Custom Search
Showing posts with label Kathleen Sebelius. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kathleen Sebelius. Show all posts

Monday, August 1, 2011

Birth Control Now Provided FREE In The United States! No Co-pays! Thank God!















HHS announces free birth control for women in the U.S.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced new guidelines in Washington Monday requiring health insurance plans beginning on or after August 1, 2012 to cover several women's preventive services, including birth control and voluntary sterilization.

According to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius the decision is a part of the Affordable Care Act's move to stop problems before they start.

"These historic guidelines are based on science and existing literature and will help ensure women get the preventive health benefits they need," she said in a news release.

In July, the Institute of Medicine issued the results of a scientific review of women's health needs and provided recommendations on specific preventive measures to help them. Today HHS approved those recommendations.

Besides contraceptive use, the list includes free screenings for conditions such as gestational diabetes and the human papillomavirus (HPV), as well as breastfeeding support and counseling on sexually transmitted diseases. The full list is available on the Department of Health and Human Services website.

Overheard on CNN.com -- Birth control should be free

The decision to offer free contraception was not supported by all. For example, groups like the Family Research Council claims the decision "undermines the conscience rights of many Americans" and Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, chairman of Committee on Pro-Life Activities with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops says "pregnancy is not a disease, and fertility is not a pathological condition to be suppressed by any means technically possible."

They feel the decision forces people to participate who may have moral or religious convictions that oppose contraception use.

The Obama administration released an amendment to the prevention regulation that allows religious institutions offering health insurance to their employees the choice of whether or not to cover contraception services.

However, supporters say the service will help millions of women who struggle to afford prescription birth control.

Birth control should be fully covered under health plans, report says

"Covering birth control without co-pays is one of the most important steps we can take to prevent unintended pregnancy and keep women and children healthy," said Dr. Vanessa Cullins, vice president for medical affairs at Planned Parenthood Federation of America when the IOM recommendations were released.

Supporters also say covering contraception helps the government save money up front.

According to an analysis from the Guttmacher Institute, in 2006, of the 2 million publicly funded births, 51% resulted from unintended pregnancies, accounting for more than $11 billion in costs.

The report found that this is a disproportionate burden on programs such as Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, given that only 38% of all U.S. births result from unintended pregnancies.



View Larger Map

Sources: AP, CBS News, CNN, Wikipedia, Google Maps

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Health Care Insurers Vs. Obama Administration: Children's Coverage











HHS Hits Insurers On Kids' Coverage


The Obama administration is taking health insurers to task again, this time for choosing to no longer sell plans intended to cover sick children, but gave the industry some new flexibility in implementing a problematic provision of the health care overhaul.

Many insurers have said in recent weeks that they would stop selling "child only" insurance plans because the overhaul requires them to accept all applicants, even if they apply for coverage at the last minute before treatment. Insurers say the provision, which went into effect Sept. 23, allows patients to game the system.

That's angered Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who said in a letter to the industry late Friday that insurers are operating in bad faith. She cited a March letter in which the trade group America's Health Insurance Plans said, "health plans recognize the hardship that a family faces when they are unable to obtain coverage for a child with a pre-existing condition."

AHIP said its members would abide by the provision. For many insurers, that meant leaving the niche market entirely to avoid getting all of the most expensive patients — or "adverse risk selection."

"While we appreciate the concerns of insurers and [state insurance] commissioners about adverse risk selection, and want to clarify what legal options exist, the plight of millions of parents who desperately want to provide health coverage and critical treatments for their children is a top priority, and we would hope that insurers who have for years offered child-only policies to healthy children would not deny coverage to families who desperately want to purchase health insurance," Sebelius wrote to AHIP. She sent a similar letter to the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association.

Insurers say they've been working with the administration since last spring to come up with a solution that would ensure children get coverage while minimizing disruption to the market and cost increases.

"That process has worked well in the area of family coverage," said Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for AHIP. "In the small but critically important niche market for child-only policies a powerful incentive has been created for parents to defer purchasing coverage until after their children need it. Plans are therefore having to make very difficult decisions about offering new child-only coverage."

HHS also issued new regulatory guidance that could make it easier for insurers to sell the policies. The agency said insurers could raise rates based on health condition — though doing so will be illegal beginning in 2014; issue different rates for child-only policies and dependent children; impose a surcharge for dropping coverage and subsequently reapplying; and instituting rules to preventing "dumping" the policies.

The moves are likely to drive premiums up, if insurers choose to start selling the policies again.

Sebelius also said she welcomes state laws that would force insurance companies to cover these children if the company offers similar coverage to adults. Insurers won't have to cover all adults regardless of pre-existing conditions until 2014 under the health reform law.

"The administration is determined that children and families receive the full benefits provided to them in the Affordable Care Act," Sebelius wrote.

The agency has already said insurers could establish an open enrollment period — say, of approximately a month — in which insurers could sell policies and still legally close access the rest of the year. HHS said Friday that it would consider a uniform open enrollment period "only if it would result in issuers selling new child-only policies."



