STEVE BANNON'S EXIT, TRUMP'S IMPEACHMENT, RACISM PERSONIFIED

STEVE BANNON'S EXIT, TRUMP'S IMPEACHMENT, RACISM PERSONIFIED:

WILL TRUMP BE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT?


Steve Bannon's exit from the Trump White House as Chief Strategist isn't the big new story being pushed by Mainstream Media windbags.

The firing of Bannon and Reince Preibus is all apart of how the Political "Thank you for helping me Win" game is played.

"You help me Win, I'll give you a cushy job and after about 6 mos to a year I will let you go and make it appear as we have beef."

Calm Down People.

it's just a Political game!

Not everyone who helps a Politician Win elections will be so blessed to be "Thanked" by being rewarded with a great paying job but nevertheless it's how the game is played.

Donald J Trump won't be IMPEACHED, just as Obama wasn't IMPEACHED but fairly tales of Impeachment attracts views and Wealthy SPONSORS to a News Source.

Following the firing of Steve Bannon Pres Trump needs to take a stand on RACISM.

There are many BLACK voters who helped Trump win in Nov 2016.

However now those BLACK supporters can Not get JOBS and are being Ostracized.

In addition RACISM and DIVISION are still hotbed issues in this nation.

So will Pres Trump risk alienating some of his far right Caucasian and ILLUMINATI supporters many of whom want to see BLACK people remain Disenfranchised in the USA?

Or will Trump take a stand and publicly admit that BLACK people who live on American soil should be treated as HUMAN BEINGS with Unalienable Rights?

PLEASE PRAY

"What's unalienable cannot be taken away or denied. Its most famous use is in the Declaration of Independence, which says people have unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."


Sources: NBC News, YouTube


***** Steve Bannon's Exit Prompts Backlash From Core Trump Backers


WASHINGTON — Steve Bannon’s exit from the White House drew an immediate backlash from his allies in the party’s populist wing, who fear their agenda is becoming sidelined within the Trump administration.

“I don’t have any longer the expectations that Trump even can keep the rest of his promises," Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, told NBC News on Friday after the announcement that the chief strategist would be leaving the administration.

The uproar threatens to divide Trump’s supporters during the most difficult stretch of his presidency yet and before a critical legislative push next month in which Congress must raise the debt ceiling, pass a budget, and make headway on tax reform.

Trump has faced withering criticism in recent days, including from members of his own party, over his response to the violence at last weekend's white nationalist demonstrations in Charlottesville, Virginia, and his defense of "very fine people" who marched with neo-Nazis there.

Trump thanked Bannon early Saturday in a tweet, saying: "He came to the campaign during my run against Crooked Hillary Clinton - it was great!"

King, whose hardline immigration stance made him a popular figure at Breitbart News, which Bannon ran before joining Trump's campaign, said the White House was being taken over by “northeasterners” instead of ideological conservatives, which "really hurts the long-term strategy of the Trump administration.”

Breitbart announced late Friday afternoon that Bannon had rejoined the news site as executive chairman.

In an MSNBC appearance on Friday, Pollak said Trump had so far satisfied his base’s concerns, but warned "if he veers away, if he pulls an Arnold Schwarzenegger and tries to reinvent himself as liberal, he will see that support erode very, very quickly."

While Breitbart was a critical early supporter of the president’s political rise, running interviews and favorable articles even before he announced his candidacy, their backing has not been absolute and their coverage has taken a special interest in Trump’s staffing decisions.

When Trump feuded with Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a popular figure among immigration restrictionists, the site pushed back with stories declaring that he “embodies the movement” Trump led and that his exit would “endanger the administration.”

More recently, Breitbart portrayed Bannon’s shaky status as part of a war for control of the White House between “economic nationalists,” the web site's favored side, and “globalists” like chief economic adviser Gary Cohn, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and Deputy National Security Adviser Dina Powell, all of whom featured prominently in the site's coverage.

Breitbart White House reporter Charlie Spiering’s reporting straightforwardly referred to the trio as “Bannon’s enemies in the White House” and the coverage has portrayed Cohn as too close to the financial world (he’s a former Goldman Sachs executive) and McMaster as overly hawkish on Afghanistan and weak on Islamic terror groups.

Trump weighed in on both McMaster and Bannon during the conflict, saying that McMaster was “a good man, very pro-Israel” in a statement earlier this month and telling reporters on Tuesday that Bannon was “a good man” and “not a racist” while hinting at his possible departure.

The anti-McMaster chatter grew loud enough to draw in figures like Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who decried a “disgraceful” campaign against him by the “alt right” in a statement this week. "Such smear tactics should not be tolerated and deserve an emphatic response," he said.

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page also backed McMaster, drawing corresponding coverage in Breitbart with headlines like “Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal Tries to Take Over Trump White House for McMaster, Globalists.”

The tensions only escalated when Bannon called a reporter at the liberal publication The American Prospect and undercut the administration’s tough talk on North Korea’s nuclear program, saying “there’s no military solution” with acceptable losses and that “they got us.”

On the the other end of the political spectrum, Bannon’s ouster could be a small step toward easing tensions with elected Republicans upset over Trump’s Charlottesville response and who had previously expressed concerns about Bannon’s role.

Bannon, who once called Breitbart "the platform for the alt-right," had long been decried by anti-hate groups over his site's coverage, which included a tag for stories on "black crime" and ran op-ed articles by far right European politicians. In the days leading up to his exit, Reps. Pete King, R-N.Y., and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., had both explicitly called for his firing.

