Custom Search
Showing posts with label Waterloo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Waterloo. Show all posts

Thursday, January 9, 2014

CHRIS CHRISTIE: Is "BRIDGEGATE" Christie's 2016 Waterloo?? (Not With Great Damage Control!)






#BRIDGEGATE


Is the GW "BRIDGEGATE" Scandal Gov CHRISTIE'S 2016 Waterloo??

Not if he uses great DAMAGE CONTROL & comes down really hard on the people Responsible.

Even if those people are his CLOSE Friends.

By the way does CHRIS CHRISTIE have any BLACK & LATINO People working in his Administration??

I'm NOT referring to the Office Cleaning Staff, I'm referring to Key Administration Personnel.

And......

Where was the Mainstream Media when the IRS was Targeting Innocent American Citizens for POLITICS??

I'm just saying.





ARTICLE: "It’s The Worst Example Of A Petty Political Vendetta’: Fort Lee, NJ, Mayor Sokolich On Retaliatory George Washington Bridge closings"

Emails exchanged between a Chris Christie staffer and appointee shows bridge lanes were shut as punishment for Sokolich not supporting the governor. ‘How low can you go … congratulations, you’ve just made New Jersey the brunt of every political joke for the next 25 years,’ the Fort Lee mayor added.

Bully-boy Gov. Chris Christie’s White House hopes hit a massive roadblock after emails implicated a top aide in a punitive George Washington Bridge traffic nightmare.

“Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee,” read the damning Aug. 13 email made public Wednesday — the political payback to the mayor of Fort Lee, N.J., for his refusal to endorse the GOP incumbent last year.

“Got it,” shot back the Garden State governor’s high school buddy, David Wildstein, to the message from Bridget Anne Kelly, Christie’s deputy chief of staff for legislative and intergovernmental affairs.

Fort Lee’s Democratic mayor, Mark Sokolich, told the Daily News on Wednesday he was appalled by the orchestrated gridlock in September.

“How low can you go?” he asked. “This is insane. It’s the worst example of a petty political vendetta . . . I’m embarrassed. And congratulations, you’ve just made New Jersey the brunt of every political joke for the next 25 years — again.”

Comedian Jon Stewart was among the first to fulfill the prophecy. “Clearly, somebody is getting thrown under the bus here,” the Jersey-born funnyman said on “The Daily Show With Jon Stewart.” “Fortunately for them, the bus isn’t moving. It’s stuck in terrible traffic.”

“Shame on you,” Sokolich said of the political plotters on CNN. He added he fears retribution and wants a criminal probe.

The mayor also had choice words for Wildstein, who had called him a “little Serbian” in an email. “Wildstein deserves an ass-kicking, okay? Sorry. There, I said it,” Sokolich (who is Croatian) said on MSNBC.

First responders were delayed in getting to emergencies, including a call about an unconscious 91-year-old woman who later died at a local hospital.

Asked if he had heard from Christie, Sokolich told The News the governor needs to address the people his staff put in danger during four days of madness. “Don’t explain it to me, explain it to the families that were waiting two, three times longer than they had to for first responders to arrive when their loved ones were clutching their chests because they were having either heart attacks or tremendous heart pain,” he said.

“Explain it to the family who was missing a child that the police had to respond to, or explain it to the thousands of families who couldn’t get their kids to school on time on the first day and the ensuing days thereafter,” Sokolich railed.

Christie, who denied months ago that his staff was involved in creating the chaos, said he first learned of the emails on Wednesday.

“What I’ve seen today for the first time is unacceptable,” he said in a written statement. “I am outraged and deeply saddened that not only was I misled by a member of my staff, but this completely inappropriate and unsanctioned conduct was made without my knowledge.”

The governor said “people will be held responsible for their actions.”

He canceled his only scheduled appearance on Wednesday but he will hold a press conference at 11am on Thursday at his office.

A cache of newly released messages portrayed Wildstein, a $150,000-a-year Christie appointee at the Port Authority, as an eager participant with Kelly in the vehicular vengeance. The governor’s hand-picked choice as PA chairman — David Samson — was also tarred by the burgeoning “Bridgegate.”