View Larger Map


Sources: BCBS, Politico, Wikipedia, Youtube, Google Maps

Friday, April 16, 2010

Obama Directs Hospitals To Offer Gays Health Care Rights
















Obama Extends Hospital Visitation Rights To Same-Sex Partners Of Gays


President Obama mandated Thursday that nearly all hospitals extend visitation rights to the partners of gay men and lesbians and respect patients' choices about who may make critical health-care decisions for them, perhaps the most significant step so far in his efforts to expand the rights of gay Americans.

The president directed the Department of Health and Human Services to prohibit discrimination in hospital visitation in a memo that was e-mailed to reporters Thursday night while he was at a fundraiser in Miami.

Administration officials and gay activists, who have been quietly working together on the issue, said the new rule will affect any hospital that receives Medicare or Medicaid funding, a move that covers the vast majority of the nation's health-care institutions. Obama's order will start a rule-making process at HHS that could take several months, officials said.

Hospitals often bar visitors who are not related to an incapacitated patient by blood or marriage, and gay rights activists say many do not respect same-sex couples' efforts to designate a partner to make medical decisions for them if they are seriously ill or injured.

"Discrimination touches every facet of the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, including at times of crisis and illness, when we need our loved ones with us more than ever," Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement praising the president's decision.

Obama's mandate is the latest attempt by his administration to advance the agenda of a constituency that strongly supported his presidential campaign.

In his first 15 months in office, he has hailed the passage of hate crime legislation and held the first Gay Pride Day celebration at the White House. Last month, Obama's top military and defense officials testified before Congress in favor of repealing of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy for gays in the armed forces.

But the moves have been too slow for some gay rights activists, who have urged the president to be more vocal and active in championing their causes. John Aravosis, a prominent Gay Blogger, wrote last October that Obama's "track record on keeping his gay promises has been fairly abominable."

Other gay rights activists have defended the administration, while at the same time pushing Congress to act on broader issues such as passage of an employment non-discrimination act and an end to the ban on gays serving openly in the military.

"We see this as part of our ongoing effort to encourage the administration to take action where it has the authority to act," said David Smith, a Human Rights Campaign spokesman. "We've been working and pressing the administration on our legislative agenda. That work continues."

Gay activists have argued for years that recognizing same-sex marriage would ease the stress associated with not being able to visit hospitalized partners.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have called the visitation issue a red herring, arguing that advocates want to provide special rights for gays that other Americans do not have. A spokesman for one group said the president's move was part of a broader effort to appease gays and to undermine the institution of marriage.

"In its current political context, President Obama's memorandum clearly constitutes pandering to a radical special interest group," said Peter S. Sprigg, a senior fellow for policy studies at the Family Research Council. He said that his organization does not object to gays giving their partners power of attorney but that it questions Obama's motives.

"The memorandum undermines the definition of marriage," he said.

Obama's memo to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius orders the development of new rules to ensure that hospitals "respect the rights of patients to designate visitors" and to choose the people who will make medical decisions on their behalf.

The action has the potential to increase conflicts between family members, same-sex partners and hospital staff over end-of-life decisions.

A spokesman for the American Hospital Association did not return calls and e-mails. Efforts to reach a spokesman for the Catholic Health Association of the United States were unsuccessful.

In the memo, Obama said hospitals should not be able to deny visitation privileges on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

"Every day, all across America, patients are denied the kindnesses and caring of a loved one at their sides whether in a sudden medical emergency or a prolonged hospital stay," he wrote.

Affected, he said, are "gay and lesbian Americans who are often barred from the bedsides of the partners with whom they may have spent decades of their lives -- unable to be there for the person they love, and unable to act as a legal surrogate if their partner is incapacitated."

Officials said Obama had been moved by the story of a lesbian couple in Florida, Janice Langbehn and Lisa Pond, who were kept apart when Pond collapsed of a cerebral aneurysm in February 2007, dying hours later at a hospital without her partner and children by her side.

Obama called Langbehn on Thursday evening from Air Force One as he flew to Miami, White House officials said. In an interview, Langbehn praised the president for his actions.

"I kept saying it's not a gay right to hold someone's hand when they die, its a human right," she said, noting that she and Pond had been partners for almost 18 years. "Now to have the president call up and say he agrees with me, it's pretty amazing, and very humbling."

The new rules will not apply only to gays. They also will affect widows and widowers who have been unable to receive visits from a friend or companion. And they would allow members of some religious orders to designate someone other than a family member to make medical decisions.

But it is clear that the document focuses on gays. A number of areas remain in which federal law requires proof of marriage, including receiving Social Security benefits and in taxes.

"The General Accounting Office has identified 1,138 instances in federal law where marriage is important," said one gay rights activist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity before the White House formally announced the directive. "We've knocked off one of them."



View Larger Map


Sources: CNN, Washington Post, MSNBC, Wikipedia, Google Maps

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Mammogram Mixed Messages: "Sebelius Keep Doing What You've Been Doing"






































Sebelius: "Keep doing what you’ve been doing". After days of concern, criticism and controversy over the new breast cancer guidelines, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius says women should keep doing what they’ve been doing. NBC’s chief medical editor, Dr. Nancy Snyderman, weighs in.








Task force doctor stands by breast check advice


A member of the independent panel whose new mammogram recommendations have led to confusion defended the task force's report, saying Thursday that it was based on the most up-to-date, accurate information available.

