Eric Cantor Tells GOP House Caucus: "Quit Whining & Vote!" (Video)

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Cantor: 'The debt limit vote sucks'

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor had some choice words on the debt ceiling vote for other Republicans during a closed door meeting Tuesday.

"The debt limit vote sucks," the Virginia Republican declared directly to members during the House GOP conference meeting, according to two sources behind the closed doors.

In his remarks, Cantor encouraged members to rally behind the plan proposed by Republican leadership in the House. He was joined by House Speaker John Boehner and House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-California. The members were told the new House GOP bill will come up to vote Wednesday and that the House will also vote separately on a balanced budget amendment bill later this week, the sources said.

"It comes down to the people in this room. It comes down to the willingness to stand together. This is the path to victory for the American people," Speaker Boehner said, according to the sources.

After the huddle with House GOP rank and file, Boehner admitted to reporters that not everyone in his party is falling into line.

"I do think that we're going to have some work to do to get it passed, but I think we will," he said.

And Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan, who heads the group of fiscal conservatives in the House and is opposed to Boehner's proposal, said Tuesday that right now the speaker's proposal can't pass with just Republican votes: "I am confident as of this morning there were not 218 Republicans in support of the plan."

But Cantor praised Boehner in the meeting, the sources said, saying he did an amazing job and that conference is behind him 150 percent.

According to one aide, Cantor outlined three choices for the members. He said they could run over the August 2 deadline, risk default and face the unknown. Or, second, vote through Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's plan giving what they see as a "blank check" to the president. And finally, their preference, pass a plan consistent with what they see as their principles and that forces the president to debate entitlements, taxes and spending in six months.

According to one aide, the message from Cantor to House Republicans critical of the plan was "to stop grumbling and whining and to come together as conservatives and rally behind the speaker and call the president's bluff."

Republican Rep Charlie Dent, who represents a swing district in Pennsylvania, told members it's time to govern and avoid default, the sources said.

Republican Rep. Allen West of Florida also spoke in support of the leaders' plan.

New Jersey freshman Rep. Jon Runyan, an imposing figure as a former NFL football player, told the speaker "I've got your back" and the response from Boehner was "good" – as their GOP colleagues laughed.


Sources: CNN, MSNBC TV

Debt Ceiling Talks: 14th Amendment Perhaps Only Way Out (Tick Tock!)

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

The 14th Amendment, the Debt Ceiling and a Way Out

A few days ago, former President Bill Clinton identified a constitutional escape hatch should President Obama and Congress fail to come to terms on a deficit reduction plan before the government hits its borrowing ceiling.

He pointed to an obscure provision in the 14th Amendment, saying he would unilaterally invoke it “without hesitation” to raise the debt ceiling “and force the courts to stop me.”

On Friday, Mr. Obama rejected the idea, though not in categorical terms.

“I have talked to my lawyers,” Mr. Obama said. “They are not persuaded that that is a winning argument.”

Another element of uncertainty and possible court battles do not seem to appeal to the White House, and it is, in any event, not clear that the nation’s creditors would continue to lend it money were the president to take unilateral action.

The provision in question, Section 4 of the amendment, was meant to ensure the payment of Union debts after the Civil War and to disavow Confederate ones. But it was written in broader terms.

“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payments of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion,” the critical sentence says, “shall not be questioned.”

The Supreme Court has said in passing that those words have outlived the historical moment that gave rise to them.

“While this provision was undoubtedly inspired by the desire to put beyond question the obligations of the government issued during the Civil War,” Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for the court in 1935, “its language indicates a broader connotation.”

In recent weeks, law professors have been trying to puzzle out the meaning and relevance of the provision. Some have joined Mr. Clinton in saying that it allows Mr. Obama to ignore the debt ceiling. Others say it applies only to Congress and only to outright default on existing debts. Still others say that the president may do what he wants in an emergency, with or without the authority of the 14th Amendment.

The words of the provision are in important ways quite vague. “Nobody would argue,” said Sanford Levinson, a law professor at the University of Texas, “that Section 4 is clear in its meaning, other than at the time everyone thought that the South, if they ever got back in control, would not pay Civil War debt.”

But Jack M. Balkin, a law professor at Yale, said it was possible to infer a broader principle.

“You’re not supposed to hold the validity of the public debt hostage to achieve political ends,” Mr. Balkin said. He added, though, that “Section 4 is a fail-safe that only comes into operation when everything else is exhausted.”

