transferred to other countries as long as those countries can demonstrate that they can hold the prisoners without risk. Another 10 await trial by a military court, and 46 are still being evaluated.
Current law prohibits the president from transferring the Guantanamo Bay detainees to U.S. soil, where there are only a handful of maximum-security prisons deemed appropriate to house them. Congress also added a provision to the defense policy bill signed by Obama last year requiring the administration to put forward a plan for transferring the remaining detainees to prisons in the United States.
House Speaker Paul Ryan dismissed the plan, saying it did not make a convincing case that moving detainees to the United States was "smart or safe." The plan did not provide details required by law about the cost and location of the U.S. prison.
"Congress has left no room for confusion," Ryan said in a statement. "It is against the law — and it will stay against the law — to transfer terrorist detainees to American soil. We will not jeopardize our national security over a campaign promise.”
Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the top Democrat in the House, called the administration's proposal a "strong, detailed plan" to close Guantanamo.
“The reality is Guantanamo hurts, rather than advances our efforts to keep America safe and combat terrorism abroad," Pelosi said in a statement. "Closing the detention facility at Guantanamo will strengthen our national security and affirm our values and laws. It is disappointing that Republicans have worked to prevent the long-overdue closure of the Guantanamo facility."

Monday, February 15, 2016

MARCO RUBIO IS DONALD TRUMP'S BIGGEST THREAT (YOUTH; LATINO VOTERS)







MARCO RUBIO IS DONALD TRUMP'S BIGGEST THREAT:

RUBIO ATTRACTS YOUNGER VOTERS & LATINO VOTERS.

LIKE TRUMP, RUBIO IS IN IT TO WIN IT.

Sources:  TIME, Youtube

As the 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate primary winds down, I predict that when the smoke clears there will most likely be two candidates standing:

Donald Trump and Marco Rubio

Trump is not a Politician but he is an Amazing, astute Businessman who knows Politics like he knows the back of his hands.

Rubio is indeed a Career Politician however due to his youth, he is still fresh and open to new ideas.


Both men are in it to win it and would make a great team against the Democrat machine.

~ 'Whatever happens next, God will either give me the ability to get around it, or the strength to go through it'

Marco Rubio’s play for South Carolina’s religious conservatives is anything but subtle.
His events here start with prayer and his soundtrack is heavy on Christian rock. 
The first-term Senator from Florida tells audiences that members of his family are living paycheck-to-paycheck so they can send their children to “faith-based schools.” His backers promise that Rubio would never utter profanity the way Donald Trump does. And, when asked if he can win South Carolina, Rubio simply says it is up to God.
“God is in control of everything. God has a will for my life and for your life, and for everyone else’s life. 

Sometimes God’s will is not our will, and we should be grateful for that because he knows a lot more than we do about what is best for us,” Rubio said Sunday in a packed high school auditorium, with 2,000 more supporters listening to audio piped into overflow rooms. “So what I think what we are called to do is to be faithful and do the best we can in every circumstance and pray for God’s peace.”
Rubio continued in a tone that seemed more compatible with a pulpit than a political rally. “Here is what I am at peace with: Whatever happens next, God will either give me the ability to get around it, or the strength to go through it. I think that is also true for our country,” Rubio said.
“He has blessed me with four incredible children, and a loving and godly wife,” he went on. In case anyone missed the exchange, the campaign sent along a transcript and video of the moment of Brother Marco’s brief evangelism.
The in-your-face faith might just be a winning strategy. Two-thirds of South Carolina residents say they pray daily and half say they read the Bible at least once a week. 

In 2012’s primary, 65% of Republicans said they were Evangelicals or born-again Christians. It’s tough to win in South Carolina with only a cursory nod to faith; the faithful want one of their own to win, and South Carolina demands public professions of faith. Rubio is obviously ready to stand in the public square with his creed.
Rubio is a practicing Catholic, but at various points in his life he has been a Mormon and attended a Southern Baptist-affiliated mega-church at home in Florida. 