Dr. Timothy Wilt, a member of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, stuck by its recommendation that most women don't need mammograms in their 40s and should get one every two years starting at 50. The American Cancer Society's long-standing position has been that women should get annual cancer-screening mammograms starting at age 40.

The panel's recommendations "were based on the most rigorous peer review of up-to-date, accurate information about the evidence about the harms and benefits of treatment," Wilt said on ABC's "Good Morning America."

On Wednesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius tried to ease the furor that has erupted since the panel issued its recommendations Monday. She said the task force does "not set federal policy and they don't determine what services are covered by the federal government." She advised women to "keep doing what you've been doing for years — talk to your doctor about your individual history, ask questions, and make the decision that is right for you."

Wilt did not take issue with Sebelius' statement. "Our recommendations support an individualized decision-making process," he said, and each woman still needs to talk with her doctor to make the most informed decision.

The recommendations from the task force have left women confused about whose advice to follow. And opponents of changing health care policy have criticized the new recommendations as an example of what could be expected from government-managed care.

Wilt denied accusations that the recommendations were made to help the government spend less on mammograms.

"Costs are not considered at all," he said.

The panel of doctors and scientists concluded that such early and frequent screenings often lead to false alarms and unneeded biopsies, without substantially improving odds of survival for women under 50.



Sources: MSNBC, NY Daily News

Friday, November 6, 2009

H1N1 Flu Vaccine Went To Wall Street First...Voters Want To Know Why





































































Wall Street gets H1N1 Flu vaccine first before high risk citizens and children. Now Voters want to know why.





Chris Dodd rips bankers bogarting H1N1 shots


A senior Senate Democrat is demanding answers from federal officials on why they sent swine-flu vaccines to bankers at Goldman Sachs, rather than to the schoolchildren who really need them.

“It is hard to believe that at a time when even the most vulnerable in our society are unable to obtain H1N1 vaccinations, the government is sending doses to private firms on Wall Street,” Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) said in a statement. “People are frustrated by the government’s response to this crisis, and with news like this, who can blame them? “

“Vaccines should go to people who need them most, not people who happen to work on Wall Street,” said Dodd, who’s also readying financial reform legislation that Wall Street won’t like.

Dodd sent a letter to Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, demanding she review her policies to make sure that “healthy stockbrokers” aren’t getting the H1N1 vaccine doses meant for “pregnant women and school children.” He also told Wall Street firms to immediately send back their stash.

“Schools in my state have closed; hospitals and health clinics report widespread shortages. It is shocking to think that private firms would be prioritized ahead of hospitals when the vaccine supply cannot meet the demand,” Dodd said in the letter.

News reports of that large, private employers in New York City – including Wall Street banks – and been sent of the scarce H1N1 vaccines set of a feeding frenzy Thursday. The Service Employees Union International jumped into the fray early, issuing a public call for the Wall Street fat cats to donate their doses to public hospitals.

“It’s bad enough that Wall Street crashed our economy and is back to paying out platinum bonuses after taking trillions in taxpayer-funded bailouts and backstops. But purposely endangering the health of millions of Americans during a public health crisis crosses all lines of decency,” the union’s secretary-treasurer Anna Burger said in a statement.






Flu shots for Wall Street stirs ire in New York

New York City health officials scrambled to explain themselves on Thursday in the wake of media reports about bankers who got scarce H1N1 flu vaccines through their employers.

Members of Congress fired off letters demanding immediate explanations and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reminded state and city health officers of the need to make sure the most vulnerable people get shots first.

"I am concerned that the distribution of the vaccine is resulting in favored treatment for the privileged," New Jersey Democratic Representative Frank Pallone said.

A shortage of H1N1 vaccines has frayed nerves, and public health departments across the country say they will not be able to meet the bulk of the demand until December or January.

The CDC estimates swine flu has infected more than five million people and it is documented as having killed 1,000.

The federal government, which is buying the vaccines and distributing them for free to 62 state and city health departments, says 35.6 million doses have been made and packaged since production began.

Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, a Democrat, released a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius saying he was "stunned" at the reports.

"I implore you to use whatever authorities you have to ensure that H1N1 vaccines already distributed but not yet used are promptly redirected to hospitals, schools, community health clinics, school-based health clinics, and pediatricians so that they can be made immediately available to at-risk members of the public as identified by the Department," Dodd wrote.

CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden sent out a reminder to state and city health departments that distribute vaccine.

"I ask each of you to review your plans immediately and work to ensure that the maximum number of doses is delivered to those at greatest risk as rapidly as possible," he wrote.

"I especially appreciate the many innovative ways you've found to reach them, including school-located vaccine clinics, special clinics for pregnant women, outreach to children with special needs, and making vaccine available to community- and faith-based organizations serving these high-risk populations."

Close to 160 million people are in the priority groups to get vaccine first -- healthcare workers, pregnant women, children and adults under 65 with medical conditions, caregivers for infants too young to be vaccinated and people 24 and younger.

"When H1N1 vaccine first became available in the fall, we directed all available doses to pediatricians, OB-GYNs, community health centers, public and private hospitals," New York City health department spokeswoman Jessica Scaperotti said in a telephone interview.