“Shame on you,” Sokolich told CNN on Wednesday evening, adding he feared retribution. The Fort Lee mayor also has called for a criminal probe.

Christie critics were quick to unload on a governor more used to throwing political punches than taking them.

“The governor has denied from day one that he knew anything about this,” said New Jersey state Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg. “Either the governor’s staff lied to him, or the governor was less than truthful with the people of New Jersey.”

State Sen. Barbara Buono, the Democrat who suffered a one-sided November defeat against Christie in the governor’s race, called for the immediate firing of anyone involved and a federal probe of the four-day lane closings on the world’s busiest bridge.

“It’s not at all surprising,” said Buono of the nasty behavior. “I know Chris Christie. Nothing happens in his administration without him knowing.”

New Jersey State Senator Ray Lesniak plans to request that federal prosecutors in New York and New Jersey investigate the scandal, according to WABC.

A request will also to be made to the Manhattan District Attorney for an inquiry into the scandal.

The emails reinforced Christie’s persona as a mean-spirited politician with a scorched-earth approach toward critics.

Matthew Hale, a political science professor at Seton Hall, told Reuters that Christie’s 2016 White House aspirations have taken a big hit.

“The smoking gun is not quite in the governor’s hand, but these emails show that it is awfully close to it,” Hale said.

“Gov. Christie has spent an enormous amount of effort trying to get away from the narrative that he is a bully,” he said. “These emails destroy all of that effort in a single day.”

It was Sokolich’s decision to support fellow Democrat Buono that apparently set the bizarre lane-closing plans in motion.

A text message exchange between Christie appointees showed the callous chatters taking great delight in the gridlock — timed to coincide with the first day of school.

“Is it wrong that I’m smiling?” texted an unidentified underling.

“No,” Wildstein wrote in response.

“I feel badly about the kids. I guess,” read another text.

“They are the children of Buono voters,” Wildstein coldly replied.

In an email to Kelly, Wildstein stressed that complaints from Sokolich would fall on deaf ears. The mayor said his dozens of complaint calls were ignored.

Eventually, Sokolich was told a traffic study was the reason for the closings. A Sept. 13 email said PA Chairman David Samson played a role in the bogus “traffic study.”

“The New York side gave Fort Lee back all three lanes this morning,” read the Wildstein email. “We are appropriately going nuts. Samson helping us to retaliate.”

The chairman released his own statement insisting he was unaware of the vindictive lane closings.

“I am extremely upset and distressed over today’s disclosures,” said Samson. “To be clear, neither I nor anyone on the board had any knowledge of these lane closures” until a Sept. 13 email from PA Executive Director Patrick Foye. The Port Authority is conducting its own probe.

The agency placed cones blocking two of the three toll plazas from Fort Lee, resulting in hours-long delays that stretched into adjoining towns. The jam-packed streets wreaked havoc on local first responders — even delaying the search for a missing 4-year-old girl.

The emergency response time of Fort Lee’s three ambulances was tripled, and the gridlock forced the entire police department to direct traffic, said Borough Council member Jan Goldberg.

On Sept. 9, the first day of the traffic jam, an ambulance responded to a call for the unconscious elderly woman, Goldberg said. The typical two- to three-minute response time turned into seven minutes, and she was pronounced dead at a nearby hospital. No one could say if the delay played any role in the woman’s death.

John Currie, chairman of the New Jersey state Democrats, said it was time for the Republican governor to stand up and come clean.

“I suggest the governor try a new approach when answering questions: honesty,” Currie said.

Wildstein resigned his position in December, as did Christie PA appointee Bill Baroni, as the scandal began to mushroom. Baroni, once a Jersey state senator, earned a $289,667 annual salary.


Source: NY Daily News, Youtube























CHRIS CHRISTIE: To Hold "BRIDGEGATE" Scandal Press Conference Today (Damage Control)



#BRIDGEGATE

NJ Gov CHRIS CHRISTIE will hold a Press Conference on the troubling George Washington "BRIDGEGATE" Scandal today at 11:00am.

