Custom Search
Showing posts with label Affordable Housing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Affordable Housing. Show all posts

Saturday, April 28, 2018

DEMOCRATS ARE IGNORING 2018 ELDERLY VOTERS, BUT WHY? (TAX CREDIT HOUSING)









DEMOCRATS ARE IGNORING 2018 ELDERLY VOTERS, BUT WHY?

SENIOR CITIZEN VOTERS REMAIN LOYAL VOTERS.

ISSUES WHICH CONCERN SENIOR CITIZENS INCLUDING MEDICARE AND QUALITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING, ARE BEING OVERLOOKED.

TOO MANY SENIORS RESIDE IN RAGGEDY, OVER PRICED TAX CREDIT APARTMENTS MANAGED BY SLUMLORDS (MARYLAND).

IF SENIORS COMPLAIN THEY ARE THREATENED WITH BEING PLACED IN A NURSING HOME UNTIL THEY DIE.

WHERE ARE THE POLITICIANS WHO STILL CARE ABOUT SENIORS?


Post Sources: New York Magazine, The Atlantic, WTVR, Youtube


******* Elderly White Voters Are Starting to Turn on the GOP


One of the many odd features of American politics, circa 2018, is that the primary beneficiaries of our nation’s social safety net are also the core supporters of the party that wants to slash it. No age group derives a bigger benefit from our welfare state than America’s elderly; but no cohort is as susceptible to the cultural paranoia and racial resentment that sustain the modern right, either. Thus, conservatives can’t shrink “big government” without retaining the allegiance of the voters who stand to lose most from the erosion of social insurance.

The tensions inherent to this arrangement grew conspicuous during last year’s fight over Obamacare repeal — when congressional Republicans tried to pass a health-care bill that would have drastically increased the cost of health insurance for older, working-class voters in rural America (a core GOP constituency) while dramatically lowering premiums for 20-something city-dwellers (an overwhelmingly Democratic demographic). Many purple-district Republicans voted for the bill, anyway, effectively betting that it was more politically hazardous to thwart the ideological goals of their big-dollar donors, than to betray the material interests of their gray-haired voters.

This may have been costly mistake.

According to polling from Reuters/Ipsos, the percentage of college-educated white voters who say “health care” is their top issue rose from 8 percent in 2016 to 21 percent today; over that same period, the demographic went from favoring a Republican Congress by ten points, to backing a Democratic one by two.

Of course, this shift isn’t solely the product of health-care politics. While older whites with college diplomas have swung left by 12 points since 2016, those without bachelor’s degrees have remained solidly in the GOP’s camp.

If material self-interest were the only force pushing older whites out of the Republican tent, one might expect “working class” elderly whites to be leading the exodus. Nevertheless, the Ryan agenda does seem to have played a role in alienating college-educated white Republicans, whose educational backgrounds already rendered them a less-than-ideal audience for Trump’s anti-intellectual shtick. As Reuters reports:

John Camm has been a Republican since the Nixon Administration, but the 63-year-old Tucson accountant says he will likely support a Democrat for Congress in November. He is splitting with his party over access to health insurance as well as its recent overhaul of the nation’s income tax system. He also supports gun control measures that the party has rejected.

“I’m a moderate Republican, and yet my party has run away from that,” Camm said. “So give me a moderate Democrat.”

… Voters between the ages of 60 and 65 are particularly worried about healthcare, said Brigid Harrison, a political scientist at Montclair State University in New Jersey, because they are paying ever higher private health insurance premiums and are not yet eligible for Medicare.

Polling on this fall’s elections have consistently demonstrated that the Democratic base is more energized than the Republican one. In the face of this grim data, Republicans have sought consolation in the fact that core Democratic constituencies (like nonwhite and younger voters) have historically failed to turn out for midterms in high numbers.

But the Democrats’ turnout advantage in the past year’s special elections put a dent in that hope — and the leftward lurch of elderly whites all but eviscerates it. Older, college-educated whites are among the most reliable voters in the nation. And in many of this fall’s most competitive districts, such voters account for nearly 10 percent of the population, according to Reuters’ analysis. Republicans were already at risk of losing the House due to shifts in turnout patterns, alone — but if those shifts are accompanied by significant defections among reliable GOP constituencies, the party could suffer historic losses up and down the ballot.

“The real core for the Republicans is white, older white, and if they’re losing ground there, they’re going to have a tsunami,” political scientist Larry Sabato told Reuters. “If that continues to November, they’re toast.”

Remarkably, even as Republicans have lost ground with this key demographic — and Democratic candidates have won improbable special election victories while painting their Republican opponents as enemies of Medicare and Social Security — Paul Ryan has persisted in calling for sweeping cuts to entitlement spending. Meanwhile, House Republicans are preparing a symbolic vote on a “balanced budget” amendment — a gesture meant to appease die-hard fiscal conservatives, but that seems just as likely to help Democrats put a spotlight on the potential costs of the Trump tax cuts to ordinary Americans, not least those who are relying on Uncle Sam’s largesse to get them through their golden years.


Saturday, July 29, 2017

WASHINGTON DC POVERTY - A TALE OF TWO CITIES (NO REPRESENTATION)









WASHINGTON DC POVERTY - A TALE OF TWO CITIES (NO REPRESENTATION):

GREAT WEALTH vs GREAT LACK.

WIDE ECONOMIC GAP CREATED BY 21st CENTURY GENTRIFICATION.

LOWER INCOME BLACKS ARE BEING PUSHED OUT OF NATION'S CAPITOL.

DC CITY GOVT LEADERS DON'T CARE & USE CITY ATTORNEYS TO SILENCE POOR BLACKS.