Mr. Obama’s statement largely dismissing the possibility of invoking the provision may have had a strategic element to it. A deficit-reduction deal would seem to be more likely, after all, if both sides think there is no alternative but economic chaos.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Mr. Obama’s reference to “a winning argument” suggested the likelihood that the courts would weigh in if he took unilateral action. But that is not certain.

“This is not a circumstance,” said Laurence H. Tribe, a law professor at Harvard, “in which the courts have any plausible point of entry.”

Professor Balkin agreed. “This is largely a political question,” he said. “It is unlikely courts would decide these questions.”

Some law professors have put forward possible legal claims that might overcome threshold requirements for lawsuits, like the one in which plaintiffs show they have been directly injured and so have standing to sue. “It’s unthinkable,” Professor Tribe responded, “that the courts would allow a gimmicky lawsuit to proceed.”

The president, moreover, can move quickly, while court cases take time. “At the point at which the economy is melting down, who cares what the Supreme Court is going to say?” Professor Balkin said. “It’s the president’s duty to save the Republic.”

Another possible reaction to unilateral action from Mr. Obama is impeachment. Professor Tribe said that was “not politically a very plausible scenario.”

Professor Levinson was less certain. Impeachment by the House of Representatives “seems to me quite likely.” But, he added, “it is also literally unimaginable that the Senate would convict.”

A third possible response is what some law professors call “popular constitutionalism.” The meaning of the Constitution, these professors say, is in the end what the public believes it to be. The president and members of Congress may thus pay a political price for taking stands at odds with what the public understands to be their constitutional obligations.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

U.S. leaders struggle to reach debt deal as deadline clock ticks


Two days after breaking off talks with President Barack Obama on a $3 trillion-plus deficit reduction deal, House Speaker John Boehner said Sunday his last offer remains on the table as pressure mounted to avert a looming government default.

No formal negotiations were scheduled, but sources said that talks continued among staff members of both parties and the White House amid concerns that the continuing deadlock could prompt a downturn when Asian markets open trading for the week on Sunday night Washington time.

Boehner told "Fox News Sunday" he intended to propose a way forward on Sunday afternoon. He also planned a conference call with the House Republican caucus at 4:30 p.m., according to congressional aides.

Both Boehner, R-Ohio, and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said a comprehensive deficit deal that would bring Republican support for raising the federal debt ceiling was still an option.

"It may be pretty hard to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, but my last offer is still out there. I have never taken my last offer off the table," Boehner said on "Fox News Sunday."

The speaker's spokesman, Michael Steel, said his boss and Obama spoke on the phone Sunday. The president is expected to meet with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Sunday evening.

Geithner told CNN's "State of the Union" that the so-called grand bargain sought by Obama remains in play, but he also opened the door to a two-step process pushed by Republicans that would raise the debt ceiling with some spending cuts now, then bring broader structural and tax reforms next year.

"There's nothing wrong with doing this in stages," Geithner said, but he reiterated that a deal must remove the "threat of default" from the country by settling the debt ceiling issue through 2012 because "you don't want politics messing around with America's faith and credit."

Geithner acknowledged the decision on increasing how much money the government can borrow in order to avoid defaulting on its obligations already has been politicized, saying, "They have taken this a little too far, frankly."

A Senate Democratic aide said Sunday that "despite multiple offers from our side, the speaker has so far been unwilling to agree to any form of a two-step solution that President Obama would sign."

And while talks continue, the aide said, Reid is "working on a proposal of at least $2.5 trillion in debt reduction" and may inform his caucus about that plan Sunday night.

If Congress fails to raise the $14.3 trillion debt limit by August 2, Americans could face rising interest rates, a declining dollar and increasingly jittery financial markets, among other problems.

Hard bargaining was likely to continue into the coming week, White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley warned on the CBS program "Face the Nation."

"We may have a few stressful days coming up -- stressful for markets of the world and the American people," Daley said. "In the end, there's no question in my mind, the American government will not default."

Two senators involved in months of bipartisan talks on a separate deficit reduction plan by a group known as the "Gang of Six" expressed concern Sunday over the possibility of a government default.

"I'm not confident" of a deal to raise the debt ceiling, said Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Georgia, while Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia said failure to do so "would be the biggest act of irresponsibility in modern political history."

At the Capitol building, a casually dressed David Krone, the chief of staff for Reid, was seen walking to Boehner's office holding a slip of paper. About 20 minutes later, Krone emerged from the speaker's office still holding his paper and munching on pizza.

Boehner announced Friday he was withdrawing from negotiations with Obama and instead would seek a deal with congressional Democrats, but Geithner said the president was involved in talks throughout Saturday that included congressional leaders from both parties.

