National Polls reveal DONALD
TRUMP is supported by more than 32% of American voters.
National Polls also reveal
JEB BUSH supported by only 3% of American voters.
The 2016 RNC Convention will
take place JULY 18-21 in CLEVELAND, Ohio.
Who will be crowned as the
GOP Presidential nominee?
Millions of voters believe
TRUMP will walk away with this prize.
So how did Political Royal
Family candidate JEB BUSH lose his bid for the 2016 GOP Presidential Nomination
to a Loud Successful Business Mogul from NYC named DONALD TRUMP?
Donald Trump is picking up
where he left off in 2015 when it comes to his favorite Twitter targets.
The brash billionaire and GOP
front-runner fired off several attacks against Jeb Bush, Hillary Clinton and
his latest foe: former President Bill Clinton.
Early in the morning, Trump
called the former Florida governor a "sad case" with "no chance."
".@JebBush is a sad
case. A total embarrassment to both himself and his family, he just announced
he will continue to spend on Trump hit ads!" Trump tweeted.
He then hit the former
secretary of state over her opposition to his call for a temporary ban on
Muslims entering the United States.
"Hillary Clinton said
that it is O.K. to ban Muslims from Israel by building a WALL, but not O.K. to
do so in the U.S. We must be vigilant!"
Later in the day, the real
estate mogul went on to compare her to Bush, using his favored "low
energy" diss.
"Hillary Clinton doesn't
have the strength or stamina to be president. Jeb Bush is a low energy
individual, but Hillary is not much better!"
Finally, he attacked Bill
Clinton -- who will soon appear on the campaign trail to support his wife's
presidential bid -- by calling him a "hypocrite" on women's issues.
"I hope Bill Clinton
starts talking about women's issues so that voters can see what a hypocrite he
is and how Hillary abused those women!"
One year ago, some people thought that there was a strong chance Jeb Bush would become the Republican candidate for the 2016 presidential election.
Unfortunately for Mr. Bush, that isn’t looking very likely according to the polls. In fact, no matter how much he tries to attack his opponents, Jeb Bush keeps sinking further and further.
On Friday, the Wall Street Journal asked if Jeb Bush could save his presidency.
“Yet Jeb Bush, who aspires to be the third President Bush in three decades, so far hasn’t found a sizable GOP market.
Often wobbling rhetorically, humbled by the crowded field, beleaguered by an insult-comic billionaire, his aura of inevitability vanished, if it ever existed.”
The article then notes that a comeback would be almost impossible, especially given that Jeb Bush has a 27.5 percent to 53.3 percent favorable/unfavorable rating, which is worse than the same rating for Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. However, according to the New York Times, Jeb Bush still plans to save his candidacy.
“Jeb Bush and his supporters still have a pile of money to spend, remnants of $100 million raised when he seemed early last year to be a sure bet…And allies have just begun a new ad campaign in Iowa.”
Other campaigns appear to have counted him out altogether. But, in extensive interviews over the past week, aides to Mr. Bush and important allies described a long-shot plan to pull off what seems all but impossible: winning the Republican nomination for president.
The plan has six elements: keep attacking, avoid embarrassment in Iowa, do well in New Hampshire, woo Lindsey Graham, and — perhaps most importantly — use the family network to help.
Speaking of attacking, that’s just what Jeb Bush’s Republican running mate is doing.
Trump’s Twitter account lit up on this weekend with some nasty tweets.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump will release his first TV ad on Monday. The Washington Post says it raises the temperature of the GOP race.
“Donald Trump’s ad begins with a shot of President Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Then comes a U.S. battleship launching a cruise-missile strike. From there it moves swiftly through an explosive montage: The suspects in the recent California terrorist attack. Shadowy figures racing across the U.S.-Mexico border. Islamic State militants.”
The ad, even though it hasn’t been released, has been both praised and ridiculed on Twitter — in other words, it’s good PR for Trump.
Many Republicans, even ones who aren’t thrilled with Trump, believe that he is winning and Bush is losing because Trump “has balls.” Do you think Donald Trump will end up taking the Republican nomination? Do you think Jeb Bush is really finished? Give us your thoughts in the comments section.
Two of Charlotte's Republican mayoral candidates offered competing visions for the city Thursday night, with one pushing limited government and the other offering examples of how government can work for its citizens.
Martin Davis and John Lassiter(both Republicans) outlined their views during a forum sponsored by the Black Political Caucus of Charlotte-Mecklenburg.
Seventeen City Council candidates also attended the two-hour forum at Little Rock AME Zion Church. The caucus invited everyone competing in the Sept. 15 primaries.
The Republican mayoral primary pits Davis, Lassiter and Jack Stratton, who did not attend. The winner faces Democrat Anthony Foxx in November.
Davis invoked the Founding Fathers' belief in limited government.