“Those who relish culture wars & celebrate political polarization have no place leading a country in profound need of healing & unity,” Congressman Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla., tweeted in response to the news.

CORRECTION (Aug. 18, 6:31 p.m.): A previous version of this article misstated the title of Joel Pollack at Breitbart News. He is senior editor-at-large, not editor-in-chief

TRUMP EXPOSES MICHELLE FIELDS-COREY LEWANDOWSKI ASSAULT HOAX

TRUMP EXPOSES MICHELLE FIELDS-COREY LEWANDOWSKI ASSAULT HOAX:

RUINING A MAN'S LIFE & FAMILY FOR DIRTY POLITICS.

MORE ANTI-TRUMP MEDIA THEATRICS

Sources: Daily Mail, WND, Danger & Play, YouTube

Michelle Joann Fields is a very talented, ambitious journalist well-known within the Conservative Media community.

So why did she recently throw Donald Trump's campaign manager Corey Lewandowski under the bus by falsely claiming he assaulted her at a Trump rally when raw uncut video footage shows no clear signs of any assault?

Why did Michelle's story line change after the video footage was released?

Is the Florida Prosecutor (Aronberg) who chose to proceed with charging criminal charges against Corey a Clinton operative?

Has anyone made an offer to Michelle she can't refuse in exchange for helping to stop the Trump Political movement so he can't clinch the GOP nomination in July?

Stay tuned.

**** PIERS MORGAN: Toughen up! The video of Donald Trump's campaign manager 'assaulting' a female reporter is ridiculous. A man would have been condemned as a laughing stock for complaining.

 A few years ago, I was punched in the head three times at the British Press Awards in London.

My assailant was a man named Jeremy Clarkson, then presenter of global TV car show Top Gear.

He was severely intoxicated and very, very angry at a story about his personal life which had appeared in the newspaper I ran at the time.

The third flailing blow crashed into my temple, gouging a small hole from which blood flowed profusely.

At this point, I considered my options.

a) Hit him back.

b) Go home.

c) Call the police to press charges, then phone my lawyer to sue Clarkson.

If I’d gone for option c) then I suspect he’d have been convicted of assault and I’d have ended up with a truck load of cash too.

There were, after all, about 1000 witnesses, all of whom were journalists (which is why I didn’t hit him back..).

But I concluded that on balance, I probably deserved my pummelling and so instead, I stumbled outside and caught a taxi home.

(Clarkson, ironically, was fired from Top Gear last year for punching one of his producers in the head after he failed to provide him with hot food)

My point in retelling this anecdote is that journalism’s a rough old game, and the people – male and female - who choose it for a profession tend to be fairly rough too.

‘News,’ as the great press baron Lord Northcliffe once observed, ‘is something someone somewhere doesn’t want printed.’

Gathering news is thus a precarious pursuit which often requires reporters to work in very difficult, dangerous conditions.

This morning I woke in Los Angeles to breaking news that Donald Trump’s campaign manager Corey Lewandowski had been arrested and charged with ‘battery’ over an incident with a female reporter, Michelle Fields.

His alleged crime was to assault Ms Fields as she attempted to interview Trump when he walked away from a news conference in Florida.

Helpfully, the police issued new video of the ‘clash’, illustrating very clearly exactly what happened.

The footage lasts just a few seconds and shows Ms Fields displaying commendable bravura as she approaches Trump to fire questions at him.

Crucially, DailyMail.com has now established from a member of Trump’s Secret Service detail that in the process, she touched Trump twice and was warned by agents to stop.

Lewandowski, walking a few steps behind his boss, saw this happening (he may well have heard the warnings too) and raced forward to prevent her asking more questions and put himself between Trump and the reporter.

At this point, let’s forget the gender of the journalist.

In this glorious age of equality, it shouldn’t matter – right?

Battery is battery – regardless of the sex of the victim.

Lewandowski can be seen putting his arm up to block the journalist. In doing so, he also appears to grab her arm for less than a second as he moves on.

This is all rather different from what Ms Fields herself claimed had happened when she wrote about it for her then employer, Breitbart.com: ‘I was jolted backwards. Someone had grabbed me tightly by the arm and yanked me down. I almost fell to the ground but was able to maintain my balance. Nevertheless I was shaken. Campaign managers aren’t supposed to try to forcefully throw reporters to the ground.’

Oh puh-lease.

I’ve watched the video multiple times and cannot conceive any sensible interpretation that he is committing any kind of deliberate assault.

Part of Lewandowski’s job is to protect Trump from nosey journalists, and that’s exactly what he’s doing.

Fields, let me also be very clear, was also doing her job and if I were her editor, I’d congratulate her on getting so close to her prey, especially as repeatedly touching a presidential front-runner in public when he’s surrounded by Secret Service agents is a very risky thing to do.

But my fulsome praise would very rapidly be replaced by utter incredulity if she then informed me she was going to press charges against Lewandowski for battery.

Particularly given that battery, according to the law, means ‘intentionally touching someone without that person’s will’ – the very same thing we now know Fields did to Trump.

This doesn’t mean I take violence against women lightly. But there has to be some kind of harmful intent surely?

Lewandowski wasn’t trying to hurt Michelle Fields, he was trying to stop her getting to Donald Trump. If one of the Secret Service agents had done it, as they had every right to do given her behaviour, they’d have been applauded for doing their job.

Like every journalist I know, I’ve spent much of my career being pushed, shoved, elbowed and barged in crowded places when trying to get near famous people.

It goes with the territory.

Just as for that special breed of journalists who work in war zones, daily life can include dodging bullets, bombs and grenades.