"As more vaccine became available we started to place small orders to providers that serve adults, including employee health centers."

She said the city had given 800,000 doses to about 1,100 providers, with Lenox Hill Hospital, for example, getting 1,200 doses and banking firm Goldman Sachs getting 200 of the 5,300 doses it asked for, Scaperotti said.

She said 16 of the city's 25 biggest employers had vaccine, including Columbia University, Citi Group and others, as well as the Federal Reserve Bank, which is not among the top 25 employers.

Morgan Stanley said it received 500 doses of the vaccine for its New York City locations and 500 doses for its Westchester location in suburban New York.

"We never thought we would receive doses ahead of area hospitals and once this was brought to our attention, we promptly donated the doses we received to a few area hospitals," including Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital in New York, a company spokeswoman said.




View Larger Map

Sources: Politico, MSNBC, Huffington Post, Bizaim, Forcechange, Google Maps

Sunday, November 1, 2009

H1N1 Flu Vaccine Shortage Frustrates Doctors...Lives Are At Stake!

(Doctors are becoming extremely frustrated with the H1N1 Flu vaccine shortages and delays. Lives are at stake!)




(US Dept of HHS Kathleen Sebelius states that H1N1 Flu Production is picking up.)



Sources: MSNBC

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

H1N1 Flu Vaccine Shots Are Safe...Get Yours! Don't Delay!
































(HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius: ‘Definitely is a safe vaccine. TODAY’s Meredith Vieira talks to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius about how the U.S. is preparing for the seasonal flu and the H1N1 virus.)



(Drive-thru H1N1 Flu vaccine shots are being offered nationwide.)






Sebelius: Americans must get swine flu shot

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius appealed anew Wednesday for widespread inoculation against a surging swine flu threat, calling the vaccine "safe and secure."

Sebelius unconditionally vouched for the safety of the vaccine, saying it "has been made exactly the same way seasonal vaccine has been made, year in and year out."

Appearing on morning news shows to step up the Obama administration's campaign for vaccinations, Sebelius said that "the adverse effects are minimal. ... We know it's safe and secure. ... This is definitely is a safe vaccine for people to get."

Sebelius was asked on CNN about surveys showing many parents were wary of getting their children vaccinated for fear the vaccine has been too hastily prepared and wasn't safe. She replied that it was targeted specifically at the H1N1 virus and was "right on target with an immune response."

The HHS secretary appeared as new cases of the flu, particularly among younger people, have been appearing recently. Some 600 people have died so far from the flu in this country, and the government has targeted roughly 90,000 sites to receive the swine flu vaccine by the end of this month.

"This flu is a younger person's flu," Sebelius said on NBC's "Today" show. "Kids have no immunity to the flu ... children are great carriers of bugs and viruses."

Because of the danger of easy transmission, especially in school and day-care settings, Sebelius said, "We strongly urge parents to take precautionary steps. Flu kills every year ... and we've got a great vaccine to deal with it."

"There's going to be plenty of vaccine," the secretary said. "It's rolling off the production lines right now ... ahead of schedule, and that's good news... By the end of October we should have a substantial amount available and begin to vaccinate a wider population of folks."

Said Sebelius: "There's no question the disease is out there, which is why today we're rolling out PSAs (public service announcements) ... to make sure people take steps to help prevent the spread of the disease, and in the meantime we will push the vaccine out as quickly as we get it off the production lines."

Appearing on CBS's "The Early Show," she said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the President's Advisory Committee on Immunizations have identified five target populations: pregnant women, health care workers, children with underlying health conditions ages 6 months to 24 years, older Americans with underlying health conditions.

"That's a lot of people," Sebelius said. "That's about half the population."

"By the end of this week," she added,"we'll begin to have injectable vaccine also available. We're dealing with five production companies. That's very good news. But the vaccine will become available as the lines clear up. So as soon as we have any vaccine available, we're pushing it out to 90,000 sites around the country. The early going is a little bumpy but we'll have a good supply by October."





Charlotte-Mecklenburg County gets shipment of swine flu vaccine


The Charlotte-Mecklenburg County Health Department on Tuesday received its first shipment of a nasal spray vaccine for the H1N1 flu, but it's too early to know when it will be available to the general public.

Health Department Director Wynn Mabry said the office now has 3,600 doses of the FluMist vaccine with more - including an injection form - expected to arrive in the future.

The health department requested 160,000 vaccine doses.

N.C. officials said Tuesday they ordered 52,000 vaccine doses last week, which will be sent to 102 providers statewide, including counties and hospital systems.

Mabry told county commissioners the health department is reaching out to other medical providers to learn how much of the vaccine is available in the community and how the doses will be distributed.

The nasal spray is recommended for healthy people between the ages of 2 and 49. Pregnant women and those with chronic medical conditions would need the injected vaccine.

Among those to be first in line for the nasal spray, Mabry said, are medical personnel and some child-care providers under 50. He also said the health department wants to be able to serve clients of the federal program that serves low-income women and children.

Mabry said he doesn't know yet when the health department will be able to offer the vaccine to the broader public. He encouraged people to contact their doctors to see whether they have the vaccine. It also may be available to pharmacies in the future.