On the Fox program, Boehner said the talks broke down last week because Obama and Democrats resisted "real cuts in spending" and demanded tax increases he opposes.

"After over six months of conversations with the president about doing the big deal, about taking a big step in the right direction, it is pretty clear to me that they are just not willing to do it -- that the next election matters more than what's right for the country," Boehner said.

While insisting he would prefer to reach an agreement with Democrats, Boehner added: "If that's not possible, I and my Republican colleagues in the House are prepared to move on our own, today."

He offered no details, saying they were still being crafted. Any GOP-only plan would likely have trouble winning approval in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

According to congressional sources from both parties, a possible deal under discussion would involve two stages.

Under the plan, the nation's debt ceiling would be raised through 2011 in exchange for spending cuts totaling around $1 trillion, according to Democratic sources. The ceiling would be raised again, through 2012, after a special commission is set up to find ways to reduce the long-term debt through entitlement and spending cuts and tax reform, the sources said.

While Democrats and Republicans agreed on the first stage of the plan, they split over how a second ceiling increase would be approved, the Democratic sources said.

Specifically, Democrats do not like the idea of tying future debt increases to a commission, which could deadlock and thrust the nation back into the uncertain position it is in today, according to the sources.

Both Geithner and Daley stressed the administration's opposition to requiring two votes by Congress to increase the debt ceiling -- one now and another in the first half of 2012, when the election season will be in full bloom.

When asked if Obama will follow through on his threat to veto such a deal, Geithner told CNN that Democrats in Congress would prevent such a measure from even reaching the president's desk.

"It's not going to make it that far ... so that's not a viable option," Geithner said.

According to Boehner aide Steel, a two-step process is "inevitable" because Democrats have failed to offer a concrete proposal.

The negotiations are testing the ability of leaders on both sides of the aisle to legislate effectively in an era of increasingly shrill and unyielding partisanship.

Republicans, who have railed against the growth of government, remain staunchly opposed to any tax increases. Democrats are trying to protect some of their party's primary legacies -- entitlements such as Social Security and Medicare, programs forged at the height of the New Deal and Great Society.

In a statement issued after a meeting among top congressional Democrats and Republicans on Saturday night, Pelosi, D-California, criticized Republicans for refusing to accept Obama's proposal to end Bush-era tax cuts on families earning more than $250,000 a year, which Democrats say represent the wealthiest 2% of the country.

"The delay in bringing forth a solution springs from the Republicans' decision to walk away from 98% of the American people to protect the assets of the top 2% of the wealthiest people in our country," she said in a statement.

Reid, D-Nevada, was even more targeted in his criticism of what he called Republican "intransigence."

"Their unwillingness to compromise is pushing us to the brink of a default on the full faith and credit of the United States," Reid said in a statement. "We have run out of time for politics. Now is the time for cooperation."

Earlier Saturday, Boehner and other congressional leaders met with Obama in the White House a day after Boehner broke off talks with the administration.

One Democratic official involved in the talks said the meeting was not contentious, and the participants did not rehash what went wrong with the Obama-Boehner talks. Rather, it was very focused on "just how do we fix it," and "everybody is pretty serious" about finding a way forward that prevents a default, the official said.

However, there was a recognition that the congressional leaders -- all of whom say they want to prevent default -- can only do so much about the opinions and actions of their caucuses, the official said.

"Different people put different ideas on the table" resulting in a mishmash of things that need to be sorted through to see what might be viable, the official said. Congressional staff will be sorting through the different ideas, the official added.

The president repeated his insistence that the debt ceiling be raised through the end of 2012, the source said. Both Geithner and Daley reaffirmed that stance on Sunday.

A House GOP aide told CNN that Republicans are "considering calling the president's bluff" on his refusal to sign a bill that doesn't raise the debt ceiling beyond the November 2012 election.

The aide said that party members are "struggling to see how they reach an agreement with significant debt reduction without buying time to work out the details."

"It would be terribly unfortunate if the president was willing to veto a debt-limit increase simply because its timing would not be ideal for his re-election campaign," Steel, the Boehner aide, said earlier. "We want the most significant deficit reduction possible, but linking the full faith and credit of the United States to presidential campaign politics is not a defensible position."

A Republican source familiar with the negotiations said Boehner told Republican lawmakers Friday that to get the debt ceiling raised by August 2, the House must vote on legislation by next Wednesday -- and that means it must be posted online Monday.


Sources: ABC News, CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, Youtube

Parker Griffith Switches To GOP Ranks!...Decision 2010

Rep. Parker Griffith switches To GOP



POLITICO has learned that Rep. Parker Griffith, a freshman Democrat from Alabama, will announce today that he’s switching parties to become a Republican.