Is the GW "BRIDGEGATE" Scandal Gov CHRISTIE'S 2016 Waterloo??

Not with a dose of Great DAMAGE CONTROL & hold those directly accountable & related to this Scandal responsible.



Source: NY Daily News, Youtube



Wednesday, February 3, 2010

GOP Discovers Filibuster Loophole In Dems' Reconciliation Plan




Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy





Republicans Find Loophole In Budget Ploy To Push Healthcare


As it turns out, Senate Democrats may not be able to force healthcare legislation through the chamber on a simple majority vote.

Republicans say they have found a loophole in the budget Reconciliation process that could allow them to offer an indefinite number of amendments.

Though it has never been done, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) says he’s prepared to test the Senate’s stamina to block the Democrats from using the process to expedite changes to the healthcare bill.

Experts on Senate procedural rules, from both parties, note that such a filibuster is possible. While reconciliation rules limit debate to 20 hours, senators lack similiar constraints on amendments and could conceivably continue offering them until 60 members agree to cut the process off.

Another option for Democrats would be to seek a ruling by the parliamentarian that Republicans are simply filing amendments to stall the process. But such a ruling could taint the final healthcare vote and backfire for Democrats in November.

Or Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) could use a tactic similar to the so-called nuclear option to quash the GOP tactics.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy




If those options failed, and Reid couldn’t convince a single Republican to vote with his 59-member conference, Democrats might be forced to consider withdrawing the healthcare bill.

A Democratic leadership aide confirmed to The Hill that the options outlined in this articlee are correct.

House Democrats have said they would not pass the Senate healthcare bill unless changes are made through reconciliation, which is necessary because Republicans control 41 Senate seats, enough to block legislation through the regular process.

But Republicans may end up having that power even under reconciliation.

“You could keep offering amendments until you don’t have any more to offer,” said a congressional aide, who said he did not know how long senators would be willing to stay in the chamber to move the reconciliation package. “What the body’s tolerance would be is unknown.”

A former Senate Republican leadership aide said: “The limit is on debate, not on consideration of amendments.”

DeMint said he’s ready to try anything.

“You’ll see Republicans do everything they can to delay and stop this process,” DeMint said. “They need to get the message the track they’re on is the wrong track.”

Reid spent significant time last year in close study of the Senate rules for fast-tracking healthcare legislation under special budget rules.

Reid stayed away from the special process of passing healthcare reform with only 51 votes because he knew it would be messy.

But since Republicans won a Senate seat in Massachusetts, thereby stripping Democrats of a filibuster-proof majority, it appears Democrats will need to invoke those rules to make crucial changes to healthcare legislation.

DeMint said that using reconciliation rules to pass the House-requested changes to the Senate healthcare bill with only 51 votes is “tyrannical.”

“I think you’ll see us offering amendments to get us into November, if we can,” said DeMint.

Sen. Judd Gregg (N.H.), the ranking Republican on the Budget Committee, said: “You could continue to offer amendments, I suspect.

“You can offer an unlimited number of amendments on the budget after time is elapsed so it’s logical that you could also do it on reconciliation,” Gregg said.

Democrats could try to persuade Republican colleagues to back down and withdraw their amendments after several hours or days of voting. With a unified Democratic conference, Reid would need just one GOP senator to cut off the process.

The most likely candidate would be Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), who voted with Democrats to advance the Senate Finance Committee bill but has since opposed the healthcare measure on the Senate floor.

Reid or another Democrat could make a point of order that using amendments to stall a reconciliation bill violates the spirit of the Budget Act of 1974, which sets up for expedited consideration of budget-related bills.

Reid or another Democrat could argue that offering unlimited amendments violates the spirit of limiting debate.

The parliamentarian has ruled that the limit on debate does not allow senators to filibuster the motion to proceed to a reconciliation bill. The parliamentarian could rule that the same concept applies to amendments.

No one really knows, because a lawmaker has never tried to use amendments to filibuster a reconciliation package.

“We haven’t ever tried it before,” said a congressional aide.