Some of the toughest journalists in America are women.

Would Barbara Walters, Katie Couric or Diane Sawyer have pressed charges if they’d been in Ms Fields’ position?

Of course they wouldn’t.

They’d have all brushed off Lewandowski’s obstruction and chased back after Trump to try and fire more questions at him.

That’s what real reporters do. They don’t take no for an answer.

It’s hard therefore not to escape the sad conclusion that Ms Fields is hell-bent on having her 15 seconds of fame by turning a very innocuous incident into a national scandal to deliberately embarrass and damage a presidential candidate.

After I tweeted about this today, and had the audacity to suggest Ms Fields was being a big wuss, I was instantly bombarded with vicious abuse – notably from other high profile online journalists.

Olivia Nuzzi, a noisy feminist from the Daily Beast led the way with this simple entreaty: ‘Please go f**k yourself.’

Ben Shapiro, a whiny little brat who quit Breitbart over the way they supposedly failed to defend his colleague, was racist: ‘Go screw yourself you prissy sexist Brit.’

Whilst Simon Maloy, an aesthetically displeasing toad from Salon.com, preferred body-shaming me by saying I was a ‘dough-looking, can’t-tell-where-the-neck-stops-and-chin-starts fop.’

Whatever.

Like I said, journalism’s a rough old game. You dish it out, you have to take it.

But this debate boils down to this: if a male reporter cried ‘battery’ after such a trivial incident, he’d be an absolute laughing stock.

Why should a female reporter be taken any more seriously?

By making such a grotesque mountain of such a tiny molehill, Michelle Fields has embarrassed herself and let down her profession.

Toughen up, young lady – or choose a different job.

Breitbart's Strange Obsession With Obama's Background: The Harvard Law School Video

Watch Obama Speaks at Harvard Law in '90 on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

Prior to Andrew Breitbart's Death he was collecting videotapes & work about Pres. Obama's past.

Is it safe to assume he was probably going to edit most of it to make Pres. Obama appear as some White Hating, Radical?
Given the Fact that Andrew Breitbart was NOT a Supporter of Pres. Obama & Vehemently Disagreed with his Administration, its Safe to assume this theory.

One of the videos in his collection was of a Young Barack Obama during his time at Harvard Law School.

He was speaking to a group of Students & Staff, encouraging them to Welcome Diversity.
What's So Controversial About this particular Video?

NOTHING!

However if you Edit this Video, Add Words and Additional Scenes to it, you could make Pres. Obama appear as a White Hating, Radical.

As I stated last week when news about Andrew Breitbart's death first surfaced, he knew something & was going to use to upset the 2012 Election.

Do I Believe Pres. Obama's people had Anything to do with Breitbart's Death?

NO! Of Course NOT!
NOT in a Million Years!

I don't know how or why Andrew Breitbart died but I do know he was planning on doing something Extremely Dirty to hurt President Obama.

As my Grandmother used to say to people who did her wrong:
"God does NOT like Ugly so you better watch yourself!"








Harvard video used to attack Obama provides no racial 'smoking gun'

Wait...that was it? The shocking videotape unearthed by the late, right-wing gadfly Andrew Breitbart, the one that was supposed to finally prove that Barack Obama is indeed the crazed race warrior that the right has tried to portray him to be since 2007, has turned out to be neither new, nor newsworthy.

Breitbart was supposedly working on a major exposé on the tape, which shows Obama during his days at Harvard Law School in the early 90s. It leaked early -- a suspicious cabal of liberal media elites at Buzzfeed having scooped Fox News' Sean Hannity by using the clandestine tactics that the Left calls "licensing the video from Boston's PBS TV station."

What they found will shock and horrify you -- if you are shocked and horrified by pithy compliments delivered before a mixed race crowd at the frightening Saul Alinsky radical training ground of Cambridge, Massachusetts.

In the video, Obama is speaking at a campus rally in support of Professor Derrick Bell, the first tenured black professor at Harvard Law School and one of just a handful of minorities -- and women -- with such posts in the early 90s. At the time, a student group called the Coalition for Civil Rights, which was comprised of black, Hispanic, women and gay student organizations, demanded that Harvard diversify its faculty.

(Similar protests, sit ins and demands were taking place at the undergraduate college, where the head of the African-American studies department was a white woman.

Those protests ultimately led to the hiring of Henry Louis Gates to lead the Afro-American Studies department and for a time brought Professor Cornel West to Harvard, where he battled with then Harvard University president and future adviser to President Barack Obama, Lawrence Summers.)

Bell took a leave of absence and refused to return until the law school tenured a black woman. The protests in the "smoking gun" video, which the Right is certain will take the president down, were in support of Bell's actions. In the tape, Obama tells a story about Bell addressing first year law students, saying that Bell didn't accomplish all that he did "because of his good looks and easy charm, though he has both in amble measure." The mostly white audience laughs. Scandal!

Hannity, in his Wednesday Fox show, ominously informed his audience that "in the next frame, Obama embraces the 'controversial' professor, but that part of the tape was 'covered up' by Obama's friend and Bell's fellow Harvard Law professor, Charles Ogletree, ahead of the 2008 election."

Hannity claimed that the video was selectively edited and was hidden by the media in order to protect Obama from the kind of scrutiny that conservatives are forced to endure. In fact, PBS' Frontline aired the video in its entirety, in 2008, as part of a documentary on Obama's time at Harvard that has been available on YouTube for four years...