According to a senior GOP aide familiar with the decision, the announcement will take place in this afternoon in his home district in northern Alabama.

Griffith’s party switch comes on the eve of a pivotal congressional health care vote and will send a jolt through a Democratic House Caucus that has already been unnerved by the recent retirements of a handful of members who, like Griffith, hail from districts that offer prime pickup opportunities for the GOP in 2010.

The switch represents a coup for House Republican leadership, which had been courting Griffith since he publicly criticized Democratic leadership in the wake of raucous town halls over the summer.

Griffith, who captured the seat in a close 2008 open seat contest, will become the first Republican to hold the historically Democratic, Huntsville-based district. A radiation oncologist who founded a cancer treatment center, Griffith plans to blast the Democratic health care bill as a prime reason for his decision to switch parties—and is expected to cite his medical background as his authority on the subject.

While the timing of his announcement was unexpected, Griffith’s party switch will not come as a surprise to those familiar with his voting record, which is one of the most conservative among all Democrats.

He has bucked Democratic leadership on nearly all of its major domestic initiatives, including the stimulus package, health care legislation, the cap-and trade energy bill and financial regulatory reform.

He was one of only 11 House Democrats to vote against the stimulus.

The Obama administration’s decision to scrap plans to build a missile defense shield in Eastern Europe further frustrated Griffith, according to GOP sources, since his home district contains the base for Boeing’s ground-based missile defense research.

Ironically, a National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman called Griffith a “woefully ineffective advocate for Tennessee Valley jobs” after the decision was announced in September.

Signs of Griffith’s dissatisfaction with his party began to surface publicly during the summer recess, when he received an earful of criticism from constituents.

In August—one month after Republicans picked up his former state legislative seat in a special election—he told a local newspaper that he wouldn't vote for Nancy Pelosi to remain as House Speaker because she's too divisive. He joked that if she didn’t like it, he’d provide her with a gift certificate to a mental health center.

He added that if the Democratic leadership wouldn't commit to working in a more bi-partisan manner, "perhaps we should look at altering that."

Later that month, he was booed at a town hall forum even though he said he was against his leadership’s version of health care reform.

“If I'm agreeing with you, don't fight me," Griffith said to a heckler, according to the Huntsville Times. "I'm on your team."

After the November off-year elections, he told POLITICO that he wanted to be called an independent Blue Dog and not a Democrat. He said the point of the elections was clear: “I should be nervous.”

Several Republicans had already stepped forward to challenge Griffith, and it’s not clear if they’ll drop their bids in light of his party-switch. Madison County Commissioner Mo Brooks has already raised over $100,000 for the campaign, while Navy veteran Les Phillip also was running.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee will now have to scramble to find a candidate to run against Griffith before Alabama’s April 2 filing deadline.

Though it has never elected a Republican to Congress, Griffith’s seat has a long conservative tradition but has backed Democrats who have a brand independent from the national party. As a result of the district’s ancestral Democratic heritage, Democrats still hold the majority of state legislative seats within the 5th District’s boundaries.

The district, however, is trending Republican: A wave of new residents are moving into the Huntsville suburbs, where the area’s burgeoning aerospace and defense industries have created a mini-boom. And those voters, with fewer ties to the area’s past politics, have been reliable Republican at the national level.

The district gave John McCain a resounding 61 percent of the vote last year—a tick above the 60 percent former President George W. Bush won in 2004.

Even so, last year Griffith managed a narrow win against the strong drag at the top of the ticket in one of the nastiest House races in the nation. He defeated Republican Wayne Parker 51-48 percent, despite heavy GOP spending against him.

The National Republican Congressional Committee poured in $514,000 to air ads attacking Griffith, including one that suggested he was soft on Islamic terrorism.

And the committee raised questions about whether Griffith engaged in medical malpractice by releasing decades-old documentation accusing his cancer center of under-dosing patients with radiation so he could collect more money.

Griffith is the first House Democrat to switch parties since Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-La.) changed parties in 2004. The most recent member of Congress to switch parties is Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.), who announced his decision in April.

Griffith’s predecessor, former nine-term Rep. Bud Cramer, had been frequently mentioned as a possible party-switcher—and also as a possible appointee in the Bush administration—but he retired from Congress as a Democrat.

Griffith now has $619,000 in the bank to run as a Republican, a total boosted by contributions from several of the party’s more-liberal leaders. The political action committee of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer donated $10,000 to Griffith’s reelection this year, and even Pelosi chipped in $4,000—prior to his August remarks.



View Larger Map


Sources: Politico, Google Maps