“As a nation, we have strayed far, far away from that,” he said.
He criticized what he described as Charlotte's high taxes and said he opposes economic development grants, which Lassiter has supported. Asked to answer yes or no on whether he would support “uncontrolled” and “unplanned” growth, Davis said he would.
He later clarified to the Observer that while some controls are needed, regulations should be relaxed.
Lassiter, a three-term council member, said he opposes uncontrolled growth. He also detailed initiatives he said he and the city have taken to foster economic development. In particular, he cited efforts to help minority contractors and spur development along Wilkinson Boulevard, Beatties Ford Road and North Tryon Street.
He touted what he called the unparalleled experience he would bring to the job as a former neighborhood leader, planning commissioner, school board member and councilman.
Asked how they would build coalitions across the city, Lassiter said he “understands the diversity of the community” and even invited the 80 or so people present to a breakfast he's hosting Aug. 22 at the old McDonald's Cafeteria on Beatties Ford Road.
Davis called diversity “a catchword for racial differences.”
“I've seen Tiger Woods play golf,” he said. “I've seen Barry Sanders play football. Black people are capable of competing with white people.”
At-large candidates speak
Virtually all of the 13 at-large candidates at the caucus forum agreed that economic development and public safety are the main issues facing the city. Moderator Bea Thompson also fired different questions to each of the 13.
On Sept. 15, primary voters will nominate four Democrats and four Republicans.
Here is some of what the candidates said Thursday night:
Raphael Basisa, D: Called himself an “original” with “very good judgment” who would bring new ideas to council. “I'm not going to focus on experience,” he said, “because I've never been on City Council.”
Georgia Belk, R: Touted her efforts last year on what she called “the campaign to change our court system,” which resulted in the election of her husband Bill to the District Court. “I'll be as committed on City Council to you as I was on the reform campaign last fall,” she said.
Tariq Bokhari, R: One of the organizers of Wednesday night's “town hall” on health care – a meeting that drew some 100 people – he said voters should look at what candidates do, not just what they say. “You will never hear me say it's not my responsibility,” he said.
Susan Burgess, D: The only incumbent Democrat in the race, she said she would work to keep Charlotte a great place. “I want to maintain that,” she said.
Patrick Cannon, D: Asked what mistake he'd made that he'd learned from, Cannon, a former council member, had a hard time thinking of any. “I believe that I have tried to do the best I can with the information before me,” he said.
Anthony Castrillon, D: As a first-generation American whose parents came from Ecuador, he said he hopes to keep Charlotte “a beautiful city everywhere, not just (in) certain pockets.”
Dave Howard, D: Touted his track record as a planning commissioner and advocate for affordable housing. Said Howard: “I'm a solution-oriented person.”
Craig Nannini, R: Said Charlotte's tax structure deters businesses – and jobs. “Why would a business owner come to set up shop,” he asked, “when it's going to cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars in extra costs?”
Edwin Peacock, R: The only incumbent Republican in the race said he would push to diversify the city's economy, with special focus on green energy as well as NASCAR and the financial industry.
Darrin Rankin, D: Asked how he would not give in to special interests, he had a simple answer. “Just be myself,” he said. “I'm my own person.”
Jay Rao, R: Said the biggest city budget challenge is balancing needs. She called for an audit of the entire budget “to see what works and what doesn't.”
Matthew Ridenhour, R: A former Marine, he said would help lead the city like he led joint exercises between the Marines and Army. “We focused,” he said, “on the mission.”
Bob Williams, D: Called himself “a common citizen” fed up with rising tax and utility bills. “I'm tired of (how) these things keep going up and up and up,” he said.
Republican at-large candidate Jerry Drye did not attend.
District 1 Democrats Patsy Kinsey and Owen Sutkowski and District 5 rivals Darrell Bonapart and Nancy Carter also answered questions.
Republican mayoral candidate Martin Davis asked election officials on Monday to order one of his opponents to remove a video clip from a city-produced television show from his campaign Web site.
The request was part of a complaint Davis filed with the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections against city councilman John Lassiter, and references a 5-minute, 37-second clip about Lassiter that originally aired as part of a show about the council on the Government Channel.
Mecklenburg Elections director Michael Dickerson said he planned to forward the complaint to the state board of elections. Davis told the Observer he was told the state board could discuss the matter on Thursday.
It is the second complaint Davis has filed in recent days about the TV show. The previous complaint was against Lassiter and Democratic mayoral candidate Anthony Foxx, who also sits on the city council, and claimed the city was giving the pair an unreported in-kind contribution by featuring them on the show.
City Attorney Mac McCarley has defended the video, telling the Observer last week it was not campaign-related and featured “sitting elected officials communicating with their constituents.”