He often mentioned his faith in Iowa, and that helped him place a better-than-expected third place before stumbling in secular New Hampshire.
Now that the campaign is heading toward a final push in South Carolina, Rubio is back to pushing his faith. He plans to be in South Carolina every day before Saturday’s primary. “We are all-in,” one of his top advisers said. 

The campaign once suggested they were playing for a win here, but now they’re trying to calibrate those expectations. (The same strategy called for them to come in second in New Hampshire, where he placed fifth. “Some things have obviously changed,” the same adviser says dryly.)
Rubio’s pitch has plenty of explicit promises, but he’s also crafty dropping in shorthand. 

For instance, during Saturday night’s debate, he criticized the Supreme Court’s ruling that expanded the right to marriage to same-sex couples. It was done in a way that most viewers at home might have missed it, but the religious voters who disagree with the Court heard what they needed.
“Justice Scalia understood that better than anyone in the history of this republic. His dissent, for example, on the independent counsel case is a brilliant piece of jurist work. 

And, of course, his dissent on Obergefell as well,” Rubio said. The official name of the marriage case was Obergefell v. Hodges. For the uninitiated, the citation went right past.

Rubio’s pathway to the presidency via preaching is a tough one, to be sure. Rival Ted Cruz is the son of a pastor and he has made his faith a central part of his campaign, which launched at the Jerry Falwell-founded Liberty University. 

Cruz’s father, Rafael, is a rock star in some church circles, and the son certainly enjoys some of the halo effect. Last week, Cruz made clear he wasn’t ceding any ground to Rubio, saying he could not be trusted on marriage because he at one point said same-sex unions were the law of the land. “Those are the talking points of Barack Obama,” Cruz said of Rubio’s rhetoric.

Rubio and his team are ready to fight back, reminding voters of Cruz’s admittedly shady tactics in Iowa, where Cruz’s aides told caucusgoers that Ben Carson seemed to be ending his campaign. Such a move undercuts Cruz’s character, and Rubio’s team is eager to keep that at the fore.

Take Trey Gowdy, the South Carolina Congressman who is advising Rubio. Before Rubio took the stage Sunday, Gowdy did a one-two punch against the foul-mouthed Donald Trump and the dodgy caucus strategy from Cruz.

“If you’re a parent, you will not have to put your hands over your kids’ ears a single time today,” Gowdy said to applause. “Nor will you have to explain the difference between dropping out of a caucus and picking up dry cleaning. You will not have to do that.”

They’re competing for Christians’ votes. That doesn’t mean these campaigns are offering political charity.




Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Afghan, Cuba, Iraq & Nigeria Slam Obama's Call For Tighter Airport Security




































Iraqis, Afghans Slam Airport Crackdown


Obama’s call for tighter security on travelers from 14 countries is unfair and won’t make Americans any safer, Iraqi and Afghan diplomats in Washington tell The Daily Beast’s Benjamin Sarlin.

President Obama’s strict new security guidelines for air travelers from high-risk countries is drawing criticism from officials in some of the targeted nations, including American allies Iraq and Afghanistan.

As part of an array of new measures enacted after the failed Christmas Day bombing of Detroit-bound Flight 253, airport-security officers are patting down passengers from 14 countries, most of them in the Middle East and Africa.

While the Transportation Security Administration has justified the move as a proactive means of keeping out potential terrorist threats, the Iraqi and Afghan ambassadors to the United States oppose the singling out of their citizens.

In an exclusive interview with The Daily Beast on Tuesday, Iraqi Ambassador Samir Sumaida’ie slammed the new guidelines and warned that they “will not deliver Peace and Security” to travelers.


Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy





“I don’t think its fair,” Sumaida’ie said. “Furthermore, I don’t believe that it’s effective to just look at all Iraqis, or all Egyptians, or all Saudis as terrorists—it’s counterproductive. First off, it alienates people, and second, the fact is that they are not all terrorists and they are not all even reasonably suspect.”