Hannity did his best to hype the video, which shows Obama looking and sounding almost exactly the way he does today, though with longer hair -- wait, Afros are a sign of being radical, right? -- and with his hands stuck in his pockets. He tells the crowd, "open your hearts and your minds to Derrick Bell." And it is on that phrase, and Bell's connection to an area of scholarship called "critical race theory," that the anti-Obama right plans to base its attacks.

Hannity and his guests, two editors from Breitbart's BigJournalism.com, -- who for some reason kept giggling -- spent much of the segment smearing Derrick Bell, who died last year and cannot defend himself. They called Bell a "radical," and the "Jeremiah Wright of academia." They claimed that there was a "media cover up" of this shocking videotape, which has a sinister demonstration of Obamaian mildness.

In the next segment, Fox commentator Juan Williams disappointed those in the studio by declaring that the tape was nothing new. "I expected more than that," he said. That might be the understatement of the year.

Boykin said that Obama didn't participate in most of the campus protests or in the Coalition for Civil Rights lawsuit against Harvard Law. But on key occasions, such as that day in 1991, Obama, who was something of a campus celebrity because of this status as the first African-American to head the Law Review, lent his presence and support to the group and to Bell, which helped bring critical attention to the efforts, for which Boykin praised him.

And Boykin denied that the protests were some demonstration of black nationalism. "They centered around Professor Derrick Bell and a student led movement for diversity. It wasn't even a black thing. It was a coalition of black groups, the Latino group, women, gay groups... Most of the people at our events were white!"

As for the attempts by Hannity and his cohorts to tar the reputation of the late Professor Bell, Boykin said: "I spoke at Professor Bell's funeral at the Riverside church in Harlem last year. It was an ecumenical gathering of people of all races. He was nothing like that."


View Larger Map


Sources: Buzz Feed, CNN, Daily Mail, Guardian.co.uk, Harvard Law School, NY Daily News, PBS, The Grio, Youtube, Google Maps

Andrew Breitbart Predicted Brokered 2012 GOP Convention; Was In Talks With CNN (Videos) R.I.P.

Andrew Breitbart was 'in talks with CNN' over new show with Anthony Weiner before he died aged just 43


Andrew Breitbart, the conservative firebrand and new media pioneer who died suddenly at just 43, had told friends he was poised to take his jihad against the Left deeper into the mainstream media with a regular show on CNN.

Last weekend, Breitbart told friends he was in early talks with CNN about a Crossfire-style show in which he would argue from the Right alongside former US House representative Anthony Weiner taking him on from the Left.

Such a show could have been a blockbuster. In what was perhaps his finest hour, Breitbart was the man who ended the political career of Weiner by revealing that the married congressman he had sent lewd photographs sent to young women via Twitter.

Articulate, outspoken and - before his fall from grace - a darling of the Left, Weiner was one of the few liberals who might have given Breitbart a run for his money.

It would also have been a dramatic move for CNN, which previously brought in disgraced Eliot Spitzer, who resigned as New York governor after his trysts with a high-end prostitute were revealed, for a show that was subsequently dropped.

Separately, Breitbart had been asked last Friday by Hollywood screenwriter ans producer Aaron Sorkin about how he might be portrayed in Sorkin's new HBO series The Newsroom, about the inner workings of a cable news network.

Sorkin told me via email: 'I e-mailed Andrew last Friday because the episode of The Newsroom I'm currently writing takes place during the week the Anthony Weiner photos were in the news.

'Andrew and I had struck up a friendly e-mail relationship and so I reached out to ask him if he could give me a timeline of the events from his point of view. I got a quick response -'I'm in' - and we were supposed to meet for coffee at the end of the day today [Thursday].'

Sorkin said that the coffee would have been 'about Andrew shedding any new light on the Anthony Weiner incident' and 'we'll likely see shards of Andrew during his various appearances that week' in news footage from that time.

Confidants of Breitbart say he had some reservations about a CNN show but would probably have signed up for it. He was intrigued by the notion of a show with Weiner, believing it could be a vehicle for real discussion of ideas.

Edie Emery, spokeswoman for CNN, said that CNN had no comment.

I first met Breitbart in 2007, when he was still working in relative obscurity for the Drudge Report. Engaging and irrepressible, he had a passion for taking on liberals and delighted in doing so from his native Los Angeles, which he viewed as the belly of the beast.

Working from the basement of his home in Brentwood, he would post stories on the Drudge Report that would be read by millions and help shape the media narrative. In each pretty much each corner of virtually every room was some kind of Apple device so that he would always be connected to the world outside.

He was proud that the house was right next to the LA National Cemetery, where many American troops were buried and military funerals were often held. He told me that his real estate agent had told him the proximity to the cemetery meant the house was worth less but to him it increased its value.

Although he saw the mainstream media as the enemy, he understood it and knew many of its main players. This enabled him to use the media, sometimes from with, as well as oppose it. I remember him telling me that the internet had been invented for him because is provided an outlet for his Attention Deficit Disorder, with which he had been diagnosed.

Shortly afterwards, Breitbart burst onto the national scene, leaving Drudge to set up his Big Government websites. Almost overnight, he became a conservative megastar.

The next time I saw him in LA was last September, when we met for drinks at Barney's Beanery in Westwood with mutual friends. By this time, one of the weapons he used to fight the Left was Twitter. As he approached, wearing a t-shirt from a Tea Party group he had spoken to, he was walking and tweeting.

Although he could come across as an angry figure, particularly when on the defensive on television, the reality was that Breitbart loved life and had an immense capacity for humour and mischief. Adopted by a secular Jewish couple, he had grown up holding conventional political views (his natural father was an Irish musician; he knew who his birth parents were but had no interest in meeting them).