Sources: Washington Post, RT America, BBC News, YouTube


******As D.C. families get richer, staggering disparities persist, report finds


As the D.C. budget grows more flush and housing prices continue to soar, concentrated poverty among households with children persists in some areas, according to a report released Tuesday.

The report by a local advocacy agency found that the overall median income of D.C. families has climbed since 2010. But families living in Wards 7 and 8, the only wards east of the Anacostia River, have experienced sharp declines.

D.C. Action for Children’s annual “Ward Snapshots” report breaks down child poverty rates and family economics by ward, saying that as the city fills its coffers, it needs to ensure that families across the city benefit from it.

“As the District gets more wealthy, how is it affecting all kids?” Shana Bartley, the group’s acting executive director, said of the report. “Ward Snapshots” culled data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the D.C. Department of Health, the D.C. Office of the State Superintendent of Education and more.

Since 2010, the number of young children living in the city has increased by 23 percent, and children younger than 5 account for nearly 40 percent of the child population. But the wards with the highest share of these young children — Wards 5, 7 and 8 — have the lowest median family incomes.

In Ward 8, for example, the median family income dropped nearly 17 percent between ­2006-2010 and 2010-2015, from $28,979 to $24,096.

Likewise, in Ward 7, the median family income during those years went from $34,562 to $31,273, a nearly 10 percent drop.

By comparison, the median family income in Ward 2 jumped nearly 65 percent, from $114,752 to $189,324.

Bartley said that one factor driving these disparate incomes is that as families are priced out of neighborhoods in Wards 1 and 2, for example, they are moving to Ward 8, the city’s poorest ward.

While the overall child poverty rate has declined to 26.7 percent — a drop of three percentage points since 2010 — there has been a slight uptick in Wards 3, 4 and 8. Ward 3 had a child poverty rate of 2.9 percent in 2015, compared with Ward 8’s 49 percent. Some of the increases could be attributed to rising housing costs. Ward 3’s rate was previously 2.4 percent; Ward 8’s was 48.3 percent.

The report found that more than 40 percent of D.C. residents spend more than a third of their monthly income on rent and related costs. The number of children enrolled in Medicaid increased by 21 percent, with the largest jumps in Wards 3, 4 and 8.

Some positive trends also emerged: In Wards 7 and 8, teen pregnancy rates steadily declined between 2010 and 2015, and students’ standardized test scores there saw slight increases between 2015 and 2016.

The report does not create a new narrative in the nation’s capital: The city has long been divided by race and socioeconomics. The report suggests that the wave of wealth the city has seen in recent years — the D.C. budget has reserves totaling $2.4 billion — has not trickled to all residents equitably.

“The biggest thing for the District to be is forward thinking,” Bartley said. “We’re continuing to see a baby boom, we are seeing families laying down roots in the city, public school enrollment is increasing, but we have to make sure that there’s infrastructure in the city to support healthy growth for all families and kids in the District.”

D.C. Action for Children recommends that the city boost access to quality early-childhood care and education, use census and local demographic data to determine how to allocate the city’s budget, and put more resources toward home-visiting programs that would support maternal and child health.

D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser released her 2018 $13.8 billion budget earlier this month that proposes modest spending increases for affordable housing, homeless services and education.

Monday, December 5, 2016

CARSON IS "UNQUALIFIED" TO PELOSI YET SHE WON'T RETIRE AFTER 2016 LOSSES






CARSON DEEMED "UNQUALIFIED" BY PELOSI YET SHE WON'T RETIRE AFTER 2016 LOSSES:

CARSON IS HIGHLY QUALIFIED AND PELOSI NEEDS TO RETIRE OR DEMS WILL NEVER WIN AGAIN.


Sources: AP, CNN, YouTube


****** Huckabee asks Pelosi if she's 'racist or just dumb' after Carson remarks


Huckabee is a surrogate for Trump.
Pelosi's office called his remarks "name calling".
Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee slammed House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi for her comments on the decision to tap Ben Carson as head of Housing and Urban Development, asking if she is "racist or just dumb?"

Huckabee, who became a Trump surrogate after he dropped out of the 2016 Republican primary, tweeted on Monday, "Ben Carson is first HUD Sec to have actually lived in gov't housing. Fancy Nancy Pelosi says he's not qualified; is she racist or just dumb?"

A spokesman for Pelosi told CNN on Monday that "name-calling" is "beneath" Huckabee.

"This nomination is universally viewed as bizarre and the nominee is clearly unqualified. Name calling like this is beneath the dignity of even Governor Huckabee," Drew Hammill told CNN in an email.

He added: "No one seriously thinks Ben Carson is qualified to do this job."

CNN contacted a spokesman for Carson to clarify whether he lived in government housing as Huckabee's tweet claims -- Carson's spokesman sent a tweet from the retired neurosurgeon's confidant Armstrong Williams.

Williams tweeted Monday, "Dr. Carson's mother worked 3 jobs at a time to keep them out of public housing, but he grew up around many who utilized housing programs."

In a statement released earlier on Monday, Pelosi said Carson is "a disconcerting and disturbingly unqualified choice" for HUD secretary, adding there is "no evidence that Dr. Carson brings the necessary credentials" to the role.


Carson has never held a government position and campaigned in the Republican presidential primary largely on his qualifications as a pediatric brain surgeon and his personal story.


Tuesday, December 17, 2013

PROJECT UPLIFT 2016: BLACK COMMUNITY WISHLIST FOR JOBS & SELF-SUFFICIENCY



New Politics Podcasts with Black Political Buzz on BlogTalkRadio


#ProjectUplift2016

PROJECT UPLIFT 2016: THE BLACK AMERICAN COMMUNITY WISHLIST:

21st Century BLACK American Communities need to offer BLACK Citizens more than just CHURCHES, CHICKEN JOINTS, CLUBS, & LIQUOR Stores.

