Keep It Moving Folks! Just More Racist, Fearful Rhetoric From Presidential Wanna Be Newt Gingrich.
Here Are 3 Main Reasons Why Pres. Barack Obama WILL Win A 2nd Term In 2012:
1) The GOP Lied To American Voters About Their REAL Reason For Regaining Control. It Wasn't About JOBS! Instead It Was About NOT Having A BLACK Man In Charge!
2) Most GOP Candidates Are STILL On That "Birther" Trip.
3) The Agenda Of Most GOP Politicians Is To Destroy Unions & ALL Federally-Funded Programs Which Help Black & Hispanic Citizens.
Newt Gingrich on Friday blasted the Obama administration for what he labels a refusal to confront radical Islam. Continue Reading
“Until you replace this president and until you have the Congress and the new president replace large parts of our bureaucracies, we’re going to continue to be dominated by a secular, anti-Christian and anti-Jewish elite, which is seeking to impose on us rules that make zero sense,” he told religious conservatives at the American Family Association’s pastors’ policy briefing in Iowa.
Gingrich, answering a question about challenging Sharia law on U.S. soil, said the country’s leadership was “so afraid to tell the truth” and “timid” that it didn’t swiftly prosecute the Pakistani immigrant who was sentenced to life in prison last year for planting a bomb in Times Square. And he pointed out that the federal government has sued a school district for denying a Muslim middle school teacher unpaid leave to make a pilgrimage to Mecca.
“I simply suggest that every church in the country announce there is a new principle that visiting Bethlehem every year for three weeks is an important part of your devotion,” he said to applause.
“The whole thing collapses,” he added. “It’s an absurdity. It’s part of this desperation of our secular elites to do everything they can to prove they are not anti-Muslim.”
Gingrich insisted that he’s not anti-Muslim himself, but that he is “deeply opposed” to the religion’s radical wing that represses women, homosexuals and Christians.
“I think it’s time to have the courage to stand up and say that we represent an insistence on modernity,” he said. “And we represent a decisive opposition to those who would kill us for the purpose of imposing our beliefs on the rest of us. And we are prepared to say an act of terrorism is an act of Jihadism.”
Cory Booker was the Obama of American politics before Barack Obama leaped onto the national stage. When Booker first ran for mayor of Newark in 2002, Barack Obama was a relatively unknown Illinois state senator. It would be two more years before Obama’s keynote address at the Democratic National Convention would transform him into an international star.
But Booker, a fresh-faced former Rhodes Scholar and graduate of Stanford University and Yale Law School, was already being lauded—in the national press, on Wall Street, and in Hollywood, as well—as the face of a new generation of post-civil-rights, post-baby-boomer (in style, if not exactly in fact) African-American politicians who would march America into a glorious new day. (Other rising stars in this cohort include Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Alabama Rep. Artur Davis, and Washington, D.C., Mayor Adrian Fenty).
Booker lost his first mayoral race to longtime incumbent Sharpe James, a scandal-plagued, wily, streetwise old-fashioned pol and former gym teacher who denounced Booker as an Uncle Tom—and as an interloper (Booker grew up in the suburbs) far removed from Newark’s tough streets.
Four years later, as Booker’s campaign donations and popularity surged, Sharpe opted out of trying for a sixth term. Booker swept into office and Sharpe—long an object of suspicion and ugly rumors—eventually went to prison (from which he was recently released) for fraud and conspiracy after he failed to disclose he was romantically involved with a woman he helped buy nine plots in a city redevelopment zone between 2001 and 2005.
Booker’s success at turning inspirational rhetoric into effective governance might well provide something of a template for Obama. And last week, as Booker basked in the afterglow of his recent reelection for a second term, I asked him to reflect on what he has done. “Four years ago, I was really selling … the rather ephemeral qualities of hope and possibility. ‘Believe in me. Believe in us.’ And those are all important things,” he said. “But when you have nothing to back it up with, it made it very difficult … Now I can talk not just about what we’re going to do, but point to examples of what we’ve done.”
He has plenty to boast about, as The Star-Ledger, Newark’s newspaper, pointed out in endorsing him: “Under Booker, gun violence in Newark has been cut in half. The city payroll has shrunk by 17 percent.
New parks have sprouted up across the city. The Housing Authority has been brought back from the dead, and the pace of new construction of affordable housing has picked up. New programs have helped hundreds of released prisoners find jobs, arranged financing for small businesses and helped families combat foreclosure. The list of innovative programs goes on.”