Parliamentarian Alan Frumin could rule Republican amendments after a certain number out of order. But he could also allow the GOP amendments, since they are not expressly barred.

If Frumin ruled with Republicans, Reid would be in a difficult position. He could either pull the bill off the floor or he could appeal the ruling of the parliamentarian.

With a simple majority of 51 votes, Reid could overturn the ruling of the chair and set a Senate precedent that amendments must be limited to within reason. This tactic would be similar to the so-called nuclear option Senate Republicans considered using in 2005 to overrule Democratic filibusters of judicial nominees.



Sources: The Hill, MSNBC, The Ed Show

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Firing Michael Steele Could Be GOP's "Waterloo"...Here's Why




















Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy






Firing Legally Elected RNC Chairman Michael Steele would be the GOP's "Waterloo".

Here's why....

You know folks I thought the Republican Party would have learned something crucial about American Voter Mentality by now, especially after their crushing defeat in 2008 but alas that isn't so.

As it currently stands GOP Leaders are attacking Michael Steele and yes these attacks do appear to be racially motivated whether anyone else wishes to admit this theory is true.

Michael Steele is the first African-American RNC Chairman in the Republican Party's history.

Perhaps GOP Leaders thought when he was elected Steele would just be a quiet, token Minority Gimmick to attract Black Voters for future elections.

Wrong!

Steele was Loud, Outgoing, Bold, Brash and loaded with Gaffes that would make VP Joe Biden proud.

On the upside Steele is also Highly Intelligent and understands the Political landscape much like Pres. Barack Obama. (Obama won remember?)

Instead of GOP Leaders bonding with Steele to make him feel welcome, they immediately began distancing themselves from him and trying to control him as if he were a purchased Slave.

Yes I said it! A purchased slave!

Now GOP Leaders are using Steele's promotion of his book as a way to push him off the cliff into non-existence.

Well I have something to say about these attacks.

GOP LEADERS YOUR BEING FOOLISH and...SEEMINGLY RACIST!!

America is a Melting Pot and Michael Steele helps to make up that Melting Pot!


In case you haven't noticed Voters are hurting right now.

We need Jobs and we want to feel Safe!

This includes Independent Voters, Young Voters, White Voters, Black Voters, Hispanic Voters, Senior Citizen Voters and Democrat Voters riding the fence who are all watching how viciously your behaving towards Mr. Steele.

We're all watching you!

If any of you felt as if Michael Steele was wrong why not take him aside and deal with him quietly?

You know the same way Sen. John McCain dealt with Sarah Palin on the 2008 Campaign trail when she goofed up BIG time!

In case you've forgotten Pres. Barack Obama received 45% of White Voter support on election night November 2008.

That's more than Clinton and Kerry in previous elections.

The flip side is GOP candidates need Minority Voter support in order to regain control of Congress.

For the moment heavy Minority Voter Support looks possible for Republicans.

Why?

Due to Obama's Admin. intentionally ignoring America's Middle Class, Senior Citizens, Low Income Voters and Black Voters since he's been elected, Democrats may have a hard time retaining us during 2010 and 2012 elections.

(We thought Pres. Obama cared about us but thus far he's only returned affection and shown gratitude to Wealthy Wall Street Bankers NOT his "small time" loyal Voters.)

In addition Pres. Obama has a staff of "eggheads" who can't seem to relate to real, everyday people. Hurting People.

American Voters ask for Jobs and he comes up with this "Green Jobs" program.

His Green Jobs program is a good idea but....

People are Unemployed, facing Eviction, facing Foreclosure and trying to keep Warm in a terrible Winter.

Who does Pres. Obama thinks has time to return to school when their faced with such dire personal circumstances?

Even citizens who already possess College Degrees don't really have time to return to school. Their just trying to survive like everyone else.

Sometimes it seems as if Pres. Obama's Admin. is trying to get rid of all small time, regular people in hopes of re-creating a Super Intelligent, "Egghead" race.

I know it sounds crazy but why else would he sit back for an entire year and let people lose their jobs and homes?

His HAMP (Making Homes Affordable program) (managed by Tim Geither) was basically useless.