BLACK Citizens are paying TAXES yet Our Communities often LACK Basic Programs.......Places.......and Resources necessary for everyday Survival.

We Need JOBS......EDUCATION......& SMALL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES!

Welcome to PROJECT UPLIFT 2016!!

Since the BLACK Community remains the most Disadvantaged Community in America, here are 13 Programs & Places I would I like to see in every 21st Century BLACK American Community prior to the 2014 & 2016 General Elections.

FYI:
I have Currently Observed most of these SAME 13 Programs in WHITE Communities. Including many Low Income WHITE Communities!

These 13 Programs will UPLIFT BLACK American Communities by Encouraging a Mentality & Spirit of SELF-SUFFICIENCY, and by creating EMPLOYMENT Opportunities for BLACK Citizens:

13 PROJECT UPLIFT 2016 PROGRAMS:

*1) ACADEMIC After School Programs with a Focus on reaching HOMELESS Students & Underachieving; At-Risk Students..

There will be Quality Tutoring in these areas:
LITERACY..........MATH.........SCIENCE.........ART........WRITING.......... SOFTWARE CODING.......and FINANCIAL LITERACY.

(SOFTWARE CODING is a very lucrative Career which does not require a College Degree.)

I would also like to see these ACADEMIC After School Programs offer BOYS-ONLY MENTORING Programs with Classes on getting into College.

And................

Offer GIRLS-ONLY MENTORING Programs with Classes on getting into College.


* 2) Community Health Centers with a Focus on PREVENTIVE CARE instead of ABORTION Clinics posing as Community Health Centers.

* 3) Real PARKS and Real Walking Nature Trails for SAFE Exercise Options.

* 4) "OBAMACARE One-Stop Shop Education & Enrollment Centers" with Licensed Health Care Insurance Agents on-site.

In fact these "OBAMACARE One-Stop Shop Education & Enrollment Centers" could also offer Training Classes for Eligible Citizens to become Licensed Health Care Insurance Agents,

and...........Offer Training Classes for Eligible Citizens to become Certified Nursing Assistants.

* 5) Non-Partisan VOTING Centers with a Focus on VOTER REGISTRATION & VOTER EDUCATION.

* 6) SMALL BUSINESS Resource Centers with Classes on GRANT Writing & Cloud Funding,

and...........Affordable SMALL BUSINESS Hubs for New local START-UPS.

* 7) A Farmer's Market with Classes on Urban Farming & Healthy Cooking to Prevent DIABETES & High Blood Pressure.

* At least One NATURAL HAIR CARE Salon with a Focus on Growing & Retaining Healthy, Naturally Long BLACK Hair.

These Salons must also SELL NATURAL HAIR CARE Products.

And........Local Salons in BLACK Communities which offer COSMETOLOGY Training with a Focus on NATURAL HAIR CARE such as the AVEDA Institute.

The AVEDA Institute is #2 after PAUL MITCHELL.

* 9) LEGAL AID Program Centers with a Classes on Eviction.......Illegal Foreclosures.......Harassment from HOAs......Employment Discrimination......Hospital Double-Billing.

I would also like to see these LEGAL AID Program Centers offer Opportunities & Scholarships for Eligible Students who want to Attend LAW SCHOOL.

* 10) EMPLOYMENT Centers with a Focus on helping Unemployed Citizens to become Re-employed and receive JOB Training SKILLS.

* 11) Real LIBRARIES with Up-to-date Technology Labs for Citizens who lack Computers or the Internet in their Residences.

* 12) POLICE Precincts with a Focus on local POLICE forming Partnerships with BLACK American Citizens instead of Fighting against BLACK Citizens.

Eliminate "Stop & Frisk"!

Eliminate "Stand Your Ground!"

Eliminate "Walking while BLACK!"

Eliminate "Driving While BLACK!"

* 13) AFFORDABLE HOUSING…….Affordable Housing = CONSTRUCTION JOBS for Unemployed People!

Affordable Housing also = Community Revitalization!!


Source: Blog Talk Radio



Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Charlotte's Elizabeth Community Wealthy Residents vs Low Income Housing (Another Battle?)




















Low income housing hoping to move in to Elizabeth


People who build low income housing want to move into Charlotte's Elizabeth neighborhood.

The proposed development would be right behind a school and next to a park, so neighbors want to make sure the apartments will be a good fit.

Elizabeth is considered one of the Queen City's hidden jewels, and neighbors want to keep it that way.

“It’s pretty much the closest I think you can be to a small town in Charlotte,” said Beth Haenni, the Vice President of the Elizabeth Community Association.

“We have an eclectic neighborhood, smart, and lots of people who are thinking hard about this project and want to know a lot more details about it before we'll blindly support it.”

The new project is low income housing that would be built right near Elizabeth Traditional Elementary School. There’s already a similar complex on North Davidson Street.

“Residents come here, they lease an apartment, they are able to stay as long as they want and we wrap supportive services around them to help them be successful,” said Pam Jefsen with McCreesh Place.

It’s called permanent supportive housing. People at risk for homelessness pay 30 percent of their income to live here and get a one bedroom apartment.

We are very selective about who can come here and live in a community like this one,” Jefsen added.

Jefsen says crime is a non-issue.

NewsChannel 36 checked and found very few calls for service to the facility.







Elizabeth Area Plan Moves Forward


The tree lined streets, the beautiful old homes, the walkability to bars and restaurants. Charlotte's Elizabeth neighborhood is one of just a few of its kind in the Queen City.

There are many stakeholders, from the residents to the nearby hospitals to the colleges to the businesses. Many have the same goal: growth. "We said we need to take a step back and make sure that we've got an overall picture for the community that we wanna push forward in the next 25 years," says Andy Misiaveg, the president of the Historic Elizabeth Neighborhood Foundation.