The county also is working with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools and private schools to offer vaccinations to students once more doses arrive.

People with questions about the vaccine can call 311




View Larger Map

Sources: MSNBC, US Dept of HHS, CNN, CDC, AP, McClatchy Newspapers, Charlotte Observer, Google Maps

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

North Carolina Busted By The GAO For Medicaid Fraud (Again)...Health Care Reform Watch












































GAO report: Millions in fraud, drug abuse clogs Medicaid


As Congress debates the government's role in health care, a report out Wednesday finds that state and federal officials failed to detect millions of dollars in Medicaid prescription drug abuse.

An audit of the government program in five large states found about 65,000 instances of beneficiaries improperly obtaining potentially addictive drugs at a cost of about $65 million during 2006 and 2007 — including thousands of prescriptions written for dead patients or by people posing as doctors.

The report, by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), represents "an enormous opportunity to save money," says Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., who has scheduled a hearing Wednesday on the findings.

When bills for the doctors' visits are added, along with the potential for Medicaid fraud in states not reviewed by the GAO audit, Carper said: "We're talking hundreds of millions of dollars."

That could be good news for President Obama, who argues that a massive expansion of health care coverage can be funded by squeezing waste out of the current system. But as Pres. Obama continues to press for a government-run health insurance plan, the GAO report also reveals shortcomings in how the government manages Medicaid. The program for low-income and disabled Americans, run jointly by states and the federal government, underwrote more than $23 billion in drug costs last year.

The GAO audit focused on 10 types of frequently abused prescription drugs — painkillers and mood-altering medications. Abuse of such medications is "second only to marijuana," Joseph Rannazzisi of the Drug Enforcement Administration says in prepared testimony for the hearing.

A well-known example is the death of pop star Michael Jackson, which was ruled a homicide in August after revelations that the singer had pressed his personal physician to prescribe powerful sedatives to help him sleep.

The states targeted by the GAO — California, Illinois, New York, North Carolina and Texas — accounted for 40% of Medicaid's prescription drug payments in fiscal years 2006 and 2007. They are not fully taking advantage of federal databases or technology that could spot fraud, the report said.

The GAO found:

• About 65,000 cases where Medicaid beneficiaries visited six or more doctors and up to 46 different pharmacies to acquire prescriptions — a practice known as "doctor-shopping" that allows purchasers to exceed the legal limit of drugs.

• Sixty-five doctors or pharmacists writing or filling prescriptions after being banned from Medicaid, some for illegally selling such drugs.

• About 1,800 prescriptions written for dead patients and 1,200 prescriptions "written" by dead physicians.

States are working to prevent Medicaid prescription abuse but there are "significant issues that must be addressed," Ann Kohler, director of the National Association of State Medicaid Directors, says in testimony prepared for the hearing. One obstacle she identified: tight state budgets that are slowing needed information-technology improvements.





North Carolina Must Repay Feds $300 Mil For Medicaid "Billing Errors" (Fraud)

-It took the state months to notice that one of its Medicaid funds was flush with money, but employees couldn't figure out why.

Now, because of a huge accounting error, North Carolina must repay the federal government about $300 million for taking too much for public hospital services.

The state will pay back $200 million by the end of this month, and will repay the rest during the next 11 months, according to the state Department of Health and Human Services.

Medicaid is the federal government's health insurance program for the poor and disabled. The state received about $7.5 billion in federal Medicaid money last year. Though the federal government pays most of the costs, the state picks up about one-third of the expenses.

The mistake was triggered in November, when a state worker sent the department's controller's office incorrect information on how much money hospitals should take from the federal government and how much they should take from the state account, said Lanier Cansler, DHHS secretary.

State workers noticed the Medicaid account was out of whack about March, but couldn't find the source of the problem, Cansler said. The state discovered the mistake at the end of June as it prepared to make more changes to Medicaid billing formulas, and told the federal government about it.

The $200 million can be repaid almost immediately because the state has unspent money in the account hospitals were supposed to be tapping, Cansler said.

The $300 million mistake comes at a sensitive time for Gov. Beverly Perdue, as she pushes for tax increases to cover a budget that is nearly a month overdue. Earlier this week, the governor upended budget negotiations, saying she could not support a budget with an income tax surcharge and a drop in per pupil education spending.

In a statement, Perdue said she told Cansler and the state's new Medicaid director, Craigan L. Gray, to make correcting the problem a top priority. She said she wants a report on disciplinary actions.

"While this problem may have originated prior to my term as Governor, the circumstances under which it was made and perpetuated are simply unacceptable," she said.

Perdue said Friday she ordered DHHS to tell the state budget office if its Medicaid accounts are more than 2 percent off projections and submit a report explaining the cause.

This isn't the first time the state has lost the handle on Medicaid payments. DHHS was criticized in a recent legislative report for losing track of how much Medicaid money it was spending on a community mental health program that peaked at more than $100 million a month soon after it started.

New computers coming

A key to better monitoring Medicaid money, Cansler said, is a computer system that will be installed in four months that will let users know quickly how much money is being withdrawn from accounts and where it's going. It will replace a system that Cansler called "old and outdated."