Pres. Obama also intentionally allowed Democrat State Governors and City Mayors (such as in North Carolina) to use Stimulus Funding to fill in Budget Gaps or waste it on silly, Non-Jobs producing projects.

For example in North Carolina thousands of Teachers lost their jobs because Gov Bev Perdue used Stimulus Funds for other stuff. i.e., Helping balance NC's Budget.


These same hurting, highly disgruntled American Voters may have a change of heart in 2010, 2012 and consider swinging on over to GOP candidates but....

Not if GOP Leaders turn them off by treating RNC Chairman Steele like dirt or a third world citizen.

Regardless of how any GOP Leaders feel about Michael Steele, he is still a Human Being created in God's image deserving of respect.

The same respect they consistently display to Sarah Palin.

While we're on the subject of Palin, why is it that I see her paw prints all over these recent attacks on Chairman Steele?

Maybe its because he failed to mention her in his book.

And....

If GOP Leaders are betting their future on Tea Party Protesters its a HUGE mistake!

In fact if Republican Strategists do their homework they'll discover the Tea Party Movement is actually destroying the GOP.

(Gov Tim Kaine's observation was on the money regarding Tea Party Protesters when he spoke on the movement back in December 2009.)

The majority of those Tea Party folks won't even cast ballots for ANY Politician because their angry at "Big Government".

Sarah Palin knows this but she just wants more money.

Furthermore many of those Tea Party Protesters are Polarizing Racists.

Take a look at some of those signs.

Those signs are an embarrassing disgrace to any Political Party.

I don't recall seeing any Tea Party Protesters while George W. Bush or Bill Clinton were in Office do you?

To sum it up if GOP Leaders continue publicly and personally attacking Michael Steele, it will be to the Republican Party's own demise.

Important races worthy of winning are fast approaching like those in North Carolina.

North Carolina Voters even Democrat Voters, are sick and tired of all the Corruption and Racism killing this state.

Each year more and more Political and Public Corruption continues to increase without Democrat Leaders doing anything to stop it.

Hint, Hint: NC is a state ripe for a possible Republican takeover.

If the GOP doesn't quickly heal itself and unify, Democrats will continue to stomp Republicans.

I predict that if the GOP continues down a road of Southern, Conservative "Racial Purity" by 2012 Pres. Barack Obama won't have worry about having to run against a Republican Candidate, because the GOP will no longer exist.

P.S.

If GOP Leaders think they can win without Young Voters, Minority Voters, Low Income Votes and Senior Citizens, think again because....

Its NOT going to ever happen.

Minority Voters are the future so get used to it!












Michael Steele: "I Didn't Seek This Job"



Hard to figure: "I didn’t ask for, I didn’t seek this job, I didn’t ask for it," Steele told Dennis Miller today. "It wasn’t part of my, you know, chartered course in life to wind up as chairman of the Republican National Committee. You know, there was a convergence of moments here."

Adds The American Spectator's Philip Klein:

Now, perhaps Steele's right and I'm mistaken. Perhaps I completely imagined covering the RNC chairman's race, going to watch him debate other candidates, or attending the RNC election last January. Maybe I imagined receiving emails on behalf of his candidacy, and maybe this video in which Steele announces his candidacy by saying, "I want the gig. I'm ready, I'm ready to lead this party" is an elaborate fabrication".



View Larger Map


Sources: Politico, American Spectator, MSNBC, C-Span, Huffington Post, Youtube, Google Maps

Monday, December 21, 2009

Will Senate Health Insurance Bailout Bill Ruin Reid In 2010?



















After Criticism, Reid Vindicated By Early-Morning Vote On Health Care


Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) scored the biggest victory of his tenure as Senate Democratic leader early Monday when every member of his caucus voted to advance the Senate health care bill.

Had the bill derailed, it would have proved a major embarrassment for the leader, a setback drawing intense media scrutiny over the holiday.

Instead, legislation over which Reid at times seemed to wield single-handed control is one step closer to Senate-House negotiations and will likely have a broad impact on the American healthcare system for decades to come.

