Custom Search
Showing posts with label Capitalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Capitalism. Show all posts

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Standard & Poor's Role In 2008 Market Crash Possibly Criminal; Investigation Needed!
















Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy






Senate report on Wall Street crash: The criminalization of the American ruling class

The US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released a voluminous report last Wednesday on the Wall Street crash of 2008 that documents the fraud and criminality that pervade the entire financial system and its relations with the government.

The 650-page report is the outcome of a two-year investigation that involved over 150 interviews and depositions as well as the examination of subpoenaed emails and internal documents of major banks, government regulatory agencies and credit rating firms. The report, entitled “Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse,” establishes that the financial crash and ensuing recession were the result of systemic fraud and deception on the part of the mortgage lenders and banks, carried out with the collusion of the credit rating corporations and the complicity of the government and its bank regulatory agencies.

The World Socialist Web Site will analyze the contents of this important document in detail in the coming days. However, its basic thrust is clear. As the executive summary states: “The investigation found that the crisis was not a natural disaster, but the result of high-risk, complex financial products; undisclosed conflicts of interest; and the failure of regulators, the credit rating agencies, and the market itself to rein in the excesses of Wall Street.”

At a press conference Wednesday and in subsequent interviews, Senator Carl Levin (Democrat from Michigan), the chairman of the subcommittee, was even more explicit. “Using emails, memos and other internal documents,” he said, “this report tells the inside story of an economic assault that cost millions of Americans their jobs and homes, while wiping out investors, good businesses and markets. High-risk lending, regulatory failures, inflated credit ratings and Wall Street firms engaging in massive conflicts of interest contaminated the US financial system with toxic mortgages and undermined public trust in US markets.

“Using their own words in documents subpoenaed by the subcommittee, the report discloses how financial firms deliberately took advantage of their clients and investors, how credit rating agencies assigned AAA ratings to high-risk securities, and how regulators sat on their hands instead of reining in the unsafe and unsound practices all around them. Rampant conflicts of interest are the threads that run through every chapter of this sordid story.”

Levin went on to say that the investigation had found “a financial snake pit rife with greed, conflicts of interest, and wrongdoing.” He told the New York Times: “The overwhelming evidence is that those institutions deceived their clients and deceived the public, and they were aided and abetted by deferential regulators and credit ratings agencies who had conflicts of interest.”

The report is divided into four sections, each focusing on a different contributor to the network of fraud and abuse: the mortgage lenders, the regulators, the credit rating firms and the Wall Street investment banks. The first section takes Washington Mutual (WaMu) as its case history, detailing the predatory and deceptive lending practices and accounting and reporting subterfuges that led, following the implosion of the subprime mortgage market, to the bank’s collapse and takeover by JPMorgan Chase in September of 2008.

The second examines the corrupt role of the federal Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), which oversaw three of the biggest financial failures in US history—Washington Mutual, IndyMac and Countrywide Financial. “Over a five-year period from 2004 to 2008,” the report states, “OTS identified over 500 serious deficiencies at WaMu, yet failed to take action to force the bank to improve its lending operations and even impeded oversight by the bank’s backup regulator, the FDIC.”

The third section documents the systematic manner in which the rating firms Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s gave top credit ratings to collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and other complex securities backed by subprime and other toxic mortgages, enabling the banks to make billions of dollars by palming off these junk securities as top-grade investments. In return, the rating companies raked in huge profits for their services.

As the report states: “Credit rating agencies were paid by Wall Street firms that sought their ratings and profited from the financial products being rated… The ratings agencies weakened their standards as each competed to provide the most favorable rating to win business and greater market share. The result was a race to the bottom.”

The final section examines the fraud and deception perpetrated by the major investment banks as they profited first from the inflation of the US housing market and then from its implosion. It takes as its examples Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. Goldman began betting heavily in 2007 that the housing market would collapse, packaging and selling subprime mortgage-backed CDOs even as it secretly bet that the same securities would plummet in value.

The report cites emails by Deutsche Bank’s top global CDO trader, Gregg Lippman, calling risky mortgage securities marketed by the bank “crap” and “pigs” and the bank’s operations a “CDO machine,” which he characterized as a “Ponzi scheme.”

The document points to the central role of the big Wall Street banks in promulgating the fraud, stating: “Investment banks were the driving force behind the structured finance products that provided a steady stream of funding for lenders originating high-risk, poor-quality loans and that magnified risk throughout the US financial system. The investment banks that engineered, sold, traded and profited from mortgage-related structured finance products were a major cause of the financial crisis.”

The overall picture is one of criminality on the part of the entire financial establishment that, with all levels of government serving as its co-conspirator, systematically looted the economy in order to further enrich itself. The result is a social tragedy for tens of millions of people in the US and many millions more around the world. And yet, the result of this historic crime is that the bankers and speculators are richer and more powerful than ever.

Not a single senior executive at a major US bank, hedge fund, mortgage firm or insurance company has gone to jail. Not one has even been prosecuted.