The computer system will cost about $500,000, and the federal government will pay about 90 percent, he said.

After discovering the mistake, DHHS and the state budget office checked all of the department's federal accounts and will examine them each month for problems, Cansler said.

"It raises confidence issues in my mind about everything," he said. "We didn't find anything else. We will continue to look at everything like that and how we can strengthen controls."

Not being run very well

Senate Minority Leader Phil Berger, an Eden Republican, said the state should have been taking such care with its accounts all along.

"You would think there would be internal audit procedures and internal review procedures," he said. "This is just one more indication that our state is not being run very well."

In the past, the state has been asked to repay Medicaid because of incorrect payments to hospitals.

In 2006, the state and 51 hospitals had to repay the federal government $151.5 million in excess Medicaid payments made over six years. The hospitals paid $91.5 million and the state was responsible for the rest.

A two-year investigation found that the state mistakenly claimed too much money through a federal program designed to subsidize hospitals for their care of poor patients.




View Larger Map


Sources: USA Today, GAO, Whitehouse.gov, Charlotte Observer, News & Observer, US Dept of HHS Inspector General, DEA, Health Reform.gov, National Association of State Medicaid Directors, Allbusiness.com, Wikipedia, Google Maps

Thursday, September 24, 2009

H1N1 Flu Vaccinations: Is It Safe To Skip Them?

















Swine Flu: To Vaccinate or Not to Vaccinate?

With news that the FDA has approved a swine flu vaccine, more and more parents are faced with a dilemma… to vaccinate or not to vaccinate.?

Tammy Reed, of Menifee, California says there's nothing she wouldn't do to protect her one year old daughter Corral but she's beginning to question the protection being offered against the swine flu.

She is worried that the new vaccine hasn't been tested enough and she doesn't want her daughter to be a guinea pig. I spoke with pediatrician Dr. Danelle Fisher, at the St. Johns health center. She understands that some people are skeptical, especially since the vaccine has been manufactured very quickly and many people don't know about it. But she strongly recommends that all children between the ages of 6 months and 5 years get the swine flu vaccine.

Dr. Fisher doesn't think there will be any significant side affects with the vaccine and that it's too great a risk to not get it. But Tammy Reed and more and more parents like her are going against doctor's orders. Tammy says perhaps in the future when there's more research about the vaccine she may change her mind and give it to her daughter.

But right now she's going with her gut which is telling her not to get it. Experts in disease control are concerned that if more and more parents decide not to give the vaccine to their kids this could cause an even bigger crisis and possibly slow the efforts of government officials and medical experts to prevent the spread of another contagious outbreak.

For more info on the H1N1 virus and the new vaccine go to www. cdc.gov




View Larger Map

Sources: KTLA, CDC, MSNBC, Google Maps

HIV Vaccine That Actually Works! Helps To Prevent AIDS Infection...Thai Study, Medical Milestone







































(The CDC is expected to recommend that all babies in the U.S. be circumcised in order to reduce the spread of HIV. NBC’s Dr. Nancy Snyderman discusses the controversial issue.)




First HIV Vaccine Helps Prevent AIDS Infection

For the first time, an experimental vaccine has prevented infection with the AIDS virus, a watershed event in the deadly epidemic and a surprising result. Recent failures led many scientists to think such a vaccine might never be possible.

The World Health Organization and the U.N. agency UNAIDS said the results "instilled new hope" in the field of HIV vaccine research.

The vaccine – a combination of two previously unsuccessful vaccines – cut the risk of becoming infected with HIV by more than 31 percent in the world's largest AIDS vaccine trial of more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand, researchers announced Thursday in Bangkok.

Even though the benefit is modest, "it's the first evidence that we could have a safe and effective preventive vaccine," Col. Jerome Kim told The Associated Press. He helped lead the study for the U.S. Army, which sponsored it with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

The institute's director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned that this is "not the end of the road," but said he was surprised and very pleased by the outcome.

"It gives me cautious optimism about the possibility of improving this result" and developing a more effective AIDS vaccine, Fauci said. "This is something that we can do."

The Thailand Ministry of Public Health conducted the study, which used strains of HIV common in Thailand. Whether such a vaccine would work against other strains in the U.S., Africa or elsewhere in the world is unknown, scientists stressed.

Even a marginally helpful vaccine could have a big impact. Every day, 7,500 people worldwide are newly infected with HIV; 2 million died of AIDS in 2007, UNAIDS estimates.

"Today marks a historic milestone," said Mitchell Warren, executive director of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, an international group that has worked toward developing a vaccine.

"It will take time and resources to fully analyze and understand the data, but there is little doubt that this finding will energize and redirect the AIDS vaccine field," he said in a statement.

The study tested the two-vaccine combination in a "prime-boost" approach, in which the first one primes the immune system to attack HIV and the second one strengthens the response.

They are ALVAC, from Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine division of French drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis; and AIDSVAX, originally developed by VaxGen Inc. and now held by Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases, a nonprofit founded by some former VaxGen employees.

ALVAC uses canarypox, a bird virus altered so it can't cause human disease, to ferry synthetic versions of three HIV genes into the body. AIDSVAX contains a genetically engineered version of a protein on HIV's surface. The vaccines are not made from whole virus – dead or alive – and cannot cause HIV.