This week, the Elizabeth Area Plan was adopted by Charlotte city council. It's been in the works for four years. Its focuses include preserving residential areas close to busy streets and promoting the commercial development of Elizabeth Avenue. That's good news for Mike Dawson, co-owner of Crown Station Coffee House. He says, "A lot of things are directed toward Uptown businesses and it's nice to see them take care of the businesses on the outskirts of the Uptown area."

Independence Park is another important part of the Elizabeth Area Plan. Community leaders want to enhance the green space and protect it. Misiaveg says, "We feel like the park is in a pretty precarious position between the Elizabeth Avenue development, the hospital, CPCC, all encroaching right around the park land."

Leaders will try to secure a historic preservation designation for the park to permanently protect it from development.

Elizabeth Community Association President Monte Ritchey says the entire 25 year plan is a model for other Charlotte neighborhoods, as this area tries to grow responsibly but maintain it's unique identity. He says, "We still tend to get nipped away at year after year at the edges, we lose 2, 3, 4 structures a year."

Another priority in the Elizabeth Area Plan is pedestrian improvements along 7th street, especially after the recent deaths of people trying to cross the busy road. For starters, they want to add more cross walks ASAP.



View Larger Map


Sources: Charmeck.org, Fox Charlotte, WCNC, Google Maps

Thursday, August 4, 2011

New York's 78 Square Feet Apartment Rents For $800.00 Monthly! A Deal!







New Yorker pays $800 a month for 78-square-foot apartment


It may be small, but it's no bargain.

New York architect Luke Clark Tyler rents a 78-square foot studio apartment for $800 a month in Manhattan's Hell's Kitchen, where studios usually average $1,900 per month. But in a neighborhood where the average rental price per square foot in a studio is $72, Tyler is paying almost twice as much at $123.07 per square foot, according to Mark Menendez, the director of rentals at Prudential Douglas Elliman.

"I think it's too high," Menendez said. He added that, especially with New York real estate, the price per square foot can increase as the square footage decreases, and vice-versa.

"But again it's all relative. Where can you find something for $800 in Manhattan?," he said. "Location trumps value."

For 27-year-old Tyler, who has lived in New York City on and off since 2002, avoiding long commutes is worth the tiny living space in Midtown.

"I was spending my life in a skyscraper and going underground, to work and then back again," he said. "I was missing out on anything New York had to offer. If I had to choose spending time in a train or living in a small space, I’d choose a small space."

He said he saw some studio apartments in Hell's Kitchen, a neighborhood that stretches from 34th Street to 59 Street on the West Side, that were beautiful, but were priced around $1,600.

"I just rather use that extra $800 to do something else, like take classes or enjoy the city," he said.

Although Tyler doesn't have to deal with a work commute any more (he works from home now), he likes his Midtown location because of its proximity to dance studios, another passion that New York has allowed him to pursue.

So after seeing only a couple of apartments, he settled on his shoebox apartment, smaller than his last 96-square-foot apartment in the same neighborhood. He spent up to $200 on building custom furniture, which includes a couch that folds down into a bed and extra storage space built into a closet.

He said that of his building's three floors, the top floor has four units similar to his, but have been occupied by short-term renters or occasional New York visitors. He has been living in the apartment since May 2010.

If he could add something small to his apartment, he'd choose a sink, because then at least he could "jerry rig" himself a little kitchen.

"A sink is really great," he said. "My last apartment had a sink, it was just awesome."

Tyler shares a bathroom with three other similarly-sized apartments. He said he'd prefer a kitchen over a bathroom, though.



View Larger Map

Sources: Fair Companies, MSNBC, Youtube, Google Maps

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Charlotte Says No To Affordable Housing 3rd Time This Year!


















Charlotte City Council Says No To Low-Income Housing Again


The latest attempt to find a site for low-income housing failed Monday night when the City Council rejected a move that would have allowed 90 units in the Ayrsley community in southwest Charlotte.

The council voted 6-4 to reject a request that would have given the Charlotte Housing Partnership a waiver from rules guiding the location of public housing.

It was the third time in a year that efforts to locate affordable housing have failed.

In February, the Charlotte Housing Authority pulled out of a project in Ballantyne after neighborhood protests.

Last year the Housing Partnership scuttled plans to put low-income housing in Berewick after local opposition.

Monday's vote followed emotional arguments from Ayrsley residents and housing advocates alike.

Residents argued that their already diverse neighborhood is not stable enough to accommodate more low-income housing.

They opposed the Housing Partnership's request for a waiver from a rule that bars putting a low-income housing development within a half-mile of another.

The partnership wants to build 90 low-income apartments near Westinghouse Boulevard.

Advocates argued for the waiver.

"The bottom line is we need more affordable housing," said Bert Green, director of Habitat for Humanity and a board member of the Housing Partnership. "We need it now and we need it spread throughout the entire community."

Democrat Warren Turner, whose council district includes Ayrsley, argued against the waiver.

"The fact of the matter is we have more than our share of affordable housing," he said. "I'm not against affordable housing. What we are against tonight is a policy issue."

Jerry Meek, an attorney for the residents, cited the council's ongoing re-evaluation of its housing location guidelines. The city plans a series of public hearings on the guidelines this summer.

"Why go through the charade?" Meek asked council. "If you waive it under these circumstances you can waive it under any circumstances."

Mayor Anthony Foxx appeared to appeal for a delay in the vote. He cited statistics showing that 8,000 Charlotteans are homeless, including more than 3,200 children.

"No argument can be made that will overcome the emotion," he said. With no agreement, "then we end up where we are right now - 3,000 kids without a place to sleep."

But council went ahead and voted.