There is every indication that none will be criminally indicted in the future. As with the similarly damning report released in January by the US Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, the Senate report has been largely buried by the mass media. It was reported perfunctorily on the inside pages of some of the major newspapers and barely mentioned by the broadcast and cable networks, and then dropped.

One day after the release of the Senate report, the New York Times published a long article on the failure to prosecute any of the Wall Street criminals. It recounted a private meeting between the then-president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (now Obama’s treasury secretary) Timothy Geithner and then-New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo in October 2008 at which Geithner urged Cuomo to back off on investigations of the banks and rating agencies.

The article contrasted the absence of criminal charges against bankers today with the aftermath of the savings and loan debacle of the late 1980s, when government task forces referred 1,100 cases to prosecutors and more than 800 bank officials went to jail. It noted the precipitous decline in referrals by bank regulators to the FBI, from 1,837 cases in 1995 to 75 in 2006. Over the ensuing four years, at the height of the financial crisis, an average of only 72 a year have been referred for criminal prosecution.

The Office of Thrift Supervision has not referred a single case to the Justice Department since 2000, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, a unit of the Treasury Department, has referred only three in the last decade.

How is this to be explained? Why are Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, the former CEO of Washington Mutual, Kerry Killinger, as well as Treasury Secretary Geithner and his predecessor, Henry Paulson (previously CEO of Goldman), not in prison?

Such financial manipulators are being shielded while workers are being stripped of their jobs, wages, homes and basic social services to pay for the debts resulting from the transfer of trillions in public funds to the banks. Collective resistance to this attack is being criminalized in the form of anti-strike laws, imposing fines and jail terms for workers who fight back.

One reason for the absence of prosecutions is the power of the individuals involved, all of whom wield immense influence over politicians, the media and the legal system. But it goes deeper than the status of individuals, just as the sordid state of affairs as a whole arises not from individual greed, but rather from a profound crisis of the entire system.

The criminalization of the American ruling class is the outcome of more than three decades in which the accumulation of wealth by the corporate-financial elite has become increasingly separated from real production. In its pursuit of profit, the ruling class has dismantled huge sections of industry and turned ever more decisively to financial manipulation and speculation.

The ascendancy of the most parasitic sections of the capitalist class has been accompanied by a sharp decline in the living standards of the working class. The richest and most powerful layers have acquired staggering levels of wealth by plundering society.

The ruling class itself senses that to prosecute any of the leading figures in the defrauding of the American people (and the rest of humankind) would rapidly expose the criminality of the entire system. It would mean putting the capitalist system itself on trial.



Sources: AP, MSNBC, World Wide Socialist

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Michael Moore Slams Current Health Care Bill & Wall Street























































"This bill is worse than the Status Quo. This is a huge, big wet kiss to the Health Insurance Industry. This is just deplorable that it comes from somebody who calls themselves a Democrat. They are just desperate to get anything on the floor."

"They shouldn't be handing out bonuses. They should he handing out warrants for arrests. ... If you have money in any of these banks that took TARP money, take the money out. Take the money out of those banks. Don't reward them. Don't ever trust your money with these people again. Put it in a bank that didn't take TARP money. Put it in a credit union. Just refuse to participate in this."

"People should be calling Congress (202) 456-1414".

Michael Moore on Morning Joe, Thursday, October 15th, 2009






Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy









View Larger Map


Sources: Michael Moore.com, MSNBC, The Insider, Youtube, Google Maps

Bailed Out Banks Receive Huge Tax Breaks For Christmas











































Bailout Banks Keep Tax Breaks As They Repay Loans


Citigroup and other banks starting to repay the billions of dollars they borrowed from the government are getting another boost as they exit the bailout program: Billions more in tax breaks.

Tax law allows money-losing corporations like Citigroup Inc. and General Motors Co. to use current net operating losses to offset future taxable income, reducing their tax bills for up to 20 years after the losses occur.

Under ordinary circumstances, those tax breaks would be severely limited if the companies underwent an ownership change, much like many of them did when the government acquired big blocks of their stock.

Losing the tax breaks would have substantially reduced the value of the companies, even as the government was trying to prop them up with bailout funds.

The Treasury Department didn't want that to happen, so it started issuing tax guidance about a year ago that said the rules didn't apply when the government, through its bailout programs, caused the ownership change.

Last week, Treasury issued additional guidance saying that the rules also won't apply when the government sells its stock. The new rules mean that Citigroup and other bailout companies will still be able to take advantage of tax breaks worth billions of dollars, once they become profitable and start paying taxes again.

For tax purposes, it's like the government's ownership never happened, said Robert Willens, a corporate tax accountant in New York.

The size of the tax breaks will depend on how soon the companies become profitable, Willens said. "It's certainly in the billions," he said.

Citigroup announced this week that it was repaying $20 billion to the government's Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP. Citigroup had taken a total of $45 billion in rescue funds – among the largest bailout packages received by any bank – but the government converted $25 billion of that amount into a 34 percent equity stake, which it is now selling.