Neither vaccine in the study prevented HIV infection when tested individually in earlier trials, and dozens of scientists had called the new one futile when it began in 2003.

"I really didn't have high hopes at all that we would see a positive result," Fauci confessed.

The results proved the skeptics wrong.

"The combination is stronger than each of the individual members," said the Army's Kim, a physician who manages the Army's HIV vaccine program.

The study tested the combo in HIV-negative Thai men and women aged 18 to 30 at average risk of becoming infected. Half received four "priming" doses of ALVAC and two "boost" doses of AIDSVAX over six months. The others received dummy shots. No one knew who got what until the study ended.

Thanad Yomha, a 33-year-old electrician from southeastern Thailand, said he didn't expect anything in return for volunteering for the project.

"I did this for others," Thanad said. "It's for the next generation."

All were given condoms, counseling and treatment for any sexually transmitted infections, and were tested every six months for HIV. Any who became infected were given free treatment with antiviral medicines.

Participants were followed for three years after vaccination ended.

The results: New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31 percent lower risk of infection for the vaccine group. Two of the infected participants who received the placebo died.

The vaccine had no effect on levels of HIV in the blood for those who did become infected. That had been another goal of the study – seeing whether the vaccine could limit damage to the immune system and help keep infected people from developing full-blown AIDS.

That result is "one of the most important and intriguing findings of this trial," Fauci said. It suggests that the signs scientists have been using to gauge whether a vaccine was actually giving protection may not be valid.

"It is conceivable that we haven't even identified yet" what really shows immunity, which is both "important and humbling" after decades of vaccine research, Fauci said.

Details of the $105 million study will be given at a vaccine conference in Paris in October.

This is the third big vaccine trial since 1983, when HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS. In 2007, Merck & Co. stopped a study of its experimental vaccine after seeing it did not prevent HIV infection. Later analysis suggested the vaccine might even raise the risk of infection in certain men. The vaccine itself did not cause infection.

In 2003, AIDSVAX flunked two large trials – the first late-stage tests of any AIDS vaccine at the time.

It is unclear whether vaccine makers will seek to license the two-vaccine combo in Thailand. Before the trial began, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said other studies would be needed before the vaccine could be considered for U.S. licensing.

"This is a world first which proves that vaccine development is possible," said Dr. Supachai Rerks-Ngarm, the Thai Health Ministry official who oversaw the trial. "But this is not to the level where we can license or manufacture the vaccine yet."

Mass-producing the vaccine, plus how to proceed with future studies, will be discussed among the governments, study sponsors and companies involved in the trial, Kim said. Scientists want to know how long protection will last, whether booster shots will be needed, and whether the vaccine helps prevent infection in gay men and injection drug users, since it was tested mostly in heterosexuals in the Thai trial.

The study was done in Thailand because U.S. Army scientists did pivotal research in that country when the AIDS epidemic emerged there, isolating virus strains and providing genetic information on them to vaccine makers. The Thai government also strongly supported the idea of doing the study.


Study information: http://www.hivresearch.org/phase3/factsheet.html

Vaccine coalition: http://www.avac.org/

KTLA: http://tinyurl.com/krq7kr

Government AIDS info: http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/topics/HIVAIDS/



View Larger Map

Sources: Huffington Post, Thailand Ministry of Public Health, MSNBC, World Health Organization, CDC, KTLA, NIH.gov, AVAC.org, HIV Research.org, Google Maps

Friday, September 18, 2009

Michelle Obama: "Current US Health Care System Is Unacceptable"...Women's Issue Too


















(First lady Michelle Obama says the current state of health care in the U.S. is "Unacceptable" and women have an important role to play in changing that.)



(Is the First Lady Pres. Obama's secret weapon?)





First Lady Michelle Obama: Reform is Women's issue


On the rare day when President Barack Obama had no public events scheduled, first lady Michelle Obama had the stage to herself on the health care front, pitching insurance reform as a women's issue in her strongest statements on the contentious debate so far.

Straying frequently from her prepared remarks to speak off the cuff, Obama said that in the health insurance debate, women and families are "the face of the fight."

Using personal stories from her own life — her daughter Sasha's meningitis scare, her father's struggle with multiple sclerosis — Obama said that women are "disproportionately affected by this issue because of the roles we play in our families."

"Women are affected because of the jobs we do in this economy ... Women are more likely to work part-time, or work in small businesses, jobs that don't always provide health insurance," she said. "Women are affected because in many states, insurance companies can still discriminate because of gender."

Obama, a former hospital administrator, said her husband's plan would help "achieve true equality for women."

The first lady echoed many of the points the president has made, calling his approach "a pretty reasonable plan," that would result in "good medicine and good economics."

"Under this plan, insurance companies will no longer be able to drop your coverage when you get too sick, or refuse to pay for the care you need, or set a cap on the amount of coverage you can get," she said. "And it will limit how much they can charge you for out-of-pocket expenses. Because getting sick in this country shouldn't mean that you bankrupt."