But Booker can hardly rest on his laurels. Along with the state of New Jersey—and the federal government itself—Newark is facing crushing deficits. And like his political counterparts across the country, Booker’s aspirations are circumscribed by this new age of austerity. The government “can no longer do it all … We can’t do what we used to do,” he said. “Resources are shrinking … Personnel costs are skyrocketing, [along with] health-care costs, pension costs.
So revenues are not meeting expenses and it’s getting worse every day, which is going to force us to shrink the size of government because we just can’t afford it. And we definitely can’t tax our way out of this problem.” So the future, as he see it, lies in creating “new paradigms, for not only service delivery but for community success.”
It is not just in Newark, and not just in the area of urban finance, that new models are needed. In a new study focused on metropolitan America, the Brookings Institution pronounced the dawning of a “decade of reckoning,” during which urban America would have to face tough issues largely ignored for years: “The economic roller coaster of the past 10 years has distracted the United States and its major metropolitan areas from grappling with the urgent implications of the longer-run shift afoot in our society.
Issues such as how to support communities with rapidly aging populations, how to meet family and labor-market needs through immigration, how to build workforce skills to maintain American economic leadership, and how to help lower-paid workers support themselves and their families cannot go unaddressed for another decade,” declared Brooking’s researchers.
Booker has already proven he can govern; the challenge of his second term will be to prove that he can lead, that he can breathe new life into an old city—and, in the process, help create a new model (or “new paradigms,” as he calls them) for the urban areas that growing numbers of Americans call home.
If he’s not running for president, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie may instead face a re-election challenge that has the potential to derail his political career.
Some Democrats are hoping that Cory Booker, the popular mayor of Newark, will rise to the occasion and run against one of the nation’s best known fiscal conservatives. “Democrats are salivating over a potential Booker-Christie matchup,” Democratic strategist Paul Begala told TheDC. “Cory is still little known outside of North Jersey…and yet he is running even with the poster boy of the right.”
Begala points to a survey conducted by Public Policy Polling that shows Christie and Booker tied with 42 percent of the vote, despite the fact that 38 percent of New Jersians are unfamiliar with Booker. According to PPP’s Dean Debnam, Christie “was elected largely because of [former governor] Jon Corzine’s unpopularity and he could have a lot more trouble against someone well liked such as Booker.”
Although the election is still two years away, Booker’s strong record and attractive persona make him a Democratic dream candidate. Under his leadership, Newark’s murder rates have plummeted. Meanwhile, Christie’s massive budget cuts have garnered both praise and fierce criticism in his home state, making him a hero to many on the right while potentially leaving him vulnerable to a strong Democratic challenger.
“Booker is the best hope to win back the Statehouse from a Republican who has far surpassed the public’s expectations,” said one Democratic operative based in New York. “If he runs, Christie is left with a very tough decision: prematurely run for national office, or gamble his political future against one of the most promising and gifted figures in politics today.”
According to the operative, defeating Christie, the scourge of New Jersey’s powerful public employee unions, will be a top priority for Democrats nationwide in 2014. “I doubt the national party will resist this opportunity,” she said.
Could a potential challenge from Booker influence Christie’s decision? Although he has repeatedly insisted that he has no interest in a 2012 White House run, Christie still does well in early presidential polls. His popularity among independents and even some Democrats has at least one poll indicating that he would be the strongest Republican candidate against Obama, but that doesn’t seem to have nudged Christie any closer to running. When asked about the poll showing him winning in a race against Obama, Christie said it was good news for the president because “the only person who’s beating him in the poll will once again declare that I’m not running for President of the United States.”
Even if he decides against a run, there are still ways Christie could ditch Trenton for the national scene. Possible Republican candidate Mitt Romney met with Christie at the New Jersey Governor’s mansion on Monday night, along with “nearly two dozen” advisors and Republican Party leaders, according to the Newark Star-Ledger. Some have speculated that Christie might be interested in the vice presidency next year, but Romney, a Northeastern Republican often criticized as too moderate for the GOP’s conservative primary electorate, might not be likely to choose a running mate who shares so many of his percieved weaknesses.
Christie has been knocked by conservatives for his support of Rep. Mike Castle, a moderate, in Delaware’s GOP senate primary last year; his appointment of a Muslim lawyer to New Jersey’s judiciary; and his openness to the construction of the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque.” Tom Marr, filling in for the host on Mark Levin’s popular afternoon radio show last week, went so far as to call him “a fake, a phony, and a fraud.”