"I'm pleased they upheld the policy," said Chris Stulginsky, 30, an Ayrsley homeowner. "We all hope the CMHP is able to find a site for their project within the guidelines of city policy."



View Larger Map


Sources: McClatchy Newspapers, Google Maps

Saturday, June 5, 2010

Charlotte's Progress Hindered By Extreme Racism & Small-Mindedness, No Zoo!

































I recently returned to Charlotte, NC (my current place of residence) after vacationing for a week on Long Island, NY. (Suffolk county)

Brooklyn is my native hometown and usual stomping ground, but this time I decided to spend my money elsewhere. Thus Long Island was selected as this year's pick.

If you've never visited Long Island I encourage you to get there right away and see what the fuss is all about.

Its especially beautiful this time of year.

Clean, quiet, somewhat diverse, an abundance of healthy trees, friendly residents, great (although expensive) public transportation including trains (not subways) that run all night, low crime, plenty of businesses, great schools, etc.,

And....it looks like Charlotte, NC!

Yes, for those who can afford to live there year-round, Long Island is the perfect spot.

So what's the real difference between Charlotte, NC and Long Island, NY?

Everywhere my husband and I ventured while on Long Island, the residents (mostly Caucasian population) welcomed us with open arms and were very kind.

These Northeastern, Wealthy White people treated us (two Blacks) with "Southern Hospitality" so often NOT seen in Charlotte, NC.

In Charlotte such demonstrations of "Southern Hospitality" and warmness is usually only reserved for White residents or White visitors but NOT Black citizens!

Black citizens visiting Charlotte are often treated indifferently even by other Blacks, unless of course those Black visitors are attending events such as the CIAA Basketball tournament (a sports event which attracts Black tourists).

Is it any wonder as to why Bob Johnson blasted Charlotte for being "Small-Minded", "Incestuous" and "Racist" on his way out?

Charlotte's landscape while lovely like Long Island's, can't hide the ugly Racial Discrimination eating away at Charlotte's potential to become a World Class city.

Charlotte (nicknamed the "Queen City") should be equal if not more further along than Atlanta.

What's stopping Charlotte from realizing her true potential?

None other than Racism.

Extreme, Ugly Racism and...Small-Minded Black "Leaders" afraid of helping other Black citizens achieve levels of success equal to that of White citizens.

Deep rooted Racism derived from Charlotte's close alliance with the Klu Klux Klan organization.

Black Leaders stuck in time by accepting and allowing a Willie Lynch Mentality to paralyze them from rescuing Charlotte's Minority community.

Rescuing Charlotte's Minority community from Failure and Obscurity.

Charlotte also lacks the Creativity and Urban Planning necessary for this "diamond in the rough" to step into the 21st Century.

In other words refusing to move forward yet expecting results similar to that of cities like Atlanta, Long Island and New York, NY is ludicrous!

Come on Charlotte where's your Zoo??

Atlanta has an Aquarium and New York City has a Real Zoo!

Where's Charlotte's Aquarium or Zoo?? Come on and get with it!

Isn't it time to catch up to the 21st Century?

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".

Albert Einstein



For example: Charlotte has a Light Rail system.

(only North Carolina city with a Light Rail system)

This Light Rail system primarily serves which local citizens?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White residents.

The cleaner, more modern city buses service which communities (on time)?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White communities.

Better Paying jobs, mainly Managerial positions, are reserved for which citizens?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White citizens.

Local public schools with More Experienced Teachers and Plenty of Resources are filled with type of students?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White students.

The region's best city & county services (trash collection, low water rates, low heating bills, faster Internet speed, low Cable bill rates, etc.,) are reserved for which communities?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White communities.

Better priced stores (Clothing, Grocery, Retail) with an abundance of Nice Businesses are found in which communities?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White communities.

Bike Trails, Free Wi-Fi, Museums, Nature Trails, Nice Libraries, Nice Parks, Public Swimming Pools, etc., are reserved for which communities?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White communities.

While Crime in Charlotte's Black communities skyrockets, Excellent Public Safety efforts and Effective Neighborhood Partnerships with the region's Police dept. are reserved for which communities?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White communities.

Fair Business Opportunities and Fair Property Taxes are reserved for which citizens?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White residents.

Last but certainly not least, which local communities will probably NEVER see Affordable Housing units constructed within its perimeters?

That's right!

Charlotte's Wealthier, White communities.

On the other hand Progressive cities like Atlanta, Long Island and New York, NY are reaching out to Equally help ALL of their citizens regardless of Ethnicity and Socio-Economic status.

Now I know you would like to rationalize Charlotte's Indifference and Mistreatment of Minority residents by perhaps attributing it to Charlotte's Wealthier, White residents paying higher Property Taxes right?

WRONG!

Charlotte's Wealthier, White residents do NOT pay extra or more for their city/ county services.

In fact many of them pay far less than Charlotte's Minority residents.

How so?

Charlotte's Wealthier, White citizens are allowed to Legally NOT pay their Property Taxes without being penalized or thrown in jail.

Charlotte's Wealthier, White citizens also haven't experienced a Property Tax increase in 7 years, while Charlotte's Minority residents have received a Property Tax increase each year.

I could continue on on but I believe you comprehend what I'm conveying here.

However just in case you didn't get it, Charlotte's Progress is hindered by Extreme Racism.

What a shame!

Isn't it time for this kind of Regional Ignorance to be eliminated forever?

Doesn't Charlotte, NC have a Black Mayor you ask? (Anthony Foxx)

Yes but Mayor Foxx is just a Token with NO teeth.

He wanted the job more or less for personal gain versus wanting to do what's in Charlotte's Best Interest.

If Charlotte doesn't stop such foolishness it will NEVER rise to Atlanta and New York's fame of being World Class cities.