The speech marked Obama’s most high-profile foray into promoting her husband’s top legislative priority, which was sharply controversial over the summer. The White House clearly hopes that some of Michelle Obama’s personal popularity can help build public support for the reforms.

At her speech at the Old Executive Office building next to the White House, Michelle Obama was joined by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who said, quoting Ronald Reagan, said that the status quo was unacceptable and that the time for reform is now.

"If victory were not so close, people would be a little calmer, [but] the legislative process is underway," she said. "We can have health insurance reform this year."

Sebelius blamed insurance companies for charging women more for premiums, a theme Obama touched on as well.

Recent polls show that women under 50 are more likely to support the president's approach to health insurance reform.

Three women at the event talked about juggling health scares with high premiums. Obama said that "more than half of women report putting off needed medical care because they can't afford it."

"This current situation is unacceptable. No one in this country should be treated this way. It’s not fair. It’s not right. These are hard working folks we're talking about," Obama said, casting the debate in moral terms. "This is a ‘there but for the grace of God go I’ kind of problem. None of us are exempt. Ever."

Obama said that "now more than ever it is time to act," telling the audience activists and supporters that it’s time to stake their claim.

"We can't watch the debate take on a life of its own, we have to channel our passions into change," she said. "... we have to be fired up and ready to go."




View Larger Map


Sources: Politico, AP, MSNBC, Yahoo News, Youtube, Google Maps

Thursday, September 3, 2009

H1N1 Flu Seems To Strike Kids 5 Yrs & Older Hardest...Wash Your Hands!





































MSNBC----

CDC: Swine flu deaths higher in older kids

80 percent of children who died were age 5 or older, government says.


(Starting a new school year is stressful enough, but now there’s the added worry that your kids could be walking into ground zero for swine flu. What can parents and schools do to ease these concerns.)



ATLANTA - About one in 13 U.S. swine flu deaths have been children and most of the kids have been of school age, the federal government said Thursday in its first study of the new flu's youngest victims.

More than 40 U.S. children have died from the virus since it was first identified in this country in April. The report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention takes a comprehensive look at the first 36 deaths, and found some important differences in the pediatric death toll from swine flu as compared to seasonal flu:

* Normally, half or more of the children who die from flu are age 4 and younger. But more than 80 percent of the kids who died with swine flu were 5 or older.

* Almost two-thirds of the children who died with swine flu had epilepsy, cerebral palsy or other neurodevelopmental conditions. In a previous flu season, only a third of pediatric deaths had those conditions.

* Bacterial co-infections were a big danger, and were blamed in most of the deaths of otherwise healthy children. Co-infections usually occur when a patient, weakened by a virus, then gets hit by a bacterial bug.

The CDC released the report through one of its publications, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

More than 1 million in U.S. infected

Swine flu has caused more than 1 million illnesses in the United States, the CDC estimates. More than 550 deaths and 8,800 hospitalizations have been reported to date.

It's hard to say whether children have accounted for a higher proportion of deaths from swine flu than they normally do from seasonal flu, though CDC officials say that seems to be true. The CDC doesn't monitor seasonal flu deaths as closely as it does swine flu, and it has no comprehensive count of annual seasonal flu deaths to enable such a comparison.

The new report focuses on lab-confirmed swine flu deaths reported through Aug. 8. The CDC hasn't been able to do as complete an analysis of cases that have come in since then, said Dr. Cynthia Moore, a CDC medical officer who was one of the study's co-authors.

Through Aug. 8, there were 477 total swine flu deaths, including 36 in children.

Only about 20 percent of those children were age 4 or younger. That's unusual: Often 50 percent or more of seasonal flu deaths are in infants and toddlers, who have less mature immune systems and smaller air passages and are generally in more danger from respiratory infections.

"There's a lot of school-aged children" in the death count, said Dr. Beth Bell, a CDC epidemiologist who is a leader in the agency's swine flu response efforts.

Older kids may be more likely to be exposed to virus


It's not clear why such a large percentage of the swine flu pediatric deaths are in kids aged 5 and older. It simply may be because older children were more likely to encounter the virus — at schools, summer camps — than very young children who spend more time at home, Bell said.

The initial numbers in the report are small and the CDC will need to look at more reports to see if the trends hold up, CDC officials said.

Two-thirds of the children who died had high-risk medical conditions. Nearly all of them had an illness related to the nervous system, including mental retardation, cerebral palsy and epilepsy and other seizure disorders.

Years ago experts recognized that children with Neuro-developmental conditions are at higher risk of serious complications from the flu. But the proportion of swine flu victims with that kind of underlying condition was swine flu percentages are high compared to a previous flu season, CDC officials said.

It's not clear how significant that finding is, because many of the children had other medical problems that had weakened their bodies, CDC officials said.

Of the children who were healthy before they got swine flu, many were probably killed by a one-two punch of swine flu working with a bacterial co-infection, CDC officials said.

Bacterial co-infections have been an increasingly noticed danger since the government started tracking pediatric flu deaths in 2004. So their occurrence with swine flu was not a surprise, but emphasized the needs for parents and doctors to be alert to the danger and give the child antibiotics when appropriate, CDC officials said.



View Larger Map

Sources: MSNBC, Day Life, Google Maps