Still, in the midst of what many have called a weak Republican field, Christie’s apparent ability to mount a strong challenge to Obama could be a deciding factor. The modern GOP has a long record of nominating comparatively moderate candidates for president: Bob Dole, George W. Bush, and John McCain all came from the more centrist, compromise-accepting wing of the Party. And even though he rules out a 2012 campaign, Christie always stops short of saying he will never run for president.
“I’m going to need a job … after 2013, you know?” Christie said on Meet the Press last year. “So whether it’s going to be governor of New Jersey or something else, it’s going to be doing something. So maybe it will be doing that. Who knows?”
So where does Christie go from here? Given that no major Republican candidate has formally entered the race, he could always change his mind about a White House run. With Booker waiting in the wings, taking his chances nationally might start to look like an attractive option.
Welcome to the BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ Blog. (Established 2008)
My name is Laurel. (Author & Publisher)
I Blog with a focus on POLITICS, Business, and occasionally Entertainment.
FACTS ABOUT LAUREL:
Wife,
Mother of a U.S. Soldier,
Sister,
Woman of GOD,
Loyal Friend,
Creative,
Blood-related to a nationally known Charlotte Politician.
Black Female, Intelligent,
Married,
Love to Travel,
Credentialed by the RNC and DNC.
Political Blogger/ Commentator
Grassroots Activist,
PROFESSIONAL STATUS:
Credential Political Blogger/ Commentator,
Registered Independent Voter
Original Native of BROOKLYN, NY
Currently reside in CHARLOTTE, NC
I’m Nice but don’t get it twisted because my Mind is Sharp!
Since You’ve Chosen to Visit and Read the Contents of this Blog by Personal Choice, and of Your Own Free Will,
Please don’t ask me to Compensate you for Expressing individual commentary/ Posted Articles, which are protected by the First Amendment, citing Freedom of Speech & Freedom of Expression.
No Intentionally Malicious Slander, Libel or Defamation of Character content will be published and I will always Credit all Sources.
NOTE TO ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS, APPOINTED OFFICIALS & PUBLIC FIGURES:
Per the Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case: 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan………
The Public has a Right to Criticize the People who Govern them, so the least Protection from Defamation is given to Public Officials. When officials are accused of something that involves their behavior in office, they have to prove all of the above elements of defamation and they must also prove that the defendant acted with “actual malice.” (For a definition of actual malice, see the “History of Defamation and the First Amendment, below.”)
People who aren’t Elected but who are Still Public Figures because they are influential or famous — like Actors, Actresses, Movie Stars, Singers & Entertainers, Journalists, TV Hosts, Bloggers, etc., — also have to Prove that Defamatory statements were made with Actual Malice, in most cases.
To the Associated Press and other Media Organizations:
When I use your Content Links., I’m also citing the Fair Use Doctrine (Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107) for further Copyright permission.
Posts and Links published on Black Political Buzz are not endorsed by Black Political Buzz Blog Author Laurel’s Employer, nor the Employers of other Black Political Buzz employees.
This includes Links, Posts and Comments posted on Black Political Buzz’s Facebook and Twitter account pages.
Comments, Links and Opinions of site visitors are Independently-Owned and not endorsed by Black Political Buzz employees, Blog Author Laurel or Laurel’s Employer.)
(No Personal Offense intended) Please know that Black Political Buzz is not responsible for nor do I endorse Requests for Donations from Third Parties on this Blog.
I will Only Endorse Requests for Donations made on behalf of BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ Blog for Business Purposes & Operating Expenses.
I will also Only Endorse Requests for Donations on behalf of Legitimate Politicians and Legitimate Political Candidates. PERIOD!!
If anyone else or another Organization wishes to post a link to Request Donations, I am NOT endorsing ANY of those Requests!
Unless I receive a personal Request to do so and I have Professionally Confirmed that the Third Party Organization or Charity is indeed a Legitimate Entity.
NOTE: Anyone who chooses to give to any Third Party Organization NOT Endorsed by BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ is doing so at his or her own risk.
BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ does NOT Discriminate against Politicians, Political Candidates, Organizations or Charities based on Race, Color, Nationality, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Religion, Faith, Disability, Political Affiliation, Creed, Education, Social Status, Age.
This disclaimer applies to ANY and All requests for Donations on this Blog. Thanks for understanding. Again No Personal Offense intended.
For Story Tips….Corrections…….. or Requests for Endorsements:
Please contact me via e-mail: blackpoliticalbuzz@gmail.com
or via my Facebook page: facebook.com/blackpoliticalbuzz
Thanks for stopping by
God Bless
Laurel @BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ
LINKS: POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE & INFORMATIONAL SITES