Just before the pivotal vote, Reid downplayed its political significance and emphasized the impact on the lives of ordinary people who earn modest incomes and struggle with health problems.

“This isn’t about partisanship or procedure. It’s not about politics, and it’s not about polling,” Reid said.

“It is about people. It’s about life and death in America. It’s about human suffering. And given the chance to relieve this suffering, we must,” he said.

The route to the 1 a.m. vote, which took place with solemn ceremony as Reid requested that weary lawmakers vote at their desks, was not a smooth one.

Reid came under withering criticism not only from GOP colleagues but also from prominent liberal leaders and activists who questioned his leadership and even called for defeat of the legislation.

In October, Markos Moulitsas, a well-known liberal blogger and contributor to The Hill, accused Reid of abdicating his leadership role because of his “inability to keep his caucus together” and suggested that Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) would be more effective.

But Monday’s vote showed that Reid did just what his critics said he could not. He kept all of his Democratic colleagues together, even though he had to make compromises that many disliked.

“It’s a total vindication of Harry Reid’s strategy, which, believe me, he had on track all along,” said Schumer.

The leader spent weeks courting wary centrists who drove a hard bargain by demanding that he drop a proposal to set up a government-run insurance program and place strict cost curbs on the legislation.

As centrists kept making new demands, Reid had to withstand the grumbling of liberal colleagues who complained that a few centrists were exercising disproportionate influence.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) declared he was “very disappointed” after Reid announced last week the bill would not include a government-run insurance program or a proposal to allow people as young as 55 to buy Medicare coverage.

Schumer said the negotiations followed a plan that Reid laid out from the start.

“The strategy was basically to do everything he could first to make sure the left and our party base saw we did everything we could,” said Schumer, who led negotiations on behalf of liberals to set up a public option.

Reid became the Senate’s point man on healthcare reform in mid-October, when he took on the role of merging legislation passed out of the Senate Finance and Health committees.

Reid crafted a bill that he knew Senate liberals would find more pleasing than the centrists would, most notably by including a government-run health insurance program even though it lacked the necessary votes.

Then Reid methodically made concessions to win centrists’ support — most dramatically, he discarded the public option and the Medicare buy-in. Although liberals such as Brown gnashed their teeth over these concessions, the protracted negotiations demonstrated they were necessary to get 60 votes.

The strategy ultimately worked because liberals were convinced that the bill was the best measure they could get passed.

In the end, liberals such as Brown and Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) joined forces with centrists such as Sens. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) and Ben Nelson (D-Neb.).

In a statement Sunday, Feingold, whose support was uncertain until the final hours, applauded the legislation:

“While the loss of the public option is a bitter pill to swallow, on balance, the bill still delivers meaningful reform,” he said. “This bill significantly expands coverage and helps protect Wisconsinites from high costs and insurance company abuses, such as denying or restricting coverage based on pre-existing conditions.”

Lincoln, who met frequently with Reid to rework legislative details, said the bill was not one she would have written. Nevertheless, she declared Sunday it would “offer families more stability” and “reassure our small businesses and the self-employed that health insurance companies will no longer dictate their bottom lines.”

Reid scheduled several special meetings of the Democratic Conference to rally colleagues to support the legislation, despite their early misgivings.

One such pivotal meeting occurred on Monday of last week, when Reid told colleagues that he would strip the Medicare buy-in proposal that had been intended to replace the public option.

“He reminded everyone what was at stake and that failure was not an option,” said a Democratic aide familiar with the meeting.

Reid reminded his colleagues of Sen. Jim DeMint’s (R-S.C.) comments during a conference call with conservatives in July: that if Republicans defeated healthcare reform, it would be President Barack Obama’s Waterloo.

Reid told colleagues that failure would also serve as a devastating political defeat for Democrats in Congress.

Few know this as well as Reid, who himself faces a difficult reelection fight next year.

Jon Ralston, a prominent Nevada political expert, said the failure to pass healthcare reform through the Senate would have inflicted a serious blow to Reid’s reelection efforts.