By the way using precious dollars to establish "Collard Green" Museums is NOT going to fix Charlotte's terrible Race Relations & Lack of Creativity issues.

After reading this post please don't tell me to move!

Instead why not channel some of that energy into improving Charlotte-Mecklenburg's status in comparison to other REAL World Class cities?

In the meantime carry on Atlanta, Long Island & New York with your bad selves! And I do mean good!



View Larger Map


Sources: Brainy Quote, Charmeck.org, McClatchy Newspapers, WCNC, Wikipedia, Google Maps

Thursday, May 20, 2010

American Black Agenda Is M.I.A., 6 Keys For Effective Recovery






















"If your afraid say your afraid, than go somewhere, sit down and let someone else take over".
Spoken by the Rev. Al Sharpton at a Civil Rights Rally in Charlotte, NC December 2007.



Black Leaders To Obama: "We Have A Right To Expect Something!"


Has anyone seen America's missing Black Agenda?

I've searched high and low and still it remains hidden.

President Barack Obama and Charlotte Mayor Anthony Foxx have both decried a Black Agenda by firmly insisting no such agenda is needed for the American Black Community.

Were they correct or are they intentionally ignoring what ails Minority citizens (mainly African-Americans) in today's society?

Hmmmm Let's see:


a) Southern Lawmakers are Re-Segregating Public Schools faster than you can say "Jim Crow".

This includes in Charlotte, NC.

How can it become a reality for Minority Public School students to compete with White students if they are attending Low Performing, Racially Segregated schools with inexperienced and non-caring Teachers?

b) Businesses are still illegally using the Credit History of otherwise Qualified Minority Applicants as an NOT to hire them, even when the jobs their applying for are non-related to Banking & Finance.

Is this being done to White Job Applicants?

NO!


c) Black Entreprenuers are still experiencing great difficulty securing SBA and Private Loans for Start-ups, even when they have great Business Plans and sufficient Collateral.

d) Private Colleges are still charging Minority (especially Black) College Students higher Tuition Rates than White Students as a means of discouraging those students from attending their Learning Institutions.

e) Minority citizens are still losing their homes to Foreclosure at a much faster rate than White homeowners because Banks are more willing to Re-Finance or approve Loan Modifications for White homeowners regardless of if they are employed or not.

f) The three major Credit Reporting Agencies: Equifax, Experian and Transunion are still INTENTIONALLY reporting False or Inaccurate information about Minority citizens when businesses conduct or request Inquiries.

g) The same Credit Reporting agencies are also selling outdated unpaid accounts in many cases more than 10 years old, to Debt Collectors.

Those Debt Collectors than create New Account numbers for those outdated unpaid accounts and put those same debts right back onto the accounts of Minority Citizens.

This keeps the Credit Scores of Minority Citizens extremely low.

For White citizens who have outdated unpaid accounts on their Credit Profiles Equifax, Experian and Transunion automatically & immediately deletes those accounts from their Credit Profiles after 7 years like clock work regardless if they are paid in full or not.

h) Many Minority citizens seeking to rent Apartments or Rental Houses are often told they must pass very rigorous background checks in order to have their applications approved.

i) Minority citizens are still also receiving Inadequate and Substandard Health Care even when they have Private Insurance.

j) The gap between and Black and White Wealth continues to widen.

k) Black men are still filling America's Prisons at an alarmingly high rate.

Ironically as the High School & College graduation rate among Minority citizens decreases, the percentage of them being locked up increases.

I could go on but I believe you fully comprehend that "Houston we definitely have a problem" as it relates to American Race Relations.


Is this situation hopeless?

Is it possible for Minority citizens to walk in the same Legal bliss and exercise their God given via the U.S. Constitution as White citizens in this country?

Yes but not until the 6 Keys to Recovery listed below are carried out.



An Effective American Black Agenda should require that:


1) Black Voters begin to think for themselves when its time to cast their ballots versus supporting Black candidates via Straight Ticket Voting, without researching what those Black candidates' perspectives are on issues pertinent to the Black community.

I mean come on at least check to see if they have done anything at all to help support the Black Community. Even on a small Grassroots level.

Instead of running in "Packs" (going along to get along) learn to think for yourself! Isn't that why God Almighty gave each person born on Planet Earth a Brain and a Mind??


2) Black Voters should expect their elected Black officials to actually represent them versus just sitting in Public Office as silent, Token Politicians rubber stamping bills for the purpose of getting their palms greased.

What are you voting for True Representation or a Lame Sitting Duck??


3) Black Voters should expect their Black Leaders to lead by example by publicly Speaking up when it comes to blatant, obvious Racism in areas such as: Equitable & Fair Business Opportunities (ex. Bank Loans for Small Businesses), Education, Employment, Equal Justice within the U.S. Criminal System, Fair Housing, Health Care, Fair Credit Practices, Fair Taxation, etc., instead of behaving like scared "Uncle Toms".


4) Black Voters should expect their elected Black Officials & Leaders to take ACTION against blatant, obvious Racist policies in such areas as: Equitable & Fair Business Opportunities(ex. Bank Loans for Small Businesses), Education, Employment, Equal Justice within the U.S. Criminal System, Fair Affordable Housing, Health Care, Fair Credit Practices, Fair Taxation, etc., instead of behaving like scared "Uncle Toms".


5) Black Voters should STOP electing Black candidates who don't give a darn about them unless...they run in tight knit, Elite circles. (Fraternities, Sororities, Freemasons, etc.,)

And one more thing...

6) Whatever happened to Black Leaders who were Free Thinkers like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X?

Oh that's right they were assassinated!

Well...if your NOT willing to lay down your life for your Brother or Sister, than don't run for Public Office.

If you can't take the heat, get out or stay away!

Want to get rich?