The tax breaks will cost the government billions of dollars in tax revenue, but the government's stock in the companies is worth more because value of the companies is higher.

Treasury spokeswoman Nayyera Haq said the guidance issued last week was not targeted toward any individual company. It was released last week because Treasury was expecting a number of banks to start paying back their loans, exiting the bailout program.

"This guidance is the part of the government's orderly exit from TARP," Haq said.

She defended the overall strategy of helping bailout companies preserve their tax breaks, pointing out that the original law was intended to prevent corporate raiders from taking over money-losing companies simply to cash in on their tax breaks.

"This rule was designed to stop corporate raiders from using loss transactions to evade taxes, and was never intended to address the unprecedented situation where the government owned shares in banks," Haq said. "And it was certainly not written to prevent the government from selling its shares for a profit."

Willens said the Treasury Department's strategy makes sense. However, he said, it highlights an unprecedented government intervention in the private sector.

"We've never seen anything like this," Willens said. "The unilateral actions they are taking are unprecedented. This is just one of many."







Wells Fargo: "We're comfortable" with lower capital


To repay its government loans, Wells Fargo & Co. will make a trade-off: Its capital levels will fall below those of its competitors.

But in a call with analysts Tuesday morning, chief executive John Stumpf signaled that he wasn't concerned. And several analysts later said the fact that the government is letting Wells maintain a lower capital level is actually a good sign.

"It signals the government has confidence in the earnings power at the bank," Paul Miller, an analyst at FBR Capital Markets, wrote in a note to clients.

Also Tuesday, Wells sold $12.25 billion in stock to help repay its federal loans. That was more than the $10.4 billion it initially expected. Chief financial officer Howard Atkins said the bank was "very pleased with the positive reception from investors."

"We appreciate the confidence investors have demonstrated in Wells Fargo's strength and future prospects," he added.

Wells had announced Monday night that it intends to repay its $25 billion loan from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. It was anxious to avoid being the last big bank still holding TARP money, after rival Citigroup Inc. announced hours earlier that it would repay its loans.

After it repays TARP, Wells will have a Tier 1 common ratio of 6.2 percent. The ratio is a measure of a bank's ability to absorb losses, and it's closely watched by regulators. Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup all have or will have Tier 1 common ratios of 8 to 9 percent without TARP funds.

Stumpf said that his bank's capital needs are different from those of other banks, which might have riskier balance sheets. He also noted how Wells has already written down many of its potential losses from Wachovia Corp., the Charlotte bank that it bought last year.

"We don't have a big trading book, we don't have a lot of international assets, we're fairly meat and potatoes, and we have the industry's best margin of all the banks," Stumpf said, responding to a question from one analyst. "So you put all that together, we're comfortable with these ratios."

He also noted how his bank has historically maintained high levels of capital: "It allowed us to do something called Wachovia."

But the questions about capital levels weren't out of the blue. Last week, the House passed a massive financial regulation bill that would, among other things, require big banks to maintain higher levels of capital. Wells' Tier 1 common ratio of 6.2 percent is still well above the regulatory requirement of 4 percent

Stumpf declined to elaborate on the bank's repayment discussions with regulators. "I'm really not in a position to discuss the negotiations with the other party," he said. "I just don't think it would be productive."

Wells on Tuesday sold about 490 million shares at $25 each, raising the $12.25 billion. That better-than-expected amount eliminates a requirement where Wells would have had to sell a small number of assets in 2010.

However, issuing stock dilutes the value of shares held by current investors, since earnings have to be spread among more people. Miller, the analyst, estimated that Wells' stock raise will dilute shares by 11 percent.

But several analysts also said that, overall, getting rid of TARP will place Wells shares on firmer ground.

"The company still faces some headwinds ... but the TARP repayment certainly removes some concerns and eliminates some negatives to the story," R. Scott Siefers, an analyst at Sandler O'Neill + Partners, wrote in a note to clients.

Stumpf took the opportunity to praise the Wachovia deal, which he does in virtually every public appearance. He also mentioned Wells' announcement Monday, issued shortly after its TARP announcement, that it would use cash to buy out Prudential Financial's stake in the joint retail brokerage business. Wells had said this summer that it would use a combination of cash and stock to purchase Prudential's stake, which represented about a quarter of the joint business.

Stumpf said that paying totally in cash is "in our shareholders' best interest." That's because paying in stock would have diluted the holdings of existing shareholders. Wells said it would spend $4.5 billion.

Stumpf was joined on the call by bank chairman and former CEO Dick Kovacevich, who has been one of the most outspoken critics of the government's intervention in the banking industry. Kovacevich spoke briefly at the beginning of the 25-minute call, saying that Stumpf and his management are "the most talented team I've ever worked with."

Kovacevich is stepping down as chairman at the end of this month. He stayed on past the mandatory retirement age to help with the integration of Wachovia.




View Larger Map


Sources: Huffington Post, McClatchy Newspapers, Charlotte Observer, Youtube, Google Maps