Ralston said Monday’s successful vote to end the GOP filibuster “avoided what would have been a devastating loss to his campaign."

“He needed to get a bill or it would have undermined his entire reelection campaign, which is based on the message: ‘I’m a very effective guy in Washington,’ ” Ralston said.

Reid, who has struggled with public approval ratings of around 40 percent, has already run television ads touting his effectiveness as a legislator and ability to deliver for Nevada.

But Schumer said Reid’s most effective argument with colleagues was to call on them to work for the greater good of the country.

“What Harry did, he appealed to every member to work for the common good, the common good of our caucus, the Senate and the country, above all,” said Schumer. “The appeal to the higher angels worked; people don’t think that it does, but it did.”

Reid laid the groundwork for Monday’s vote for months, if not years. It could be argued that Democrats would not have reached 60 votes if not for two of Reid’s most controversial leadership decisions.

First was Reid’s decision, ratified by the rest of the Democratic Conference, to let Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) keep his chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee.

Second was Reid’s behind-the-scenes effort to recruit Sen. Arlen Specter (Pa.) to the Democratic Party. Several senior Senate Democrats criticized the deal Reid made to woo Specter.

On Monday, the healthcare bill would not have advanced without the votes of Lieberman and Specter, leaving observers to wonder how Lieberman might have voted if he lost his gavel and decided to caucus with Republicans or how Specter would have voted if still a Republican.

Reid did not have a single GOP vote to work with as a result of the thorough job Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) did to keep his own conference unified.

At times, Reid could barely contain his frustration with Republicans, who employed seldom-used tactics, such as forcing clerks to read aloud hundreds of pages of legislative text, to delay the bill.

After the clerk read aloud the final tally on the historic vote, Democrats congratulated their leader, patting him on the back and embracing him.

Slightly wobbly on his feet, like a boxer who had just won a 12-round decision, Reid squeezed the arm of 92-year-old Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) as Byrd rolled by in a wheelchair. The leader then hugged Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and shared jokes with Sens. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) and Lincoln, prompting hearty laughs from two lawmakers who threatened to vote against the bill until the final days.

“I think he’s exhausted,” Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) said.




View Larger Map


Sources: The Hill, AP, Google Maps

Monday, November 16, 2009

Palin's Media Blitz Could Be Her Political Waterloo...But She's No Joke!






































Columnist David Brooks calls Sarah Palin "a joke".





McCain camp bristles at Palin’s tell-all. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin lashes out at some former members of John McCain’s presidential campaign staff in her new memoir, “Going Rogue.” Now some of the staffers are firing back. NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reports.




Palin opens up. Sarah Palin begins her book tour with an interview with Oprah Winfrey.






From Levi to Letterman: Palin's rough year


Despite all the money and attention former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s autobiography is expected to draw as it hits bookshelves this week, it’s difficult to think of a national political figure who’s had a rougher year than the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee.

Consider President Barack Obama with the ups and downs in his first year in office. Or Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who's facing a tough re-election bid and the difficult task of getting 60 votes to pass health care through his chamber. And don't forget the leaders of the Republican party who are out of power and have seen the GOP’s poll numbers decline.

But from the moment the 2008 campaign ended until her surprising resignation as Alaska governor in July, Palin has endured political setbacks, suffered through embarrassing revelations, became the subject of ethics complaints (most of which were dismissed), and even feuded with a late-night comedian and the father of her grandchild.

Her calendar has been full of controversial moments:

* Immediately after the presidential contest was over, McCain campaign officials told reporters about Palin committing apparent acts of insubordination, like her unprecedented (and rejected) request to deliver her own concession speech.

In March, Levi Johnston — the father of her grandchild — announced that he and Palin’s daughter, Bristol, had ended their relationship.

* In April, Palin’s spokeswoman criticized Johnston’s tell-all appearance on the “Tyra Banks Show,” saying: “We’re disappointed that Levi and his family, in a quest for fame, attention and fortune, are engaging in flat-out lies, gross exaggeration and even distortion of their relationship.”

* Also in April, the Alaska legislature voted to reject Palin’s pick for state attorney general, Wayne Anthony Ross, who had been criticized for calling gays and lesbians “degenerates.”