Than do your research (supply & demand), draft a good Business plan, start the Business, Work hard and spend your money wisely.

In other words don't get involved in Politics just to fatten your pockets.

No American Black Agenda needed indeed!


"Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends".

John 15:13


"I prefer Liberty with danger than Peace with Slavery".


Jean Jaqueas Rousseau

"A Slave is one who waits for someone else to Free him".

Rosellen Brown



View Larger Map


Sources: Black Agenda Report, Charmeck.org, Chicago Defender, Chicago Suntimes, McClatchy Newspapers, MSNBC, MyNC.com, NAACP, NY Times, The Grio, Vodpod, Google Maps

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Charlotte's Affordable Housing Debate vs. NC Senate Bill 810 (Videos)






























(N.C. Senate Bill 810) N.C. State Law Prevents Charlotte City Officials From Denying Public Housing In Ballantyne


N.C. State law says some neighbors' concerns about a proposed Affordable Housing project in Ballantyne doesn't matter when it comes to voting for approval or denial.

N.C. Senate Bill 810 was signed into Law by Gov. Bev Perdue last fall.

The new Legislation says a development can't be denied simply because it contains Affordable Housing.

It means meetings like one held past Monday at Harrison United Methodist Church are good for airing concerns -- and that's about it.

Warren Cooksey represents the Balllantyne area on the Charlotte City Council.

He listens to his constituents, but says his hands are tied on the vote, thanks to the New Law.

"We run the risk from either side, depending upon what the vote is of Legal Action, saying you didn't do this right," said Cooksey.

Warren Cooksey says the evaluation whether it's an appropriate land use is the issue, not the impact on neighboring property values and not potential concerns about crime.

Police say some of the most crime-ridden areas in Charlotte are Affordable Housing neighborhoods.

At Ballantyne Crossing, about one-third of the 86 units are proposed low-income.

"If crime is perceived to be a shorthand for a perception of Affordable Housing, we are prohibited from Discriminating against Affordable Housing in a land use decision," Cooksey said.

To ease neighbors' concerns, the city says they can request conditions to the agreement, like requesting improved roads, sidewalks, green space and lighting.

People who are in favor of the Ballantyne Crossing complex say there's a need for Affordable Housing for people who work in Ballantyne, who want to live there as well.






Hundreds Of Charlotte Citizens Turn Out Against Ballantyne Affordable Housing Project


The meeting started inside while people were still lining up outside. Hundreds showed up to hear more about a proposed public housing complex in the Ballantyne area. One by one, they fired questions and comments at the developers, Republic Development Group:

"What experience do you have creating something like this?"

"Can you not find a more suitable place than what is the southern gateway to our community?"

"Where I'm coming from is I don't want it here.

My house is over one million dollars and I don't want the crap next to me."

The project took a hit Monday afternoon when the Charlotte Housing Authority issued a statement that it would not participate in the mixed income housing development.

"Questions about certain aspects of the project's structure, including its Density (the total number of apartment units relative to the cost of the land) and funding, prompted our decision," said Jennifer Gallman with the Charlotte Housing Authority.

"We keep going," said Stuart Proffitt of Republic Development.

Proffitt says he still hopes to build the 86 unit complex with another affordable housing developer. A representative from the Crosland Company told News Channel 36 the developer has asked if Crosland would manage the property if it were approved.

One man, who asked not to be identified, said he believed this was a case of "not in my backyard." "I live on the West side and this will be pushed to some other part of town," he said.

But opponents say that's not the case. They point to the fact that the proposed site, south of Ballantyne, off of Johnston Road, has no easy access to public sidewalks, little public transportation and already overcrowded schools.

Cynthia Jennings lives in the Ballantyne area. "People who live in low income housing want the same thing we all do. A nice place to live for their families. But the way the developer came in, through the back door, was sneaky and shady," she said.








Southwest Charlotte Neighbors Move To Block Low-Income Apartments


A proposal to build 90 apartments for working class families is drawing criticism and resentment from homeowners who would live near the development.

More than 4.5 acres of land near the northeast corner of Westinghouse Boulevard and South Tryon was purchased for the rental homes last December.

About 200 residents of the Ayrsley community filled a meeting room Tuesday evening for what the project's developer called a "courtesy meeting".

Several of the homeowners carried signs which read "Save Ayrsley" and "No Low Income Housing"

The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Housing Partnership, a non-profit agency, would build the two and three-bedroom apartments for families who make less than $32,000 per year.

"We don't have people who are just goofing off," said Patricia Garrett, the agency's president. "They have jobs. They go to school."

Garrett said neighbors are often misinformed about affordable housing communities. She said her managers often screen prospective tenants more thoroughly than at other, privately-run apartments.

Still, some Ayrsley homeowners told NewsChannel 36 they are concerned about the potential impact of more rental units in a community with an abundance of vacant apartments and town homes for lease.

"Build more when you have vacancies all over? "It doesn't make sense," said homeowner Monica Ainslie.

Because another 52-unit apartment community for low-income families, Summerfield, is less than a half-mile from the proposed site, developers must ask Charlotte's city council for permission to build the new apartments. The city's development rules are designed to prevent a heavy concentration of subsidized housing in one neighborhood.

"Nobody here is opposed to Subsidized Housing," Ayrsley homeowner Lauren Widrick told NewsChannel 36. "It's the violation of city council's policy in regard to clustering subsidized housing."

Garrett said her agency believes an additional 90-unit apartment community is not unreasonable for the area and is needed to provide housing for families who cannot afford to lease a home at the market rate.

Vacant apartments in Ayrsley are not eligible for the federal and state tax credits which would pay for most of the $10 million project, she said.

Council is expected to vote on the apartment community next month. An exact date has not been set.