The new restrictions, the ambassador added, do not reflect the circumstances of the latest attack.

“The cause of all this has been this young man from Nigeria, but it seems that there was plenty of intelligence about him to indicate that he was a threat,” he said. “How about improving the handling of intelligence? That would have helped eliminate that particular threat and probably most similar threats.”

Sumaida’ie said the United States should expect formal complaints from Iraq and other nations targeted by the policy.

“We intend to raise the matter with the American administration, and I’m sure we will not be the only people who will feel this way,” he said.

Afghanistan’s ambassador to the United States, Said Jawad, echoed the Iraqi diplomat’s opposition to the measures.

In a statement, Jawad told The Daily Beast that terrorist threats “are a global concern, not just a precise problem originating within the borders of a handful of countries.” Al Qaeda, he said, “is an organization made of up individuals who do not carry legitimate passports, and in fact, actively recruit individuals from all over the world, especially in Europe and the United States.”

Added Jawad: “It’s unfair to single out all Afghans for extreme scrutiny, especially when there has never been an instance of international terrorism carried out by an Afghan; the exception being an Afghan refugee who was raised in Pakistan and lived in the United States”—an apparent reference to Najibullah Zazi, a suspected al Qaeda terrorist arrested in Colorado last year.

“Afghans completely understand the need for stronger security measures since everything and everyone is a target of terrorist attacks in Afghanistan. But we must not let our fear force a missed opportunity to produce meaningful security measures which don’t ostracize innocent travelers, brings us all closer to fighting a common enemy and allows everyone to travel the globe in relative safety.”

Officials from Nigeria, the suspected bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s country of origin, are also up in arms over their inclusion on the list. Nigerian Foreign Minister Ojo Maduekwe told reporters on Tuesday that the security measures are “an unacceptable New Year’s gift.” Cuba, also on the list, criticized the move in a state-run newspaper as “anti-terrorist paranoia.”

In addition to Iraq, Afghanistan, Nigeria, and Cuba, the countries on the list are Algeria, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

Airline groups are on board with the new security measures and announced their support of the plan on Monday.


“We believe the new guidelines enhance security for the flying public, and they’re being implemented in the most convenient manner,”
David Castelveter, a spokesman at the Air Transport Association, told The Wall Street Journal.

A call to a TSA spokesman for comment was not immediately returned.




View Larger Map


Sources: The Daily Beast, MSNBC, NY Times, Reuters, TIME, Wall Street Journal, Google Maps

Friday, April 17, 2009

President Obama Extends the Olive Branch to Cuba & Latin America!




While attending the Summit of Americas conference in Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago on Friday President Obama sought to mend Foreign Policy relations between Cuba and Latin America with those countries' leaders.

The purpose of the Summit of Americas conference is to bring together the Heads of State and Government of the Western Hemisphere to discuss common concerns, seek solutions and develop a shared vision for their future development of the region, be it economic, social or political in nature.

Despite the fact that Cuba was the only nation at the summit without representation, President Obama still chose to extend the Olive Branch of Peace to both Cuba and President Chavez's region, while vowing to lift embargo restrictions.
This includes opening up trade in the near future.

He also stated he would do away with travel restrictions between the United States and Cuba.

To seal this deal President Chavez of Venezuela and President Raul Castro of Cuba, are both expected to reciprocate the good will currently being offered to them by the United States.

To help ease alarm and skepticism from Cuban-Americans concerned about Cuba's Communist past, going forward President Obama has promised to engage with the Cuban Government on Human Rights, Freedom of Speech, Democratic Reform, Drugs, Immigration and the Economy.

If you recall I posted a story last week about some members of the Black Congressional Caucus who traveled to Cuba to meet with President Raul Castro.

Those congressional delegates are now waiting for a meeting to brief President Obama on their dialogue with Castro and other Cuban Officials.


At the Summit of Americas conference President Obama states "The United States seeks a new beginning with Cuba".