Despite his fearlessness, he was also a sensitive soul and a very affectionate husband to Susie and father of four. He gloried in his battles, re-tweeting the vilest things said about him to shame and expose their authors.

But he told me that he had wondered about the effect of his public persona when his son had been upset relating how a school friend had said to him: 'My father says that your father is evil'.

But Breitbart was happy to have made a hundred new friends for every friend he had lost because of his new celebrity as a Right-winger.

That night, he recounted how he had received an agonised - and completely unsolicited - email from a college friend who had explained at great length why he could no longer be his friend. Breitbart laughed at the presumptuousness of the whole thing and how he had replied with two words: 'Oh well.'

He also said that night that he had recently gone to the hospital emergency room with a tightness in his chest. When a nurse had 'freaked out' at how high his blood pressure was, he had responded: 'Don't tell me that - you'll make it even higher.'

Breitbart had looked overweight and stressed that night. I and the others with us told him he needed to ease up on his insane travel schedule and he talked about trying to exercise more, taking downtime with his family and getting a personal assistant to take charge of his diary.

But he always seemed to be on Twitter, on TV, on the phone or on a plane - and sometimes seemingly two or three of these at once. A few months ago, he set up a part-time base on Capitol Hill, spending time in Washington working out of a wonderfully kitsch historic house decorated by a rich Egyptian and right next to the US Supreme Court.

I last saw Breitbart on Saturday in Troy, Michigan. He was appearing at the Tea Party-linked Americans For Prosperity conference, where Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney also spoke. That morning, he had uncharacteristically slept in until 10am and there had been a panic about where he was.

During his speech, however, he was on vintage form, describing Barack Obama as 'the metronome' and his allies as 'the alligators'. He declared proudly: 'I'm out there fighting with the metronome.

I'm out there fighting with the alligators.' At another point, he said: 'I'm fighting these people as hard as I can. They're totalitarians.'

He urged conservatives to 'stop acting like Leftists' in denouncing those who backed Republican candidates who might not pass this or that purity test and said it was essential to get behind whoever was the nominee.

As usual, he was extremely funny, joking about how he had shaved his stubble and cut his hair after Occupy people said that 'I look like a bum'. In describing an anti-Republican media narrative designed to divert attention from unemployment and gas prices by highlighting social issues, he said: 'I have four children.

I took care of the thing down there. Contraception's not in the top two billion things in my world.'

He branded MSNBC 'race card television' and that if a conservative said 'gymnasium' on television, the response would be: ''Gym' originates in antebellum South Carolina.

You're all racist!'

The next day, he took a car to Detroit airport with filmmaker Ann McElhinney, another speaker and a close friend. As he got in, he told her: 'I feel awful. I feel really bad.' She put it down to a hangover.

In the car, they discussed Aaron Sorkin - on Friday night, he had shown her the email from Sorkin - and the prospect of a CNN with Weiner. Breitbart felt that such a CNN show would rehabilitate Weiner but he wanted to ensure it would be serious and would involve going out and talking to real people as well as back-and-forth in the studio.

They talked about Fox News, which Breitbart felt was stuck in the past with too many blonde presenters and outdated formats. One of the journalists he admired most, he said, was Dana Loesch, who worked for him as Big Government and is now also CNN contributor.

He described her as a 'warrior princess', effective because she was cool and modern.

Breitbart thought that the Left feared people like Loesch most because she was an attractive, engaging, hip person who did not fit the stereotype of dour, fusty conservative. Essentially, the same thing could have been said about him.

One of Breibart's central arguments was that conservatives had allowed themselves to be excluded from popular culture - film, television, music, even art. He was a central figure in the largely undercover world of Hollywood conservatism.

At the end of his speech in Troy, he said that conservatives would have to endure the race card and the 'fairness' card being played against them in the coming election. 'This is warfare. They're at war with you and the very idea that you're still here shows that the Tea Party mindset is alive and kicking.'

Who would have thought that the fiercest and most formidable conservative warrior of all was about to leave the battlefield.





Andrew Breitbart, a Conservative Blogger is DEAD at 43 Supposedly from "Natural Causes".

Breitbart helped to launch popular Websites: "The Drudge Report" & "Huffington Post".

He later launched his own Successful site: "Big Government".

Call me Crazy or Call me a "Conspiracy Theorist" (I'm NOT) but I truly believe Andrew Breitbart Knew Something.
Something that could upset the 2012 Election.

He was probably getting ready to expose what he knew & now Suddenly he ends up DEAD in Los Angeles at 43.
NOT A Coincidence!

Even if Breitbart was a Pain-in-the-butt Politically for Liberals, GOP Establishment Leaders & some Conservatives, he still had the right of Freedom of the Press.

Someone on Twitter wanted to know if former Congressman Anthony Weiner is happy Andrew Breitbart is Dead.

I seriously doubt Anthony Weiner will issue a Public Statement Celebrating Breitbart's Death despite what he did to him.

On a Personal level, I am NOT happy to see Anyone Die regardless of what they have done because I'm NOT God.

I'm telling ya'll Los Angeles is Corrupt! This includes LAPD & the Coroner's Office.

When Powerful People want to get rid of Someone In the Political or Entertainment Arena, for the past several years their deaths have occurred in Los Angeles.

The Cause of Death is Always Mysterious and listed as Natural Causes, Suicide or Prescription Drug Overdose.

As this Election closes in, the American People are going to see even more Strange Things Occurring. I Suggest We ALL Begin to Pray.