Charlotte City leaders will also be asked to approve $1 million from the city's Housing Trust Fund for the development.

Council member David Howard is a vice-president with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Housing Partnership and part of the development team for the proposed apartments. He said Tuesday he will recuse himself from council's decision.



View Larger Map


Sources: McClatchy Newspapers, North Carolina General Assembly, WCNC, Google Maps

Friday, April 23, 2010

Charlotte City Council Violates N.C. Affordable Housing Law (Bill 810)
























N.C. State Law Prevents Charlotte City Officials From Denying Public Housing In Ballantyne


N.C. State law says some neighbors' concerns about a proposed Affordable Housing project in Ballantyne doesn't matter when it comes to voting for approval or denial.

N.C. Senate Bill 810 was signed into Law by Gov. Bev Perdue last fall.

The legislation says a development can't be denied simply because it contains Affordable Housing.

It means meetings like one held past Monday at Harrison United Methodist Church are good for airing concerns -- and that's about it.

Warren Cooksey represents the Balllantyne area on the Charlotte City Council.

He listens to his constituents, but says his hands are tied on the vote, thanks to the New Law.

"We run the risk from either side, depending upon what the vote is of Legal Action, saying you didn't do this right," said Cooksey.

Warren Cooksey says the evaluation whether it's an appropriate land use is the issue, not the impact on neighboring property values and not potential concerns about crime.

Police say some of the most crime-ridden areas in Charlotte are Affordable Housing neighborhoods.

At Ballantyne Crossing, about one-third of the 86 units are proposed low-income.

"If crime is perceived to be a shorthand for a perception of Affordable Housing, we are prohibited from Discriminating against Affordable Housing in a land use decision," Cooksey said.

To ease neighbors' concerns, the city says they can request conditions to the agreement, like requesting improved roads, sidewalks, green space and lighting.

People who are in favor of the Ballantyne Crossing complex say there's a need for Affordable Housing for people who work in Ballantyne, who want to live there as well.






Hundreds Of Charlotte Citizens Turn Out Against Ballantyne Affordable Housing Project


The meeting started inside while people were still lining up outside. Hundreds showed up to hear more about a proposed public housing complex in the Ballantyne area. One by one, they fired questions and comments at the developers, Republic Development Group:

"What experience do you have creating something like this?"

"Can you not find a more suitable place than what is the southern gateway to our community?"

"Where I'm coming from is I don't want it here.

My house is over one million dollars and I don't want the crap next to me."

The project took a hit Monday afternoon when the Charlotte Housing Authority issued a statement that it would not participate in the mixed income housing development.

"Questions about certain aspects of the project's structure, including its Density (the total number of apartment units relative to the cost of the land) and funding, prompted our decision," said Jennifer Gallman with the Charlotte Housing Authority.

"We keep going," said Stuart Proffitt of Republic Development.

Proffitt says he still hopes to build the 86 unit complex with another affordable housing developer. A representative from the Crosland Company told News Channel 36 the developer has asked if Crosland would manage the property if it were approved.

One man, who asked not to be identified, said he believed this was a case of "not in my backyard." "I live on the West side and this will be pushed to some other part of town," he said.

But opponents say that's not the case. They point to the fact that the proposed site, south of Ballantyne, off of Johnston Road, has no easy access to public sidewalks, little public transportation and already overcrowded schools.

Cynthia Jennings lives in the Ballantyne area. "People who live in low income housing want the same thing we all do. A nice place to live for their families. But the way the developer came in, through the back door, was sneaky and shady," she said.








Southwest Charlotte Neighbors Move To Block Low-Income Apartments


A proposal to build 90 apartments for working class families is drawing criticism and resentment from homeowners who would live near the development.

More than 4.5 acres of land near the northeast corner of Westinghouse Boulevard and South Tryon was purchased for the rental homes last December.

About 200 residents of the Ayrsley community filled a meeting room Tuesday evening for what the project's developer called a "courtesy meeting".

Several of the homeowners carried signs which read "Save Ayrsley" and "No Low Income Housing"

The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Housing Partnership, a non-profit agency, would build the two and three-bedroom apartments for families who make less than $32,000 per year.

"We don't have people who are just goofing off," said Patricia Garrett, the agency's president. "They have jobs. They go to school."

Garrett said neighbors are often misinformed about affordable housing communities. She said her managers often screen prospective tenants more thoroughly than at other, privately-run apartments.

Still, some Ayrsley homeowners told NewsChannel 36 they are concerned about the potential impact of more rental units in a community with an abundance of vacant apartments and town homes for lease.

"Build more when you have vacancies all over? "It doesn't make sense," said homeowner Monica Ainslie.

Because another 52-unit apartment community for low-income families, Summerfield, is less than a half-mile from the proposed site, developers must ask Charlotte's city council for permission to build the new apartments. The city's development rules are designed to prevent a heavy concentration of subsidized housing in one neighborhood.

"Nobody here is opposed to Subsidized Housing," Ayrsley homeowner Lauren Widrick told NewsChannel 36. "It's the violation of city council's policy in regard to clustering subsidized housing."

Garrett said her agency believes an additional 90-unit apartment community is not unreasonable for the area and is needed to provide housing for families who cannot afford to lease a home at the market rate.

Vacant apartments in Ayrsley are not eligible for the federal and state tax credits which would pay for most of the $10 million project, she said.

Council is expected to vote on the apartment community next month. An exact date has not been set.

Charlotte City leaders will also be asked to approve $1 million from the city's Housing Trust Fund for the development.

Council member David Howard is a vice-president with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Housing Partnership and part of the development team for the proposed apartments. He said Tuesday he will recuse himself from council's decision.



View Larger Map


Sources: McClatchy Newspapers, North Carolina General Assembly, WCNC, Google Maps