But Davis writes in his complaint that Lassiter's use of the video clip on his Web site constitutes an “illegal contribution.”
“I ask that you issue a cease and desist to Lassiter to remove the video from his campaign website and take whatever legal action against Lassiter that is warranted under North Carolina law,” Davis wrote.
Davis said he has a video on his own campaign web site that cost $2,400 to make and is of lesser quality, so taxpayers may have paid more to cover the cost of the Lassiter clip.
On Monday, Lassiter said the TV show on the council was produced by the city last year and done independently of the election season. He said he included the segment on his campaign site because “I think it's an accurate portrayal of my involvement and a good way for people to get to know me.”
Lassiter said the video is in the public domain and available on the city Web site, as are Martin's appearances at city council meetings. He said Martin could download those clips if he wishes to let people know more about him.
Replied Martin: “We'll see what the board of elections has to say about that.”
Davis, Lassiter and Jack Stratton are vying against each other in a September primary.
Welcome to the BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ Blog. (Established 2008)
My name is Laurel. (Author & Publisher)
I Blog with a focus on POLITICS, Business, and occasionally Entertainment.
FACTS ABOUT LAUREL:
Wife,
Mother of a U.S. Soldier,
Sister,
Woman of GOD,
Loyal Friend,
Creative,
Blood-related to a nationally known Charlotte Politician.
Black Female, Intelligent,
Married,
Love to Travel,
Credentialed by the RNC and DNC.
Political Blogger/ Commentator
Grassroots Activist,
PROFESSIONAL STATUS:
Credential Political Blogger/ Commentator,
Registered Independent Voter
Original Native of BROOKLYN, NY
Currently reside in CHARLOTTE, NC
I’m Nice but don’t get it twisted because my Mind is Sharp!
Since You’ve Chosen to Visit and Read the Contents of this Blog by Personal Choice, and of Your Own Free Will,
Please don’t ask me to Compensate you for Expressing individual commentary/ Posted Articles, which are protected by the First Amendment, citing Freedom of Speech & Freedom of Expression.
No Intentionally Malicious Slander, Libel or Defamation of Character content will be published and I will always Credit all Sources.
NOTE TO ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS, APPOINTED OFFICIALS & PUBLIC FIGURES:
Per the Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case: 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan………
The Public has a Right to Criticize the People who Govern them, so the least Protection from Defamation is given to Public Officials. When officials are accused of something that involves their behavior in office, they have to prove all of the above elements of defamation and they must also prove that the defendant acted with “actual malice.” (For a definition of actual malice, see the “History of Defamation and the First Amendment, below.”)
People who aren’t Elected but who are Still Public Figures because they are influential or famous — like Actors, Actresses, Movie Stars, Singers & Entertainers, Journalists, TV Hosts, Bloggers, etc., — also have to Prove that Defamatory statements were made with Actual Malice, in most cases.
To the Associated Press and other Media Organizations:
When I use your Content Links., I’m also citing the Fair Use Doctrine (Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107) for further Copyright permission.
Posts and Links published on Black Political Buzz are not endorsed by Black Political Buzz Blog Author Laurel’s Employer, nor the Employers of other Black Political Buzz employees.
This includes Links, Posts and Comments posted on Black Political Buzz’s Facebook and Twitter account pages.
Comments, Links and Opinions of site visitors are Independently-Owned and not endorsed by Black Political Buzz employees, Blog Author Laurel or Laurel’s Employer.)
(No Personal Offense intended) Please know that Black Political Buzz is not responsible for nor do I endorse Requests for Donations from Third Parties on this Blog.
I will Only Endorse Requests for Donations made on behalf of BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ Blog for Business Purposes & Operating Expenses.
I will also Only Endorse Requests for Donations on behalf of Legitimate Politicians and Legitimate Political Candidates. PERIOD!!
If anyone else or another Organization wishes to post a link to Request Donations, I am NOT endorsing ANY of those Requests!
Unless I receive a personal Request to do so and I have Professionally Confirmed that the Third Party Organization or Charity is indeed a Legitimate Entity.
NOTE: Anyone who chooses to give to any Third Party Organization NOT Endorsed by BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ is doing so at his or her own risk.
BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ does NOT Discriminate against Politicians, Political Candidates, Organizations or Charities based on Race, Color, Nationality, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Religion, Faith, Disability, Political Affiliation, Creed, Education, Social Status, Age.
This disclaimer applies to ANY and All requests for Donations on this Blog. Thanks for understanding. Again No Personal Offense intended.
For Story Tips….Corrections…….. or Requests for Endorsements:
Please contact me via e-mail: blackpoliticalbuzz@gmail.com
or via my Facebook page: facebook.com/blackpoliticalbuzz
Thanks for stopping by
God Bless
Laurel @BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ
LINKS: POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE & INFORMATIONAL SITES