Andrew Breitbart Dead at 43 R.I.P.







Publisher and Author Andrew Breitbart Dead

Andrew Breitbart, the noted conservative Internet publisher and author, has died. He was 43.

A statement posted on his website said that Breitbart died "unexpectedly from natural causes" this morning.

The Los Angeles Coroner's Office confirmed to ABC News Radio that Breitbart died shortly after midnight at UCLA Medical Center.

The following statement was posted on Breitbart's website today:

"With a terrible feeling of pain and loss we announce the passing of Andrew Breitbart. We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior.

Andrew lived boldly, so that we more timid souls would dare to live freely and fully, and fight for the fragile liberty he showed us how to love.

Andrew recently wrote a new conclusion to his book, Righteous Indignation:

'I love my job. I love fighting for what I believe in. I love having fun while doing it. I love reporting stories that the Complex refuses to report. I love fighting back, I love finding allies, and—famously—I enjoy making enemies.

Three years ago, I was mostly a behind-the-scenes guy who linked to stuff on a very popular website. I always wondered what it would be like to enter the public realm to fight for what I believe in. I've lost friends, perhaps dozens. But I've gained hundreds, thousands—who knows?—of allies. At the end of the day, I can look at myself in the mirror, and I sleep very well at night.'

Andrew is at rest, yet the happy warrior lives on, in each of us."

A conservative blogger and journalist, Breitbart helped launch the Huffington Post and was an editor at the Drudge Report.

He also founded his own news network, acting as the publisher of several news websites including Breitbart.com, Breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism and Big Peace.

Big Government broke the ACORN child sex trafficking scandal and also, in 2011, the "Weinergate" photo scandal that led to the resignation of New York Rep. Anthony Weiner.

Breitbert was known for publishing controversial exposes and wrote a best-selling critique of celebrity culture, "Hollywood, Interrupted." His newest book "Righteous Indignation: Excuse Me While I Save the World!" was on the New York Times bestseller list.




View Larger Map


Sources: ABC News, AOL, CNN, Daily Mail, Huff Post, MSNBC, Youtube, Google Maps

Andrew Breitbart Mysteriously Dead At 43! R.I.P. Warning Or Natural Causes?

Andrew Breitbart, a Conservative Blogger is DEAD at 43 Supposedly from "Natural Causes".

Breitbart helped to launch popular Websites: "The Drudge Report" & "Huffington Post".

He later launched his own Successful site: "Big Government".

Call me Crazy or Call me a "Conspiracy Theorist" (I'm NOT) but I truly believe Andrew Breitbart Knew Something.
Something that could upset the 2012 Election.

He was probably getting ready to expose what he knew & now Suddenly he ends up DEAD in Los Angeles at 43.
NOT A Coincidence!

Even if Breitbart was a Pain-in-the-butt Politically for Liberals, GOP Establishment Leaders & some Conservatives, he still had the right of Freedom of the Press.

Someone on Twitter wanted to know if former Congressman Anthony Weiner is happy Andrew Breitbart is Dead.

I seriously doubt Anthony Weiner will issue a Public Statement Celebrating Breitbart's Death despite what he did to him.

On a Personal level, I am NOT happy to see Anyone Die regardless of what they have done because I'm NOT God.

I'm telling ya'll Los Angeles is Corrupt! This includes LAPD & the Coroner's Office.

When Powerful People want to get rid of Someone In the Political or Entertainment Arena, for the past several years their deaths have occurred in Los Angeles.

The Cause of Death is Always Mysterious and listed as Natural Causes, Suicide or Prescription Drug Overdose.

As this Election closes in, the American People are going to see even more Strange Things Occurring.

I Suggest We ALL Begin to Pray.

Andrew Breitbart Dead at 43.

R.I.P.







Publisher and Author Andrew Breitbart Dead

Andrew Breitbart, the noted conservative Internet publisher and author, has died. He was 43.

A statement posted on his website said that Breitbart died "unexpectedly from natural causes" this morning.

The Los Angeles Coroner's Office confirmed to ABC News Radio that Breitbart died shortly after midnight at UCLA Medical Center.

The following statement was posted on Breitbart's website today:

"With a terrible feeling of pain and loss we announce the passing of Andrew Breitbart. We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior.

Andrew lived boldly, so that we more timid souls would dare to live freely and fully, and fight for the fragile liberty he showed us how to love.

Andrew recently wrote a new conclusion to his book, Righteous Indignation:

'I love my job. I love fighting for what I believe in. I love having fun while doing it. I love reporting stories that the Complex refuses to report. I love fighting back, I love finding allies, and—famously—I enjoy making enemies.

Three years ago, I was mostly a behind-the-scenes guy who linked to stuff on a very popular website. I always wondered what it would be like to enter the public realm to fight for what I believe in. I've lost friends, perhaps dozens. But I've gained hundreds, thousands—who knows?—of allies. At the end of the day, I can look at myself in the mirror, and I sleep very well at night.'

Andrew is at rest, yet the happy warrior lives on, in each of us."

A conservative blogger and journalist, Breitbart helped launch the Huffington Post and was an editor at the Drudge Report.

He also founded his own news network, acting as the publisher of several news websites including Breitbart.com, Breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism and Big Peace.

Big Government broke the ACORN child sex trafficking scandal and also, in 2011, the "Weinergate" photo scandal that led to the resignation of New York Rep. Anthony Weiner.

Breitbert was known for publishing controversial exposes and wrote a best-selling critique of celebrity culture, "Hollywood, Interrupted." His newest book "Righteous Indignation: Excuse Me While I Save the World!" was on the New York Times bestseller list.