View Larger Map

Sources: Huffington Post, CNN, summit-americas.org, Youtube, Google Maps

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Mel Watt Goes to Cuba.....Good save Mel but will it work??





Members of the Congressional Black Caucus (including Mel Watt) (umm what's their purpose for existence again?) recently visited Cuba to meet with the country's leaders in hopes of mending/ re-opening Trade Policies or something like that.

Supposedly the Black Caucus wanted to assist President Obama with the United States' diplomatic efforts in loosening some of our current restrictions which prevents Trade and keeps Cubans off our borders. Or something like that.

Following talks with Cuban President Raul Castro (brother of Fidel), Congressional Black Caucus Chair Barbara Lee (D) of California informed the Media of how receptive Cuba's leaders appear to be for Change.

How wonderful. The Congressional Black Caucus decides to get up and do something noble to help keep their seats....hmmphf I mean help the Economy.

Sidebar: Wait a minute!

Aren't these some of the SAME Black Caucus Members who didn't really jump onboard Obama's train until he actually earned the required Delegates to become the Official Democratic Party Presidential Nominee?

In other words they lacked the vision to see the possibility of a Black Man becoming President of the United States of America.

Yes, they are one in the same.

After the dialogue with President Raul Castro, the Delegates informed the U.S. Media of how nice and well-organized Cuba appeared to be.

Well of course! Duh! Its a Communist Country being visited by American Politicians. Did you think they were going to show you all of the Negative, Government-controlled stuff?

In fact Cuban-American Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen expressed great disdain about the meeting. She also disapproved of the dialogue because the Delegates failed to meet with any Dissidents and Human Rights Activists during their visit.

The only caveat to this "successful" meeting of International Minds, was the releasing of a statement by Fidel (after the meetings) alleging one of the Delegates told him "despite President Obama's election, America is still a Racist Country". Gasp! Imagine such blasphemy, such propaganda being printed!

Of course Chairwoman Lee denies that any of the visiting members made such comments, at least not in her presence.

However....we all know the only person who may have spoken those words to the Castros. The Radical Bobby Rush! You know the outspoken Black Congressman from Illinois and a former member of the Black Panthers. Yep that's him!

Yes Bobby was in the midst because he accompanied the group to Cuba.

If anyone could have made such a statement to the Communist Leaders, it would have been Rush. So there Congresswoman Barbara Lee! Perhaps you better check yourself on that one before you deny it was ever mentioned to the Castros.

Now as it relates to U.S. Congressman Mel Watts a Democrat from Charlotte, this trip was obviously a campaign ploy strategically planned to do accomplish three things for him: 1) Strengthen his campaign by keeping him in the public's eyes, 2) Make his Constituents think he's REALLY doing something to earn their votes, 3) Make his Constituents think he's really doing something to earn his BIG Washington Bucks!

By the way where was good ole, handsome Mel when the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled to not allow anymore Gerrymandering to be used for NC Voting Districts?

Let's see the Lawsuit was filed in 2005, yet Watt seemingly did absolutely NOTHING to help ensure that his district which runs from Charlotte to High Point, remained a Pre-dominantly Minority Voting District.

The result of his doing absolutely NOTHING to help the North Carolina Black Vote remain strong, was a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court which rejected North Carolina's reasons for Racial Gerrymandering.

Good Ole Mel rode that "Easy Vote/ Easy Win Gravy Train" for about a decade.

He foolishly thought he could remain a U.S. Congressman without actually having to earn his Constituents' trust and votes, for maybe another ten years. Poor Mel, now he has to REALLY get off his behind and WORK to stay in public office.

Well at least it was nice while it lasted right Mel?

That trip to Cuba for Public Relations was a good try Mel but will it work??

We'll see during the next election.


CNN covers the Congressional Black Caucus's visit to Cuba.





View Larger Map

Sources: ABC News, Wikipedia, Carolina Politics Online, CNN Political Ticker, Needs of the Many, Politico, Huffington Post, MyDD, Fox News, Google Maps, Youtube