* In June, after comedian David Letterman made a crude joke about one of her daughters, Palin fired back calling his comments “sexually perverted,” while her husband Todd said, “Any 'jokes' about raping my 14-year-old are despicable.” Letterman later apologized.

* Also in the summer, Vanity Fair published a devastating article that recounted her troubles during and after the presidential campaign.

And after all of that, Palin shocked the world in July when she resigned from office — with some 18 months left in her first term.

“A good point guard … drives through a full-court press, protecting the ball, keeping her head up because she needs to keep her eye on the basket,” she said at her resignation announcement. “And she knows exactly when to pass the ball so that the team can win. And that is what I'm doing.”

Palin’s political freefall

Her resignation, however, didn’t stop the embarrassments or setbacks. In August, the Alaska legislature voted to override her veto of $28.6 million in federal stimulus funds.

This fall, in that attention-grabbing special congressional election in New York, she led the charge of national Republicans endorsing the third-party conservative candidate over the more liberal GOP nominee. But that divide helped a Democrat win the seat.

And Palin’s resignation didn’t stop her political freefall, either. According to last month’s NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, only 27 percent of Americans have a positive view of her — down five points from the survey conducted just after her resignation, and down 19 points since she was selected as McCain’s running mate.

The result of all of this?

“Fewer people today see her as a serious political entity going forward,” said one Republican strategist who worked with Palin on the McCain campaign.

The battleground state book tour

But that isn’t going to stop her from selling a lot of books and attracting a lot of media attention. On Monday, she appears on Oprah Winfrey’s show to promote her book, “Going Rogue: An American Life.”

On Tuesday, the book goes on sale. And on Wednesday, she begins a book tour that will take her to 13 cities — 11 of which just happen to be in presidential battleground states (like Florida, Indiana, Ohio, and Virginia).

In fact, Palin starts her tour in Michigan, a battleground state the McCain campaign withdrew from the day of Biden-Palin vice presidential debate. Afterward, Palin went, well, rogue and openly questioned the move. “I want to get back to Michigan and I want to try," she said.

Just last week, in a posting she made on her Facebook page announcing her book tour dates, Palin quipped, “Last year, I made a promise to the good people of Michigan that I would be back, and now I’m keeping that promise.”

Can she make a political comeback?

The question is whether Palin’s book tour — and the publicity it will receive — can spark a political comeback after her rough year. If she does have her eyes on the presidency, her defenders say, next week’s rollout will be extremely important.

The Weekly Standard’s William Kristol, a Palin supporter, believes that she remains a viable presidential contender. “It’s silly to claim Palin has no chance to win the nomination or the presidency,” he wrote after her resignation in July, citing her standing in early 2012 GOP primary polls and her ability to fire up the Republican base. “She’ll be able to make the case effectively that she should be the nominee, or she won't.”

In a recent e-mail exchange with NBC, Kristol added: “I’d say next month or so is very important for Palin, an unusual instance where a month three years before next election could be an inflection point regarding her chances, either positively or negatively.”

Yet other Republicans are no longer taking Palin as a serious presidential possibility. One party strategist, who requested anonymity to speak freely, says that Palin certainly appeals to the base. “In the right environment, she could be helpful to raise money.”

But the strategist argued that the “‘US Weekly’ atmosphere” surrounding her and her family makes her less viable. “It is hard to take someone that seriously with that kind of drama.”

Ditto the fact that she currently lacks an organization, the strategist said. “Making comments on Facebook is not the serious way to run for office.”

Republican political consultant Mike Murphy, who has been critical of Palin in the past, bluntly says that she won’t be the party’s nominee in 2012.

“She’ll have a muscular career as a political celebrity, and she’ll have a voice,” he said. “I just don’t think that she’s a strong political candidate.”

Murphy adds, “She is polarizing within the GOP and totally unpopular outside the party. And that is not a recipe to get into the White House.”




View Larger Map

Sources: MSNBC, ABC News, The Daily Beast, Amazon.com, Youtube, Google Maps