View Larger Map


Sources: ABC News, AOL, CNN, Huff Post, MSNBC, Youtube, Google Maps

Anthony Weiner's Wife Is Pregnant! Please Resign! Pray For Him

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Ok. Now This Story Is Getting Really, Really Weird.

The NY Times Has Reported That Congressman Weiner's Beautiful Wife Huma Is With Child.

Its Also Been Reported More Pics Of Weiner's "Hot Dog Bun" Were Released Today.

Yet The Guy Refuses To Step Down!

Let's Face It Folks.

The fact Weiner Refuses To Step Down Proves He Is Emotionally Unstable & Badly In Need Of Immediate Mental Health Intervention.

This Is So Sad. So So Sad!

Everyone In New York Loves Anthony Weiner. Even People Who Love To Hate Him.

At This Point I Believe If He Steps Down (Like Yesterday!), His Political Career Could Still Be Repaired Sometime In The Future.

However Only AFTER He Seeks Mental Health Treatment First. i.e., Dr. Drew Pinsky.

But If The Guy Refuses To Resign & Refuses To Seek Treatment, God Only Knows What Might Happen Next.

(FYI: Many Suicides Are Committed In New York City Each Year.)

I Only Hope His Wife Huma, The Clintons, Nancy Pelosi & Chuck Schumer Will Convince Him To Resign & Immediately Allow Himself To Be Committed Into One Of Dr. Drew's Facilities In California.

The Guy Obviously Needs Some Rest & Relaxation.

Perhaps Getting Away From The Fast Pace Of NYC & Into The Laid Back Environment Of Sunny California Will Do Weiner Some Good.

Don't Worry About Andrew Breitbart!

Breitbart Is NOT A Journalist.

Instead He's Nothing More Than A Homewrecker & Dirty, Paid GOP Operative.

Nothing Good Will Come Of Breitbart Just Watch! Scumbags Like Him Always Get Their Due!

Meanwhile Too Much Is At Stake Politically For Weiner To Remain In Public Office.

Pres. Obama NEEDS To Be Re-elected.

Democrats & Independents Need To Focus On Stopping Republicans From Ruining Our Nation With Unfair, Unequal Budget Cuts Disguised As "Deficit Reduction".

Budget Cuts Which ONLY Hurt Middle Class Citizens, Veterans, Senior Citizens, College Students & Low Income Citizens!

And Millions Of Voters Still Need JOBS!!!

This Is Definitely NOT The Time To Continue Talking About Weiner's Private "Assets"!

Congressman Anthony Weiner Sir, We STILL Love You & Appreciate All Of Your Service.

But Please, For The Sake Of Your Beautiful Wife, Unborn Child, The Entire Democratic Party & 2012 Elections.....

PLEASE SIR RESIGN TODAY!

We Are Praying For You.

God Bless You & Your Family.






Weiner’s Wife Is Pregnant

Their marriage has become the subject of intense speculation and scrutiny amid an embarrassing online sex scandal.

Now, Representative Anthony D. Weiner and Huma Abedin are about to make news of a different kind: they are expecting their first child.

Ms. Abedin, 35, is in the early stages of pregnancy, according to three people with knowledge of the situation.

The pregnancy, which the couple has disclosed to close friends and family, adds a new dimension to questions about the future of their marriage.

Mr. Weiner, 46, has admitted to engaging in salacious online conversations with at least six women over the last few years, including an incident last month in which he sent a photograph of himself in underwear to a college student in Washington state. He apologized to his wife and declared that they have no intention of splitting up.

“We will weather this,” Mr. Weiner said on Monday, during his emotional news conference. “I love her very much, and she loves me.”

But Ms. Abedin, a longtime aide to Hillary Rodham Clinton, has remained silent about the topic as she keeps up a hectic schedule at the State Department.

Ms. Abedin returned to work this week and departed on Wednesday for a trip to Northern Africa with Ms. Clinton.

A State Department spokesman declined to comment Wednesday afternoon.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Here It Is Straight No Chaser!

I Totally, Totally Agree With MSNBC's Ed Schultz (Glad To See You Back Ed) That Its Time For Congressman Anthony Weiner (D-NY) To Resign.

After Supporting Him Earlier, I Now Believe It Would Be In The Best Interest Of The 2012 Elections, That He Should Step Down. NOW!

If Weiner Refuses To Resign He Could Possibly Ruin Chances For Democrats To Regain The U.S. House & Could Also Possibly Cost Democrats The U.S. Senate.

Thus He Should No Longer Continue Speaking Out To The Press.

He Should No Longer Try To Hold On To His Seat Hoping He'll Be Able To Ride Out This Scandal Because It Won't Work!

Just Please SHUT UP & STEP DOWN For Christ's Sake!

PLEASE!

And....

Schedule An Appointment To Meet With Dr. Drew Pinsky ASAP In The Process.

Do I Still Believe Weiner Fell Into The GOP's Waiting Hands On This One?

YES!

The GOP Didn't Want Weiner, A Liberal Democrat To Become Mayor Of NYC.

So When He Messed Up With This Sexting, Twitter Scandal He Became Putty In Their Hands.

Andrew Breitbart, Founder Of Biggovernment.com & A Paid GOP Operative, Doesn't Just Sit Around Waiting For Scandalous Stories Like These To Pop-Up Out Of Nowhere, No!

Instead Breitbart Preys Upon Influential Democrat Politicians, Helps Set Them Up & Than Moves In For The KILL!

Kill As In Kill Their Political Careers, Thereby Making Room For GOP Replacements.

Folks Like Peter King (R) (Mr. "Muslim Radicalization") Who Represents Long Island, Was Also Probably Sitting & Waiting By The Sidelines For Weiner To Self-Destruct.

No Worries Folks!

Because There's Absolutely NO Chance Weiner Will Become New York's Mext Mayor In 2013.

However Unlike Adulterer & Former Presidential Candidate, John Edwards (D-NC), It Doesn't Appear That Weiner Violated Any Laws. (i.e., Campaign Finance Laws)

And Lying Isn't Usually A Crime Unless You LIE To A Government Or Law Enforcement Official Right?

i.e., John Ensign (R-NV)

After Receiving Some Serious Sex Addiction Counseling From Dr. Drew Pinsky, Who Knows What Weiner's Next Career Might Be.

But If He Wants To Regain The Trust Of His Constituents, He Will More Than Likely Have To Start Over At Ground Zero. (No Pun Intended)

Like Possibly Becoming A NYC District Rep., City Councilman Or.....

Perhaps Starting An Advocacy Program For Some Of Brooklyn's Most Vulnerable Citizens To Help With Issues That Have Repeatedly Plagued Citizens Who Reside In That Part Of New York City.

Ex: Slum Landlord Housing, Illegal Evictions, No Hot Water, No Heat, Illegally Fired, Low Unemployment, Bad Public Schools, Serious Crime, Mob Takeovers, Child Abuse & Neglect, etc.,

Kudos To U.S. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi For Immediately Starting An Ethics Investigation Following Weiner's Babbling Idiot's Press Conference.

Listen Weiner For The Good Of Your Party & Pres. Obama's Re-election, Please Just SHUT UP & STEP DOWN!

Don't Drag This Out Any Longer Because The GOP Is Eating It Up Like A Delicious Coney Island Frankfurter.

Just RESIGN Dude!

TODAY!

And STOP Sexting Photos Of Your "Hot Dog Bun" To Other Women.

You're A Married Man Now Dude!

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Weiner's only choice is to resign

As Anthony Weiner is about to find out: When you're a politician, not all lies are the same. There's a big difference between breaking a campaign promise by failing to deliver on something and breaking the public's trust with an outright falsehood.

When you do the former, the public will shrug and surmise that you're no better or worse than any other elected official. But when you do the latter, you signal that you can no longer be trusted on any level.

In what you'd have to call a negative trend, Americans have become accustomed over the years to politicians saying one thing to get elected and doing another once they're in office. In fact, these days, people think that is normal. Whether it's George H.W. Bush breaking his promise of "no new taxes," or Barack Obama violating his pledge to make immigration reform a priority of his administration, most people are tolerant of broken promises. They tell themselves that circumstances have changed or that the elected official will eventually make good. Besides, they say, every politician has his share of unfulfilled pledges.

That's not Weiner's problem. The lies he told in response to reporters' questions were much worse and much more direct. They were told not with the desire to get elected but with the intent to mislead and deceive. And that being the case, the damage to his political future is likely to be much more severe.

But you knew that already, if you caught even a glimpse of Monday's news conference where Weiner finally came clean about posting lewd photos on his Twitter account and lying about it.

It was a much different story than what we heard last week, when Weiner claimed that his account had been compromised and that, as a "prank," a hacker had posted

But you knew that already, if you caught even a glimpse of Monday's news conference where Weiner finally came clean about posting lewd photos on his Twitter account and lying about it.

It was a much different story than what we heard last week, when Weiner claimed that his account had been compromised and that, as a "prank," a hacker had posted a lewd photo on the account and sent the photo to a young woman. In a textbook example of how not to answer a question, Weiner told MSNBC's Luke Russert that, while he didn't send the tweet, he "can't say with certitude" whether he was the person in the photo. In an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Weiner couldn't even say whether the underpants in the picture were his.

Monday, amid reports that there were more pictures that could yet be released, Weiner apparently decided to cut his losses before the story got worse. He apologized for lying about the ordeal and admitted carrying on inappropriate virtual relationships with several women he'd met online. Better late than never, the married congressman took "full responsibility" for both the relationships and for lying in an attempt to cover them up.



"To be clear, the picture was of me, and I sent it," Weiner said. "I'm deeply sorry for the pain this has caused my wife and our family, my constituents, my friends, my supporters and my staff," he said. "I lied because I was ashamed at what I had done, and I didn't want to get caught."

No kidding. Isn't that why most people lie -- because they're afraid of getting caught? That's obviously no excuse. Nor does it look good that the Democratic leadership in the House wants to know whether Weiner used government resouces while he "exchanged messages and photos of an explicit nature with about six women over the last three years." (Weiner says he doesn't believe he did.)

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi announced just moments after the news conference that she would call "for an Ethics Committee investigation to determine whether any official resources were used or any other violation of House rules occurred." Weiner said afterward that he "will fully cooperate with an investigation by the House ethics committee."

Whether or not Wiener violated House ethics rules, it is already clear that he violated the trust of his constituents. When he lied to reporters, he lied to the American people, who count on journalists to tell them what elected officials are doing on their dime. There's no way to make up for that kind of deceit. The relationship between lawmaker and constituent is forever damaged, and this public servant will never be effective again.

As it stands, Weiner is just holding a seat that the people of New York could put to better use. That's why the congressman has no choice but to resign.


View Larger Map


Sources: CNN, Fox News, Huffington Post, MSNBC, NY Daily News, NY Times, Wikipedia, Youtube, Google Maps